4.3: Species vs. Paleospecies

Physical Anthropology · LibreTexts

0%

Contents

    Text

    Size
    100%
    Theme
    Typeface
    Line length
    Spacing

    From LibreTexts, under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as the source states it; its equations are written in TeX, which the PDF shows typeset. This page at LibreTexts.

    4.3: Species vs. Paleospecies

    The definition of a species is something we can demonstrate very clearly: if two individuals can have grandkids, then they're part of the same species. With fossils it's tricky to test this. If you bang two fossils together, they don't make baby fossils. In the next section on paleoanthropology, we will lump fossils into groups and label them with an official-looking genus and species designation written in Latin and in italics, but it's really important for you to remember that this designation is not a concrete fact, it's just a hypothesis that will continue to be tested (and often contested). Understanding that paleospecies are hypotheses will help you to understand the context for many of the debates in paleontology and especially paleoanthropology.

    Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    Skim species for evolutionary biology

    READ EVOLUTIONARY SPECIES VS. CHRONOSPECIES

    *Lygers, Zonkeys, Jaglions… skim examples of hybrids


    This page titled 4.3: Species vs. Paleospecies was last modified on Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:30:50 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Arnie Daniel Schoenberg via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.