Podcasts · We the People

For or Against Constitutional Originalism?

· 1 h 02 min

Episode For or Against Constitutional Originalism?

0:00 1:01:35

Jonathan Gienapp of Stanford University and Stephen Sachs of Harvard Law School join Chief Scholar Thomas Donnelly to discuss Gienapp’s new book, Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique. They review the history of originalism and debate the role of originalism in constitutional interpretation today. This conversation was originally streamed live as part of the NCC’s America’s Town Hall program series on October 8, 2024.

Resources:

• Jonathan Gienapp, “Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique” (2024) • Stephen Sachs and Will Baude, “Originalism and the Law of the Past” (Law and History Review, 2019) • Michael Stokes Paulsen and Vasen Kesavan, “Is West Virginia Unconstitutional?” (90 Cal L. Rev. 291, 2002) • William Baude, Jud Campbell, and Stephen Sachs, “General Law and the Fourteenth Amendment” (76 Stanford L. Rev 1185, 2024) • Jud Campbell, “Four Views of the Nature of the Union” (47 Harvard J. Law & Public Policy 2, 2024) • Fletcher v. Peck (1810) • District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) • United States v. Rahimi (2024)

Stay Connected and Learn More

• Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org • Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr. • Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate. • Subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen. • Join us for an upcoming live program or watch recordings on YouTube. • Support our important work.

Donate

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them. Explicit shows are for adult profiles only, and children’s profiles hear only children’s shows. More about this list.