2.7: Chapter References

Mechatronics: Fundamentals, Design, Integration, and Validation · LibreTexts

0%

Contents

    Text

    Size
    100%
    Theme
    Typeface
    Line length
    Spacing

    From LibreTexts, under CC BY-NC 4.0, as the source states it; its equations are written in TeX, which the PDF shows typeset. This page at LibreTexts.

    2.7: Chapter References
    1. R. C. Dorf and R. H. Bishop, Modern Control Systems, 12th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2011, ISBN-10: 0-13-602458-0.
    2. T. J. R. Hughes, Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, 1st ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1987, ISBN-13: 978-0-1331-7025-2.
    3. X. Chen, G. Zhu, X. Yang, D. Hung, and X, Tan, “Model-based estimation of flow characteristics using an ionic polymer-metal composite beam,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 18, no., pp. 932–943, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2012.2194300.
    4. G. Zhu, K. M. Grigoriadis, and R. E. Skelton, “Covariance control design for the Hubble Space Telescope,” AIAA J. of Guid., Control, and Dyn., vol. 18, no.2, pp. 230–236, May 1995.
    5. G. Rizzoni and J. Kearns, Principles and Applications of Electrical Engineering, 6th ed., New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2015, ISBN-13: 978-0-0735-2959-2.
    6. A. M. H. Al-Hajjar, S. S-M. Swei, and G. Zhu, “Novel LPV modeling and flutter suppression control of a smart airfoil,” IMechE J. of Syst. Control Eng., vol. 233, no. 6, pp. 609–624, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0959651818804377.
    7. A. K. Al-Jiboory and G. Zhu, “Mode shape matching for LPV modeling to handle mode veering phenomena,” Int. J. of Dyn. And Control, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 469–475, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40435-018-0469-0.
    8. S. Qu, G. Zhu, W. Su, and S. S. Swei, “LPV-based transition flight control design for a tilt-rotor aircraft,” Proc. of IMechE, Part G: J. of Aerosp. Eng., vol. 236, no. 16, pp. 3354–3369, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1177/09544100221083713.
    9. L. Hua, J. Tang, H. Dourra, and G. Zhu, “A grey-box surrogate vehicle energy consumption model capable of real-time updating,” Fourth Edition of Focused Sect. on TMECH/AIM Emerg. Topics, IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2092–2100, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2023.3276743.
    10. G. Zhu, R. E. Skelton, and P. Li, “Q-Markov cover identification using pseudo-random binary signals,” Int. J. of Control, vol. 62, no.6, pp. 1273–1290, 1995.
    11. G. Zhu, “Weighted multi-rate q-Markov cover identification using PRBS — an application to engine systems,” Math. Problems in Eng., vol. 6, pp. 201–224, 2000.
    12. L. Ljung: System Identification — Theory for the User, 2nd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: PTR Prentice Hall, 1999, ISBN-10: 0-13-656695-2.
    13. D. Mitrinović and J. Kečkić, (1984). The Cauchy Method of Residues: Theory and Applications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1984, ISBN-10: 9-02-771623-4.
    14. Z. Chen, S. Shatara, and X. Tan, “Modeling of biomimetic robotic fish propelled by an ionic polymer-metal composite caudal fin,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 448–459, 2010.
    15. J. Sader, “Frequency response of cantilever beams immersed in viscous fluids with applications to the atomic force microscope,” J. of Appl. Phys., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 64–76, Jul. 1998.
    16. D. Williamson, R. E. Skelton, and G. Zhu, “Moment matching model reduction for multi-rate linear systems,” Int. J. of Control, vol. 52, no. 6, pp.1279–1294, 1990.
    17. J. V. Candy, “Accelerometer modeling in the state-space,” LLNL report, Feb. 10, 2021. [Online] Available: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1777338.
    18. P. Regtien and E. Dertien, Sensors for Mechatronics, 2nd. ed., Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2018, IBSN 978-0-12-813810-6.
    19. J. Yang\({}^{\ }\)and G. Zhu, “Adaptive recursive prediction of the desired torque for a hybrid powertrain,” IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech., vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 3402–3413, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2014.2357395.
    20. J. Yang and G. Zhu, “Stochastic predictive boundary management of a hybrid powertrain,” IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 4700–4713, Jun. 2016, dol: 10.1109/TVT.2015.2504325.
    21. A. Pal, L. Zhu, Y. Wang, and G. Zhu, “Constrained surrogate-based engine calibration using lower confidence bound,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 3116–3127, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2021.3053246.
    22. J. Tang, A. Pal\({}^{*}\) D. Wen, C. Archer, J. Yi, and G. Zhu, “Stochastic Bayesian optimization for predicting borderline knock,” Int. J. of Engine Res., vol. 24, no. 3, pp.793–807, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1177/14680874211065237.
    23. M. J. Asher, B. F. Croke, A. J. Jakeman, et al. “A review of surrogate models and their application to groundwater modeling,” Water Resour. Res., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 5957–5973, 2015.
    24. B. Ankenman, B. L. Nelson, and J. Staum, “Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling,” in Proc. IEEE 2008 Winter Simul. Conf., 2008, pp. 362–370.
    25. A. Forrester, A. Sobester, and A. Keane, “Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide,” Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2008, ISBN-13: 978-0-4700-0606-8.
    26. A. I. Forrester, A. J. Keane, and N. W. Bressloff, “Design and analysis of noisy computer experiments,” AIAA J., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2331–2339, 2006.
    27. S. N. Lophaven, H. B. Nielsen, and J. Søndergaard, “DACE: a Matlab kriging toolbox, Version 2 (2002),” Accessed: Jan. 2026. [Online] Available: http://www2.compute.dtu.dk/pubdb/edoc/imm3213.ps.
    28. J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, et al., “Design and analysis of computer experiments,” Statistical Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 409–423, 1989.
    29. T. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, S. Dey, et al., “A critical assessment of kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells,” Arch. of Comput. Methods in Eng., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 495–518, 2017.
    30. P. J. Diggle, J. A. Tawn, and R. A. Moyeed, “Model-based geo-statistics,” J. of the Roy. Statist. Soc.: Series C (Appl. Statist.), vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 299–350, 1998.
    31. W. W. Peterson, Error Correcting Coding, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Tech. Press, 1961, ISBN-13: 978-0-2621-6039-1.

    Solutions to Practice Problems

    1. The solutions for P2.1 are
      1. \(F\left(s\right)=\dfrac{3s+8}{(s+2)(s+3)}\)
      2. \(G\left(s\right)=\dfrac{2}{s^2}e^{-3s}\)
      3. \(F\left(s\right)=\dfrac{2}{s+2}e^{-2(s+2)}\)
      4. \(F\left(s\right)=10\dfrac{(s+5)e^{-π(s+5)}}{{\left(s+5\right)}^2+1}\)
    1. The solutions for P2.2 are
      1. \(y\left(t\right)=8(1-e^{-2t})\)
      2. \(y\left(t\right)=e^{-t}{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{os} 2t\ }\)
      3. \(f\left(t\right)=te^{-2t}+\dfrac{t^2}{2}e^{-2t}\)
      4. \(f\left(t\right)={\mathrm{c}\mathrm{os2} \left(t-3\right)u\left(t-3\right)\ }\)
    1. Three-step solution process in Section 2.2:

    Step 1) The quarter car free-body diagrams.

    image57.png

    Step 2) Equations of motion

    \[m_b{\ddot{x}}_1\left(t\right)+b_s\left({\dot{x}}_1\left(t\right)-{\dot{x}}_2(t)\right)+k_s\left(x_1\left(t\right)-x_2\left(t\right)\right)=0\nonumber \]

    \[m_w{\ddot{x}}_2\left(t\right)+b_s\left({\dot{x}}_2\left(t\right)-{\dot{x}}_1\left(t\right)\right)+k_s\left(x_2\left(t\right)-x_1\left(t\right)\right)+k_wx_2(t)=f\left(t\right)\nonumber \]

    Step 3) Transfer functions

    \[X_1(s)=\dfrac{b_ss+k_s}{m_bs^2+b_ss+k_s}X_2(s)\nonumber \]

    \[X_2\left(s\right)=\dfrac{1}{m_ws^2+b_ss+\left(k_s+k_w\right)}F\left(s\right)+\dfrac{b_ss+k_s}{m_ws^2+b_ss+(k_s+k_w)}X_1(s)\nonumber \]

    1. \[\dfrac{(J+mr^2)}{r}\ddot{x}\left(t\right)+\dfrac{b}{r}\dot{x}\left(t\right)=-τ(t)\nonumber \]

       

    \[G_1\left(s\right)=\dfrac{Θ(s)}{T(s)}=\dfrac{1}{\left(J+mr^2\right)s^2+bs}=\dfrac{1}{s\left[\left(J+mr^2\right)s+b\right]}\nonumber \]

    \[G_2\left(s\right)=\dfrac{X(s)}{T(s)}=\dfrac{-r}{\left(J+mr^2\right)s^2+bs}=\dfrac{-r}{s\left[\left(J+mr^2\right)s+b\right]}\nonumber \]

    1. The coefficient matrices for the five-element beam model are

    \[J=J_e\left[ \begin{array}{cc} \begin{array}{ccc} 52 & 42 & 30 \\ 42 & 40 & 30 \\ 30 & 30 & 28 \end{array} & \begin{array}{cc} 18 & 6 \\ 18 & 6 \\ 18 & 6 \end{array} \\ \begin{array}{ccc} 18 & 18 & 18 \\ 6 & 6 & 6 \end{array} & \begin{array}{cc} 16 & 6 \\ 6 & 4 \end{array} \end{array} \right] \nonumber\nonumber \]

    \[B=b_e\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}
    2 & -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
    -1 & 2 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\
    0 & -1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\
    0 & 0 & -1 & 2 & -1 \\
    0 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 2
    \end{array}\right] \nonumber\nonumber \]

    \[K=k_e\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}
    2 & -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
    -1 & 2 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\
    0 & -1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\
    0 & 0 & -1 & 2 & -1 \\
    0 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 2
    \end{array}\right] \nonumber\nonumber \]

    The fluid flow-induced torque vector \(Γ\) is expressed as

    \[\ Γ\mathrm{(}\mathrm{t)}=\dfrac{l}{2}\left[ \begin{array}{c} \begin{array}{c} f^f_1\left(t\right)+2\sum^5_{j=2}{f^f_j\left(t\right)} \\ f^f_2\left(t\right)+2\sum^5_{j=3}{f^f_j\left(t\right)} \end{array} \\ \begin{array}{c} f^f_3\left(t\right)+2\sum^5_{j=4}{f^f_j\left(t\right)} \\ f^f_4\left(t\right)+2f^f_5\left(t\right) \\ f^f_5\left(t\right) \end{array} \end{array} \right] \label{2.210}\nonumber \]

    1. The following are the free body diagrams for \(J\) and \(m.\)

    image58.png

    The equations of motion for \(J\) and \(m\) are as follows.

    \[j\ddot{θ}\left(t\right)+b_m\dot{θ}\left(t\right)=τ\left(t\right)+rf(t)\nonumber \]

    \[m\ddot{x}\left(t\right)=-rf\left(t\right), x\left(t\right)=rθ(t)\nonumber \]

    b) The Laplace transforms of all of the equations are

    \(\begin{array}{c} \begin{array}{ccc} I_a\left(s\right) & = & \dfrac{1}{L_as+R_a}\left(E_a\left(s\right)+E_m\left(s\right)\right) \ \\ T(s) & = & K_τI_a\left(s\right), E_m\left(s\right)\ =K_mΩ\left(s\right) \end{array} \\ \begin{array}{ccc} Ω\left(s\right) & = & \dfrac{1}{Js+b_m}\left(T\left(s\right)-T_l(s)\right), X\left(s\right)=\dfrac{-1}{ms^2}F(s) \ \\ Ω\left(s\right) & = & sΘ\left(s\right), \ X\left(s\right)=rΘ\left(s\right), sX\left(s\right)=rΩ(s) \ \end{array} \end{array}\) &

    c) The system block diagram is

    image59.png

    d) The equation of motion from \(E_a(s)\) to \(Θ(s)\) is \[G\left(s\right)=\dfrac{Θ(s)}{E_a(s)}=\dfrac{K_τ}{s\left\{(L_as+R_a)((J+ms^2)s+b_m)+K_τK_m\right\}}\nonumber \]

    The linearized model at \(v_0=30\ m/sec\) is \[1000δ\dot{v}\left(t\right)+60.1δv\left(t\right)=δf_m\left(t\right) \to G\left(s\right)=\dfrac{ΔV(s)}{ΔF_m(s)}=\dfrac{1}{1000s+60.1}\nonumber \]​​​​​​​

    1. Solution for steady state \(x_0=2>0\) with \({\dot{x}}_0={\ddot{x}}_0=0\)
    2. The linearized differential equation and transfer function are shown below.

    \[2δ\ddot{x}\left(t\right)+6δ\dot{x}\left(t\right)+7δx\left(0\right)=δf_a(t) \to \dfrac{\Delta X(s)}{\Delta F_a(s)}=\dfrac{1}{2s^2+6s+7}\nonumber \]

    1. Complete the problem based on Example 2.19.
    1. Complete the reading assignment and write a summary by following these steps below.
      1. Reading references [21] and [22] and summarizing the Kriging gray-box modeling method into a step-by-step process.
      2. Creating a MATLAB example of a physical system in your research area and generating the associated Kriging gray-box model following the process developed in Step 1).
      3. Summarizing the Kriging gray-box modeling process and your example into a technical report.
    1. Complete the reading assignment and write a summary.
      1. Reading references [10] and [11] and summarizing the \(q\)-Markov Cover system identification method into a step-by-step process.
      2. Creating a MATLAB example of a physical system in your research area and generating the \(q\)-Markov Cover system model following the process developed in Step 1).
      3. Summarizing the \(q\)-Markov Cover modeling process and your identification example into a technical report.

    This page titled 2.7: Chapter References was last modified on Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:33:05 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Guoming Zhu (Co-DREAM OER) .