Opening the book…
Much of the work done by an ArrayStack involves shifting (by \(\mathtt{add(i,x)}\) and \(\mathtt{remove(i)}\)) and copying (by \(\mathtt{resize()}\)) of data. In the implementations shown above, this was done using \(\mathtt{for}\) loops. It turns out that many programming environments have specific functions that are very efficient at copying and moving blocks of data. In the C programming language, there are the \(\mathtt{memcpy(d,s,n)}\) and \(\mathtt{memmove(d,s,n)}\) functions. In the C++ language there is the \(\texttt{std::copy(a0,a1,b)}\) algorithm. In Java there is the \(\texttt{System.arraycopy}\mathtt{(s,i,d,j,n)}\) method.
void resize() {
T[] b = newArray(Math.max(2*n,1));
System.arraycopy(a, 0, b, 0, n);
a = b;
}
void add(int i, T x) {
if (i < 0 || i > n) throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException();
if (n + 1 > a.length) resize();
System.arraycopy(a, i, a, i+1, n-i);
a[i] = x;
n++;
}
T remove(int i) {
if (i < 0 || i > n - 1) throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException();
T x = a[i];
System.arraycopy(a, i+1, a, i, n-i-1);
n--;
if (a.length >= 3*n) resize();
return x;
}
These functions are usually highly optimized and may even use special machine instructions that can do this copying much faster than we could by using a \(\mathtt{for}\) loop. Although using these functions does not asymptotically decrease the running times, it can still be a worthwhile optimization.
In the Java implementations here, the use of the native \(\texttt{System.arraycopy}\mathtt{(s,i,d,j,n)}\) resulted in speedups of a factor between 2 and 3, depending on the types of operations performed. Your mileage may vary.
This page titled 2.2: FastArrayStack - An Optimized ArrayStack was last modified on Sat, 01 May 2021 15:12:27 GMT and is shared under a CC BY license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Pat Morin (Athabasca University Press) .
The book could not be loaded just now.