Two Stories That Decide Every Case.
· 26 min · S1 E29
Episode Two Stories That Decide Every Case.
Send us Fan Mail
Why civil trials are decided by the story jurors reconstruct, not the one we intend to tell. We map the psychology behind narrative drift and share a data-driven framework to make plaintiff narratives resilient in court and in deliberation. • lawyer’s intended structure versus juror reconstruction • intuition, stress and simplification under cognitive load • gap-filling with personal experience and substitute standards • availability, defensive attribution and system justification • emotional coherence and moral alignment as decision drivers • patterned drift points: responsibility, causation, irrelevant salience, invented motives • deliberation multiplier and dominance effects in group consensus • case story alignment audit and emotional topography mapping • structural fixes: causation sequencing, explicit motive, vivid anchors • designing simplification tools and framing system rule-breaking • strategic voir dire to surface values, credibility lenses and damages caps
https://scienceofjustice.com/
@JuryAnalyst
Links in the notes 1
Chapters
Transcript
Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them. Explicit shows are for adult profiles only, and children’s profiles hear only children’s shows. More about this list.