11.3: Tragedy of the Commons and Common Pool Resources

International Relations: Politics, Power, and Global Connections · LibreTexts

0%

Contents

    Text

    Size
    100%
    Theme
    Typeface
    Line length
    Spacing

    From LibreTexts, under CC BY-NC 4.0, as the source states it; its equations are written in TeX, which the PDF shows typeset. This page at LibreTexts.

    11.3: Tragedy of the Commons and Common Pool Resources

    Tragedy of the Commons

    The concept of the tragedy of the commons was introduced by ecologist Garrett Hardin in his 1968 article, which describes how individual actions driven by self-interest can lead to the depletion of shared resources. Hardin illustrates this with the example of a common pasture shared by multiple herders, each incentivized to add more cattle to maximize personal gain. As each herder acts in their own interest, the pasture becomes overgrazed, eventually harming all herders by degrading the resource they depend on. This dilemma highlights the difficulty of managing shared resources when individual benefits come at a collective cost, making it a fundamental issue in environmental policy and international relations​.

    While Hardin’s tragedy of the commons implies that shared resources are inevitably doomed to overuse, political scientist Elinor Ostrom challenged this view with her 1990 work, Governing the Commons. Ostrom argued that communities could effectively manage common resources through cooperative governance rather than government control or privatization. Based on extensive field research, she identified successful examples where local communities created rules and norms for resource management, demonstrating that people could self-organize to prevent resource depletion. Ostrom outlined design principles for effective management of common resources, including:

    1. Clearly defined boundaries: Community members need to know who has access to the resource and understand its limits.
    2. Collective decision-making: Resource users participate in setting and enforcing rules.
    3. Monitoring and enforcement: Local monitors ensure compliance, deterring overuse through shared accountability.
    4. Conflict-resolution mechanisms: Quick, low-cost avenues for resolving disputes among users prevent tensions from escalating.
    5. Recognition of community authority: External authorities respect the community’s self-established rules.

    Ostrom’s findings contradicted Hardin’s assumption that individuals would inevitably act selfishly, suggesting instead that communities could manage resources sustainably. Her work offered a cooperative framework for addressing global environmental issues, showing that grassroots governance structures could complement international agreements in safeguarding the global commons.


    This page titled 11.3: Tragedy of the Commons and Common Pool Resources was last modified on Thu, 20 Aug 2026 15:51:42 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Robert Stockwell.