11.6.2: Other Typological Projects

Other Typological Projects

Typological thinking did not belong to August Sander alone. Across the interwar years and the decades immediately surrounding them, photography kept returning to the same modern temptation: to organize the world by recurring forms, recurring bodies, recurring categories. Sometimes that impulse produced images of startling beauty. Sometimes it produced social critique. And sometimes it became a technology of management, turning people into data and difference into hierarchy. (The Museum of Modern Art)

Karl Blossfeldt offers one of the clearest examples of typology moving away from the human subject and into nature. His plant studies isolate stems, buds, tendrils, and leaves against neutral grounds, enlarging them until they read less like botanical specimens than like prototypes for sculpture, ornament, or architecture. MoMA’s essay on Blossfeldt emphasizes that these photographs were initially made as teaching tools, intended to provide models of formal invention for students in the applied arts; the Metropolitan Museum of Art similarly notes that his images gained wide attention only after their publication in Urformen der Kunst in 1928. What matters is not just that Blossfeldt photographs plants, but that he photographs them as repeatable structures. Nature becomes a catalogue of design intelligence, a visual archive of form ready for modern use. (The Museum of Modern Art)

Lewis Hine works from a different pressure point. Where Blossfeldt turns typology toward morphology, Hine turns it toward labor. His photographs for the National Child Labor Committee and his broader documentary practice repeatedly present the worker as both individual person and social type: spinner, breaker boy, mill hand, newsboy, immigrant, construction laborer. The Metropolitan Museum of Art notes that Hine left teaching in 1908 to become a staff photographer for the NCLC, producing thousands of negatives of children at work across the United States, while the Library of Congress frames the collection as a resource not only for labor history but for the study of working-class families, housing, health, and industrial life. Hine’s pictures do not flatten their subjects into anonymous examples, but they do rely on recognizability. The worker becomes legible as a public category, and that legibility is precisely what gave the images reformist force. (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)

The darker side of typology appears in police, medical, and racial archives, where photography serves less to witness than to classify. Histories of policing and photography describe the medium as an evidentiary and surveillance technology central to the maintenance of social order; medical archives, meanwhile, reveal how clinical photography turned patients into visual cases; and scholarship on racialized photographic atlases shows how faces could be organized, circulated, and read as “types” in support of anthropological and colonial knowledge systems. In these contexts, typology becomes an instrument of control. The image does not merely describe difference; it helps manufacture the authority to manage, confine, diagnose, and rank it. That is the double lesson of interwar photographic culture and its surrounding archives: the typological image can clarify the social world, but it can just as easily discipline it. (Taylor & Francis Online)

Footnotes

1. Murata, Hikari. “Material Forms in Nature: The Photographs of Karl Blossfeldt.” Object:Photo Essays, Museum of Modern Art, n.d. Accessed 4 Mar. 2026. (The Museum of Modern Art)
2. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. “Karl Blossfeldt, Blumenbachia hieronymi.” The Met Collection, www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/286358. Accessed 4 Mar. 2026. (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
3. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. “Early Documentary Photography.” Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, Oct. 2004. Accessed 4 Mar. 2026. (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
4. Library of Congress. “About This Collection: National Child Labor Committee Collection.” Library of Congress, www.loc.gov/collections/national-child-labor-committee/about-this-collection/. Accessed 4 Mar. 2026. (The Library of Congress)
5. Gürsel, Zeynep Devrim, et al. “Photography and Policing.” History of Photography, vol. 45, no. 3–4, 2021. Accessed 4 Mar. 2026. (Taylor & Francis Online)
6. Kenny, Stephen C. “Capturing Racial Pathology: American Medical Photography at Charity Hospital, 1880–1910.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, vol. 75, no. 1, 2020. Accessed 4 Mar. 2026. (PMC)
7. Mak, Geertje. “A Colonial-Scientific Interface: The Construction, Viewing, and Circulation of Racialized Faces in Hagen’s Atlas.” American Anthropologist, vol. 122, no. 3, 2020. Accessed 4 Mar. 2026. (Anthrosource)

---