Opening the book…
Standard 31: Guide includes the opportunity for learners to check for understanding (i.e., low-stakes quiz or poll).
Check for an embedded and/or link to a low-stakes quiz or poll that centers around the guide's content. The low-stakes assessment should align with the guide's learning objectives.
Standard 32: The guide enables the users to have the opportunity to provide descriptive feedback regarding the guide, the experience with the guide, guide design, content, user experience, & technology.
Check to see if there is a "Rate this Guide" section where students can provide feedback to the guide author. This may present itself as a short text response and/or a star rating or instructions for giving feedback (i.e., email us at xxx@yyy.edu to let us know what you like and/or dislike about this guide).
Next, you will see an example of how a peer review team may identify standards as “Met” or “Not Met” during the library guide peer review process using the LGAS rubric.
I would like to thank my fellow University of North Florida colleague and Virtual Learning Librarian, Beryl White-Bing, for sharing her library guide that she is working on to publish. By viewing her guide, we will review the standards authentically.
3.5: Assessment and Feedback (31 - 32) is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Sarah Moukhliss, University of North Florida & Trina McCowan Adams, Flagler College.
The book could not be loaded just now.