3.3.4: Energy Flow in Food Webs

BIOL 101- Environmental Science · LibreTexts

0%

Contents

    Text

    Size
    100%
    Theme
    Typeface
    Line length
    Spacing

    From LibreTexts, under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, as the source states it; its equations are written in TeX, which the PDF shows typeset. This page at LibreTexts.

    3.3.4: Energy Flow in Food Webs

    Trophic interactions in a community can be represented by diagrams called food chains and food webs. Energy flows through a community as a result of trophic interactions.

    Energy Flow

    Cells run on the chemical energy found mainly in carbohydrate molecules, and the majority of these molecules are produced by one process: photosynthesis. Through photosynthesis, certain organisms convert solar energy (sunlight) into chemical energy, which is then used to build carbohydrate molecules (figure \(\PageIndex{a}\)). The energy that is harnessed from photosynthesis enters the communities continuously and is transferred from one organism to another. Therefore, directly or indirectly, the process of photosynthesis provides most of the energy required by living things on Earth. 

    A tree with arrows representing the inputs and outputs of photosynthesis
    Figure \(\PageIndex{a}\): Photosynthesis uses solar energy, carbon dioxide, and water to release oxygen and to produce energy-storing sugar molecules. Image and caption by OpenStax(opens in new window) (CC-BY(opens in new window)). Access for free at openstax.org(opens in new window).

    Organisms that conduct photosynthesis (such as plants, algae, and some bacteria), and organisms that synthesize sugars  through other means are called producers. Without these organisms, energy would not be available to other living organisms, and life would not be possible. Consumers, like animals, fungi, and various microorganisms depend on producers, either directly or indirectly. For example, a deer obtains energy by eating plants. A wolf eating a deer obtains energy that originally came from the plants eaten by that deer (figure \(\PageIndex{b}\)). Using this reasoning, all food eaten by humans can be traced back to producers that carry out photosynthesis.

    Deer running quickly through vegetation
    Figure \(\PageIndex{b}\): The energy stored in carbohydrate molecules from photosynthesis passes through the food chain. The predator that eats these deer is getting energy that originated in the photosynthetic vegetation that the deer consumed. (credit: Steve VanRiper, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

    Consumers can be classified based on whether they eat animal or plant material (figure \(\PageIndex{c}\)). Consumers that feed exclusively on animals are called carnivores. Lions, tigers, snakes, sharks, sea stars, spiders, and ladybugs are all carnivores. Herbivores are consumers that feed exclusively on plant material, and examples include deer, koalas, some bird species, crickets, and caterpillars. Consumers that eat both plant and animal material are considered omnivores. Humans, bears, chickens, cockroaches, and crayfish are examples of omnivores.

    A collage of a lion, ladybug, mule deer, bear, and crayfish
    Figure \(\PageIndex{c}\): Carnivores like the lion (top left) eat primarily meat. The ladybug (lower left) is also a carnivore that consumes small insects called aphids. Herbivores, like the mule deer (middle) eat primarily plant material. Omnivores like the bear (top right) and crayfish (bottom right) eat both plant and animal based food. Lion by Kevin Pluck; ladybug by Jon Sullivan; mule deer by Bill Ebbesen; bear by Dave Menke; crayfish by Jon Sullivan. All from OpenStax(opens in new window) (CC-BY(opens in new window)). 

    Dead producers and consumers are eaten by detritivores (which ingest dead tissues) and decomposers (which further break down these tissues into simple molecules by secreting digestive enzymes). Invertebrate animals, such as vultures, worms and millipedes are examples of detritivores, whereas fungi and certain bacteria are examples decomposers. 

    Food Chains

    A food chain is a linear sequence of organisms through which nutrients and energy pass as one organism eats another. Each organism in a food chain occupies a specific trophic level (energy level), its position in the food chain. The first trophic level (TL) in the food chain is the producers. The primary consumers (the herbivores that eat producers) are the second trophic level. Next are higher-level consumers. Higher-level consumers include secondary consumers (third TL), which are usually carnivores that eat the primary consumers, and tertiary consumers (fourth TL), which are carnivores that eat other carnivores. In the Lake Ontario food chain, shown in figure \(\PageIndex{d}\), the Chinook salmon is the apex consumer at the top of this food chain. Some communities have additional trophic levels (quaternary consumers, fifth order consumers, etc.). Finally, detritivores and decomposers break down dead and decaying organisms from any trophic level. There is a single path through a food chain.

    This food chain illustrates the trophic levels in Lake Ontario, from producer to tertiary consumer.
    Figure \(\PageIndex{d}\): These are the trophic levels of a food chain in Lake Ontario at the United States–Canada border. Energy and nutrients flow from photosynthetic green algae (producers) at the base to the primary consumers, which are mollusks, or snails. The secondary consumers are small fish called slimy sculpin. The tertiary and apex consumer is Chinook salmon. Detritivores and decomposers are not shown. (credit: modification of work by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/NOAA)

    One major factor that limits the number of steps in a food chain is energy. Only about 10% of the energy in one trophic level is transferred to the next trophic level. This is because much energy is lost as heat during transfers between trophic levels or to decomposers due to the second law of thermodynamics. Thus, after four to six trophic energy transfers, the amount of energy remaining in the food chain may not be great enough to support viable populations at higher trophic levels 

    Certain environmental toxins can become more concentrated as they move up the food chain, with the highest concentrations occurring in the top consumers, a process called biomagnification. Essentially, a top consumer ingests all the toxins that had previously accumulated in the bodies of the organisms at the lower trophic levels. This explains why frequently eating certain fish, like tuna or swordfish, increases your exposure to mercury, a toxic heavy metal.

    Food Webs

    While food chains are simple and easy to analyze, there is a one problem when using food chains to describe most communities. Even when all organisms are grouped into appropriate trophic levels, some of these organisms can feed at more than one trophic level. In addition, species feed on and are eaten by more than one species. In other words, the linear model of trophic interactions, the food chain, is a hypothetical and overly simplistic representation of community structure. A holistic model—which includes all the interactions between different species and their complex interconnected relationships with each other and with the environment—is a more accurate and descriptive model. A food web is a concept that accounts for the multiple trophic interactions between each species (figure \(\PageIndex{e}\) and f).

    Terrestrial food web systems diagram.
    Figure \(\PageIndex{e}\): This food web shows the interactions among organisms across trophic levels. Arrows point from an organism that is consumed to the organism that consumes it and represent energy transfer. The producers (plants) capture energy from the sun. The level above the producers shows the primary consumers that eat the producers. Some examples are squirrels, mice, seed-eating birds, and beetles. Spiders and centipedes eat beetles. Robins eat beetles, spiders, and centipedes, and toads eat beetles and centipedes. Foxes eat squirrels and mice; owls eat squirrels, mice, seed-eating birds, and robins; and snakes eat mice, seed-eating birds, robins, centipedes, and toads. Some consumers are in between trophic levels because they eat a combination of primary, secondary, and/or tertiary consumers. All the producers and consumers eventually become nourishment for the decomposers (mushrooms, mold, and bacteria) and detritivores (earthworms) in the soil, which are depicted at the bottom of the illustration. (credit “fox”: modification of work by Kevin Bacher, NPS; credit “owl”: modification of work by John and Karen Hollingsworth, USFWS; credit “snake”: modification of work by Steve Jurvetson; credit “robin”: modification of work by Alan Vernon; credit “frog”: modification of work by Alessandro Catenazzi; credit “spider”: modification of work by “Sanba38″/Wikimedia Commons; credit “centipede”: modification of work by “Bauerph”/Wikimedia Commons; credit “squirrel”: modification of work by Dawn Huczek; credit “mouse”: modification of work by NIGMS, NIH; credit “sparrow”: modification of work by David Friel; credit “beetle”: modification of work by Scott Bauer, USDA Agricultural Research Service; credit “mushrooms”: modification of work by Chris Wee; credit “mold”: modification of work by Dr. Lucille Georg, CDC; credit “earthworm”: modification of work by Rob Hille; credit “bacteria”: modification of work by Don Stalons, CDC)
    Food web systems diagram of Arctic species.
    Figure \(\PageIndex{f}\): In this food web, each organism may have multiple food sources or be eaten by multiple species. Phytoplankton are the primary producers. They are consumed by sand lances, krill, and zooplankton. Sand lances are consumed by puffins, kittiwake, and cephalopods. Krill are consumed by the sand lance, cephalopods, auklets, and salmon. Zooplankton are consumed by the sand lance, krill, auklets, and salmon. Puffins are eaten by rats and gulls. Kittiwakes are eaten by rats, foxes, and gulls. Cephalopods are consumed by puffins and gulls. Auklets are consumed by gulls and foxes. Salmon are consumed by cephalopods and gulls. Rats are consumed by foxes and gulls. Gulls are consumed by foxes. Detritivores and decomposers are not shown. Image by Mariana Ruiz Villarreal (LadyofHats) for CK-12 Foundation (CC-BY-NC(opens in new window)).

    Key Concept: Gross vs. Net Primary Productivity

    • Gross Primary Productivity (GPP): The total energy captured by producers through photosynthesis.
    • Net Primary Productivity (NPP): The energy remaining after producers use some for their own life processes.
    • Why it matters: NPP determines how much energy is available to consumers and influences ecosystem productivity.

    Energy Transfer, Food Webs, and Food Production

    Only a small fraction of the energy available at one trophic level becomes biomass that can be used by the next trophic level. Much of the energy is lost as heat during metabolism, used for movement and other life processes, or released as waste. As a result, ecosystems contain less available energy at each higher trophic level. Ecologists estimate that, on average, only about 10% of the energy at one trophic level is transferred to the next, although the exact amount varies among ecosystems. This pattern is known as the 10% rule and helps explain why food webs typically contain fewer organisms at higher trophic levels (figure \(\PageIndex{g}\)).

    An energy pyramid highlighting 10% energy transfer from one level to the next.
    Figure \(\PageIndex{g}\): Energy Pyramid highlighting 1% energy from the sun is captured by photosynthesizers. Thereafter, 10% energy transfer between each level. Image credit: Erin Rempala (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).

    The 10% rule also helps explain why producing animal-based foods often requires more resources than producing plant-based foods. Livestock consume large amounts of plant biomass, but only a portion of that energy is converted into animal tissue. Most of the energy is used for growth, movement, body maintenance, and heat production. Because energy is lost at each trophic transfer, producing meat generally requires more land, water, and feed than producing an equivalent amount of plant-based food.

    Understanding energy transfer helps scientists evaluate the environmental impacts of food production and identify strategies that support more sustainable food systems.

     

    Attribution

    This page was heavily revised and rewritten by Erin Rempala and contains adapted content originally authored by Melissa Ha and Rachel Schleiger and is licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

    Modified by Melissa Ha from the following sources:


    This page titled 3.3.4: Energy Flow in Food Webs was last modified on Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:33:56 GMT and is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Melissa Ha and Rachel Schleiger (ASCCC Open Educational Resources Initiative) .