Yours

Educational200759 min320×240

Establishment of Religion Clause Oral Arguments, Part 2

U.S. Court of Appeals

EducationReligion

At the Internet Archive

Clips are not offered for this film: the Internet Archive does not let a page read its file (no CORS headers), so it cannot be cut in your browser.

Low resolution (320×240): this is the archive's own copy.

About

U.S. Court of Appeals - 202212-2-DVD - Establishment of Religion Clause Oral Arguments, Part 2 - The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco heard oral arguments in two cases on the use of God-related language. In the second case, the Court reviewed a district court's ruling in Newdow v. Carey in which the court permanently prohibited a local school district from leading students in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Sacramento physician, aethist, and lawyer Michael Newdow had argued that public schools using the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and was an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. He argued that while reciting the pledge is voluntary, it becomes unconstitutional when students who do not believe in God are forced to hear it. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/202212-2

Human-made No record of this work says a model made it. What this means.

Archive
Internet Archive, in FedFlix: US government films
Licence or status
CC0 1.0, as the Internet Archive states it.
Credit
U.S. Court of Appeals
Language
English
Who can watch
The archive gives no rating. Invisible Network shows it to Tweens profiles and older, judged from its collection and subjects. How films are placed