Yours

Educational20061 h 2 min320×240

Fox Television v. FCC Oral Argument

U.S. Court of Appeals

Education

At the Internet Archive

Clips are not offered for this film: the Internet Archive does not let a page read its file (no CORS headers), so it cannot be cut in your browser.

Low resolution (320×240): this is the archive's own copy.

About

U.S. Court of Appeals - 195903-1-DVD - Fox Television v. FCC Oral Argument - Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively. Language used may offend some viewers. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/195903-1

Human-made No record of this work says a model made it. What this means.

Archive
Internet Archive, in FedFlix: US government films
Licence or status
CC0 1.0, as the Internet Archive states it.
Credit
U.S. Court of Appeals
Language
English
Who can watch
The archive gives no rating. Invisible Network shows it to Tweens profiles and older, judged from its collection and subjects. How films are placed