Yours

10.6: Due Process in the Juvenile Court

Introduction to the American Criminal Justice System · LibreTexts

0%

Contents

    Text

    Size
    100%
    Theme
    Typeface
    Line length
    Spacing

    From LibreTexts, under CC BY-SA 4.0, as the source states it; its equations are written in TeX, which the PDF shows typeset. This page at LibreTexts.

    Kent v. United States (1966) [1]

    parens patriae philosophy of the Juvenile Court ‘is not an invitation to procedural arbitrariness.'” [2]

    In re Gault (1967). [3]

    In re Winship (1970) [4]

    Breed v. Jones (1975) [5]

    [6]

    1. Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045 (1966). ↵
    2. Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, pp. 554-556 (1966) ↵
    3. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428 (1967) ↵
    4. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068 (1970) ↵
    5. Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519, 95 S.Ct. 1779 (1975) ↵
    6. 27 Raley, Gordon. 1995. "The JJDP Act: A Second Look." Juvenile Justice Journal, 2:11–18. ↵

    This page titled 10.6: Due Process in the Juvenile Court was last modified on Tue, 20 Jan 2026 01:50:49 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Alison S. Burke, David Carter, Brian Fedorek, Tiffany Morey, Lore Rutz-Burri, and Shanell Sanchez (OpenOregon) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.