Podcasts · Divided Argument

Mechanical / Animal

· 56 min · S6 E21

Episode Mechanical / Animal

0:00 56:10

We're in triage mode as the Court clears its end-of-term backlog. We run through the week's opinion dump before focusing on two cases that look unrelated but turn on the same question: when may a state rewrite background property law to limit a constitutional right? In Wolford v. Lopez, the Court strikes down Hawaii's rule requiring a property owner's express consent before a firearm may be carried onto otherwise-public premises. Then to Pung v. Isabella County, a takings case asking whether a homeowner whose property is sold for back taxes is owed only the sale proceeds or full fair-market value. Along the way: a theory about a Landor v. Louisiana flip, the week's run of 6-3 conservative wins, and a short detour into the perils of teaching Federal Courts.

Key Topics

[00:00:00] - Triage mode: recording June 25 amid the end-of-term opinion dump [00:01:29] - What's still outstanding — and the campaign-finance case's standing problem [00:03:56] - The Landor "flip" theory: did Justice Jackson lose the majority to Justice Gorsuch? [00:06:40] - Thursday's decisions: Monsanto v. Durnell (FIFRA), two immigration wins, Wolford v. Lopez [00:08:58] - Counting the week's seven 6-3 conservative wins; the Hemani surprise [00:12:57] - The throughline: when may a state redefine property to evade a constitutional right? [00:18:35] - Wolford v. Lopez: Hawaii's "express consent" gun rule after Bruen [00:20:42] - The Bruen framework — step one vs. step two, and the free-speech analogy [00:26:57] - The change vs. the outlier: uniformity and Hawaii's sensitive-places list [00:30:49] - Alito's historical analogues: poaching laws and the Black Codes [00:33:34] - Jackson's dissent: race, Equal Protection, and how non-mechanical Bruen really is [00:38:59] - Caetano, the Ramos v. Louisiana callback, and Alito on racist origins [00:41:21] - Barrett's concurrence, Kagan's narrower path, and the rejected "spirit of aloha" [00:48:23] - Pung v. Isabella County: tax sales, takings, and "just compensation" [00:51:45] - Thomas's historical turn on tax-sale rules, and the fairness backstop [00:55:45] - Sign-off

Relevant Links

•

Supreme Court of the United States: https://www.supremecourt.gov/

•

Divided Argument podcast: https://www.dividedargument.com/

•

Transcripts: https://www.dividedargument.com/transcripts

•

Commentary blog: https://blog.dividedargument.com/

•

Merchandise: https://store.dividedargument.com/

•

New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf

•

Tyler v. Hennepin County: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-166_q86b.pdf

•

Ramos v. Louisiana: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-5924_j4el.pdf

The episode on the publisher’s site (opens in a new tab)

Transcript

    Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them. Explicit shows are for adult profiles only, and children’s profiles hear only children’s shows. More about this list.