2.12: Forensic Psychology

General Psychology for Honors Students · LibreTexts

0%

Contents

    Text

    Size
    100%
    Theme
    Typeface
    Line length
    Spacing

    From LibreTexts, under CC BY-NC-SA, as the source states it; its equations are written in TeX, which the PDF shows typeset. This page at LibreTexts.

    Forensic psychology is a branch of psychology that deals with questions of psychology as they arise in the context of the justice system. For example, forensic psychologists (and forensic psychiatrists) will assess a person’s competency to stand trial, assess the state of mind of a defendant, act as consultants on child custody cases, consult on sentencing and treatment recommendations, and advise on issues such as eyewitness testimony and children’s testimony (American Board of Forensic Psychology, 2014). In these capacities, they will typically act as expert witnesses, called by either side in a court case to provide their research- or experience-based opinions. As expert witnesses, forensic psychologists must have a good understanding of the law and provide information in the context of the legal system rather than just within the realm of psychology. Forensic psychologists are also used in the jury selection process and witness preparation. They may also be involved in providing psychological treatment within the criminal justice system. Criminal profilers are a relatively small proportion of psychologists that act as consultants to law enforcement.

    LINK TO LEARNING

    The APA provides career information about various areas of psychology.

    REFERENCES

    American Board of Forensic Psychology. (2019). About. https://abfp.com/ about/

    American Psychological Association. (2014). Graduate training and career possibilities in exercise and sport psychology. www. apadivisions.org/division-47/about/resources/training

    American Psychological Association. (2020). APA divisions. www. apa.org/about/division/

    Association for Psychological Science. (n.d.). Who we are. www. psychologicalscience.org/about/who-we-are

    Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992

    Carlson, N. R. (2013). Physiology of behavior (11th ed.). Pearson.
    Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. G.,

    Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology. Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018413

    Endler, J. A. (1986). Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press.

    Hock, R. R. (2009). Forty studies that changed psychology: Explorations into the history of psychological research (pp. 308–317). Pearson.

    Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., & Vernon, P. A. (1996). Heritability of the Big Five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. Journal of Personality, 64, 577–591. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996. tb00522.x

    MacDonald, C. A. (2013). Health Psychology Center presents: What is health psychology? healthpsychology.org/what-is-health- psychology/

    McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1). Sage.

    Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 141–144. doi.org/10.1016/ S1364-6613(03)00029-9

    Munakata, Y., McClelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H., & Siegler, R. S. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104, 689–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.686

    Person, E. S. (1980). Sexuality as the mainstay of identity: Psychoanalytic perspectives. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 605–630. https://doi.org/10.1086/493755

    Rantanen, J., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Pulkkinen, L., & Kokko, K. (2007). Long-term stability in the Big Five personality traits in adulthood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 511–518. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00609.x

    Riggio, R. E. (2013, March 18). What is industrial/organizational psychology? Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/ us/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201303/what-is- industrialorganizational-psychology

    Roberts, A. W., Ogunwole, S. U., Blakeslee, L., & Rabe, M. A. (2018, October). The population 65 years and older in the United States: 2016. U.S. Census Bureau. www.census.gov/content/dam/ Census/library/publications/2018/acs/ACS-38.pdf

    Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 208–232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243

    U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Table 2: Projected age groups and sex composition of the population. www.census.gov/data/ tables/2017/demo/popproj/2017-summary-tables.html

    This page titled 2.12: Forensic Psychology was last modified on Tue, 08 Sep 2026 06:18:28 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Kate Votaw via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.