9.2: The operators  and †.

Quantum Mechanics · LibreTexts

0%

Contents

    Text

    Size
    100%
    Theme
    Typeface
    Line length
    Spacing

    From LibreTexts, under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0, as the source states it; its equations are written in TeX, which the PDF shows typeset. This page at LibreTexts.

    9.2: The operators  and †.

    In a previous chapter I have discussed a solution by a power series expansion. Here I shall look at a different technique, and define two operators \(\hat{a}\) and \(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\),

    \[\hat{a}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(y+\frac{d}{d y}\right), \quad \hat{a}^{\dagger}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(y-\frac{d}{d y}\right) .\]

    Since

    \[\frac{d}{d y}(y f(y))=y \frac{d}{d y} f(y)+f(y)\]

    or in operator notation

    \[\frac{d}{d y} \hat{y}=\hat{y} \frac{d}{d y}+\hat{1}\]

    (the last term is usually written as just 1 ) we find

    \[\begin{array}{l}
    \hat{a} \hat{a}^{\dagger}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\hat{y}^2-\frac{d^2}{d y^2}+\hat{1}\right) \\
    \hat{a}^{\dagger} \hat{a}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\hat{y}^2-\frac{d^2}{d y^2}-\hat{1}\right)
    \end{array}\]

    If we define the commutator

    \[[\hat{f}, \hat{g}]=\hat{f} \hat{g}-\hat{g} \hat{f}\]

    we have

    \[\left[\hat{a}, \hat{a}^{\dagger}\right]=\hat{1}\]

    Now we see that we can replace the eigenvalue problem for the scaled Hamiltonian by either of

    \[\begin{aligned}
    \left(\hat{a}^{\dagger} \hat{a}+\frac{1}{2}\right) u(y) & =\epsilon u(y) \\
    \left(\hat{a} \hat{a}^{\dagger}-\frac{1}{2}\right) u(y) & =\epsilon u(y)
    \end{aligned}\]

    By multiplying the first of these equations by \(\hat{a}\) we get

    \[\left(\hat{a} \hat{a}^{\dagger} \hat{a}+\frac{1}{2} \hat{a}\right) u(y)=\epsilon \hat{a} u(y) .\]

    If we just rearrange some brackets, we find

    \[\left(\hat{a} \hat{a}^{\dagger}+\frac{1}{2}\right) \hat{a} u(y)=\epsilon \hat{a} u(y) .\]

    If we now use

    \[\hat{a} \hat{a}^{+}=\hat{a}^{\dagger} \hat{a}-\hat{1},\]

    we see that

    \[\left(\hat{a}^{\dagger} \hat{a}+\frac{1}{2}\right) \hat{a} u(y)=(\epsilon-1) \hat{a} u(y) .\]


    Question: Show that

    \[\left(\hat{a}^{\dagger} \hat{a}+\frac{1}{2}\right) \hat{a}^{\dagger} u(y)=(\epsilon+1) \hat{a}^{\dagger} u(y) .\]

    We thus conclude that (we use the notation \(u_n(y)\) for the eigenfunction corresponding to the eigenvalue \(\epsilon_n\) )

    \[\begin{aligned}
    \hat{a} u_n(y) & \propto u_{n-1}(y), \\
    \hat{a}^{\dagger} u_n(y) & \propto u_{n+1}(y) .
    \end{aligned}\]


    So using \(\hat{a}\) we can go down in eigenvalues, using \(a^{\dagger}\) we can go up. This leads to the name lowering and raising operators (guess which is which?).

    We also see from \(\PageIndex{12}\) that the eigenvalues differ by integers only!


    This page titled 9.2: The operators  and †. was last modified on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 01:09:47 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Niels Walet via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.