Opening the book…
History & Benefits of Using Fossil Fuels.
For most of history, people got energy from simple sources like their own strength, animals, and burning wood. Then the Industrial Revolution changed everything by introducing fossil fuels, which powered huge advances in technology, society, and the economy. (figure \(\PageIndex{a}\)). The world is currently dependent on fossil fuels, and existing infrastructure and technologies facilitate their continued use.
An advantage of using coal for electricity is that it plentiful and inexpensive, especially in the United States, which has larger coal reserves than any other country. Furthermore, coal mining is a source of jobs and tax income. Coal's economic advantage is dwindling, however, as technologies associated with renewable sources of energy, such as solar and wind, become more efficient and inexpensive. The U.S. Energy Information Administration compared the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for technologies that will begin use in 2023, and the cost of coal-generated electricity exceeded that of many renewable sources (figure \(\PageIndex{b}\)). The LCOE accounts for the building and operation costs of power plants, solar panels, wind turbines, etc.
Oil and natural gas continue to meet global energy needs. Despite expansions in renewable energy use, no alternative energy source is currently sufficient to replace oil and natural gas. (A combination of different renewable sources could be possible in the future.) While the United States does rely on imported oil, it continues to produce some oil and natural gas (mostly through fracking), bolstering U.S. energy independence. Local and state economics in regions rich in oil and natural reserves depend on continued extraction of these fossil fuels.
While all fossil fuels harm cause some degree of environmental harm, natural gas is a preferred fossil fuel for electricity generation when considering its environmental impacts. When burned, coal emits nearly double the carbon dioxide that natural gas does. Additionally, much less nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide (both air pollutants) are emitted from burning natural gas. It also does not produce ash as coal does (see below).
Health and Environmental Impacts
Fossil fuel usage is the main cause of Global Climate Change (See Global Climate Change(opens in new window) for more details). The negative impacts of fossil fuel use begin with the extraction of the resource. Fossils fuels are often located far from where they are utilized so they need to be transported by pipeline, tankers, rail or trucks. These all present the potential for accidents, leakage, and spills. Additional negative impacts are associated with processing, electricity generation, and disposal of the waste generated.
Coal Mining and Usage
Surface mining of coal disrupts local ecosystems above coal deposits as overburden is removed to access them (figure \(\PageIndex{c}\)). In mountaintop removal, a large volume of overburden is dumped over nearby habitats, causing further destruction (figure \(\PageIndex{d}\)). Mountaintop removal has affected large areas of the Appalachian Mountains in West Virginia and Kentucky. Habitat loss from coal mining decreases biodiversity, resulting in a loss of ecosystem services. Both surface and subsurface mining expose rocks that can contain contaminants, such as heavy metals or sulfates, which them leach into streams or other bodies of water. This not only harms aquatic life, but it also disrupts nutrient cycling. One of the largest environmental impacts of subsurface mining may be the methane gas that must be vented out of mines to make the mines a safe place to work. Methane gas is a potent greenhouse gas and contributes to Global Climate Change. Finally, the process of mining ultimately compacts soil. This combined with the loss of trees, which slow the flow of run-off and promote infiltration, increases the risk of flooding.
Figure \(\PageIndex{d}\): Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining in Pike County, Kentucky Photograph shows mountaintop coal removal mining in Pike County, Kentucky. Source: By https://www.flickr.com/people/15648670@N00 iLoveMountains.org - Mountaintop Removal Mine Site above Route 23 in Pike County, Kentucky, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/inde...curid=33452045
Coal miners face health hazards such as explosions, mine collapse, and exposure to toxic fumes. Black lung disease is a respiratory condition characterized by coughing and shortness of breath that occurs in miners exposed to too much coal dust. Residents near mines also risk exposure to coal dust and underground toxins following explosions. As a result of exposure to toxins, birth defects and other health problems are common in residents near mines.
Coal is considered the “dirtiest” source of energy because its combustion results in the most air pollution. Coal power plants emits a variety of air pollutants including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and heavy metals. Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide are sources of acid rain (acid deposition), smog, and health issues. Heavy metals cause neurological and developmental problems in humans and other animals. Burning of coal emits particulate matter and higher amounts of carbon dioxide per unit of energy than the use of oil or natural gas. Carbon dioxide is the most frequently emitted greenhouse gas and causes climate change. In 2018, electricity generation was responsible 27% of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, and much of this was emitted from coal power plants. The transportation of coal usually relies on fossil fuels, releasing further pollution.
Ash (including fly ash and bottom ash) is a residue created when coal is burned at power plants. In the past, fly ash was released into the air through the smokestack, where it would contribute to particulate matter air pollution. Laws now require that much of the fly ash now must be be captured by pollution control devices, like scrubbers. In the United States, fly ash is generally stored at coal power plants or placed in landfills. Ash from storage or landfills can spill or leach into groundwater, resulting in water pollution.
Conventional Extraction Oil and Natural Gas
Exploring and drilling for oil degrades land and ocean habitats. On land, extensive infrastructure such as road networks, transport pipelines and housing for workers are needed to support a full-scale drilling operation. These can pollute soil and water, fragment habitats, and disturb wildlife. Extraction of oil and natural gas is also hazardous for workers, who have a high incidence of cancer and heart disease.
Human-caused oil spills in rivers and oceans harm ecosystems. From an economic perspective, oil spills disrupt the fishing industry and tourism. Oil spills at sea are generally much more damaging than those on land, since they can spread for hundreds of nautical miles in a thin oil slick which can cover beaches with a thin coating of oil. This can kill sea birds, mammals, shellfish and other organisms it coats. Oil spills on land are more readily containable if a makeshift earth dam can be rapidly bulldozed around the spill site before most of the oil escapes, and land animals can avoid the oil more easily.
Oil spills can result from supertanker accidents such as the Exxon Valdez in 1989, which spilled 10 million gallons of oil into the rich ecosystem of coastal Alaska and killed massive numbers of animals. The largest marine oil spill began in April 2010 when a natural gas explosion at an oil well 65 km offshore of Louisiana occurred on Deepwater Horizon Oil Rig. It killed 11 employees and flowed for 3 months in 2010, releasing an estimated 200 million gallons of oil (figure \(\PageIndex{d}\)). Wildlife, ecosystems, and people’s livelihood were adversely affected. A lot of money and huge amounts of energy were expended on immediate clean-up efforts. The long-term impacts are still not known. The National Commission on the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling was set up to study what went wrong. The worst oil spill ever occurred during the Persian Gulf war of 1991, when Iraq deliberately dumped approximately 200 million gallons of oil in offshore Kuwait and set more than 700 oil well fires that released enormous clouds of smoke and acid rain for over nine months.
During an oil spill on water, oil floats to the surface because it is less dense than water, and the lightest hydrocarbons evaporate, decreasing the size of the spill but polluting the air. Then, bacteria begin to decompose the remaining oil, in a process that can take many years. After several months only about 15% of the original volume may remain, but it is in thick asphalt lumps, a form that is particularly harmful to birds, fish, and shellfish. Cleanup operations can include a variety of components, but each has its procs and cons. Skimmer ships that vacuum oil from the water surface, but these are effective only for small spills. Controlled burning works only in early stages before the light, ignitable part evaporates, but this also pollutes the air. Dispersants are detergents that break up oil to accelerate its decomposition, but some dispersants may be toxic to the ecosystem. Bioremediation refers to adding microorganisms that specialize in quickly decomposing oil, but this can disrupt the natural ecosystem.
Unconventional Extraction of Oil and Natural Gas
Fracking causes more environmental damage than conventional extraction. The considerable use of water (figure \(\PageIndex{e}\)) may affect the availability of water for other uses in some regions, and this can affect aquatic habitats. In fact, fracking consumes more water than the use of nuclear energy, coal, or conventional oil and natural gas. If mismanaged, hydraulic fracturing fluid can be released by spills, leaks, or various other exposure pathways that contaminate land and groundwater (figure \(\PageIndex{f}\)). Fracking fluid flowback – the fluid pumped out of the well and separated from oil and gas – not only contains the chemical additives used in the drilling process but also contains heavy metals, radioactive materials (which release radiation), volatile organic compounds, benzene (a carcinogen), toluene, ethylbenze, xylene, and other toxic air pollutants. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can react with the atmosphere to form ground-level ozone, which is associated with respiratory disease. Toulene can cause dizziness, confusion, headaches, and miscarriages. Ethylbenzene is a possible carcinogen that also causes dizziness, eye irritation, and hearing loss. Xylene also causes dizziness and headaches and furthermore can be fatal at high concentrations. In some cases, this contaminated water is sent to water treatment plants that are not equipped to deal with some of these classes of contamination. Finally, injecting wastewater for disposal can even induce earthquakes.
Other unconventional sources of fossil fuels can also harm the environment. Surface mining of tar sands or oil shales requires the removal of all vegetation and leaves pollutants behind, causing habitat loss (figure \(\PageIndex{g}\)).
Transportation, Refineries, and Combustion
Natural gas is released into the atmosphere from coal mines, oil and gas wells, and natural gas storage tanks, pipelines, and processing plants. These leaks are the source of about 25% of total U.S. methane emissions, which translates to three percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change. When natural gas is produced but cannot be captured and transported economically, it is “flared,” or burned at well sites, which converts it to carbon dioxide. This is considered to be safer and better than releasing methane into the atmosphere because carbon dioxide is a less potent greenhouse gas than methane. However, when natural gas with high concentrations of the toxic gas hydrogen sulfide is flared, it produces carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and many other compounds (see Air Pollution for more details).
Leaks also happen when we use petrochemicals on land. For example, gasoline sometimes drips onto the ground when people are filling their gas tanks, when motor oil gets thrown away after an oil change, or when fuel escapes from a leaky storage tank. When it rains, the spilled petrochemicals get washed into the gutter and eventually flow to rivers and into the ocean. Another way that oil sometimes gets into water is when fuel is leaked from motorboats and jet skis. When a leak in a storage tank or pipeline occurs, petrochemicals can also get into the ground, and the ground must be cleaned up. To prevent leaks from underground storage tanks, all buried tanks are supposed to be replaced by tanks with a double lining.
Oil refining emits a variety of toxins and is the single largest source of benzene (figure \(\PageIndex{g}\)). As a result, residents living near oil refineries have a high incidence of cancer, asthma, and birth defects. When petrochemicals such as gasoline or diesel are burned, they release a variety of air pollutants, including carbon dioxide (a cause of climate change), sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter, and lead (see Air Pollution for more details). The transport of oil by ship or trunk also requires energy in the form of fossil fuels, generating more pollutants. Compared to oil and coal, burning natural gas releases the fewest pollutants and greenhouse gases.
Solutions
The main solution to the pollution and climate destabilizing effects of fossil fuels is to stop using fossil fuels as quickly as possible and switch to renewables for all our energy needs (see Renewable Energy and Conservation for more information).
Reclamation can help reduce the habitat damage caused by mining or fossil‑fuel extraction by restoring the land once operations end. This process may include reshaping disturbed ground, covering it with topsoil to shield organisms from heavy metals, radioactive materials, and other toxins, and neutralizing acidic runoff created when sulfates leach from exposed rock. Afterward, vegetation is replanted and disrupted water flow is partially restored.
However, reclamation cannot fully recreate the complex landscapes, stream networks, mature forests, or ecological systems that existed before mining. Even so, it does make it easier for native species to return than if the land were left untreated.
So‑called “clean coal” technologies have existed since the 1980s and can reduce some air pollution from burning coal, but they are not truly clean. Burning coal still creates major environmental and health risks (figure \(\PageIndex{i}\)). Some technologies remove toxins like mercury before combustion, while others capture pollutants such as sulfur dioxide or coal ash during burning. For example, smokestack scrubbers filter out sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and mercury before the exhaust is released. In effect, these systems turn what would have been air pollution into solid waste that still must be safely disposed of. Today, the term “clean coal” usually refers to carbon capture and storage (CCS)(figure \(\PageIndex{h}\)). In CCS, emissions from burning fossil fuels are passed through a solvent that traps carbon dioxide, which is then separated out. In theory, some CO₂ could be reused in industrial processes, and the rest stored deep underground. While CCS can reduce some emissions and pollutants, it does not eliminate fossil‑fuel air pollution. It also requires 25-40% more energy, lowering the efficiency of power plants. CCS facilities are expensive to build and maintain, and retrofitting older coal plants would further raise electricity costs. The technology also carries risks, including leakage, groundwater contamination, and increased seismic activity.
By the middle of this century, countries would need to put 6 billion tons of carbon dioxide underground each year, according to the United Nations. This plan would require much more land and infrastructure, hundreds of thousands of miles of new pipelines, and many new tankers to move the gas. It would also need about 2,000 places underground to store the CO₂, meaning a new storage site would have to be built every 4 days for the next 25 years. This is estimated to cost tens of trillions of dollars. Many of the 12 existing CCS sites hold less CO2 than estimated, some have been plagued by broken pipes, leaky rocks, and other problems.
MIT civil and environmental engineering professor Charles Harvey and Kurt House, CEO of KoBold Metals, argue that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a poor investment because it mainly enables oil and gas companies to continue producing fossil fuels rather than reducing them. They note that CCS projects have repeatedly failed, cost taxpayers billions, and cut far fewer emissions than renewable energy. In their view, funding CCS slows the transition to clean energy, and those resources would be better spent on proven cheaper, solutions like wind and solar power..
For more on the problems with carbon capture and why it is not the solution to the climate crisis see this excellent 6/25/26 interactive article from ProPublica: Why Carbon Capture Can't Conceivably Solve the Climate Change.
.
Because fossil fuels are limited, their reserves will eventually run out, and the world will have to rely on other energy sources. In practice, we won’t extract the very last fossil fuels because the cost will become too high to make it worthwhile. The market is already shifting toward renewables, which are cheaper and far less harmful to people and the environment. Alongside expanding renewable energy, energy conservation — using energy more efficiently and avoiding waste — is essential, since the cleanest and safest energy is the energy we never have to use.
Attribution
This page was heavily revised and rewritten by Erin Rempala and contains adapted content from content originally authored by Melissa Ha and Rachel Schleiger and is licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 and:
- Gidden, M.J., Joshi, S., Armitage, J.J. et al. A prudent planetary limit for geologic carbon storage. Nature 645, 124–132 (2025). Nature(opens in new window) [doi.org]
- Grossman, D. (2022, May 19). Everything you need to know about clean coal: Is carbon capture and storage technology a pipe dream or panacea? Popular Mechanics.
- Harvey, C., & House, K. (2022, August 16). Every dollar spent on this climate technology is a waste. The New York Times. NYTimes(opens in new window) [www.nytimes.com]
- MIT Climate Portal. (n.d.). How much carbon dioxide would we have to remove from the air to counteract climate change? Massachusetts Institute of Technology. MIT.edu(opens in new window) [climate.mit.edu]
- Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (n.d.). Fossil fuels. Our World in Data. Our World in Data(opens in new window) [ourworldindata.org]
- Worth, K., & Waldron, L. (2026, June 25). Why carbon capture and storage won’t fix our climate crisis. ProPublica. [projects.propublica.org/why-carbon-capture-cant-solve-climate-change/]
Modified by Melissa Ha from the following sources:
- Challenges and Impacts of Energy Use, Non-Renewable Energy Sources, and Water Pollution from Environmental Biology by Matthew R. Fisher (licensed under CC-BY(opens in new window))
- Fossil Fuels(opens in new window) from An Introduction to Geology by Johnson et al. (licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA(opens in new window))
- Chapter 4: Non-Renewable Energy(opens in new window) from Introduction to Environmental Science: 2nd Edition (2018) Biological Sciences Open Textbooks by Zehnder, Caralyn; Manoylov, Kalina; Mutiti, Samuel; Mutiti, Christine; VandeVoort, Allison; and Bennett, Donna (licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA(opens in new window)).
This page titled 7.1.4: Consequences of Fossil Fuels was last modified on Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:12:33 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Melissa Ha and Rachel Schleiger (ASCCC Open Educational Resources Initiative) .
The book could not be loaded just now.