Yours

Educational200754 min320×240

Establishment of Religion Clause Oral Arguments, Part 1

U.S. Court of Appeals

EducationReligion

At the Internet Archive

Clips are not offered for this film: the Internet Archive does not let a page read its file (no CORS headers), so it cannot be cut in your browser.

Low resolution (320×240): this is the archive's own copy.

About

U.S. Court of Appeals - 202212-1-DVD - Establishment of Religion Clause Oral Arguments, Part 1 - The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco heard oral arguments in two cases on the use of God-related language. In Newdow v. U.S. Congress the plaintiff, Sacramento physician, aethist, and lawyer Michael Newdow, sought to have "In God We Trust" removed from U.S. currency because of its reference to God. He argues that the motto violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. A lower court had ruled against Newdow saying that the words amounted to a secular national slogan not an endorsement of religion. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/202212-1

Human-made No record of this work says a model made it. What this means.

Archive
Internet Archive, in FedFlix: US government films
Licence or status
CC0 1.0, as the Internet Archive states it.
Credit
U.S. Court of Appeals
Language
English
Who can watch
The archive gives no rating. Invisible Network shows it to Tweens profiles and older, judged from its collection and subjects. How films are placed