# EPISODE 68: Administrative Liability of Lawyers

An episode of [Supreme Court Ph Podcast](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1852172756), 9 May 2025, 25 min.

Audio: https://anchor.fm/s/fbd1e45c/podcast/play/102411897/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2025-4-9%2Ff465ec7d-c7e0-cf24-32ae-a5cd26be7968.mp3

Should lawyers be held administratively liable for issuing checks that are dishonored due to insufficient funds or due to a closed account? Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Appeals (CA) Associate Justice Geraldine C. Fiel-Macaraig, Vice Chairperson of the Department of Ethics and Judicial Conduct of the Philippine Judicial Academy. Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and CA Justice Fiel-Macaraig discuss whether lawyers are administratively liable for issuing bouncing checks, within the context of the case of William S. Uy v. Atty. Elerizza A. Libiran-Meteoro, A.C. No. 13368, decided on May 21, 2024.

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.