Educational199956 min720×480

The ADR Act of 1998: What it Means for the Courts

Federal Judicial Center

Education

At the Internet Archive

Clips are not offered for this film: a public-domain mark that nothing bears out (no year, or a year no US term has left).

Not offered: its uploader or archive marks it public domain, and nothing the site holds bears that out (its record gives no year, or a year from 1978 on, which no US term has left), so where it is free is not known. Unclear is not offered. Open it at the Internet Archive.

About

Federal Judicial Center

ava20934vnb1 -- 3808-V/99 (1999)

The ADR Act of 1998: What it Means for the Courts

While retaining a high degree of flexibility and discretion for individual courts, the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998 imposes a number of requirements, among them that each court authorize the use of at least one form of ADR for civil cases, including bankruptcy adversary proceedings; implement its own ADR program; and adopt local rules requiring litigants to consider using ADR. District Judges Gladys Kessler (D.D.C.) and James Rosenbaum (D. Minn.) discuss the essential elements of the Act and how courts can comply with its provisions.

Human-made No record of this work says a model made it. What this means.

Archive
Internet Archive, in FedFlix: US government films
Licence or status
Public domain (Creative Commons dedication), as the Internet Archive states it.
Credit
Federal Judicial Center
Language
English
Who can watch
The archive gives no rating. Invisible Network shows it to Tweens profiles and older, judged from its collection and subjects. How films are placed