# 15 Cases So Disturbing… Netflix Won't Cover Them | 229

An episode of [Lazy Chill True Crime](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1815534472), 11 May 2026, 2 h 14 min.

Audio: https://anchor.fm/s/10f1e70d4/podcast/play/119787168/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2026-4-10%2F423882096-44100-2-8c72a88d0f7af.mp3

Join me for 15 chilling true crime cases and other unsolved mysteries that are too disturbing for Netflix. Episode 229 of the true crime podcast btw. This is a compilation of three previous parts in this series. 👇 Youtube links: Lazy Chill History Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@LazyChillHistory Lazy Chill Zone Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@LazyChillZone 👇 Support My Work: 🛍️ Merch: https://lazy-chill-zone-shop.fourthwall.com ❤️ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lazychillzone 👇Social Media Links: https://www.instagram.com/lazychillzone/ 👇 Podcast links: ⚡History Video Podcast on Spotify⚡: https://open.spotify.com/show/7km5pLWpYWEj1mrPpEfRUr?si=0FHYnZf-Qs2FY1GyLevfig ⚡True Crime Podcast on Spotify⚡: https://open.spotify.com/show/0klIz08pAr7wR4we0Ia4sk?si=68qZxCeAQkysXzMZrHE0Iw 🍏 True Crime Podcast on Apple 🍎: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/lazy-chill-true-crime/id1815534472 unsolved mysteries, true crime, cold cases, unsolved mysteries, missing persons, murder investigation, forensic evidence, serial killers, crime scene analysis, dark history, criminal psychology, real life horror, police investigations, DNA breakthroughs, forensic genealogy, crime documentaries, criminal profiling, mysterious disappearances, solved cases, justice system, law enforcement stories, cold case files, creepy mysteries, true crime storytelling, crime reconstruction, chilling cases, investigative reporting, modern forensics, victim advocacy, unidentified remains, crime scene forensics, disturbing cases, true crime analysis, hidden clues, infamous crimes, real crime stories, forensic evidence

## Transcript

[0:00] Nanette Krentel prophetically told her family someone was
[0:03] going to burn her house down with her inside it.
[0:06] A few months later, a cyclist saw smoke rising from the trees
[0:10] in rural Lacombe, LA, and called 911.
[0:15] When firefighters pulled what was left of Nanette from the
[0:18] smoldering wreckage of her home, she'd already been dead for
[0:22] hours. Not from the fire, but from a
[0:25] bullet to the head. 9 surveillance cameras had been
[0:29] watching the property and 30 weapons were stored in the
[0:32] house. Her husband was even the local
[0:35] Fire Chief and none of it saved her.
[0:38] That was July 14th, 2017 and as of today, nobody has been
[0:45] charged with this shocking crime.
[0:49] Nanette Krentel was 49 years old and had been married to Steve
[0:53] Krentel for over 2 decades. They live together on a
[0:56] sprawling, wooded 100 acre property in Lacombe, a quiet
[1:00] community tucked into St. Tammany Parish on Louisiana's
[1:03] North Shore. Steve served as the Acting Chief
[1:07] of Saint Tammany Fire Protection District 12A, prominent local
[1:11] position that gave the family deep roots in the community.
[1:15] By most accounts, the family lived a relatively ordinary life
[1:18] in an area where people tend to know each other's business.
[1:22] But beneath that surface, things weren't as stable as they
[1:25] looked. Steve later admitted to having
[1:29] had an affair with a younger colleague during the marriage.
[1:32] Nanette's father, Dan Watson, would later tell investigators
[1:36] that his daughter had been considering leaving Steve before
[1:40] her death. Still, none of that fully
[1:43] explains what happened on that Friday afternoon in the middle
[1:46] of July when someone put a gun to Nanette's head and then tried
[1:51] to erase every trace of the crime.
[1:55] Phone records show that Nanette's last known activity on
[1:58] July 14th, 2017, was a call she placed to a local Kmart about a
[2:03] prescription refill at roughly 10:00 in the morning.
[2:07] Her final outgoing call to another person came about an
[2:11] hour before the 911 call. At approximately 2:30 that
[2:16] afternoon. A person riding their bike
[2:18] through the area spotted smoke billowing from the Crental
[2:21] property and rode home to report it.
[2:24] First responders arrived to find the house engulfed, and when
[2:28] they made entry into the master bedroom, they discovered a body
[2:32] lying face up on the floor. The burns were so severe that
[2:36] identification wasn't immediately possible, though DNA
[2:40] testing would later confirm it was Nanette.
[2:43] Also found near the body were two handguns, with nearly three
[2:47] dozen additional firearms scattered throughout the ruins.
[2:51] Investigators from the Louisiana State Fire Marshall's office
[2:55] quickly determined that the fire had been intentionally set.
[2:59] Accelerant had been poured in multiple locations throughout
[3:02] the living room and master bedroom, and in what would
[3:05] become one of the cases most damning details, the accelerant
[3:09] had been specifically applied to the digital video recorder in
[3:13] the living room. This was the hub that stored all
[3:16] the footage from the 9 surveillance cameras covering
[3:19] the property. The recorder was so badly
[3:22] damaged that even FBI specialists couldn't recover any
[3:25] video from it, despite having some of the world's leading
[3:29] experts in the field work on it. Whoever did this knew exactly
[3:33] what they were doing, and they knew exactly what to destroy to
[3:36] cover their tracks. In the immediate aftermath, the
[3:41] Saint Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office appeared to treat the
[3:44] death as if she'd done it herself. 2 weapons found near
[3:48] Nanette's body seemed to support that theory, and the crime scene
[3:52] investigation was reportedly discontinued in the early
[3:55] stages. But five days later, ballistic
[3:58] testing proved that neither weapon found near her had been
[4:01] fired. The scene was cordoned off again
[4:04] and the investigation shifted tremendously.
[4:08] On September 14th, 2017, exactly 2 months after her death, the
[4:15] Saint Tammany Parish Coroner officially ruled Nanette's death
[4:19] a slaying. His reasoning was direct and
[4:22] difficult to dispute. There was no soot in her airway,
[4:26] not even at a microscopic level. That absence made a powerful
[4:31] case that Nanette was already dead before the fire ever
[4:34] started. Unfortunately, Ballistics
[4:37] testing couldn't provide such cut and dried clues, both due to
[4:41] the physics of the bullet and the fire itself.
[4:44] The bullet had entered her temple, and it hadn't exited her
[4:48] skull, instead lodging in soft tissue.
[4:53] The intense heat of the fire complicated ballistic analysis
[4:56] significantly, and investigators eventually determined that it
[5:00] was likely, though not certainly, from a 40 caliber
[5:03] handgun. However, this analysis was
[5:06] informed by the fact that Nanette typically carried one of
[5:09] these in her purse, suggesting the attacker may have turned her
[5:13] own weapon against her. Unfortunately, this was educated
[5:17] guesswork, and ultimately the forensic team couldn't
[5:20] definitively determine whose gun it actually was.
[5:25] In homicide cases, the spouse is always the first person
[5:29] investigators look at, and Steve Krentel was no exception.
[5:33] He had motive on paper, the admitted affair, a marriage that
[5:38] might have been ending, and the fact that he held a position of
[5:41] trust and respect in the community.
[5:44] But here's the thing. Despite this apparent motive,
[5:48] there was absolutely nothing whatsoever to link him to the
[5:51] crime. Steve completely cooperated with
[5:54] the investigation from the start.
[5:57] He submitted to a polygraph test and passed, and he had an alibi.
[6:02] He was at the fire station at the time of the incident.
[6:05] He was publicly ruled out as a person of interest in the case.
[6:09] Steve would later resign from his position as Fire Chief amid
[6:13] separate revelations about inappropriate relationships with
[6:16] multiple staff members. His personal life was messy,
[6:21] without question, but that didn't make him guilty.
[6:25] Far from it. If Steve Krentel was the obvious
[6:29] suspect, his brother Brian was the one Nanette herself had been
[6:33] afraid of. In the months and years before
[6:36] her death, Nanette sent a stream of emails to her father in Iowa,
[6:40] warning him about the danger she believed Brian posed.
[6:44] Brian Krentel had a lengthy criminal record and a history of
[6:48] volatile behavior. According to family members,
[6:51] he'd made explicit threats against Nanette, including a
[6:55] threat to burn the home down with her inside.
[6:58] In fact, Nanette had learned to shoot specifically because she
[7:01] was afraid of Brian. She'd pushed for the
[7:04] installation of the 9 surveillance cameras around the
[7:07] property. She'd also been counting on a
[7:10] geofence, an electronic monitoring boundary that was
[7:14] supposed to alert Brian's probation officer if he came
[7:18] within 1000 feet of the Krentel home.
[7:21] But here's where the story takes its darkest turn.
[7:24] After Nanette's death, Steve recorded a conversation with
[7:28] Brian's probation officer. The probation officer admitted
[7:32] to him, apparently off the record, that the tracking
[7:36] function on Brian's ankle monitor wasn't working that day.
[7:40] The one safeguard Nanette was relying on to keep her
[7:43] brother-in-law away from her home had never been active at
[7:46] the material time. Now, with all this, you're
[7:50] probably expecting me to say that there's just simply not
[7:53] enough evidence to charge Brian. But that's where yet another
[7:57] twist comes in. Despite all of this, Brian was
[8:01] officially cleared, and for very good reason.
[8:05] Surveillance evidence from Brian's parents house placed him
[8:08] with his parents about 15 miles away on the date and time
[8:13] Nanette died. The Saint Tammany Parish
[8:16] Sheriff's Office has never publicly named him as a person
[8:19] of interest or a suspect. If the case itself is
[8:24] disturbing, the investigation that followed has been nearly as
[8:28] troubling. Nanette's family grew
[8:31] increasingly vocal about what they saw as a lack of urgency
[8:34] and transparency from the Sheriff's Office.
[8:37] And they weren't the only ones who noticed.
[8:40] In 2019, a man named Jerry Rogers, federal investigator
[8:46] with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development
[8:49] and a former employee of the Sheriff's Office, was arrested.
[8:54] His crime, according to law enforcement, was sending a
[8:57] series of anonymous emails to Nanette's sister, Kim Watson, in
[9:02] which he criticized the lead detective on the case.
[9:05] Rogers had created an e-mail address specifically for the
[9:08] purpose of contacting people close to the case.
[9:12] The arrest itself became a scandal, and a federal judge
[9:16] later ruled that Rogers had been illegally arrested, finding that
[9:20] the sheriff's deputies had violated his civil rights.
[9:24] The Louisiana attorney general declined to prosecute.
[9:28] Court filings revealed that an FBI agent had requested a
[9:31] criminal probe into the Sheriff's Office over what was
[9:35] described as a possible police conspiracy related to the case.
[9:40] Now, it's important to note here that this quote, UN quote police
[9:42] conspiracy is simply alleged and has never been confirmed as a
[9:47] fact. But the allegation was made by
[9:49] federal law enforcement. That said nothing came of it.
[9:53] So take that allegation with a grain of salt, since it may
[9:57] simply be an unproven allegation without any meaningful evidence
[10:01] to back it up. The Sheriff's Office ultimately
[10:04] settled Rogers federal civil rights lawsuit for an
[10:07] undisclosed amount. Sheriff Smith, for his part,
[10:12] pushed back on the criticism, suggesting at various points
[10:15] that the case had been weaponized for political
[10:18] reasons. But for Nanette's family, none
[10:21] of the political noise changed the central, agonizing reality.
[10:26] The person who ended the life of their loved one was still free.
[10:31] The FBI was eventually given access to the full case file and
[10:35] has been re analyzing evidence and information gathered during
[10:38] the investigation. As of right now, all we know is
[10:42] that someone for some reason walked onto that 100 acre
[10:46] property in broad daylight and shot an innocent woman in the
[10:50] head. The perpetrator then doused her
[10:53] home in accelerant, destroyed the one device that might have
[10:57] captured them on camera, and set the whole thing ablaze.
[11:02] Then, just like that, they walked away, and nearly a decade
[11:07] later, they're still walking free.
[11:11] In the end, Nanette Krentel predicted exactly how she would
[11:14] die, which in retrospect may simply be a bizarre coincidence
[11:19] because the person she feared couldn't have done the crime.
[11:24] In my analysis, the early handling of Nanette Krentel's
[11:28] death appears to have shaped the entire trajectory of the
[11:31] investigation, potentially with irreversible consequences.
[11:36] When authorities initially approached the scene under the
[11:38] assumption that she had caused her own death, the urgency and
[11:42] rigor typically applied may not have been fully activated.
[11:47] Critical steps such as preserving the scene,
[11:51] documenting evidence thoroughly, and immediately pursuing
[11:54] forensic leads could have been delayed or de prioritized.
[11:59] In cases involving fire, where evidence is already fragile and
[12:03] easily destroyed, even small lapses and procedure can have
[12:07] outsized effects. The destruction of the
[12:10] surveillance system only compounded this vulnerability,
[12:14] eliminating what may have been the most direct path to
[12:17] identifying a suspect. If key evidence was overlooked
[12:21] or compromised in those first crucial hours, it will likely
[12:25] never be recovered if it could have been recovered regardless.
[12:30] As a result, the case risks remaining permanently
[12:32] unresolved, perhaps not for lack of effort, but because the
[12:36] foundation of the investigation was weakened at the very
[12:39] beginning. On the morning of February 28th,
[12:44] 2019, Alicia Griffin picked up her phone, spoke with her
[12:48] husband, Martin Haupt, and told him she'd be heading to her
[12:51] doctor's appointment. It was a mundane promise, the
[12:55] kind you make 100 times and never think twice about.
[12:59] But she never made it to that appointment.
[13:03] Within 72 hours, Alicia would travel hundreds of miles South
[13:07] from Sacramento to the Mexican border.
[13:11] She abandoned her father's car in Tijuana with her purse and
[13:14] identification still inside, and vanished from the face of the
[13:19] earth. What happened in those three
[13:21] days is a question law enforcement has been trying to
[13:25] answer for years, and the few clues that do exist only make
[13:30] the whole thing more disturbing. Alicia was 46 years old, living
[13:36] in Sacramento, CA at the time of her disappearance.
[13:40] She'd been diagnosed with bipolar disorder type one in her
[13:43] mid 20s, a condition she'd managed for over 2 decades, and
[13:48] by all accounts, she was in a hopeful period of her life.
[13:52] She'd recently married Martin Haupt, a man who was in the
[13:56] process of relocating from Switzerland to Sacramento to
[14:00] build their life together. The future seemed like it was
[14:04] opening up for her, not closing down.
[14:07] But there was a complicating factor.
[14:10] In the weeks before she disappeared, Alicia had
[14:13] undergone a change in her medication, an adjustment to the
[14:17] prescription she relied on to manage her mental health.
[14:21] Those close to her have noted that she'd had previous episodes
[14:24] where she'd wander away from home without warning.
[14:28] It was a known pattern, a feature of her illness that the
[14:31] people around her had learned to watch for.
[14:35] But this time, that pattern would become devastatingly
[14:38] relevant in ways no one could have anticipated.
[14:43] After missing her doctor's appointment on the morning of
[14:46] February 28th, Alicia didn't just stay home or go somewhere
[14:50] local. She got in her father's car and
[14:53] began driving South, apparently in the grip of a mental health
[14:56] crisis. Over the next two days, she
[15:00] covered the distance from Sacramento all the way down to
[15:03] the Mexican border, a journey of roughly 500 miles.
[15:08] During this time, the people in her life began receiving
[15:11] unsettling signals. Friends and family reported
[15:15] cryptic text messages from Alicia's phone, the kind that
[15:19] didn't sound quite right, along with unusual charges appearing
[15:23] on her credit cards. Something was clearly wrong.
[15:27] But the most alarming moment came from a phone call placed
[15:30] from a hotel near Los Angeles International Airport.
[15:34] During that call, someone close to Alicia could hear a man's
[15:37] voice in the background, a voice that didn't belong to anyone
[15:41] they recognized. He had apparently instructed
[15:44] Alicia to go to a bank machine and withdraw money, a disturbing
[15:49] incident that suggests she was under the control of someone who
[15:52] was taking advantage of her. Who that man was has never been
[15:57] publicly identified, and his role in the events that followed
[16:02] remains one of the cases most troubling unknowns.
[16:06] On March 1st, Alicia was spotted near the airport in Inglewood,
[16:10] CA, and by the next day, March 2nd, she'd crossed the border
[16:16] into Mexico. Her dad's vehicle was found
[16:19] abandoned at a car wash in Tijuana, and inside it were her
[16:23] purse and her identification documents.
[16:26] A witness at the car wash later told investigators that they'd
[16:30] seen Alicia there and that she'd been acting erratically.
[16:34] This account lined up with the theory that she was in the
[16:37] middle of a severe mental health episode, but it also deepened
[16:41] the mystery. Why Tijuana?
[16:44] Was she following some internal logic that only made sense to
[16:47] her in that state, or was she being LED there by someone else?
[16:53] The Sacramento Police Department took the lead on the case and
[16:57] Martin Haupt was investigated as a person of interest, which is
[17:00] standard practice when a spouse goes missing.
[17:03] He was cleared by authorities and has been cooperating with
[17:06] the investigation ever since. The focus then shifted to
[17:11] tracing Alicia's movements in Mexico, and there's some
[17:14] conflict on what was actually found.
[17:17] There's an unconfirmed report that a Mexican detective managed
[17:21] to identify Alicia on surveillance footage from a
[17:24] store located a few miles from the car wash where her vehicle
[17:27] was found. However, I wasn't able to
[17:30] independently verify this, and the footage is nowhere to be
[17:33] found online. Not even a still frame, Nothing.
[17:37] That said, it may be true, and perhaps it's available in some
[17:41] Spanish language source that I don't have access to.
[17:46] Alicia's family, unwilling to accept the silence, hired a
[17:50] private investigator to continue digging where official resources
[17:54] might fall short. That effort, unfortunately,
[17:57] didn't turn up any new leads either.
[18:00] The case sits in a painful limbo.
[18:03] There's no evidence that Alicia is dead, but there's no evidence
[18:07] she's alive. She's listed as a missing person
[18:10] with both the California Department of Justice and the
[18:14] National Missing and Unidentified Person System.
[18:18] The Sacramento Police Department's Missing Persons
[18:20] Unit continues to work the case, but publicly available updates
[18:24] have been scarce for years. There are a few ways to read the
[18:29] evidence, and none of them are comforting.
[18:31] The 1st and perhaps most straightforward theory is that
[18:34] Alicia was in the throes of a bipolar episode potentially
[18:38] triggered or worsened by her medication change.
[18:43] During this time, she made a series of irrational decisions
[18:47] that led her across the border and into a dangerous situation.
[18:52] Tijuana can be an unforgiving city for anyone, and it's an
[18:56] especially dangerous place for a woman in the middle of a
[18:59] psychiatric crisis. In this scenario, Alicia may
[19:04] have met with foul play after arriving in Mexico, taken
[19:08] advantage of by someone who recognized her vulnerability.
[19:12] The second theory, and the one that haunts her family the most,
[19:16] centers on the mysterious man heard during the hotel phone
[19:19] call near the airport. If someone was directing Alicia
[19:24] to withdraw money, that suggests exploitation at a minimum, and
[19:28] something far darker at worst. Was she being manipulated by
[19:33] someone who recognized her compromised mental state?
[19:37] Was she trafficked? The presence of an unidentified
[19:41] man giving her financial instructions is the kind of
[19:45] detail that turns a missing person's case into something
[19:49] that feels more genuinely sinister.
[19:52] The fact that this individual has never been identified
[19:55] publicly only adds to the unease. 1/3 possibility less
[20:01] discussed, but worth noting is that Alicia is still alive
[20:05] somewhere, either unable or unwilling to make contact.
[20:10] People experiencing severe psychiatric episodes have, in
[20:14] rare cases, established entirely new routines in unfamiliar
[20:18] places. Sometimes not resurfacing for
[20:21] months or even years without her identification, she could be
[20:26] living anonymously, possibly unaware of the search being
[20:29] conducted on her behalf. It's the most hopeful scenario,
[20:34] but with each passing year, it becomes harder to sustain.
[20:39] It's possible that she feels a deep sense of embarrassment or
[20:43] shame about the actions she took during the time she was
[20:46] experiencing A psychiatric episode.
[20:49] If that's the case, I would just hope she comes to the
[20:52] realization that this was a medical episode and not
[20:56] something to be ashamed of. But that said, given the amount
[21:01] of time she's been missing now, this is sadly looking like a
[21:04] much less likely possibility. Alicia Griffin's case sits at
[21:10] the intersection of mental health, possible criminal
[21:13] exploitation, and the particular dangers that come with crossing
[21:17] an international border while in crisis.
[21:20] Her story doesn't have the massive dramatic twists that
[21:23] tend to generate extensive media coverage, which may be part of
[21:27] the problem. Cases like hers can slip through
[21:31] the cracks of public attention, remembered primarily by the
[21:34] people who loved her and the investigators who haven't given
[21:38] up. Her case is still open with the
[21:40] Sacramento Police Department, and neither her family or
[21:44] investigators are willing to give up on Alicia, $70,000 in
[21:51] jewelry, $4000 in cash, both still on the bodies.
[21:58] Whatever happened in that driveway on the morning of March
[22:01] 16th, 1988, it wasn't a robbery. It was an execution.
[22:07] Methodical, coordinated, efficient, and deeply,
[22:11] unmistakably personal. And the man most people believe
[22:15] ordered it wouldn't see the inside of a courtroom for nearly
[22:18] two decades. To understand why Mickey
[22:23] Thompson's death sent shock waves through the motorsport
[22:25] world, you have to understand who he was, and who he was
[22:30] defies easy summary. Born Marian Thompson on December
[22:35] 7th, 1928 in Alhambra, CA, Mickey was the kind of person
[22:41] who looked at a junkyard and saw a land speed record.
[22:45] By 14, he'd bought his first car, a 1927 Chevy, for $7.50.
[22:53] Before he was old enough to legally drive, he was racing
[22:56] home built machines on the dry lake beds of Southern
[22:58] California. By his early 20s, Thompson was
[23:02] working as a journalist at the Los Angeles Times while pouring
[23:06] every spare hour into hot rodding.
[23:09] In 1955 he designed and introduced what became known as
[23:14] the Slingshot Dragster, a configuration that placed the
[23:18] driver behind the rear axle and fundamentally changed the sport.
[23:22] But the achievement that made Mickey Thompson a household name
[23:26] came on September 9th, 1960 at Utah's Bonneville Salt Flats.
[23:32] Behind the wheel of Challenger 1A remarkable 4 engine machine
[23:36] he'd built largely from salvage parts, Thompson hit a one way
[23:40] speed of 406.60 mph. He became the first person to
[23:45] break the 400 mile per hour barrier and he'd surpassed a
[23:49] mark that had stood since 1947. There was just one problem.
[23:55] Official speed records require 2 consecutive runs in opposite
[23:59] directions. A mechanical failure on the
[24:02] return pass meant the record was never formally certified.
[24:06] But it didn't matter. In the eyes of the racing world,
[24:10] Mickey Thompson was the fastest man in America.
[24:14] Over the following decades, Thompson accumulated an almost
[24:17] absurd range of accomplishments, and he set 295 speed records at
[24:21] Bonneville alone. He entered cars at the
[24:24] Indianapolis 500. He participated in over 10,000
[24:29] races across his career, winning numerous championships.
[24:35] In 1971, Thompson married Trudy Feller, a former secretary at
[24:39] Hot Rod magazine. The wedding was pure Mickey.
[24:43] He chartered 3 jets to carry 250 guests from Long Beach to Las
[24:47] Vegas. Trudy wasn't just along for the
[24:50] ride though. She became Mickey's full
[24:53] business partner and together they formed the Mickey Thompson
[24:56] Entertainment Group known as MTEG.
[25:00] The venture effectively took indoor motocross and off road
[25:03] racing out of the Backcountry and into major metropolitan
[25:07] stadiums and arenas. Mt e.g. staged crowd pleasing
[25:11] events at venues like the Anaheim Stadium and the 80,000
[25:15] seat Pontiac Silverdome. By the mid 1980s, it was one of
[25:20] the hottest promotions in motorsport entertainment, and it
[25:24] was this successful venture that would ultimately bring Mickey
[25:27] Thompson into the orbit of the man who'd arrange his death.
[25:32] On April 1st, 1984, Mickey Thompson signed a stock transfer
[25:37] agreement with a motorsport promoter named Michael Goodwin.
[25:40] The deal combined their business interests with profits and
[25:44] losses split 7030 in Goodwin's favor.
[25:48] The 1st events under the partnership shows that the
[25:51] Hoosier Dome in Indianapolis and the Silver Dome in Michigan lost
[25:56] money, which isn't unusual for new ventures.
[26:00] But what happened next set the tone for everything that
[26:03] followed. Goodwin came to Thompson asking
[26:06] for $60,000 to cover bills from the Indiana event.
[26:10] Thompson paid. Then Goodwin asked for another
[26:13] 17,000 from Michigan and Thompson paid that too.
[26:18] Multiple witnesses would later testify that Goodwin, for his
[26:22] part, didn't contribute his share of anything.
[26:26] By October of 1984, Thompson had had enough, and he took the
[26:30] matter to court. The judge dissolved the
[26:34] partnership and returned control of MTEG to Thompson.
[26:38] But the legal battle was far from over.
[26:41] In May of 1986, a California court ruled that Michael Goodwin
[26:46] had stolen more than $500,000 from the partnership and awarded
[26:50] Thompson $514,000 in damages. This is a figure that would
[26:55] eventually grow to nearly $1,000,000 with interest and
[26:58] penalties. Goodwin, for his part, refused
[27:01] to pay. He didn't just refuse once.
[27:05] He refused repeatedly, defiantly, and with increasing
[27:09] hostility. What emerged during the eventual
[27:12] trial painted a picture that's hard to dismiss as coincidence.
[27:18] Roughly 15 different people would testify that they'd heard
[27:21] Goodwin talk openly about wanting Mickey Thompson dead,
[27:25] according to witness testimony. He'd said he'd rather see
[27:29] Thompson in the ground than pay him a dime.
[27:32] He reportedly told at least two people the specific cost he
[27:36] believed it would take to have Thompson eliminated.
[27:39] These weren't whispered confessions shared in private,
[27:42] either. He was very open about it.
[27:45] They were repeated, almost casual declarations made openly
[27:49] over a period of approximately 2 years leading up to March of
[27:53] 1988. It was still early on a
[27:57] Wednesday morning around 6:00 when Mickey and Trudy Thompson
[28:02] stepped out of their home in the gated community of Bradbury.
[28:06] This is a quiet community nestled in the San Gabriel
[28:09] Valley foothills east of Los Angeles, and definitely not the
[28:14] sort of place where violence often occurs.
[28:18] They were headed to their offices at Anaheim Stadium, the
[28:21] same commute they made most days.
[28:24] Mickey opened the garage door for Trudy to pull out in her
[28:27] vehicle, then walked toward his own car. 2 hooded gunmen were
[28:31] waiting. They shot Mickey first, wounding
[28:35] him, then dragged him out into the driveway.
[28:39] One of the attackers went after Trudy as she attempted to back
[28:42] out in the couple's van. Then, with Trudy gone, the
[28:46] second gunman walked back up the driveway to where the first was
[28:50] standing over Mickey and shot him fatally in the head.
[28:54] The assailants fled the scene on bicycles they'd ridden to the
[28:58] residence. A neighbor who heard the
[29:00] commotion reported seeing two men in their 20s, approximately
[29:04] 6 feet tall, pedaling away from the property.
[29:08] Investigators arriving at the scene found the Thompsons bodies
[29:11] with all their valuables untouched.
[29:14] A stun gun that didn't belong to the victims was recovered
[29:17] nearby. Robbery was immediately ruled
[29:20] out. Whoever did this came with a
[29:23] single purpose and a single purpose only.
[29:28] From the very beginning, investigators looked hard at
[29:30] Michael Goodwin. The financial motive was
[29:33] obvious, the threats were well documented, and Goodwin's
[29:37] behavior in the months surrounding the slayings raised
[29:40] serious red flags. Two months before the Thompsons
[29:44] were eliminated, Goodwin and his wife had purchased $275,000
[29:49] worth of gold coins. They'd also wired approximately
[29:53] $400,000 to banks on Grand Turk Island in the Caribbean.
[29:58] Five months after the Thompsons deaths, the Goodwins left the
[30:02] United States on their yacht and didn't return for more than two
[30:06] years. But suspicion isn't evidence,
[30:09] and for years the case stalled. The two gunmen were never
[30:13] identified and in fact never were.
[30:18] There was no physical evidence tying Goodwin directly to the
[30:21] crime scene, and no weapon was ever recovered.
[30:25] The investigation ground forward in fits and starts, with Los
[30:29] Angeles County Sheriff's Detective Mark Lilienfeld
[30:32] leading the charge in 1998. Lilienfeld sought to have
[30:37] Goodwin charged, but the effort stalled, potentially held back
[30:42] by Goodwin's wealth and political connections.
[30:45] He eventually took his case to the Orange County District
[30:48] Attorney's Office, which secured an indictment against Goodwin in
[30:52] 2001 following a raid on Goodwin's home.
[30:57] Even then, the road to trial was long, and it wasn't until late
[31:01] 2006 that Michael Goodwin finally sat in a courtroom to
[31:05] answer for what happened in that Bradbury driveway.
[31:10] The prosecution's case was entirely circumstantial, and
[31:13] they acknowledged as much. There was no genetic evidence,
[31:18] no fingerprints, and no one was arguing that Goodwin was the
[31:21] triggerman. What they had instead was a
[31:25] mountain of testimony, 15 witnesses who'd heard Goodwin
[31:29] threaten to have Thompson eliminated.
[31:32] They also had financial records showing suspicious asset
[31:35] movement and evidence that Goodwin had been spotted in the
[31:38] Thompsons neighborhood with binoculars.
[31:41] These were damning facts for the man who owed Mickey Thompson
[31:44] nearly $1,000,000 and swore he'd sooner see him dead than follow
[31:49] the court order. On January 4th, 2007, after
[31:53] nearly 19 years of investigation, a jury found
[31:57] Michael Frank Goodwin guilty. In March of that year, he was
[32:01] sentenced to two consecutive life terms without the
[32:04] possibility of parole. Goodwin appealed, and in 2015,
[32:10] the California Second District Court of Appeal upheld the
[32:13] conviction, describing the body of circumstantial evidence as
[32:18] overwhelming. The two men who actually pulled
[32:22] the triggers on that Wednesday morning in 1988 have never been
[32:26] identified and never faced any consequences for what they did.
[32:30] Despite the conviction of the man believed to have ordered the
[32:33] hit, the operational details of the crime remain an unsolved
[32:38] mystery. Perhaps the most unsettling
[32:42] thing is how these shooters were recruited.
[32:44] But whatever the case, Goodwin never talked.
[32:48] Personally, I think this may indicate that the hit men were
[32:51] retained through an organized criminal syndicate.
[32:54] Otherwise, I can see no other reason why Goodwin wouldn't have
[32:57] flipped on them, especially after his appeals ran out.
[33:01] There's also the matter of the stun gun found at the scene.
[33:05] It didn't belong to the Thompsons, and its presence has
[33:08] never been fully explained. It's entirely possible that
[33:12] Goodwin hadn't actually ordered a hit, but rather an abduction
[33:17] of the couple. He seems like a rather sick
[33:20] individual, so perhaps he wanted to finish the job himself rather
[33:25] than have the couple shot in their driveway.
[33:29] After all, this is a guy who owned a yacht and could have
[33:33] taken them out into international waters where
[33:36] they're dumped. Bodies would almost certainly
[33:38] never have been found. But that's just completely
[33:41] speculative on my part, though I do think it's actually quite
[33:45] plausible. Claudia Lawrence was a 35 year
[33:54] old chef from York, England who vanished in 2009.
[33:58] Born on February 27th, 1974 in the town of Malton, she grew up
[34:03] in North Yorkshire and later settled in the Heworth area of
[34:07] York. She worked as a cook at the
[34:10] University of York and was considered reliable and hard
[34:13] working. Claudia lived alone in a home in
[34:16] Heworth and was close to her family.
[34:20] Her father Peter was a lawyer and her mother Joan had been a
[34:25] local mayor. She was sociable and
[34:28] independent, often spending evenings at a local pub with
[34:31] friends. Claudia had never married and
[34:34] had no children, but she maintained what has
[34:37] euphemistically been called a quote UN quote active social
[34:41] life. She had a series of romantic
[34:44] relationships, including some with men who were married or
[34:48] involved with others. She was discreet about these
[34:51] liaisons, a fact that would later draw significant media
[34:55] attention. After she disappeared on March
[34:59] 18th, 2009, Claudia followed her usual routine.
[35:04] She worked an early shift and was captured on CCTV heading
[35:08] home around 3:00 PM that evening.
[35:11] She spoke with both of her parents by phone and sounded
[35:15] cheerful and normal. She even made plans for the
[35:18] upcoming Mother's Day with her mom and she said she was going
[35:21] to bed early because of her next day's early shift.
[35:25] Also, just a quick programming note, Mother's Day in the UK
[35:30] falls on the 4th Sunday of Lent rather than in May.
[35:34] Her car was in the garage for repairs, so she would be walking
[35:38] to work. Claudia sent her last known text
[35:42] at 8:23 PM and received a reply at 9:12 PM.
[35:47] After that, no one heard from her again.
[35:49] But there's significant evidence that she would attempt to get to
[35:52] work the following morning. But I'll come back to that.
[35:58] When Claudia didn't show up for her 6:00 AM shift on March 19th,
[36:02] her colleagues became alarmed. She wasn't the type to miss work
[36:05] without warning. Later that day, she also failed
[36:09] to meet a friend at their local pub as planned, and calls to her
[36:13] phone went unanswered. By the next day, her family's
[36:16] concern had turned to panic. After her friends raised the
[36:19] alarm that afternoon, her father went to her house to check on
[36:24] her, accompanied by a family friend with a spare key inside.
[36:29] Everything was in place and there were no signs of a
[36:31] struggle. The bed was neatly made and a
[36:34] few dishes were in the sink, suggesting she had eaten before
[36:37] heading out. Crucially, her handbag
[36:41] containing her wallet, bank cards and passport was left
[36:45] behind. However, her cell phone was
[36:49] missing, as was the blue and Gray backpack that held her
[36:52] chef's uniform. It appeared she had left for
[36:55] work as usual early on March 19th but never arrived.
[36:59] Peter Lawrence contacted North Yorkshire Police to report his
[37:03] daughter missing and a full investigation began.
[37:08] Initially, the police saw no immediate evidence of foul play
[37:12] and treated Claudia's disappearance as a routine
[37:14] missing person case. They considered the possibility
[37:18] that she might have left on her own, but her friends and family
[37:21] insisted she would never vanish without telling anyone.
[37:25] As days passed with no sign of her, the voluntary disappearance
[37:30] idea became less likely. Officers searched along her
[37:34] walking route for any clues of an accident or abduction and
[37:37] found nothing. In the first weeks, hundreds of
[37:40] police personnel and volunteers scoured the area, making door to
[37:44] door inquiries and combing the area extensively, but no trace
[37:49] of Claudia turned up. There was also no activity on
[37:53] her bank accounts after she went missing.
[37:56] By late April 2009, about 5 weeks after she vanished, the
[38:00] case was reclassified as a suspected slaying inquiry,
[38:04] reflecting the growing fear that Claudia had been harmed by
[38:07] someone. Detectives explored various
[38:12] scenarios in the early stages. They looked into whether a
[38:15] stranger might have attacked Claudia during her pre dawn
[38:18] walk, but no evidence supported the theory of a random
[38:21] assailant. Some tips about suspicious
[38:24] people in the area LED nowhere, and checks on known offenders in
[38:28] the region revealed no connection with those leads.
[38:31] Exhausted, investigators turned their focus to people in
[38:35] Claudia's life. The case drew nationwide
[38:40] attention almost immediately, given her ties to Cyprus and
[38:44] that the last text she received was from a friend there.
[38:48] Officers travelled there to interview friends she had met on
[38:50] holiday. However, they found no evidence
[38:54] that Claudia had left the country or that anyone overseas
[38:58] was involved. Back in York, detectives
[39:02] interviewed dozens of people who knew Claudia and dug into the
[39:05] details of her personal life. They learned she had been
[39:11] involved in multiple relationships, some of which
[39:14] weren't publicly known to her friends and family.
[39:18] Police theorized that someone close to her, perhaps a lover,
[39:22] ex partner, or the angry partner of someone she knew, might have
[39:27] had a personal motive to harm her.
[39:31] They compiled a timeline of her recent social contacts and
[39:34] activities. Some individuals were hesitant
[39:37] to fully cooperate, possibly out of fear or a desire to keep
[39:41] certain matters private. In 2013, new forensic techniques
[39:48] were applied to the case and these developments led to a
[39:51] series of arrests in 2014 and 2015.
[39:56] In May 2014, a 59 year old local man was arrested on suspicion of
[40:02] Claudia's slaying. He was a former work colleague
[40:06] who lived near Claudia's home and had occasionally given her a
[40:09] lift. Police searched his properties
[40:12] but ultimately found no evidence to charge him and he was
[40:16] released. Over the next year, several
[40:19] other men in their 50s were arrested, including a pub
[40:22] landlord and a few of the men who socialized with Claudia.
[40:27] Some were held on suspicion of the slaying and others for
[40:30] allegedly hiding information. Each arrest led to extensive
[40:35] searches and interviews. However, as with the first
[40:38] suspect, nothing definitive could be pinned on any of them.
[40:42] By 2017, a total of nine people had been arrested over the
[40:46] course of the inquiry. Yet no one was charged and
[40:50] Claudia was still missing. The theory most favored by
[40:56] police is that Claudia was slain by someone she knew.
[41:00] The narrow window of time during her routine walk and the lack of
[41:04] any signs of struggle or robbery suggests she likely encountered
[41:08] a familiar person. Most victims know their
[41:11] perpetrator, which also supports this line of thinking.
[41:16] Under this scenario, the perp may have approached her in a non
[41:18] threatening way, perhaps offering a ride or engaging in
[41:22] conversation. This could explain why no one
[41:25] reported witnessing anything unusual on the morning in
[41:28] question. After all, people are seen
[41:31] getting in and out of vehicles all the time, and the only way
[41:34] that sort of event would stick out is if there was something
[41:37] truly bizarre or unusual about the interaction.
[41:44] Others speculate that she was slain by someone she had an
[41:47] affair with or by the spouse of one of these individuals.
[41:51] In the former case, it's been speculated that the individual
[41:54] may have viewed Claudia as a liability and eliminated her.
[41:59] In the latter case, some have alternatively speculated that
[42:03] the slaying may have been a professional job and that
[42:06] Claudia may have been brought to a site where she was finished
[42:10] off. Another possibility is that
[42:15] Claudia fell victim to an unknown attacker in a random
[42:18] crime. Investigators consider the
[42:21] scenario of a stranger abduction, but they found little
[42:24] evidence for it. Speculation about known serial
[42:28] offenders was explored due to some coincidental similarities,
[42:33] but no connection was ever established.
[42:36] Likewise, the idea that Claudia chose to disappear on her own
[42:40] has been firmly rejected by both police and her family.
[42:44] She left behind all her important belongings and had
[42:48] made plans for the near future. It's now been more than 15 years
[42:54] since Claudia vanished, and if she's alive, she'd be in her
[42:57] early 50s. That said, investigators firmly
[43:01] believe that she isn't alive and that she was likely slain on the
[43:05] day she vanished. For now, the disappearance of
[43:10] Claudia Lawrence continues to remain one of Britain's most
[43:13] haunting unsolved mysteries. Somebody better help her.
[43:19] That's what the man said as he walked out of the maze of
[43:21] bookshelves on the second level of Penn State's Patty Library on
[43:25] the afternoon of November 28th, 1969.
[43:29] His right hand was tucked behind his back as he climbed the
[43:32] stairs and disappeared inside the stacks.
[43:36] A 22 year old English graduate student named Betsy Ardzma was
[43:41] lying on the floor between rows of dusty periodicals.
[43:45] Not a single person around her understood what was going on,
[43:48] since the wound she had sustained was both incredibly
[43:52] small and incredibly deep. She had been wearing a red dress
[43:57] over a white turtleneck, and that red fabric masked the true
[44:01] nature of the injury. By the time anyone figured out
[44:05] what had actually happened, Betsy Ardsma was beyond saving
[44:09] and her attacker had vanished into history.
[44:14] On the afternoon of November 28th, 1969, the day after
[44:18] Thanksgiving, Betsy left her residence in Atherton Hall with
[44:22] her roommate, Sharon Brandt. They were heading to Patty
[44:26] Library so Betsy could gather research material for an English
[44:30] paper. The two separated at some point
[44:33] before reaching the library, and Betsy ended up on level 2 of the
[44:37] building score stacks. It was a remote and poorly lit
[44:41] area of narrow aisles hemmed in by towering shelves of old
[44:45] periodicals. Notably, the secluded nature of
[44:49] this section was well known on campus for all the wrong
[44:53] reasons. It had a reputation as a meeting
[44:56] spot for illicit encounters, which would become a
[44:59] complicating factor in the investigation that followed.
[45:03] Sometime between 4:45 and 4:55 PM, students nearby heard what
[45:09] sounded like a gasp and the crash of falling books.
[45:14] Moments later, a tall man with blonde hair wearing khaki
[45:18] trousers and a flannel shirt emerged from the stacks and
[45:21] delivered his now infamous line about helping the girl.
[45:26] Two people saw him clearly enough to provide descriptions
[45:29] later. Merrily Erdely, a classmate of
[45:32] Betsy's, and Joao Wafinda, an international student.
[45:37] When library staff reached Betsy, they concluded she'd had
[45:41] some kind of fairly routine medical episode, a fainting
[45:45] spell, or, in the worst case, maybe a seizure.
[45:49] They noticed fluid on the tile floor and, somewhat bizarrely,
[45:53] sent janitors to clean it up before any detectives arrived.
[45:57] While they waited for medical help, they had the shelving
[46:00] straightened and the books restacked, further destroying
[46:03] evidence from the scene. They did all of this before
[46:07] anyone contacted police. By the time Betsy was rushed to
[46:11] the campus hospital, the crime scene had been effectively
[46:15] destroyed. The investigation that followed
[46:19] was massive in scale and almost immediately hamstrung.
[46:23] The Pennsylvania State Police assigned roughly 35 troopers to
[46:27] the case. They set up a temporary command
[46:30] center on the campus and began interviewing hundreds of
[46:33] students and faculty, but the fundamentals were gone.
[46:38] The crime scene had been contaminated before law
[46:40] enforcement even knew a crime had occurred.
[46:44] No weapon was ever recovered, and the physical evidence was
[46:47] nearly non existent given that a janitor had cleaned up the
[46:51] scene. They detected male biological
[46:54] traces in the area using black lights, but given the stacks
[46:58] dubious reputation, those traces could have come from anyone at
[47:02] any time. Composite sketches were drawn
[47:05] from witness descriptions, but only one was released to the
[47:09] public. Ultimately, though, the case
[47:12] would go cold without any suspects being named.
[47:15] Patty Library kept its doors open, and the spot where Betsy
[47:19] lost her life became just another aisle in a building most
[47:23] students walked through without a second thought.
[47:27] In the late 2000s, two independent investigators
[47:31] converged on the same name, Richard Charles Hafner.
[47:35] Hafner was a geology graduate student at Penn State in 1969.
[47:40] He'd earned his master's degree there that same year and would
[47:43] go on to complete his PhD by 1972.
[47:47] He was tall, handsome, well dressed, and by all accounts,
[47:52] extremely volatile. He had a hair trigger temper,
[47:56] particularly where women were concerned, and reportedly
[48:00] carried a custom made knife. His connection to Betsy was
[48:03] personal, as he'd briefly pursued a romantic relationship
[48:07] with her that fall, but she'd rebuffed him in favor of her
[48:11] boyfriend, David Wright. Betsy's roommate, Sharon Brandt,
[48:16] told police shortly after the slaying that Hafner had visited
[48:20] their dorm room more than once in the weeks before the attack.
[48:24] She strongly suggested he be interviewed in relation to the
[48:27] crime, believing that his behavior was highly unusual
[48:31] during this period. What happened with that
[48:34] interview, if it even happened at all, remains unclear in the
[48:39] public record. But here's the thing.
[48:42] There were significant other warning signs as well, beyond
[48:46] his strange conduct with her roommate on the evening Betsy
[48:50] died. Approximately 45 minutes after
[48:53] she was slain, Hafner showed up at a professor's home in an
[48:57] agitated state. He was out of breath and wanting
[49:00] to know if there was anything in the news about a girl being
[49:03] slain in Patty Library. This is particularly odd because
[49:08] he doesn't seem to have suggested who this person was,
[49:11] despite them being fairly well known to one another.
[49:16] He later appeared at her boyfriend's residence, similarly
[49:20] anxious and seeking information. Now, while none of this is
[49:24] definitive, of course, Hafner's subsequent life didn't do much
[49:28] to inspire confidence in his character.
[49:31] In 1975, he was charged with committing some real sick acts.
[49:35] But the trial held in January 1976 before a Lancaster County
[49:40] jury, ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury.
[49:44] Accusations of predatory behavior followed him for years,
[49:48] and it was noted that the earliest accusations came before
[49:51] the attack on Betsy. He was cited for disorderly
[49:55] conduct in 1981, charged with aggravated assault and resisting
[50:00] arrest in 1994, and convicted of assaulting a woman in a Delaware
[50:04] parking lot in 1998. He passed away from a heart
[50:08] attack in 2002, never having been charged with Betsy's
[50:12] slaying or even named as a person of interest.
[50:17] The most damning piece of information came to light after
[50:20] Hafner's death. In 2009, a researcher who was
[50:25] working on the case was contacted by Hafner's nephew.
[50:30] The nephew disclosed that around 1975, he'd overheard A heated
[50:35] argument between Hafner and his grandmother, Hafner's mom.
[50:39] The argument reportedly escalated until the mother made
[50:42] a statement to the effect that he'd taken that girl's life and
[50:46] now he was destroying hers. If this is true, at the very
[50:50] least it suggests that Hafner's mother believed that he had
[50:53] committed the crime, whether he actually did it or not.
[50:58] And that's the thing. Hafner was definitely an
[51:00] absolutely sick individual and a predator, and she knew he knew
[51:04] Betsy. She may have simply believed
[51:07] that he was capable of the crime and come to believe that he
[51:10] definitely did it. In the summer or early fall of
[51:15] 1976, David Wright, Betsy's boyfriend, went to Penn State's
[51:20] Dean, a man named Charles Hosler, and told him about
[51:24] Hafner. Why he specifically did this so
[51:27] many years after the crime remains a mystery, and some have
[51:31] speculated it may have been because of the trial, which
[51:34] occurred the same year. He shared his suspicion that
[51:38] Hafner was responsible for Betsy's death, and Hosler passed
[51:42] the information along to the university's general counsel,
[51:45] their chief in house lawyer, so to speak.
[51:49] What happened at that point is unclear, though some have
[51:52] alleged that the university buried it in an effort to avoid
[51:56] dredging up negative press around the case.
[51:59] It probably won't shock you, though, that this has never been
[52:02] confirmed and remains simply that, an unproven allegation.
[52:08] Personally, I suspect that they simply turned over what Wright
[52:12] said to the police. There are, of course, a number
[52:17] of other theories outside of the Hafner hypothesis.
[52:21] Some investigators over the years also looked into a
[52:23] possible connection to Ted Bundy, who'd attended Temple
[52:27] University around the same period, but the link never held
[52:30] up under scrutiny. A psychologist who'd examined
[52:34] Bundy for his defense team in the mid 1980s dismissed the
[52:39] theory entirely, noting that the method didn't match Bundy's
[52:43] established patterns. The investigation into that
[52:46] angle was ultimately inconclusive and is generally
[52:50] considered to be highly unlikely.
[52:52] It's also notable that the description of the attacker
[52:55] simply doesn't look like Bundy at all, unless we are to assume
[52:59] he was wearing a blonde wig for the crime.
[53:02] All that said, as I was recording this video, it turns
[53:06] out that Bundy has now been definitively linked to another
[53:09] victim in 1974, so his list of crimes continues to grow.
[53:14] Another theory suggested Betsy may have stumbled upon an
[53:17] illicit encounter in the stacks and been silenced, but this too
[53:22] remained unsubstantiated. One thing I wasn't able to find
[53:28] out in my research is if the male biological samples found in
[53:31] the stacks were preserved for genetic testing.
[53:35] If they were, and that's a big if, this could potentially prove
[53:40] the Hafner theory, even though he would no longer be available
[53:44] for direct genetic testing. Genetic genealogy techniques
[53:48] could potentially be useful. However, in 1969, forensic
[53:53] genetic testing, even in its absolute most basic form, was
[53:58] still decades away, so I truly doubt samples were preserved.
[54:03] Of course, another significant weakness of this approach is
[54:06] that the genetic material may not have been related to the
[54:09] crime whatsoever. These remote library stacks were
[54:13] used as a lover's lane of sorts, so a lack of a connection
[54:17] wouldn't be definitive. Strictly speaking, due to the
[54:20] reputation of the stacks, even a positive connection to Hafner
[54:24] wouldn't actually prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, but
[54:28] it would likely provide closure. A father of three texts his wife
[54:35] that he's on his way home. Then he stops for gas and pulls
[54:39] cash out from a bank machine. And then he's gone.
[54:43] Not figuratively, not temporarily, but in the full and
[54:47] devastating sense of the word. Dino Valdez stepped into the
[54:52] ether on September 18th, 2025, somewhere in Santa Fe, NM, and
[54:59] no one has been able to figure out what happened to him.
[55:03] What makes this mystery so difficult to sit with isn't just
[55:06] the absence of answers, it's the collision between 2 completely
[55:10] different stories about who Dino Valdez was and what happened to
[55:15] him. One account is told by people
[55:18] who knew him well, and another has been told by individuals
[55:22] whose credibility remains very much in question.
[55:27] Valdez was 36, a Marine veteran who'd served multiple tours in
[55:32] Afghanistan and a journeyman lineman for American power.
[55:37] He'd married his high school sweetheart, Victoria, and the
[55:40] two had been together 15 years, a period of time during which
[55:44] their family had continued to grow.
[55:47] The family lived in Coyote, a small community in northern New
[55:51] Mexico's Rio Arriba County, on a property shared with Dino's
[55:55] father. Dino had grown up there, and his
[55:57] roots ran deep in that soil. In September 2025, he'd been
[56:02] working a contract job in Silver City, about 300 miles South of
[56:06] home. The arrangement was typical for
[56:09] lineman work. Stay near the job during the
[56:12] week, drive home on the weekends.
[56:15] It was a long haul, but it was steady and the pay was good.
[56:19] And Dina was the kind of man who kept to a routine.
[56:22] He showed up, he called home, and he always came back.
[56:26] And that consistency is exactly why his disappearance hit so
[56:30] hard. Dino left Silver City around
[56:34] noon on September 18th. At roughly 2:30 in the
[56:38] afternoon, he texted Victoria to let her know he was heading
[56:42] north. About an hour after that, he
[56:45] spoke with a cousin by phone. Nothing in either communication
[56:50] raised any alarm. Then, around 5:30 that evening,
[56:54] his credit card registered a gas purchase at an Allsups
[56:57] convenience store on Cirillos Road in Santa Fe, followed by a
[57:02] cash withdrawal. Those two transactions are the
[57:05] last verified actions Dino Valdez is known to have taken on
[57:09] his own. And you may notice my unusual
[57:12] phrasing there. And trust me, that's
[57:15] intentional. So keep it in mind.
[57:18] After 5:30 PM on September 18th, there's nothing.
[57:22] No further word of any kind from the man himself.
[57:26] Victoria reported him missing to New Mexico State Police on
[57:29] September 21st. The three day gap between his
[57:33] last text and the missing person report isn't unusual when you
[57:37] factor in spotty rural cell coverage and an unpredictable
[57:41] work schedule. However, it meant that by the
[57:44] time investigators started retracing his steps, the trail
[57:48] was already rapidly cooling. On September 19th, the day after
[57:53] Dino was last confirmed alive, four separate 911 calls came in
[57:58] from the Harrison Rd. area in Santa Fe.
[58:01] Callers described a violent disturbance involving a white
[58:04] pickup truck with someone inside who was screaming loudly as if
[58:08] in complete terror. One caller reported that several
[58:12] individuals arrived in a dark colored vehicle, broke the
[58:16] trucks rear passenger window and entered it.
[58:19] Both vehicles then took off toward Aguafrea St. leaving
[58:23] behind a man in a white shirt and shorts who appeared to be
[58:26] severely impaired. A license plate number provided
[58:30] by one of the callers matched Dino's 2015 Chevy Silverado.
[58:36] Santa Fe Police were dispatched around 2:45, but the responding
[58:40] officers were redirected to a higher priority robbery call.
[58:44] By the time someone actually arrived at the Harrison Rd.
[58:47] scene well after the first call, there was nothing to find.
[58:52] The truck was gone, and there was absolutely no trace of
[58:55] evidence to suggest anything had occurred at that scene.
[58:59] Whatever had happened there had played out entirely without law
[59:03] enforcement present. That delayed response became one
[59:07] of the most heavily scrutinized elements of the investigation. 4
[59:12] independent callers a plate match to a missing man's
[59:15] vehicle, and nobody from law enforcement actually witnessed
[59:19] any of it. In the days following the
[59:22] disappearance, Dino's credit card didn't go dormant.
[59:26] On the morning of September 19th, a large gas purchase was
[59:30] made, far too much to fill a single truck, the kind of amount
[59:35] that suggested multiple vehicles were being fueled.
[59:38] Over the next two days, additional charges appeared at a
[59:41] car wash and a retail store, along with three more attempted
[59:45] transactions. Victoria caught the activity,
[59:49] recognized it didn't match Dino's habits, and immediately
[59:53] cancelled the card. However, at that time, she
[59:56] believed that he likely had just lost his wallet and she didn't
[59:59] jump to the worst case scenario and report him missing.
[1:00:04] Then came October 13th when a State Police officer on patrol
[1:00:08] near Harrison Rd. stopped a man on a bicycle for running a stop
[1:00:12] sign. The man had outstanding warrants
[1:00:15] and when he was arrested, officers found Dino Valdez's
[1:00:19] driver's license in his possession.
[1:00:21] When the man was questioned, he claimed that he had quote UN
[1:00:25] quote found it, but had no further knowledge about who the
[1:00:28] man was. And I'm going to interject in
[1:00:31] the narrative here since I've seen some talk online about how
[1:00:35] this individual was likely involved.
[1:00:38] I suspect that likely wasn't the case, since I doubt any criminal
[1:00:42] who had been involved in the disappearance would have held on
[1:00:45] to such an obvious piece of evidence.
[1:00:48] The idea that the driver's license was found by an addict
[1:00:52] who may have been contemplating using it for other nefarious
[1:00:55] purposes does strike me as fairly likely.
[1:00:59] That would also explain why the man wasn't overly helpful when
[1:01:02] questioned, since obviously he was planning on doing something
[1:01:06] questionable with the license. Regardless, on October 28th,
[1:01:11] state police interviewed a homeless person who offered a
[1:01:14] disturbing account of what happened.
[1:01:16] A woman had allegedly given Dino fent in place of coke.
[1:01:20] This was allegedly due to what I'll euphemistically call a mix
[1:01:24] up regarding payments for services rendered.
[1:01:27] The implication was that Valdez had died of an overdose on or
[1:01:31] around September 19th. Shortly after, police
[1:01:35] interviewed the woman in question, who reportedly marked
[1:01:38] a location on a phone where Valdez's body had supposedly
[1:01:42] been taken somewhere in the mountains near Pecos.
[1:01:47] Nobody has ever been recovered from that location or anywhere
[1:01:50] else, and detectives noted that both of these people had very
[1:01:54] significant credibility issues. When the Santa Fe New Mexican
[1:01:59] newspaper published details from police reports in December 2025,
[1:02:04] they sparked A firestorm. The framing of the story around
[1:02:08] the allegation that Valdez had solicited illicit goods and
[1:02:11] services wasn't well received at all.
[1:02:15] People who knew Dino rejected the characterization outright,
[1:02:19] saying that he wasn't into that sort of thing.
[1:02:23] The Valdez family acknowledged publicly that they believe Dino
[1:02:26] is no longer alive, but they firmly rejected the version of
[1:02:30] events emerging from police reports.
[1:02:33] The Valdez family hired a private investigator who has
[1:02:37] stated that foul play was unquestionably involved.
[1:02:41] According to their theory, Dino was targeted by strangers for
[1:02:44] material gain. The stolen truck, the
[1:02:47] unauthorized card usage, and the possession of his identification
[1:02:51] by a stranger all point, in their view, towards something
[1:02:55] far more deliberate. And while I don't necessarily
[1:02:58] agree on that last point, the first two points do seem to
[1:03:02] suggest a financial motive for the disappearance in a way the
[1:03:06] accidental overdose narrative doesn't.
[1:03:10] As of early 2026, a New Mexico State Police spokesperson
[1:03:14] confirmed that the case remains classified as a missing person's
[1:03:17] investigation, not a criminal one.
[1:03:20] Valdez hasn't been located and his white Silverado hasn't been
[1:03:24] recovered. No arrests have been made and no
[1:03:27] charges have been filed against the woman identified in police
[1:03:30] interviews or the man found with Dino's license.
[1:03:35] On the morning of June 1st, 19 O 2, William Harscent walked into
[1:03:40] the kitchen of Providence House in Peasant Hall, Suffolk.
[1:03:44] He found his daughter Rose lying at the bottom of the servant's
[1:03:47] staircase, clearly deceased from apparent stab wounds.
[1:03:52] Her nightgown was scorched, the lower half of her body was
[1:03:56] charred by fire, and a smashed oil lamp lay nearby alongside a
[1:04:01] bottle reeking of paraffin. She was 22 years old and, as the
[1:04:06] post mortem would soon reveal, 6 months pregnant, a fact that
[1:04:11] wasn't publicly known. Peasant Hall was a quiet
[1:04:15] agricultural village in Suffolk, England, and its rhythms were
[1:04:18] dictated by harvests, Chapel services, and local gossip.
[1:04:24] But gossip had been churning around Rose Harson for over a
[1:04:27] year before her death, and the man at the center of it was
[1:04:31] about to become the prime suspect in one of the most
[1:04:35] confounding cases in English legal history.
[1:04:40] Rose Harsant had been employed as a live in domestic servant by
[1:04:44] William and Georgiana Crisp at Providence House.
[1:04:48] She was also a member of the local Primitive Methodist Choir,
[1:04:52] and it was there that she'd crossed paths with William
[1:04:54] Gardner, the chapel's choir master and a Sunday School
[1:04:58] supervisor. Gardner was 35, married to a
[1:05:03] woman named Georgina and the father of six children.
[1:05:08] He worked as a foreman at a local factory and was a man of
[1:05:12] real standing in a community where standing meant something.
[1:05:16] In May of 19 O1, roughly a year before Rose's death, 2 Peasant
[1:05:21] Hall residents named Alfonso Skinner and George Wright
[1:05:25] claimed they'd witnessed something compromising.
[1:05:29] They said they saw Rose enter the Doctor's Chapel, a Wesleyan
[1:05:33] Methodist building she'd been tasked with cleaning, and then
[1:05:36] watched as Gardner slipped in after her.
[1:05:40] According to their account, they overheard conversation between
[1:05:44] the two that referenced a very spicy chapter of the Book of
[1:05:47] Genesis. The rumor tore through the
[1:05:49] village, and Gardner denied everything and demanded an
[1:05:52] apology, which Skinner and Wright refused.
[1:05:56] A church inquiry convened under Reverend John Guy found nothing
[1:06:00] conclusive to indicate any wrongdoing aside from the
[1:06:04] testimony of these two town gossips.
[1:06:07] Guy dismissed the matter as trumped up, and the congregation
[1:06:11] rejected Gardner's offer to resign.
[1:06:14] On paper, the scandal was over, but in practice it had only
[1:06:18] burrowed deeper, dividing this community.
[1:06:21] Many people believe that the highly specific testimony of
[1:06:24] Skinner and Wright had been disregarded due to Gardner's
[1:06:28] social standing, a recipe for trouble.
[1:06:31] But let's get back to what happened to Rose in the
[1:06:33] subsequent investigation itself. When police arrived at
[1:06:38] Providence House, they found a crime scene dense with evidence
[1:06:42] but frustratingly short uncertainty.
[1:06:45] Rose's body showed defensive wounds on her hands and bruising
[1:06:49] on her face, making clear she'd fought her attacker.
[1:06:53] The kitchen smelled strongly of paraffin and beyond the broken
[1:06:57] lamp and the charring on her body, officers recovered a
[1:07:00] prescription bottle traced to the Gardener household.
[1:07:04] There was also a letter unsigned.
[1:07:07] It was addressed to R and instructed her to place a light
[1:07:11] in her window at 10:00 for about 10 minutes before extinguishing
[1:07:14] it. It also said that the writer
[1:07:17] would come around to the back at midnight if the candle signal
[1:07:20] had been raised. Someone had arranged A
[1:07:22] clandestine meeting with Rose on the night she was slain, and the
[1:07:26] question was whether the handwriting belonged to Gardner.
[1:07:31] Investigators also found a copy of the East Anglian Daily Times
[1:07:35] near the body. Rose's employers, the Crisps,
[1:07:39] didn't subscribe to this newspaper, but William Gardner
[1:07:43] did. A clasp knife belonging to
[1:07:46] Gardner was examined and found to have trace remnants of a
[1:07:49] suspicious red fluid inside its hinge.
[1:07:52] Neighbors reported seeing Gardner on his porch at around
[1:07:55] 10:00 on the night of the crime, near the time when the candle
[1:07:59] signal was supposed to be sent out.
[1:08:02] The day after Rose's body was discovered, witnesses claimed
[1:08:06] they'd seen a bonfire burning on Gardner's property.
[1:08:10] On June 3rd, 19 O2, William Gardner was arrested and most
[1:08:15] people thought the matter had been wrapped up in a nice neat
[1:08:18] little package. But then came the trials.
[1:08:23] The first trial opened at the Ipswich of sizes on November
[1:08:26] 7th, 19 O2. The prosecutor was Henry
[1:08:30] Fielding Dickens, son of the novelist Charles Dickens, with
[1:08:35] the defense led by Ernest Wilde before Judge Sir William
[1:08:38] Grantham. And yes, if you're wondering why
[1:08:40] I gave all their names, it was indeed because I wanted to name
[1:08:44] drop Charles Dickens's son in this segment.
[1:08:48] As a quick aside, it was while researching the much more famous
[1:08:51] Charles Dickens that I ended up stumbling upon this case, but I
[1:08:55] digress. The prosecution's case was
[1:08:58] entirely circumstantial, since there was no eyewitness, no
[1:09:03] confession, and no forensic technology capable of linking
[1:09:07] Gardner to the scene. What they had was a web of
[1:09:10] suggestive details, the medicine bottle, the newspaper, the
[1:09:15] letter, the knife, the bonfire, the scandal, and the pregnancy.
[1:09:22] The defense hit back hard. Georgina Gardner testified that
[1:09:26] her husband had been in bed with her the entire night.
[1:09:29] A neighbor corroborated this, claiming she'd been awake late
[1:09:33] into the night and hadn't seen him leave the house during that
[1:09:36] period. Georgina also explained away the
[1:09:40] medicine bottle, saying she'd given it to Rose when she was
[1:09:43] unwell. The mysterious red fluid on the
[1:09:47] knife's hinge simply came from skinning a rabbit, and it was
[1:09:51] cleaned off because that's just good hygiene.
[1:09:55] The so-called bonfire was simply for boiling water, a common
[1:09:59] practice in that area at that time.
[1:10:02] But the defense's most aggressive tactic was an all out
[1:10:05] assault on Rose's character. They revealed that love letters
[1:10:09] and suggestive poems from various men had been found in
[1:10:12] her room. The argument was blunt.
[1:10:16] Rose had been involved with multiple men, any of whom could
[1:10:19] have been the father and by extension, her attacker.
[1:10:24] The prosecution couldn't definitively prove Gardner was
[1:10:27] the father, and this ambiguity cut deep into their case.
[1:10:32] After three days of testimony, the jury was sent away to come
[1:10:36] to their decision. They came back deadlocked, and
[1:10:40] 11 of 12 jurors voted to convict.
[1:10:43] But a single holdout, a man named Evan Edwards, refused to
[1:10:47] agree. The result was a mistrial.
[1:10:52] The second trial began on January 20th, 19 O3 this time
[1:10:56] before a separate judge. The evidence and arguments were
[1:11:00] largely the same, but the outcome flipped almost
[1:11:03] perfectly, raising disturbing questions about jury systems
[1:11:07] generally. This time, 11 jurors voted to
[1:11:10] acquit, with only one holding out for conviction.
[1:11:14] Faced with the near certainty that a third trial would produce
[1:11:17] the same result, the prosecution declined to proceed further.
[1:11:22] The attorney general issued a writ of null, A prosequi,
[1:11:26] meaning that they were not going to attempt a further conviction,
[1:11:29] effectively ending the case. William Gardner walked free.
[1:11:34] Though he was never formally acquitted, and under English law
[1:11:38] at the time, he existed in a kind of legal limbo.
[1:11:42] Neither convicted nor cleared, Gardner and his family left
[1:11:48] Peasant Hall and relocated to London, where he lived quietly
[1:11:52] until his passing in 1941, having never spoken publicly
[1:11:56] about the case. The village, for its part,
[1:11:59] slowly moved on, though the brutal slaying left a mark that
[1:12:03] endured for generations. Over the years, several
[1:12:08] alternative theories have emerged.
[1:12:11] Some researchers have pointed to Frederick Davis, one of the men
[1:12:14] whose letters were found in Rose's room, as a potential
[1:12:17] suspect. Others have proposed a rather
[1:12:21] bizarre theory where they believe she accidentally fell,
[1:12:25] struck her head, and then someone simply decided to finish
[1:12:29] her off. I'm not quite sure I understand
[1:12:32] that theory, but some people seem to take it seriously,
[1:12:36] though as far as I can tell it is highly speculative at best
[1:12:39] and complete fiction at worst. Perhaps the most compelling
[1:12:44] alternative theory points to Georgina Gardner herself.
[1:12:49] The argument runs like this. Georgina knew about the affair,
[1:12:53] knew about the pregnancy, and had every motive to confront the
[1:12:57] woman threatening to destroy her family.
[1:13:01] If Georgina was the one who went to Providence House that night,
[1:13:04] it would explain why William's alibi centered so firmly on his
[1:13:08] wife's testimony. Georgina was in essence, never
[1:13:12] looked at as a suspect because going on the logic of the time,
[1:13:16] women didn't commit such personal up close acts of
[1:13:19] violence. In hindsight, if true, it would
[1:13:23] explain the ferocity of the attack, which bore the hallmarks
[1:13:27] of personal rage rather than cold calculation.
[1:13:31] Personally, I think this idea makes a lot of sense since
[1:13:34] Georgina could have planned the crime to make it appear like her
[1:13:37] husband did it. Afterwards, she could have fully
[1:13:41] confessed what she had done to her husband while also letting
[1:13:45] him know that she would be his alibi.
[1:13:48] If true, Georgina may have leveraged the virtually non
[1:13:52] existent forensic technology of the time to commit the virtually
[1:13:55] perfect crime and quote UN quote when her husband back in the
[1:14:00] process. It's extremely dark, but
[1:14:03] honestly it's why I find this unsolved mystery so extremely
[1:14:08] compelling. Whether or not Georgina was
[1:14:13] responsible, no one was ever held accountable for what
[1:14:16] happened to Rose Harsant. She was a young woman caught
[1:14:19] between the rigid morality of Edwardian village life and the
[1:14:23] private desires that ran beneath it.
[1:14:26] The scandal that preceded her death had already reduced her to
[1:14:30] an object of gossip. The trials that followed reduced
[1:14:34] her further, turning her personal life into a courtroom
[1:14:37] weapon deployed against her own memory.
[1:14:40] In the end, despite the horrors of the crime that was committed,
[1:14:45] the legal system ultimately just gave up.
[1:14:52] In 1929, a single photograph made its way into newspapers and
[1:14:56] scientific journals across the world, and it appeared to show
[1:15:00] something impossible. It was an ape sitting upright on
[1:15:05] a wooden crate somewhere in the jungles of South America.
[1:15:10] The problem? Apes don't live in South
[1:15:12] America. They never have.
[1:15:15] The continents primate population consists entirely of
[1:15:18] monkeys, and the distinction between the two is significant.
[1:15:23] If the photograph was genuine, it would have rewritten
[1:15:26] everything scientists thought they knew about primate
[1:15:28] distribution and evolution. It didn't, of course, but the
[1:15:33] story behind how that image came to exist and why anyone believed
[1:15:38] it is far more interesting than the creature itself.
[1:15:43] The man behind the photograph was Francois Deloise, a Swiss
[1:15:46] geologist born in 1892 who'd been sent to South America on an
[1:15:51] oil prospecting expedition. And before you leave a comment
[1:15:55] about the pronunciation, I've always heard this creature
[1:15:58] called the Deloise Ape using the English style pronunciation, so
[1:16:03] I'm going to stick with that throughout.
[1:16:06] Between 1917 and 1920, Deloise and his team surveyed the dense,
[1:16:11] unforgiving jungle along the Venezuela, Colombia border.
[1:16:16] It wasn't glamorous work and the region was brutally hostile,
[1:16:19] thick with tropical disease and dangerous wildlife.
[1:16:23] The model own indigenous people who viewed the surveyors as
[1:16:27] unwelcome intruders also presented a significant threat.
[1:16:31] They attacked the expedition repeatedly, and Deloise himself
[1:16:35] reportedly took an arrow to the knee during one skirmish.
[1:16:40] Well, actually, it seems more likely he took the arrow to the
[1:16:43] thigh, but let's not let that get in the way of dredging up a
[1:16:47] good Skyrim meme. But I digress.
[1:16:51] Of the 20 men who set out on the expedition, allegedly only four
[1:16:55] of them made it home alive. It was during this harrowing
[1:16:59] period that Deloise claimed his extraordinary encounter took
[1:17:02] place. According to his account, while
[1:17:05] the group was camped near the Terra River, two large primates
[1:17:09] emerged from the undergrowth. They walked upright, broke
[1:17:13] branches from nearby trees and waved them aggressively like
[1:17:17] weapons. They hurled their own excrement
[1:17:20] at the men and Deloitte's team opened fire, cutting down the
[1:17:24] female while the male fled into the jungle.
[1:17:27] The men then propped the body of the deceased creature on a
[1:17:30] wooden crate and took a photograph.
[1:17:33] And while I've had to crop this famous picture due to censorship
[1:17:36] issues, many people assume the so-called ape was male, but it
[1:17:41] was in fact female. Deloise said the animal stood
[1:17:45] roughly 4 feet 5 inches tall, had no tail and possessed 32
[1:17:50] teeth, the same number found in humans and apes, not monkeys.
[1:17:56] For nearly a decade, the photograph sat quietly in
[1:17:59] Deloise's personal travel notebook.
[1:18:02] It wasn't until 1929 that it found its champion in George
[1:18:06] Montandon, a French Swiss anthropologist who reportedly
[1:18:11] stumbled across the image while leafing through records.
[1:18:14] Montandon was electrified, and he declared the creature an
[1:18:17] entirely new, previously unknown species and gave it a scientific
[1:18:23] name. He presented his findings to the
[1:18:26] French Academy of Sciences, his paper was published, and the
[1:18:30] photograph was splashed across the newspapers of the world.
[1:18:34] But Montandon's enthusiasm wasn't purely scientific.
[1:18:37] Since his entire career was staked upon the fact that apes
[1:18:41] once lived in the Americas. Not everyone was convinced, and
[1:18:46] in fact, most scientists weren't buying it.
[1:18:49] Right from the beginning, scientists who examined the
[1:18:52] photograph pointed out a number of glaring problems.
[1:18:56] The creature's face bore A striking resemblance to that of
[1:18:59] a common spider monkey, a species found throughout the
[1:19:02] forests of Central and South America.
[1:19:05] Spider monkeys have prehensile tails, and the absence of one in
[1:19:09] the photograph raised immediate red flags.
[1:19:13] It looked less like the animal was naturally tailless and more
[1:19:17] like the tail had been deliberately removed or hidden.
[1:19:21] Critics also noted that certain anatomical features visible in
[1:19:24] the image were consistent with the anatomy of female spider
[1:19:28] monkeys. The claimed tooth count of 32
[1:19:31] was impossible to verify from a photograph, and Deloitte never
[1:19:35] preserved the skull, the skeleton or any other physical
[1:19:39] evidence. He claimed that the body had
[1:19:42] been lugged along for part of the journey but was ultimately
[1:19:45] lost in the jungle. There was also the matter of
[1:19:48] scale. Deloise insisted the creature
[1:19:51] was over 4 feet tall, but the only reference point in the
[1:19:55] photograph was the wooden crate it sat on.
[1:19:58] No one could independently verify the crates dimensions,
[1:20:02] and without a reliable sense of scale, the animal in the
[1:20:06] photograph could have been any size.
[1:20:09] However, supporters of the idea that this was a real ape noted
[1:20:13] that Deloise hadn't tried to publicize the claim at all.
[1:20:17] The photograph simply sat waiting to be discovered by an
[1:20:20] eager scientist who wanted to prove his own extremely
[1:20:24] questionable theories. The definitive blow came decades
[1:20:29] later in 1962, when a Venezuelan physician named Enrique Tejera
[1:20:35] published a letter in the newspaper El Universal, and it's
[1:20:40] probably important to note here that he was a fairly significant
[1:20:43] scientist who had also served in various high postings in the
[1:20:47] Venezuelan government. Tahara had been a friend of
[1:20:51] Deloise and had once actually claimed to have seen a living
[1:20:55] South American ape himself. But in this letter he reversed
[1:20:59] course entirely and he described Deloise as a prankster and laid
[1:21:04] out what he said really happened.
[1:21:06] According to Tahara, Deloise had acquired a pet spider monkey
[1:21:10] during the expedition. The unfortunate monkey had
[1:21:14] become diseased and makeshift emergency surgery was performed
[1:21:18] to remove the tail, saving the animal's life.
[1:21:21] For a time, Deloise kept the monkey as a companion, walking
[1:21:26] alongside it until it eventually perished, at which point he
[1:21:30] propped it up on the crate and snapped the famous photograph.
[1:21:33] As a joke, Tahara also pointed out something hiding in plain
[1:21:38] sight within the image itself, a banana plant growing in the
[1:21:42] background. Banana plants are cultivated by
[1:21:46] humans and generally don't grow wild in deep jungle, which meant
[1:21:50] the photograph likely couldn't have been taken at a remote
[1:21:53] wilderness campsite. The photograph almost certainly
[1:21:57] had to have been taken near an area of human settlement.
[1:22:01] Deloise never lived to see his prank fully unravelled.
[1:22:05] He died in 1935, just six years after the photographs
[1:22:09] publication, at the age of 43. Montandon's fate was grimmer
[1:22:14] still since he ended up aligning himself with Vichy France.
[1:22:19] He was ultimately eliminated by the French Resistance in 1944
[1:22:23] for his collaboration as politics.
[1:22:26] Today, the scientific consensus is unambiguous.
[1:22:30] The creature in the photograph was almost certainly a white
[1:22:33] bellied spider monkey, and the identification as a new species
[1:22:37] was a fraud. Bizarrely though, when I was
[1:22:40] growing up, I recall watching numerous documentaries on The
[1:22:44] History Channel that covered this quote UN quote ape.
[1:22:49] Unfortunately, none of those supposedly historical shows
[1:22:53] presented the true facts of the creature, instead presenting it
[1:22:57] as a potential ape in the Americas.
[1:23:00] Anyway, I virtually never asked this anymore, but if you
[1:23:03] remember this as well, please leave a comment because I need
[1:23:06] to know that I wasn't the only one.
[1:23:12] At 3:30 in the morning on December 11th, 1995,
[1:23:16] firefighters forced their way into a Georgetown row house and
[1:23:20] found something that didn't make sense.
[1:23:23] The fire was small, barely $15,000 in damage, confined
[1:23:27] almost entirely to a bed in an upstairs bedroom.
[1:23:31] But lying on that bed, barely breathing, was a 38 year old
[1:23:36] woman with third degree burns over more than 80% of her body.
[1:23:41] The kind of injuries, 1 paramedic later noted that you'd
[1:23:45] normally only see when an entire building burns to the ground.
[1:23:50] Her name was Lynn Amos, and she'd been set on fire while she
[1:23:53] slept. She would survive 10 agonizing
[1:23:56] days before dying in the hospital, and to this day,
[1:24:00] nobody has ever been charged for this unthinkable crime.
[1:24:05] Lynn was, by every account, a brilliant and ambitious woman.
[1:24:09] Born and raised in Alabama, she earned her undergraduate degree
[1:24:13] from the University of Alabama before completing her MBA at the
[1:24:17] University of Texas. Her career in finance took her
[1:24:21] first to New York City, where she negotiated leveraged buyouts
[1:24:26] and later worked for the prestigious management
[1:24:28] consulting firm Booz Allen. She was single, well liked, and
[1:24:33] had a wide circle of friends who described her as gregarious and
[1:24:37] sharp. In August of 1995, just four
[1:24:41] months before her death, she made a major career move.
[1:24:46] She relocated to Washington, DC to join a consulting firm called
[1:24:49] Barron's Group, a subsidiary of KPMGA global accounting firm.
[1:24:56] Her new role was specific in high stakes.
[1:24:59] She was being sent to Mexico to evaluate the lending practices
[1:25:03] of several large banks. One of these institutions was
[1:25:07] tied to the Mexican equivalent of the Federal Reserve.
[1:25:11] It was the kind of work that could make a career.
[1:25:14] Instead, it may have ended her life.
[1:25:19] In the weeks leading up to the fire, Lynn's behavior began to
[1:25:22] shift in ways that alarmed the people closest to her.
[1:25:26] She'd always been open and social, but she started pulling
[1:25:29] back from conversations about her work.
[1:25:32] About a month before the fire, she had lunch with a friend
[1:25:35] named Emily Smith, who worked in a related field.
[1:25:40] During that meal, Lynn confided that she'd uncovered deeply
[1:25:44] problematic lending practices during her investigation.
[1:25:48] She said her eventual report was going to be ugly.
[1:25:51] She wouldn't elaborate further, and she declined to share
[1:25:54] specifics. But the implication was clear.
[1:25:58] She'd found something serious enough that it troubled her to
[1:26:01] talk about it openly. Around the same time, colleagues
[1:26:06] reported that Lynn had begun receiving a string of mysterious
[1:26:09] hang up phone calls at home. She told Co workers she believed
[1:26:14] the calls were connected to her work in Mexico.
[1:26:17] Then on December 10th, the day before the fire, Lynn attended a
[1:26:22] brunch with a group of friends. During the gathering, she let
[1:26:26] slip that she'd encountered some dangerous things during her
[1:26:29] investigation, but again, she wouldn't go into detail.
[1:26:35] That evening, between 10:00 and 10:30, she spoke to a friend on
[1:26:39] the phone. She sounded clear, lucid, and in
[1:26:42] good spirits. She also called her office to
[1:26:46] say she had a doctor's appointment the next morning and
[1:26:48] would be late for work. After that, nobody heard from
[1:26:52] her again until firefighters broke down her door roughly 5
[1:26:57] hours later. When first responders pulled
[1:27:01] Lynn from the bed, someone asked her if she knew what had
[1:27:05] happened, and a barely conscious Lynn shook her head.
[1:27:09] She lingered for 10 days, barely conscious and unable to speak,
[1:27:13] before dying on December 21st, 1995.
[1:27:18] The initial assessment by fire investigators pointed toward a
[1:27:21] tragic accident. They found a single cigarette
[1:27:25] butt among the bedding that had been swept onto a deck by
[1:27:28] firefighters, and Lynn's blood alcohol level registered three
[1:27:32] times the legal limit. The early conclusion was grim
[1:27:36] but straightforward. A woman had gotten wasted,
[1:27:40] fallen asleep with a lit cigarette, and paid the ultimate
[1:27:44] price for an innocent mistake. But Lynn's friends and family
[1:27:49] immediately pushed back, and they insisted she wasn't a
[1:27:52] smoker. She wasn't even someone who
[1:27:54] occasionally lit up while under high stress situations.
[1:27:58] She simply never smoked, ever. Interestingly, no ashtrays,
[1:28:03] lighters, matches or cigarette packs were found anywhere else
[1:28:07] in her home. The cigarette appeared to have
[1:28:10] been planted. And then, more than a week after
[1:28:14] the fire, an insurance company investigator submitted a
[1:28:17] devastating report to cops. After examining the bedroom, the
[1:28:23] investigator found accelerants on the mattress, the pillow, and
[1:28:27] the floor. The fire hadn't been started by
[1:28:30] a cigarette at all. Rather, it had been deliberately
[1:28:33] set using a combination of gasoline, kerosene, turpentine,
[1:28:38] and paint thinner. Doctors who had treated Lynn
[1:28:41] confirmed that her burn patterns weren't consistent with an
[1:28:44] accidental fire. On January 25th, 1996, the
[1:28:50] medical examiner officially ruled her death a slaying over,
[1:28:53] ruling the preliminary finding that it was an accident.
[1:28:59] By the time the case was reclassified, critical damage
[1:29:02] had already been done. Because investigators initially
[1:29:06] treated the fire as an accident, the crime scene was never
[1:29:09] properly secured. Within hours of the blaze, a
[1:29:14] contractor arrived to board up the windows and padlock the
[1:29:17] front door. By that same afternoon, the
[1:29:21] building's owner, a Georgetown University professor, his fiance
[1:29:26] and insurance representatives had all walked through the home.
[1:29:30] The medical examiner later stated publicly that only police
[1:29:34] investigators should have been allowed inside.
[1:29:38] Whatever trace evidence might have identified A perpetrator
[1:29:41] had likely been trampled, disturbed or destroyed.
[1:29:46] The family's attorney would later say the failure to
[1:29:49] preserve the scene effectively crippled the investigation from
[1:29:52] the start. Despite the setbacks,
[1:29:55] investigators did piece together a likely sequence of events from
[1:30:00] what little evidence they did have.
[1:30:03] There were no signs of forced entry, which meant the
[1:30:05] perpetrator either had a key or was someone Lynn knew well
[1:30:09] enough to let inside. The prevailing theory is that
[1:30:13] sometime after her last phone call, someone entered the
[1:30:16] townhouse, likely under false pretenses rather than any sort
[1:30:20] of force. This individual then forced Lynn
[1:30:24] to consume enough alcohol to incapacitate her and then doused
[1:30:28] her body in bed with accelerants before setting her on fire.
[1:30:32] The cigarette butt was placed deliberately in an attempt to
[1:30:35] stage the scene as an accident. It was, according to the
[1:30:39] family's attorney, an attack that bore every hallmark of a
[1:30:42] professional hit. The most haunting detail in the
[1:30:47] entire case may be this. Lynn Amos's report on the
[1:30:51] Mexican banks was never completed.
[1:30:54] Whatever she'd found, whatever practices she'd deemed ugly,
[1:30:58] whatever dangerous things she'd witnessed, all of it died with
[1:31:02] her. Emily Smith, her friend from the
[1:31:06] financial world, speculated that Lynn had likely stumbled onto
[1:31:09] fraudulent loans or money laundering connected to
[1:31:12] international drug trafficking. It's a theory that's never been
[1:31:16] proven, but it aligns disturbingly well with the
[1:31:19] timeline of threatening phone calls, increasing secrecy, and a
[1:31:24] method designed to make her death look accidental.
[1:31:28] The Baron's group declined through a spokesman to comment
[1:31:31] on Lynn's work, and their chilling silence has persisted
[1:31:34] for three decades. The investigation eventually
[1:31:38] stalled due to the lack of physical evidence and the
[1:31:42] absence of witnesses. No suspects have ever been
[1:31:45] publicly named. The case was featured on
[1:31:48] Unsolved Mysteries in December of 1996, but it produced no
[1:31:53] breakthrough leads. Lynn Amos's mother, Helen Amos,
[1:31:59] has spoken publicly about the toll of not knowing who
[1:32:01] eliminated her daughter or why. She said the family will never
[1:32:06] recover from losing Lynn, but that the absence of answers
[1:32:09] makes the grief immeasurably worse.
[1:32:12] Her brother Doug has been equally blunt, calling the case
[1:32:15] a straightforward professional hit and expressing frustration
[1:32:19] with the initial failures of the investigation.
[1:32:22] Some have also questioned, given the stakes involved, whether the
[1:32:27] initial investigation was botched or whether it went
[1:32:31] perfectly to plan. It's been speculated that the
[1:32:34] politically powerful hands involved in this crime may have
[1:32:38] crossed international boundaries and played a role in the
[1:32:41] investigation as well. More than 30 years have now
[1:32:46] passed since that December night in Georgetown, and the case
[1:32:50] remains exactly where it was in 1996.
[1:32:55] Somewhere, somebody knows what Lynn Amos found in those Mexican
[1:32:58] bank records. And somebody knows why a
[1:33:01] brilliant, ambitious woman was silenced in her own bed while
[1:33:05] the rest of Washington slept. On the afternoon of October
[1:33:12] 19th, 1978, a building employee at the Osborne Apartments on
[1:33:17] West 57th St. in Manhattan heard two gunshots ring out from Ste.
[1:33:21] 1B. Five hours later, police
[1:33:24] discovered the bodies of 64 year old actor Gig Young and his 31
[1:33:28] year old wife Kim Schmidt. Both had been shot in the head.
[1:33:32] Young lay face down on the bedroom floor with a Smith and
[1:33:35] Wesson revolver still in his hand.
[1:33:38] Schmidt was face down beside him.
[1:33:40] There was no note. A diary lay open on a nearby
[1:33:44] surface turned to the entry for September 27th, which read
[1:33:49] simply that they'd gotten married that day.
[1:33:52] It had been just three weeks since the wedding.
[1:33:55] Police also found three additional revolvers and roughly
[1:33:59] 350 rounds of ammunition in the apartment.
[1:34:03] Young's Academy Award for best supporting actor sat nearby.
[1:34:07] The motive for what happened in that room has never been
[1:34:10] determined. It's a strange thing when a man
[1:34:13] wins the highest honor in his profession and then, less than a
[1:34:18] decade later, dies in circumstances so grim that the
[1:34:22] achievement becomes a footnote. But that's the story of Gig
[1:34:27] Young, an actor whose talent was real, whose demons were
[1:34:31] relentless, and whose final act of violence remains one of
[1:34:35] Hollywood's most baffling unsolved mysteries.
[1:34:40] The man who became Gig Young was born Byron Barr on November 4th,
[1:34:45] 1913 in St. Cloud, MN.
[1:34:49] His father, John, worked as a chef, and his mother, Emma,
[1:34:54] struggled with illness throughout much of his
[1:34:56] childhood. The family relocated to the
[1:34:59] nation's capital and later to Waynesville, NC.
[1:35:03] He discovered acting through high school plays and after
[1:35:07] graduating worked as a used car salesman while studying acting
[1:35:11] at night. When a friend offered him a ride
[1:35:14] to Hollywood if he'd split the cost of gas, he took the risk.
[1:35:19] He earned a scholarship to an acting school and eventually
[1:35:22] caught the attention of Warner Brothers, who signed him for bit
[1:35:26] parts. In 1942, he appeared in a film
[1:35:30] called The Gay Sisters as a character named Gig Young.
[1:35:35] The studio liked the name and insisted he adopted permanently,
[1:35:39] partly to avoid confusion with another actor working under the
[1:35:42] same birth name. Notably, this means that Gig
[1:35:45] Young is credited in the film as Gig Young, but he wasn't playing
[1:35:49] himself. But he was about to be
[1:35:52] interrupted by the events in the world at the time, and he ended
[1:35:55] up serving in the Pacific in the fight against the Japanese
[1:35:58] Empire. He expected to return to his
[1:36:03] previous contract, but Warner Brothers dropped him either
[1:36:06] while he was enlisted or soon after, and he began freelancing.
[1:36:10] Throughout the late 1940s and 1950s, Young carved out a
[1:36:15] reliable niche as the charming second lead.
[1:36:18] He was the best friend, the brother, the man who never got
[1:36:22] the girl. He earned his first Academy
[1:36:24] Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor in the 1951
[1:36:28] drama Come Fill the Cup, playing an alcoholic opposite James
[1:36:33] Cagney. A second nomination followed for
[1:36:36] the 1958 comedy Teacher's Pet, where he held his own alongside
[1:36:41] Clark Gable and Doris Day. But stardom in his own right
[1:36:45] always seemed to elude him. He was good enough to be
[1:36:49] noticed, never quite big enough to carry a picture.
[1:36:53] Young's personal life was a revolving door of failed
[1:36:56] marriages and escalating dysfunction.
[1:36:59] His first wife, Sheila Stapler, was a classmate from his acting
[1:37:03] school days. His second wife, Sophie
[1:37:06] Rosenstein, was a drama coach at Paramount who was several years
[1:37:10] his senior. Unfortunately, she was diagnosed
[1:37:13] with cancer shortly after the wedding and died less than two
[1:37:17] years later. Young was then briefly engaged
[1:37:20] to actress Elaine Stritch, A fellow heavy drinker whose own
[1:37:24] account of their destructive relationship would later surface
[1:37:27] publicly. In 1956, Young married actress
[1:37:32] Elizabeth Montgomery, who would go on to star in Bewitched.
[1:37:36] Her father, television producer Robert Montgomery, opposed the
[1:37:41] union and reportedly refused to attend the ceremony.
[1:37:46] The marriage lasted 7 years before Montgomery divorced
[1:37:49] Young, citing his worsening alcoholism and general
[1:37:53] dysfunctional behavior. Those close to the couple
[1:37:56] confirmed that Young's conduct had been volatile and at times
[1:38:00] violent. Nine months after the divorce
[1:38:03] from Montgomery, Young married real estate agent Elaine
[1:38:06] Williams, who was pregnant at the time.
[1:38:10] Their daughter Jennifer was born in April 1964.
[1:38:15] The marriage collapsed within three years, and during the
[1:38:18] subsequent child support battle, Young denied that Jennifer was
[1:38:22] his biological child, despite there being no evidence to the
[1:38:26] contrary. He fought the case for five
[1:38:29] years and lost, and the relationship between father and
[1:38:33] daughter never recovered. In 1969, Young's former agent
[1:38:39] Martin Baum, who had become head of ABC Pictures, pushed to cast
[1:38:43] Young to play a sleazy character in the movie They Shoot Horses.
[1:38:47] Director Sydney Pollack hadn't wanted him.
[1:38:51] Jane Fonda, the film's star, was reportedly unhappy with the
[1:38:55] choice, but Baum insisted and Young delivered the performance
[1:39:00] of his career. He won the Academy Award for
[1:39:04] Best Supporting Actor, beating out a strong field.
[1:39:07] He wanted it to be the beginning of leading man status, the start
[1:39:11] of what people could finally call a Gig Young movie.
[1:39:14] But it never happened. Instead, the Oscars seem to mark
[1:39:19] the beginning of the end. Young is sometimes cited as an
[1:39:23] example of the so-called Oscar curse.
[1:39:26] This is the alleged phenomenon where an award winner's career
[1:39:29] inexplicably stalls or declines after the win.
[1:39:33] In Young's case, the decline was neither inexplicable nor sudden,
[1:39:37] and it was all due to his increasingly unhealthy
[1:39:40] relationship with alcohol. After a decent supporting role
[1:39:44] in Lovers and Other Strangers in 1970, Young's alcoholism began
[1:39:49] destroying what was left of his professional life.
[1:39:53] In 1974, Mel Brooks cast him as the Waco Kid in Blazing Saddles,
[1:39:59] but on his first day of shooting.
[1:40:02] Young collapsed on set. Some accounts attribute it to
[1:40:06] alcohol itself, while others believe it was brought on by an
[1:40:09] attempt to quit drinking cold Turkey before filming began.
[1:40:14] Either way, Brooks fired him and replaced him with Gene Wilder,
[1:40:18] who turned the role into one of the most beloved comedic
[1:40:21] performances of the 1970s. Two years later, Aaron Spelling
[1:40:27] cast Young as the voice of the unseen Charlie in the new series
[1:40:32] Charlie's Angels. Young couldn't even manage that.
[1:40:37] He was too impaired to record his lines and was replaced at
[1:40:40] the last minute by John Forsyth. By the mid 1970s, Young was
[1:40:45] having trouble remembering dialogue during stage
[1:40:47] performances. At the same time, he was
[1:40:50] receiving psychiatric treatment from Doctor Eugene Landy.
[1:40:54] Landy was a controversial psychologist who would later
[1:40:58] have his California medical license revoked for ethical
[1:41:01] violations involving his treatment of Brian Wilson.
[1:41:07] Young's final film was Game of Death, the Patchwork Bruce Lee
[1:41:11] Project cobbled together years after Lee's death in 1973.
[1:41:17] While working on the film in Hong Kong, Young met Kim
[1:41:20] Schmidt, a 31 year old German woman who worked as a magazine
[1:41:25] editor and script supervisor. Details about their courtship
[1:41:29] are sparse, but whatever drew them together moved fast.
[1:41:34] On September 27th, 1978, they married.
[1:41:40] Schmidt was Young's fifth wife, and she was half his age, a fact
[1:41:45] that raised eyebrows by most accounts.
[1:41:49] The couple appeared happy in the brief window between the wedding
[1:41:52] and their deaths. On the day of October 19th,
[1:41:56] Young reportedly taped an appearance on a New York City
[1:41:59] talk show. At some point after returning to
[1:42:03] their apartment at the Osborne, Young loaded a revolver and shot
[1:42:07] Schmidt in the back of the head. A building employee heard the
[1:42:11] shots at approximately 2:30 in the afternoon, but the bodies
[1:42:15] weren't found until five hours later.
[1:42:18] The investigation that followed was brief.
[1:42:22] Police concluded that Young had acted on the spur of the moment
[1:42:25] and that his actions were not premeditated.
[1:42:29] They initially considered the possibility of a pact, but
[1:42:32] ultimately ruled that Young was the sole perpetrator.
[1:42:36] No witnesses came forward with evidence of an argument or
[1:42:39] disturbance. The motive was never established
[1:42:42] and nearly half a century later, remains unknown.
[1:42:48] There's no clear explanation for what drove him to shoot his wife
[1:42:51] of three weeks and then close the curtain on himself.
[1:42:54] But this, of course, hasn't stopped the speculation.
[1:42:58] Alcoholism, career failure, deep psychiatric instability, a
[1:43:03] lifetime of broken relationships, and an apparent
[1:43:06] inability to sustain any form of genuine intimacy all played a
[1:43:11] role in the arc of his life, but none of it satisfactorily
[1:43:15] explains the specific circumstances of what happened
[1:43:18] on October 19th, 1978. According to legend, in the
[1:43:26] autumn of 1929, a laborer digging near the ruins of an old
[1:43:31] castle in Saga Prefecture, Japan, unearthed the mound of
[1:43:34] cat bones. They were piled together in a
[1:43:37] way that suggested something deliberate, something
[1:43:41] ritualistic. But local historians weren't the
[1:43:44] least bit surprised. For centuries, the people of
[1:43:47] that region had whispered about what happened inside those
[1:43:50] castle walls. It was a story involving A slain
[1:43:54] woman, a shape shifting demon and a Prince who slowly wasted
[1:43:59] away while something wearing his lover's face drank his life
[1:44:03] force night after night. It's called The Legend of the
[1:44:07] Vampire Cat of Nabashima, and it remains one of the most chilling
[1:44:11] stories in all of Japanese history.
[1:44:16] The Nabashima clan ruled Haizen Province on the island of Kyushu
[1:44:20] from the late 16th century onward.
[1:44:23] They rose to power through a mixture of political cunning and
[1:44:27] outright ruthlessness. Most infamously, they had
[1:44:30] betrayed the Ryuzoji clan, their former Liege Lord whose
[1:44:35] territory the Nabashima effectively absorbed.
[1:44:39] It was the kind of power grab that left deep scars on the
[1:44:43] regional psyche, and due to this act, their reputation was
[1:44:48] terrible. Many of the supernatural tales
[1:44:51] associated with the Nabishima family carried an unmistakable
[1:44:55] undertone of divine karmic punishment.
[1:44:59] The spirits of the betrayed, so the stories went, wouldn't rest
[1:45:03] easily. The Nabishima Lords governed
[1:45:06] from Saga Castle, and while they maintained stability for
[1:45:10] generations, their rule was haunted by that memory of how
[1:45:14] they'd come to power. Ghost stories and vengeful
[1:45:18] spirit tales attach themselves to the family like barnacles to
[1:45:22] the hull of a ship. The vampire cat legend is the
[1:45:26] most famous of these, and it first gained widespread
[1:45:29] attention through a 19th century literary collection.
[1:45:34] This was a compilation of strange and supernatural tales
[1:45:38] from the Saga domain, presented as a true secret history rather
[1:45:43] than fiction. The story begins with Prince
[1:45:47] Nabashima Mitsushiga, though historical versions sometimes
[1:45:51] shift the identity of the Prince involved.
[1:45:54] He was deeply in love with a woman named O Toyo, a concubine
[1:45:58] of extraordinary beauty, grace and intelligence.
[1:46:03] She was, by all accounts given in the tale, the light of the
[1:46:06] prince's life, his closest companion and the person who
[1:46:11] brought him the most joy. Their relationship was the envy
[1:46:14] of the court, and the Prince spent many of his private
[1:46:18] evenings in her company within the inner quarters of the
[1:46:21] castle. One night, Otoyo retired to her
[1:46:25] chambers as usual. What she didn't know was that
[1:46:29] something had quietly followed her.
[1:46:31] According to the legend, a massive cat, a bacon echo or
[1:46:36] supernatural cat spirit crept into her room while she slept.
[1:46:41] The creature eliminated Otoyo silently in the dark, buried her
[1:46:45] body beneath the veranda of the castle, and then assumed her
[1:46:48] exact physical form down to the smallest detail.
[1:46:52] From that moment on, the thing that walked through the halls of
[1:46:56] Saga Castle and spoke with Otoyo's voice and lay beside the
[1:47:01] Prince at night was no longer human, but a cat.
[1:47:07] This is the part of the story that gives it such lasting
[1:47:10] power, since there's something profoundly unsettling about a
[1:47:14] creature that wears the skin of someone you love.
[1:47:19] The Prince noticed nothing at first.
[1:47:21] Otoyo looked the same, sounded the same, behaved the same.
[1:47:26] But slowly, imperceptible things began to change.
[1:47:33] Night after night, the Prince grew weaker.
[1:47:36] He became pale, listless, unable to concentrate.
[1:47:40] His advisors, physicians, and attendants were baffled.
[1:47:44] There was no obvious illness, no wound, no poison.
[1:47:48] He simply seemed to be fading, as though something was draining
[1:47:51] the vitality out of him while he slept.
[1:47:54] And that, according to the legend, was exactly what was
[1:47:58] happening. The vampire cat, still disguised
[1:48:02] as Otoyo, was visiting the prince's bedchamber each night
[1:48:06] and feeding on his life energy. The creature was consuming him
[1:48:10] slowly while they lay in bed next to each other.
[1:48:14] The castle's guards were ordered to keep watch over the Prince at
[1:48:17] night, but something deeply strange kept happening.
[1:48:22] Every single guard who was assigned to the Prince's chamber
[1:48:25] fell into a deep, unnatural sleep as midnight approached.
[1:48:30] No matter how disciplined, no matter how alert, they'd simply
[1:48:34] collapse into unconsciousness right when they were needed
[1:48:38] most. This continued for weeks, and
[1:48:41] the Prince deteriorated further. The court was gripped by panic,
[1:48:46] and rumors of a supernatural curse began to spread through
[1:48:49] the castle like wildfire. It's worth pausing here to note
[1:48:54] that this narrative device, the guards who can't stay awake,
[1:48:58] appears in folklore traditions across the world.
[1:49:03] The inability of protectors to remain conscious in the presence
[1:49:06] of evil is a deeply archetypal idea, one that speaks to the
[1:49:10] helplessness people feel when confronting forces they don't
[1:49:14] understand. Enter Ito Soda, a young soldier
[1:49:20] of the lower ranks. In some versions, he's a foot
[1:49:23] soldier and others a retainer of modest standing.
[1:49:28] What matters is that he wasn't a man of great importance.
[1:49:31] He was simply someone who refused to accept that the
[1:49:34] situation was hopeless. Ito Soda volunteered to stand
[1:49:39] guard over the Prince, and he came prepared.
[1:49:42] Knowing that every previous guard had succumbed to sleep, he
[1:49:46] devised a method to keep himself awake through the night.
[1:49:49] He placed the blade of his short sword, his wakizashi pointing
[1:49:54] into his own thigh, and every time drowsiness crept over him,
[1:49:58] the pain from the wound jolted him back to full alertness.
[1:50:02] So does willingness to wound himself in order to protect his
[1:50:05] Lord speaks to the samurai ideal of absolute loyalty that was
[1:50:09] central to the warrior code of feudal Japan.
[1:50:13] As the night wore on, Ito's Soda remained awake, and because he
[1:50:18] remained awake, he saw what no other guard had been able to
[1:50:21] see. The false O Toyo entered the
[1:50:24] prince's chamber and approached the sleeping Lord, but when the
[1:50:28] creature sensed that someone in the room was still conscious,
[1:50:31] still watching, it hesitated. It couldn't perform its nightly
[1:50:36] ritual with a witness present. The thing retreated, and for the
[1:50:41] first time in weeks, the Prince slept peacefully through the
[1:50:45] night. His condition began to improve
[1:50:48] almost immediately, but due to the low rank of the person who
[1:50:51] had seen it, the Prince's higher retainers were reluctant to
[1:50:55] accept his claim. Soda's vigil had broken the
[1:51:00] creatures hold, but it hadn't destroyed it.
[1:51:04] The false otoyo continued to exist within the castle, and
[1:51:08] while the Prince's health was recovering, the threat remained.
[1:51:12] Eventually, Soda was able to report what he'd witnessed
[1:51:15] directly to the Prince's senior advisors, and a plan was
[1:51:18] devised. They would confront the creature
[1:51:21] directly. When Soda and a group of armed
[1:51:24] retainers moved to apprehend the false O Toyo, the creature
[1:51:28] realized it had been discovered. It dropped its human disguise
[1:51:32] and revealed its true form, a monstrous cat of enormous size.
[1:51:38] With blazing eyes and supernatural speed, The beast
[1:51:42] escaped from the castle grounds and fled into the mountains
[1:51:45] surrounding Saga. A massive hunting party was
[1:51:48] organized and the Nabashima warriors pursued the creature
[1:51:52] through the dense mist covered forests and steep terrain of
[1:51:57] Haizen Province. After a prolonged, exhausting
[1:52:01] and dangerous chase through rough terrain, they finally
[1:52:04] cornered the vampire cat and cut it down.
[1:52:07] The Prince recovered fully and Soda was rewarded for his
[1:52:11] bravery and loyalty. The real O Toyo's remains were
[1:52:15] discovered beneath the veranda, confirming everything the legend
[1:52:19] had claimed. In the end, the legend of the
[1:52:23] vampire cat of Nabashima sits in that uneasy space between
[1:52:28] folklore and history, where certainty becomes impossible.
[1:52:33] The narrative contains unmistakably supernatural
[1:52:36] elements, A shape shifting demon, guards falling into
[1:52:40] enchanted sleep, and a creature feeding on a prince's life
[1:52:44] force. These are all motifs that appear
[1:52:47] repeatedly in ghost traditions around the world.
[1:52:50] At the same time, the story is anchored to real people and
[1:52:53] places, particularly the powerful Nabashima clan who
[1:52:57] ruled Saga for centuries during the era of the Tokugawa
[1:53:01] Shoganat. That mixture is precisely what
[1:53:04] makes the story so difficult to dismiss entirely.
[1:53:09] Legends often grow around genuine incidents, transforming
[1:53:13] ordinary tragedies into supernatural dramas over
[1:53:16] generations. A sudden illness of a Lord, the
[1:53:20] unexplained death of a court attendant, or political intrigue
[1:53:23] within Saga Castle could easily have sparked rumors.
[1:53:28] Once those rumors entered oral storytelling, the details would
[1:53:32] naturally evolve, eventually merging with the well known
[1:53:35] folklore of the Bakaneko Yokai demon cat.
[1:53:39] Each retelling would have layered new embellishments onto
[1:53:42] the core narrative until the boundary between fact and
[1:53:45] fiction became impossible to trace.
[1:53:48] So while the vampire cat itself almost certainly never stalked
[1:53:52] Saga Castle, the legend may still preserve a faint echo of
[1:53:56] something real. On a quiet autumn morning in
[1:54:03] October 2012, a man walking along Zinnian Beach in Split,
[1:54:07] Croatia, noticed an unbearable stench coming from a discarded
[1:54:11] plastic bag. Inside, to his shock, was a
[1:54:15] rotting leg. This grisly discovery marked the
[1:54:18] start of one of Split's most perplexing unsolved mysteries, a
[1:54:22] dismembered John Doe whose remains would soon surface on
[1:54:26] two different beaches. Over a decade later, both the
[1:54:30] victim's name and his perpetrator remain unknown.
[1:54:35] The gruesome nature of the crime stunned the community at large
[1:54:38] and spurred an exhaustive police investigation, Yet every lead
[1:54:42] only deepened the mystery. The first body part was found on
[1:54:48] October 8th, 2012, when a passerby at Zinion Beach
[1:54:52] stumbled upon a severed leg inside a plastic bag.
[1:54:56] This leg was confirmed to be human almost immediately,
[1:54:59] sparking the initial investigation.
[1:55:02] Just over a week later, on October 16th, another gruesome
[1:55:06] find was reported across town at the Zanta Harbor, a partially
[1:55:11] decomposed human torso was spotted wedged in the rocks of a
[1:55:14] Marina breakwater. The torso had arms attached but
[1:55:19] was missing its head and both legs, clearly linking it to the
[1:55:22] earlier discovery. The following day, police divers
[1:55:27] searching the waters near that spot recovered the victim's
[1:55:29] head, which had been wrapped in newspaper and placed in its own
[1:55:33] plastic sack. No other remains were ever
[1:55:36] located despite extensive searches.
[1:55:42] All the recovered remains were sent for forensic examination,
[1:55:45] which confirmed they belong to one individual.
[1:55:49] Investigators extracted Adna profile from the victim's tissue
[1:55:53] and bone, but it didn't match anyone in Croatia's DNA
[1:55:56] databases. Fingerprints were also lifted
[1:56:00] from the plastic bag that held the head, offering a potential
[1:56:03] clue to the perpetrator, but these prints were of poor
[1:56:07] quality. The autopsy shed further light
[1:56:11] on the crime. The medical examiner determined
[1:56:14] that the John Doe likely died from severe chest injuries
[1:56:17] before being dismembered. He had multiple broken ribs.
[1:56:22] Early reports noted at least 8 fractures, as well as a broken
[1:56:26] collarbone and numerous bruises on his body, all inflicted while
[1:56:30] he was still alive. According to the coroner, these
[1:56:34] traumatic injuries suggested that the man either suffered A
[1:56:37] vicious beating or a catastrophic fall.
[1:56:41] However, given the subsequent events, the investigators were
[1:56:44] very clear that even if this was a fall, he didn't do it
[1:56:49] intentionally. The advanced state of
[1:56:54] decomposition made it difficult to determine how long the victim
[1:56:57] had been dead. Pathologists estimated he could
[1:57:00] have died anywhere from about one month to as much as a year
[1:57:04] Before the remains were discovered.
[1:57:08] A forensic analysis was commissioned to try to figure
[1:57:11] out how the man appeared in life.
[1:57:14] The reconstruction showed an older white male who was balding
[1:57:18] and had short Gray hair. He was likely around 510 and the
[1:57:23] investigation indicated he had significant dental work done in
[1:57:26] the past. Medical examiner's also noted
[1:57:30] signs of kidney and heart disease, suggesting he was in
[1:57:33] poor health and possibly had mobility issues.
[1:57:38] These clues painted a picture of a man in his 60s or 70s who
[1:57:42] lived a quiet, perhaps housebound life.
[1:57:47] Armed with the composite sketch and physical details, Split
[1:57:51] police appealed to the public for help in identifying the
[1:57:54] unknown man. They urged citizens to consider
[1:57:57] whether any elderly male neighbor or relative had gone
[1:58:00] missing from their community. This focus on immobile seniors
[1:58:05] was based on the investigators hunch that the victim had been
[1:58:07] frail and largely homebound. If such a person quietly
[1:58:12] disappeared, it might not immediately spark suspicion from
[1:58:16] neighbors or relatives. The perpetrator may have been
[1:58:20] able to simply pass it off as an instance where the man perished
[1:58:23] naturally, and given his poor health, further questions were
[1:58:28] unlikely to be raised. Despite exhaustive efforts, by
[1:58:34] the end of 2012, the case had grown cold.
[1:58:38] Not a single useful clue had been found, and the
[1:58:41] investigators frustration grew as every potential lead hit a
[1:58:45] dead end. Over the years, several theories
[1:58:50] have emerged about what might have happened.
[1:58:53] Investigators strongly suspect that this man was targeted by
[1:58:57] someone he knew, most likely a caregiver.
[1:59:01] Indeed, police noted that the John Doe appeared to have led a
[1:59:04] very isolated life in Split or its outskirts, which would make
[1:59:08] it easier for his absence to go unnoticed for a long time.
[1:59:13] This profile supports the idea that the perpetrator took
[1:59:16] advantage of the man's solitude and vulnerability.
[1:59:22] Some have speculated that the motive could have been
[1:59:24] financial, for example, concealing the death to continue
[1:59:28] collecting the man's pension or for an inheritance.
[1:59:33] Another idea suggests that the reason why the man hasn't been
[1:59:36] discovered is that he wasn't a local at all.
[1:59:39] Split is an extremely popular vacation destination.
[1:59:43] It's possible that someone from elsewhere in Europe may have
[1:59:46] brought their elderly relative to Split under the auspices of a
[1:59:49] sunny vacation. During the vacation, this
[1:59:52] relative may have slain this elderly man and then covered it
[1:59:56] up using macabre techniques. This theory also has elements of
[2:00:00] the previous ideas discussed. Since it may provide a
[2:00:04] convenient excuse for why someone is gone, if an elderly
[2:00:08] and unwell person from, say, France or Germany died on
[2:00:12] vacation in Croatia, this may not raise too many eyebrows back
[2:00:16] home from other relatives. Notably, this seems to be a case
[2:00:21] that would be ripe for solving with genetic genealogy if it
[2:00:25] happened in the United States or Canada.
[2:00:28] That said, it happened in Europe, and the laws surrounding
[2:00:31] genetic genealogy are different, so perhaps the split John Doe
[2:00:35] case will remain sadly unsolved. At dusk, a single ripple on
[2:00:44] Arkansas's White River can spark a legend.
[2:00:47] For over a century, locals have whispered that something huge
[2:00:51] lurks beneath its Muddy Waters, a hulking Gray beast, the
[2:00:55] so-called White River Monster. Rumors of a strange creature in
[2:01:00] the White River date back at least to the turn of the 20th
[2:01:04] century. An Arkansas newspaper in 1912
[2:01:10] reported that Lumberman saw a massive boulder like thing at
[2:01:13] the bottom of the river which suddenly moved, convincing them
[2:01:17] it was a giant turtle. Over the next decade, a few
[2:01:21] other witnesses claimed to see an animal with Gray, crusty skin
[2:01:26] blowing water into the air. These local tales remained
[2:01:30] obscure until the summer of 1937, when the monster exploded
[2:01:34] into national news. In July 1937, near Newport, AR,
[2:01:42] farmer Bramblett Bateman rushed to the White River after his
[2:01:45] farmhands alerted him that something enormous had risen
[2:01:48] from the water. Bateman later described the
[2:01:51] creature as wide as a car and three cars long, with a smooth,
[2:01:57] wrinkled hide like that of an elephant.
[2:02:00] He wasn't alone. At least three other locals
[2:02:03] attested to the same site. As word spread, the elusive
[2:02:07] beast earned the nickname Whitey.
[2:02:12] Newport soon caught monster fever and the town quickly built
[2:02:15] a viewing platform on the riverbank and charged $0.25.
[2:02:19] Admission to crowds of sightseers, reporters and thrill
[2:02:23] seekers poured in, giving the town a much needed influx of
[2:02:27] cash. During the Depression, the White
[2:02:29] River Monster became a media sensation.
[2:02:33] A scuba diver was even hired to search the deep pool where
[2:02:35] Whitey was seen. But after several dives into the
[2:02:38] murky water, he came up empty handed.
[2:02:44] Some experts suggested at the time the creature was nothing
[2:02:46] more than an oversized fish, perhaps an alligator gar or
[2:02:50] giant catfish, or even a floating log stirred by bubbles.
[2:02:55] By late July, with no definitive proof, the frenzy died down.
[2:03:00] The mysterious creature slipped out of the headlines, leaving
[2:03:03] behind only stories and a new found local legend.
[2:03:09] The White River Monster stayed quiet, or at least out of the
[2:03:12] news, for the next few decades, but it's simmered below the
[2:03:16] surface, growing into an Arkansas urban legend.
[2:03:20] It surfaced again in the early 1970s.
[2:03:23] In 1971, fresh reports from Newport reignited interest.
[2:03:28] Several locals claimed they saw a Gray humped creature in the
[2:03:32] river that summer. One man even snapped A blurry
[2:03:35] photo of a spiny backed hump in the water, and soon afterward
[2:03:40] enormous 3 toed footprints were found pressed in the river mud.
[2:03:45] Also, while I do have the photograph taken at the time on
[2:03:48] the screen, right now, this is 1 where I really can't recommend
[2:03:52] that you take a look if you aren't already doing so.
[2:03:55] There does appear to be something there that could
[2:03:57] technically be described as humps, but the photograph is
[2:04:01] simply too blurry to be useful at all.
[2:04:04] I suppose that's par for the course for Cryptid photography,
[2:04:07] though. At any rate, despite the grainy
[2:04:12] nature of the photo, excitement swept the area once more.
[2:04:16] In 1973, Arkansas's legislature declared part of the White River
[2:04:21] a White River Monster Refuge, legally protecting the creature
[2:04:25] within that stretch. By 1974, the sightings had
[2:04:29] stopped as abruptly as they began, and the monster once
[2:04:33] again slipped back into obscurity.
[2:04:37] Dozens of theories have bubbled up over the years. 1 Popular
[2:04:41] biological theory holds that the monster was actually a known
[2:04:45] animal misidentified in an unfamiliar environment.
[2:04:48] For instance, some researchers point to the Florida manatee as
[2:04:52] a likely candidate. Manatees are massive, often 10
[2:04:56] to 15 feet long, weighing over 1000 lbs, and have smooth Gray
[2:05:02] or nearly white skin. They also make loud blowing
[2:05:05] sounds when coming up for air, just like witnesses reported of
[2:05:09] the monsters. Notably, manatees can tolerate
[2:05:13] fresh water and sometimes wander far from Florida.
[2:05:17] There's historical precedent for this, too, and one even swam to
[2:05:21] Memphis in 2006 before sadly perishing.
[2:05:26] A lost manatee in Arkansas could explain a lot.
[2:05:30] The creature's size, color, and tendency to surface and roll in
[2:05:33] the water would absolutely fit this Cryptid.
[2:05:37] Many locals also favor the idea of an enormous alligator
[2:05:41] snapping turtle, a native river creature with a spiky shell and
[2:05:45] hefty body that could resemble a monster.
[2:05:49] Even so, the largest snapping turtles on record are still far
[2:05:53] smaller than a car sized beast described in the White River
[2:05:56] Monster urban legend. Of course, there's always the
[2:06:02] chance that the White River Monster was more imagination
[2:06:04] than reality. A mix of exaggerated sightings
[2:06:08] and hoaxes, The 1937 monster craze gave Newport a welcome
[2:06:12] boost during times of economic hardship, so some believe the
[2:06:16] hype was deliberately encouraged for publicity.
[2:06:20] This may have explained the genesis of the urban legend.
[2:06:24] And from there, people began to believe they really saw this
[2:06:26] fantastical creature. To this day, the White River
[2:06:32] Monster remains an unsolved mystery.
[2:06:35] What's certain is that the monster has left a lasting mark
[2:06:38] on Arkansas lore. Interestingly, some people have
[2:06:42] also added to the lore by claiming early American settlers
[2:06:46] or Native Americans interacted with the creature.
[2:06:49] These, however, appear to be definite later fabrications to
[2:06:52] give the story more of an air of reality.
[2:06:57] Interestingly, Newport and the surrounding region still embrace
[2:07:01] the legend with local festivals, museum exhibits and an official
[2:07:06] refuge along the river. If the White River Monster was a
[2:07:09] hoax drummed up during the Depression to boost the economy,
[2:07:13] it's still paying dividends almost a century later.
[2:07:18] Imagine a plant so valuable its resin was guarded like a gold
[2:07:22] mine and its image was minted on every coin.
[2:07:25] It wasn't a rare spice or a common grain, but a wild golden
[2:07:29] flowered herb that refused to be tamed.
[2:07:32] This was sylphium, the ancient world's most coveted botanical
[2:07:36] mystery, a wonder that allegedly cured everything from a simple
[2:07:40] cough to life threatening illnesses.
[2:07:43] It was so precious that Julius Caesar once kept 1500 lbs of it
[2:07:48] in the Roman treasury. Yet by the time the 1st century
[2:07:51] AD drew to a close, it had vanished from the Earth.
[2:07:56] The story of Sylphium is the first recorded instance of
[2:07:59] humans driving a species to extinction through greed and
[2:08:02] neglect. The legend began in 631 BC when
[2:08:09] Greek settlers arrived in Cyranaica, located in modern day
[2:08:12] Libya. They found a narrow strip of
[2:08:15] land where Sylphium grew wild, thriving after a mysterious
[2:08:20] pitch black rain had supposedly soaked the soil.
[2:08:24] For centuries, the citizens of Cyrene guarded their meadows as
[2:08:29] their most vital source of revenue.
[2:08:32] This botanical fluke turned Cyrene into an economic
[2:08:35] powerhouse. Because the plant only grew in a
[2:08:38] specific 125 mile wide region and resisted all attempts at
[2:08:43] cultivation, the Greeks held a global monopoly.
[2:08:47] They managed the harvest like a high stakes mining operation,
[2:08:51] setting strict quotas to ensure they didn't deplete the wild
[2:08:54] population. The plant's resin became a
[2:08:57] cornerstone of trade, sold for its weight in silver.
[2:09:01] Sirene's kings, the Badiads, grew fabulously wealthy by
[2:09:06] exporting this SAP across the Mediterranean.
[2:09:10] The plant was so central to their survival that it appeared
[2:09:14] on the front of their coins, often relegated to a position
[2:09:18] higher than the gods themselves. This has LED some to believe
[2:09:22] that the plant was so revered by the populace that it was
[2:09:26] actually personified and then deified for centuries.
[2:09:30] If you had sylphium, you had the riches of the world along with
[2:09:34] the power that came with that. In the kitchen, sylphium was the
[2:09:40] ultimate luxury seasoning. Stalks were roasted or boiled
[2:09:44] like vegetables, while roots were dipped in vinegar.
[2:09:47] But the true prize was the Milky resin.
[2:09:50] After being tapped from the plant, the SAP was mixed with
[2:09:54] flour to prevent decay and shipped in small blocks.
[2:09:59] It had a complex, sulfurous aroma that supposedly left a
[2:10:03] pleasant fragrance on the breath.
[2:10:05] Medicinally, it was regarded as a miracle panacea.
[2:10:10] Plenty The Elder recorded nearly 40 remedies suggesting it could
[2:10:14] treat indigestion, epilepsy and even snake bites.
[2:10:19] It was used as a topical salve for wounds, a cure for sore
[2:10:23] throats and a way to remove warts.
[2:10:26] Hippocrates even recommended it for gut issues, while others
[2:10:30] thought it could cure baldness. The plants most famous use,
[2:10:34] however, was in reproductive health.
[2:10:37] It was highly prized as a contraceptive.
[2:10:40] Women would take a pea sized amount of the resin once a month
[2:10:43] to prevent conception or manage their cycles.
[2:10:47] This widespread use meant that Sylphium was deeply connected to
[2:10:51] the themes of love and intimacy, and many historians believe this
[2:10:55] is where our modern heart symbol originated.
[2:10:59] On silver coins from Cyrene, these heart-shaped seed pods are
[2:11:03] displayed prominently, providing a visual link between the plants
[2:11:07] biological form and its cultural meaning.
[2:11:11] Even the poet Catullus referenced Sylphium bearing
[2:11:14] Cyrene when writing about the infinite number of kisses he
[2:11:17] wanted to share with his lover. This poetic interlude highlights
[2:11:21] how the plant permeated the romantic imagination of the
[2:11:24] ancient elite. Despite its fame, Silfium's
[2:11:30] exact botanical identity remains a mystery.
[2:11:34] Since it vanished before modern science could classify it, we're
[2:11:37] left with ancient descriptions and coin imagery.
[2:11:41] It's generally agreed that the plant belonged to the genus
[2:11:44] Ferula, making it a relative of giant fennel or celery.
[2:11:48] It had a thick grooved stalk and umbrella like yellow flower
[2:11:52] clusters. Some scientists have proposed
[2:11:55] species like Ferula tingatana or Thapsia gumafera, but these
[2:12:01] don't quite match the medicinal potency described by authors
[2:12:04] like Pliny. Recently, a Turkish scientist
[2:12:09] identified Farula drudiana in Turkey as a possible candidate,
[2:12:13] noting its heart-shaped seeds and unique chemical compounds.
[2:12:17] This sparked a new wave of interest because he found it
[2:12:21] growing near ancient Greek villages in Anatolia.
[2:12:26] This suggested it may have been brought there by settlers who
[2:12:29] hope to save it from extinction. While this find is exciting,
[2:12:34] many remain skeptical because the plant is native to Anatolia
[2:12:38] rather than Libya. The tragedy of Sylphium's
[2:12:42] extinction is a cautionary tale for our own age.
[2:12:46] When Rome took control of the region, the pressure for short
[2:12:49] term profit began to erode the sustainable practices of the
[2:12:53] Greeks. Greedy tax farmers ignored
[2:12:56] harvest limits, while sheep farmers discovered that sylphium
[2:12:59] fed meat was a culinary sensation.
[2:13:02] Overgrazing became a massive problem as sheep ate the young
[2:13:07] plants before they could produce seeds.
[2:13:10] This wasn't just about overconsumption though.
[2:13:13] Massive deforestation for agriculture and timber changed
[2:13:17] the local microclimate, leading to rapid desertification.
[2:13:22] The plant was incredibly sensitive to soil conditions and
[2:13:26] likely required a specific cycle of cold temperatures to
[2:13:29] germinate. As the landscape dried and the
[2:13:32] forest vanished, the conditions for sylphium survival
[2:13:36] disappeared. By the time of the Emperor Nero,
[2:13:40] only one stalk remained in Syrenaeca.
[2:13:44] It was harvested and sent to him as a curiosity, marking the
[2:13:48] quiet end of a species that had once bankrolled a Kingdom.
[2:13:53] It's a sobering reminder that even the most precious resources
[2:13:56] aren't infinite. While we may never taste the
[2:14:00] resin that Caesar valued more than gold, the legacy of
[2:14:04] Sylphium survives in every heart-shaped token of affection
[2:14:07] we share. Even if we didn't know it, it's
[2:14:11] a silent tribute to a plant that was once the pulse of an entire
[2:14:14] world.

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.