The ADR Act of 1998: What it Means for the Courts
Federal Judicial Center
Education
Clips are not offered for this film: a public-domain mark that nothing bears out (no year, or a year no US term has left).
Not offered: its uploader or archive marks it public domain, and nothing the site holds bears that out (its record gives no year, or a year from 1978 on, which no US term has left), so where it is free is not known. Unclear is not offered. Open it at the Internet Archive.
Parts
About
Federal Judicial Center
ava20934vnb1 -- 3808-V/99 (1999)
The ADR Act of 1998: What it Means for the Courts
While retaining a high degree of flexibility and discretion for individual courts, the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998 imposes a number of requirements, among them that each court authorize the use of at least one form of ADR for civil cases, including bankruptcy adversary proceedings; implement its own ADR program; and adopt local rules requiring litigants to consider using ADR. District Judges Gladys Kessler (D.D.C.) and James Rosenbaum (D. Minn.) discuss the essential elements of the Act and how courts can comply with its provisions.
Human-made No record of this work says a model made it. What this means.
- Archive
- Internet Archive, in FedFlix: US government films
- Licence or status
- Public domain (Creative Commons dedication), as the Internet Archive states it.
- Credit
- Federal Judicial Center
- Language
- English
- Who can watch
- The archive gives no rating. Invisible Network shows it to Tweens profiles and older, judged from its collection and subjects. How films are placed