The Case That Was Built Backwards
· 39 min · S2 E49
Episode The Case That Was Built Backwards
Send us Fan Mail
Most trial teams build a case by following the litigation timeline. The strongest teams build it by starting with the verdict they need to achieve and working backward. In this episode, we explore why reverse-engineering your case can uncover hidden weaknesses, sharpen discovery, strengthen mediation, and create a more persuasive trial strategy. The key takeaway: don't let procedure dictate your strategy. Build every stage of your case with the end in mind. In This Episode
• Why chronological case preparation creates strategic blind spots • How reverse-engineering strengthens discovery, depositions, and motion practice • The difference between legal proof and jury proof • Why jurors respond to human meaning, not just technical evidence • How early pressure testing reveals narrative gaps and credibility risks • Why mediation is often won or lost long before the session begins • How behavioral science helps plaintiff teams refine strategy from intake through trial
https://scienceofjustice.com/
@JuryAnalyst
Links in the notes 1
Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them. Explicit shows are for adult profiles only, and children’s profiles hear only children’s shows. More about this list.