20.7: Estimating population size

Mike’s Biostatistics Book · LibreTexts

0%

Contents

    Text

    Size
    100%
    Theme
    Typeface
    Line length
    Spacing

    From LibreTexts, under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, as the source states it; its equations are written in TeX, which the PDF shows typeset. This page at LibreTexts.

    20.7: Estimating population size

    [under construction]

    Approaches to finding out how many individuals are present in a particular geographic area.

    Census methods

    If the population is closed, and all individual can be discovered, then counting every individual is the best way to estimate the population size.

    Simple random and systematic sampling

    Random sampling would be to divide an area into a grid then randomly select grids to be counted. Systematic sampling would be to identify areas ahead of time which are likely to have the individuals, then proceed to count individuals in all areas where the individuals are likely to be.

    Capture-recapture methods

    \(\dfrac{m}{n} = \dfrac{M}{N}\)

    then solve for \(N = n \cdot \frac{M}{m}\)

    This is called the Lincoln Index, where \(N\) is the estimated population size, \(M\) is the number of individuals caught the first time (and all marked, then released), \(n\) is the number of individuals captured a second time, of which \(m\) were marked. Assumptions of this method include:

    1. closed population (i.e., no loss or gain of individuals during the capture intervals);
    2. every individual in the population has an equal chance of being caught;
    3. marks are always recognizable.

    Removal methods

    Using intensive methods (e.g., netting), capture animals, prevent immigration into the area. Assumption is that the captures per unit time yield decreasing numbers of caught individuals. Then, change in population size may be estimated by

    \(\dfrac{dN}{dt} = - \alpha N\)

    where \(\alpha\) is the removal rate. The solution to this equation is the differential \(N = N_{0} e^{\alpha t\)

    where \(e\) is the natural logarithm, \(N_{0}\) is the initial population size, and \(t\) is time intervals. If \(A\) is the number of individuals captured at time \(t_{i}\), then a plot of \(A\) on the \(Y\)-axis versus \(t_{i}\) describes this differential. \(\alpha\) could be estimated by getting the slope of the non-linear regression (\(N_{0}\) would be the intercept).

    As an approximation, you could take the based on the analysis of 2 first time intervals only. For example, if captures in the first 2 time intervals were 23 and 14 fish, then

    \(N_{0} = \dfrac{232}{23 - 15} = 66.125\)

    \(\alpha = \dfrac{23 - 15}{23} = 0.3478\)

    Capture effort

    x

    Additional reading

    http://www.sbs.utexas.edu/jcabbott/courses/bio208web/labs/populations/populations.htm


    This page titled 20.7: Estimating population size was last modified on Wed, 04 Sep 2024 04:40:19 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Michael R Dohm via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.