# The Janissary Revolt That Hung a Grand Vizier

An episode of [The Story of Turkey: From Byzantium to the Ottoman Empire to Today — Fexingo History](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1895450461), 20 Aug 2026, 8:46.

Audio: https://audio.fexingo.com/history/the-story-of-turkey/episode-0209.mp3

In 1622, the janissaries of the Ottoman Empire rose up, stormed the Topkapı Palace, and deposed the young sultan Osman II, an event that ended with his murder. This episode unpacks the revolt's causes and consequences: Osman's ambition to reform the janissary corps, the harem politics of Kösem Sultan and the Valide Sultan, the role of the Şeyhülislam, and the brief reign of the mad Mustafa I that followed. We also trace the wider pattern of janissary power over the seventeenth century, comparing Osman's fate with that of Murad IV, who brutally regained control. Along the way, we meet the grand vizier (and Osman's brother-in-law) Davud Pasha, who orchestrated the final act, and we follow the revolt's echoes in the regicide's aftermath. It's a story of institutional rebellion, palace intrigue, and a sultan who paid for reform with his life. #Janissaries #OsmanII #OttomanEmpire #TopkapıPalace #KösemSultan #MuradIV #DavudPasha #MustafaI #GrandVizier #17thCentury #Istanbul #PalaceCoup #OttomanHistory #SultanateOfWomen #History #FexingoHistory #Revolt #Regicide Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

## Transcript

Lucas: So, we've talked a lot about the janissaries — their music, their role in the Sultanate of Women, even their earlier rebellions. But there's one revolt that stands out because it ended with the sultan himself strangled to death. That's the rebellion of 1622, and it's a wild, tragic story of ambition, harem politics, and institutional stubbornness.
Luna: A sultan strangled? I thought they were untouchable.
Lucas: They were supposed to be. But Osman II was only fourteen when he came to the throne in 1618, and he had grand ideas about reforming the empire — especially the janissary corps. He wanted to break their grip on the capital, and he thought the best way was to build a new army, maybe even move the capital away from Istanbul. That did not go over well.
Lucas: The janissaries heard about his plans, and they knew what he intended — he'd said he wanted to make the pilgrimage to Mecca, but they suspected he was going to raise a new force in Syria or Egypt. So in May 1622, they rose up, stormed the Topkapı Palace, and demanded the sultan hand over his favorites, the men who'd been advising him.
Luna: Wait, so the sultan's own guards turned on him?
Lucas: Exactly. They were the palace's primary military force. The rebellion was led by the janissary agha, and they were joined by the sipahis, the cavalry, who had their own grievances. They demanded the heads of the sultan's tutor and the grand vizier, among others. Osman II tried to appease them, but the mob was relentless. They broke into the palace, and the young sultan was taken prisoner.
Lucas: Now, what's interesting is the role of the harem in this. Osman's mother, Mahfiruz Hatice, wasn't as powerful as some other valide sultans, but Kösem Sultan, the powerful valide from the previous reign, was still around. She had her own reasons to oppose Osman, because he'd sidelined her. Some historians think she and her allies in the harem quietly encouraged the janissaries, or at least didn't try to stop them.
Luna: So Kösem was playing politics even after her own son died.
Lucas: She was a survivor. After Osman was deposed, the rebels brought back Mustafa I — who was Kösem's brother-in-law, actually, another of Ahmed I's sons, but he was known to be mentally unstable. He'd already been sultan briefly after Ahmed died, but was removed after only three months because of his erratic behavior. The janissaries put him back on the throne, and that's when things got truly chaotic.
Lucas: Mustafa wasn't capable of ruling, so real power fell to his mother, Halime Sultan, and to the grand vizier, a man named Davud Pasha. Davud was married to a sister of Osman — so he was the deposed sultan's brother-in-law. And Davud made a fateful decision: he had Osman II murdered in the dungeons of Yedikule Fortress, strangling him with a bowstring, the traditional method of executing Ottoman princes to avoid spilling blood.
Luna: So the sultan's own relative ordered his death. That's brutal.
Lucas: It was a shocking act, even by the standards of the time. Osman II was only eighteen. The Ottoman dynasty had never killed a reigning sultan before — deposed sultans were usually kept alive, or at least that was the norm. This set a terrible precedent, and it sent shockwaves through the empire. The janissaries themselves were split; some felt they'd gone too far. Within months, there were counter-revolts, and Davud Pasha was executed for his role.
Lucas: The mess continued for a while. Mustafa was deposed again in 1623, and Osman's half-brother Murad IV took the throne at age eleven. That's when Kösem became the real power behind the throne as valide sultan. But Murad IV grew up to be one of the most ruthless sultans in Ottoman history — he eventually crushed the janissaries with an iron fist, executing anyone who even mentioned reform.
Luna: So Osman's death didn't change much in the long run.
Lucas: Well, it did change the political calculus. The janissaries showed they could kill a sultan and get away with it, which made it harder for any sultan to challenge them for decades. But Murad IV did manage to restore order, partly by being so brutal that even the janissaries were scared. He banned coffee and tobacco, killed his own brothers, and executed thousands. It was a dark time, but it stabilized the empire.
Lucas: There's a lesson here about how institutions resist change. Osman II was genuinely trying to modernize the army, but he underestimated the janissaries' power and overestimated his own. He didn't have the support of the ulema, the religious scholars, either — in fact, the Şeyhülislam at the time issued a fatwa approving his deposition, which gave the rebellion religious legitimacy.
Luna: So the religious leaders backed the rebellion.
Lucas: They did. That fatwa was crucial — it meant the janissaries weren't just rebelling against God's chosen ruler; they were obeying the divine will. And that's why Osman's subsequent murder was so problematic, because even with a fatwa, killing a sultan was a massive sin. It's one of the reasons the violence spiraled.
Lucas: And you know, thinking about this episode, if you've found it useful — if it's helped you understand how the Ottoman Empire actually worked, beyond the stereotypes — that's exactly the kind of thing that keeps this show going. We're ad-free because of listener support, so if you value that, you can help by buying me a coffee at buy me a coffee dot com slash fexingo.
Luna: Yeah, I know I appreciate it. It lets us dig deep into stories like this without any commercial breaks.
Lucas: It really does. And it's not just about the big battles — it's about the human decisions, the fear, the ambition. Like Osman II, who was so young and so sure he could reshape the empire, and he paid for it with his life.
Lucas: So what came after? Murad IV's reign was harsh, but it did restore some stability. And his brother, İbrahim, who came after him, was a different story — he was known as 'İbrahim the Mad' and his reign collapsed into chaos, which eventually led to the rise of the Köprülü dynasty of grand viziers. But that's a whole other episode.
Luna: I'd love to hear that one. But first, let's dig a little more into Murad IV. How did he actually regain control?
Lucas: Murad IV took the throne in 1623, and the empire was in a freefall. There were revolts in the provinces, the janissaries were effectively running the capital, and the treasury was empty. He started by executing his own brothers to secure his position — that's the infamous kardeş katli, the law of fratricide. Then he took control of the janissary corps by personally leading campaigns, like the recapture of Baghdad in 1638, which gave him legitimacy and direct loyalty.
Lucas: He also imposed a kind of terror on the capital. He banned alcohol, tobacco, and coffee, and he would roam the streets in disguise, beheading anyone violating his rules. It sounds like something out of a movie, but it worked. By the time he died in 1640, the janissaries were cowed, and the empire was stable again, at least for a while.
Luna: So Osman's death wasn't the end of the story, but it did make the path forward much bloodier.
Lucas: Exactly. And that's the thing about these palace revolts — they rarely solve the underlying problems. The janissaries kept their privileges, but the empire kept stagnating. It took a century and a half for the sultans to finally disband the corps in 1826, in the event known as the Auspicious Incident, when Mahmud II turned the artillery against them.
Lucas: But the 1622 rebellion was a turning point — it showed that no one, not even the sultan, was safe if the janissaries turned on him. And that changed the political calculus for every Ottoman ruler who followed.
Luna: It's amazing how one event can echo through centuries.
Lucas: It really is. And the irony is that Osman II was trying to do what the empire eventually had to do anyway — reform the janissary corps. He was a century and a half too early, and he paid for it. Sometimes the timing of an idea is just as important as the idea itself.

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.