Yours

Educational20021 h 24 min320×240

Flowers v. Carville

U.S. Court of Appeals

Education

At the Internet Archive

Clips are not offered for this film: the Internet Archive does not let a page read its file (no CORS headers), so it cannot be cut in your browser.

Low resolution (320×240): this is the archive's own copy.

About

U.S. Court of Appeals - 168721-1-DVD - Flowers v. Carville - Oral arguments were heard before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Flowers v. Carville. The case brought by Gennifer Flowers charges James Carville, George Stephanopoulos and Little, Brown & Company with defamation and false light. These charges stem from statements published on CNN's "Larry King Live" program in January and February of 1998 and statements in a book authored by Stephanopoulos. Former first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton is also named in the defamation lawsuit. The lower court dismissed the defamation lawsuit (filed on Flowers behalf by Judicial Watch) in November 2000, because the U.S. District Court in Las Vegas, Nevada ruled the case had passed the statute of limitations. The complaint is seeking monetary damages from the defendants and costs of attorney's fees. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/168721-1

Human-made No record of this work says a model made it. What this means.

Archive
Internet Archive, in FedFlix: US government films
Licence or status
CC0 1.0, as the Internet Archive states it.
Credit
U.S. Court of Appeals
Language
English
Who can watch
The archive gives no rating. Invisible Network shows it to Tweens profiles and older, judged from its collection and subjects. How films are placed