# The Mysterious Radio Source That Has Been Active for 20 Years

An episode of [Bedtime Astronomy](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1736397134), 21 Sep 2026, 18 min.

Audio: https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/75149914/radiop.mp3

VT J1906+0849 is a mysterious radio source in the Milky Way that has remained active for more than 20 years, repeatedly brightening while producing no detectable X-rays. Astronomers believe it may involve a black hole or neutron star feeding on surrounding matter, with a dense disk wind hiding its central engine while powering powerful radio jets. The object could represent a previously unknown class of stellar remnants. Thank you for listening to Bedtime Astronomy — your guide to the cosmos. New episodes on space exploration, NASA missions & the latest astronomy breakthroughs. This episode includes AI-generated content.

## Transcript

[0:03] Speaker 1: Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos
[0:07] Speaker 1: with our soothing Bedtime Astronomy podcast. Each episode offers a
[0:12] Speaker 1: gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for
[0:16] Speaker 1: unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries
[0:20] Speaker 1: of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful
[0:22] Speaker 1: slumber under the night sky.
[0:27] Speaker 2: You know, usually when we think about a cosmic event, uh,
[0:31] Speaker 2: something out there in the galaxy blowing up or colliding,
[0:34] Speaker 2: there's this expectation of speed.
[0:36] Speaker 3: Right, yeah, like a sudden burst.
[0:37] Speaker 2: Exactly, like a camera flash in the dark, a star collapses,
[0:41] Speaker 2: a supernova goes off, you get this incredibly violent burst
[0:45] Speaker 2: of energy, and then it just, you know, fades away.
[0:47] Speaker 3: It dissipates.
[0:48] Speaker 2: Yeah, it's clean, it's fast, and our telescopes catch the afterglow.
[0:52] Speaker 2: But then you look closely at our own Milky Way galaxy,
[0:55] Speaker 2: and suddenly that camera flash gets, well, it gets stuck.
[0:58] Speaker 3: Which is incredibly jarring for astronomers. The universe is dynamic, sure,
[1:03] Speaker 3: but the events that usually capture our attention are those
[1:06] Speaker 3: rapid transients. Yeah. They transition quickly. A star ends its life,
[1:10] Speaker 3: it flashes, and we observe the remnants.
[1:11] Speaker 2: Because that fits our human timescale, right?
[1:13] Speaker 3: Exactly. The timescale of human observation aligns perfectly with the
[1:17] Speaker 3: peak and fade of those massive explosions. But when you
[1:20] Speaker 3: encounter something that just stubbornly refuses to follow those rules,
[1:24] Speaker 3: it forces a complete reevaluation.
[1:26] Speaker 2: Okay, let's unpack this. We are looking at a celestial
[1:30] Speaker 2: anomaly that is basically a cosmic detective story happening right
[1:34] Speaker 2: in our own backyard.
[1:35] Speaker 3: And the suspect is just sitting there glaring at us
[1:38] Speaker 3: in radio waves.
[1:38] Speaker 2: Right. It's designated as VTJ 1906 plus 0849. And it's
[1:45] Speaker 2: a radio signal that has been blazing away for over
[1:47] Speaker 2: two decades now, completely breaking the known rules of astrophysics.
[1:52] Speaker 3: What's fascinating here is that we often operate under this
[1:54] Speaker 3: assumption that that we have a pretty comprehensive inventory of
[1:58] Speaker 3: the galaxy.
[1:59] Speaker 2: Like we know all the usual suspects.
[2:01] Speaker 3: Right, we know black holes, pulsars, flare stars, your typical
[2:04] Speaker 3: accreting binaries. But this strongly suggests there are entirely new
[2:07] Speaker 3: classes of objects just waiting to be discovered. This might
[2:10] Speaker 3: be the very first of its kind ever documented.
[2:12] Speaker 2: Which is wild. So our mission today is to unravel
[2:15] Speaker 2: exactly what this anomaly is, look at the completely bizarre
[2:18] Speaker 2: clues it's leaving behind, and figure out what it means
[2:21] Speaker 2: for the hidden structures in our universe.
[2:23] Speaker 3: And to really understand a mystery of this scale... You
[2:26] Speaker 3: have to establish a history. You have to look at
[2:28] Speaker 3: the timeline.
[2:29] Speaker 2: Yeah, how long has this thing actually been watching us? Or, oh,
[2:32] Speaker 2: how long have we been watching it?
[2:33] Speaker 3: It officially caught the wider astronomical community's attention back on
[2:38] Speaker 3: October 27, 2017. Okay, 2017. Yeah, during the Very Large
[2:42] Speaker 3: Array Sky Survey, which we usually just call VLA.
[2:45] Speaker 2: Well, at least a VLA.
[2:46] Speaker 3: It's this massive undertaking scanning the radio sky, and right
[2:50] Speaker 3: off the bat, This object just completely stood out. It
[2:53] Speaker 3: actually holds the title of the brightest known transient in
[2:56] Speaker 3: VLAS at low galactic latitudes.
[2:59] Speaker 2: I want to pause on that low galactic latitude part
[3:02] Speaker 2: because that is a massive detail for you listening. It
[3:05] Speaker 2: means we are looking right into the thickest, dustiest part
[3:08] Speaker 2: of the Milky Way's disk.
[3:09] Speaker 3: Exactly. The galactic plane is incredibly dense.
[3:12] Speaker 2: Which completely obscures a lot of optical light. So we
[3:14] Speaker 2: rely on these radio waves to even see what's happening
[3:17] Speaker 2: in there. And in that dense cosmic fog, this thing
[3:20] Speaker 2: was just blindingly bright. But 2017, that's just when VLS
[3:23] Speaker 2: found it.
[3:24] Speaker 3: That's just the modern discovery point. Yeah. To truly understand
[3:27] Speaker 3: a transient, astronomers have to do essentially cosmic archaeology.
[3:31] Speaker 2: I love that term. Right.
[3:33] Speaker 3: So a team led by Jesse M. Miller at Caltech,
[3:36] Speaker 3: they decided to look backward in time. They dug into
[3:38] Speaker 3: archival data. cross-referencing sky coordinates across all these older surveys.
[3:43] Speaker 2: Which sounds like a nightmare of data processing.
[3:45] Speaker 1: Oh, it is.
[3:46] Speaker 3: You're dealing with different telescope sensitivities, different calibrations.
[3:49] Speaker 2: Yeah.
[3:49] Speaker 3: But they traced its history all the way back to 2005. Wow, 2005. Yeah,
[3:53] Speaker 3: in the MAGPIS survey. And back then, it was glowing
[3:56] Speaker 3: at about 35 millijanski.
[3:58] Speaker 2: Okay, millijanski being our standard unit for measuring radio wave brightness.
[4:04] Speaker 1: Correct.
[4:04] Speaker 3: So it's sitting at some 5 millijanski in 2005. But
[4:08] Speaker 3: the evolution is the really crazy part. By 2014, it
[4:11] Speaker 3: had peaked at over 200 milijanski.
[4:13] Speaker 2: Wait, so it brightened by a factor of six?
[4:16] Speaker 3: Roughly a factor of six, yeah, over the course of
[4:18] Speaker 3: about 21 years. It then faded somewhat and then underwent
[4:21] Speaker 3: a brand new re-brightening phase in late 2025.
[4:25] Speaker 2: See, that is what I mean by the camera flash
[4:27] Speaker 2: getting stuck. A normal radio transient is bright and then
[4:30] Speaker 2: gone in days, maybe weeks if it's sluggish.
[4:32] Speaker 3: Yes, normally.
[4:32] Speaker 2: But this, this is like a firework that shoots up
[4:36] Speaker 2: into the night sky, explodes. but then just freezes in place.
[4:40] Speaker 2: And it just continues to glow brighter and brighter for
[4:43] Speaker 2: 20 yims. It never fades into the dark.
[4:46] Speaker 3: It's a great analogy. And we aren't talking about something
[4:48] Speaker 3: at the edge of the observable universe either. This object
[4:51] Speaker 3: is situated somewhere between 49,000 and 104,000 light years away
[4:56] Speaker 3: from us.
[4:57] Speaker 2: Okay, so that's what, roughly 15 to 32 kiloparsecs?
[5:00] Speaker 3: Exactly. It is firmly within our own galactic neighborhood.
[5:03] Speaker 2: A 20-year frozen firework in our own galaxy. But as
[5:07] Speaker 2: weird as that timeline is, the fact that it's been
[5:09] Speaker 2: glowing for two decades is really only half the mystery.
[5:12] Speaker 3: Isn't it?
[5:13] Speaker 1: It is.
[5:14] Speaker 3: Because in observational astronomy, the real puzzle isn't always what
[5:17] Speaker 3: an object is doing. Sometimes the most glaring physical clue
[5:22] Speaker 3: is what it isn't doing.
[5:23] Speaker 2: The missing evidence.
[5:24] Speaker 3: Precisely. The missing evidence that completely contradicts all of this
[5:28] Speaker 3: radio data we just talked about.
[5:29] Speaker 2: Because with all that radio noise, I mean, all that
[5:31] Speaker 2: continuous energy being blasted out for 20 years... You would
[5:34] Speaker 2: expect a whole symphony of other signals.
[5:36] Speaker 3: You'd expect it to be lighting up across the spectrum.
[5:39] Speaker 2: Right. Especially x-rays. You'd expect a massive amount of x-rays.
[5:42] Speaker 2: But when they pointed the Swift X-ray Observatory right at
[5:45] Speaker 2: this thing looking for an x-ray counterpart, what did they find?
[5:48] Speaker 3: Absolutely zero x-rays.
[5:50] Speaker 2: Zero.
[5:50] Speaker 3: Completely silent on that frequency. Total x-ray silence. And that
[5:55] Speaker 3: breaks almost everything we know about objects emitting this much
[5:59] Speaker 3: sustained radio energy.
[6:00] Speaker 2: Because the physics required to make radio waves that strong
[6:04] Speaker 2: usually generate extreme heat, right?
[6:06] Speaker 3: Yes, extreme heat produces X-rays. But it gets even stranger
[6:09] Speaker 3: when we look at the physical size of the object.
[6:12] Speaker 3: Astronomers use the very long baseline array, the VLBA.
[6:15] Speaker 2: Which is where they link radio telescopes across the globe
[6:18] Speaker 2: to act like one giant telescope.
[6:20] Speaker 3: Exactly, to achieve incredibly high resolution. And we have VLBA
[6:24] Speaker 3: data spanning 2010, 2022, and newly in 2025. And this
[6:25] Speaker 3: data proves... that the emitting region, the actual physical space
[6:32] Speaker 3: generating these massive radio waves, is incredibly compact.
[6:35] Speaker 2: Wait, so it's not expanding outward? It's just a tiny
[6:37] Speaker 2: fixed point?
[6:38] Speaker 3: It refuses to expand. The radio emitting core remains tightly confined.
[6:42] Speaker 3: It's just sitting there.
[6:42] Speaker 1: But hold on.
[6:43] Speaker 2: The spectral lines, the light signatures we get from the object,
[6:46] Speaker 2: don't they show hints of gas moving at thousands of
[6:50] Speaker 2: kilometers per second?
[6:51] Speaker 3: They do. Fast-moving gas is definitely present in the system.
[6:55] Speaker 2: Okay, let me synthesize this, because this feels like a
[6:57] Speaker 2: massive physical contradiction. You have gas moving at thousands of
[7:00] Speaker 2: kilometers a second. That strongly implies a violent flow of
[7:04] Speaker 2: material or some kind of outward explosion.
[7:06] Speaker 3: It implies a massive kinetic event, yes.
[7:08] Speaker 2: But the high-resolution VLBA data shows the object itself is
[7:12] Speaker 2: staying completely compact over 15 years of observation. How does
[7:16] Speaker 2: something move that fast but not actually go anywhere?
[7:20] Speaker 3: To figure that out, we have to look at the
[7:21] Speaker 3: bigger picture and factor in the thermodynamics. The brightness temperature
[7:25] Speaker 3: of this object is estimated to be between 100 million
[7:28] Speaker 3: and and 10 billion Kelvin.
[7:30] Speaker 2: Wait, I'm sorry, 10 billion degrees?
[7:32] Speaker 3: Yes, 10 billion.
[7:34] Speaker 2: That sheer mathematical reality instantly vaporizes any theory relying on
[7:39] Speaker 2: normal stellar activity. I mean, if this were just thermal heat,
[7:42] Speaker 2: like a normal star doing something weird, the outward pressure
[7:45] Speaker 2: of 10 billion degrees would blow the system apart instantaneously, right?
[7:49] Speaker 3: In a fraction of a second. It would not stay compact.
[7:53] Speaker 3: The physics completely align with that conclusion. Normal matter fundamentally
[7:57] Speaker 3: behaves differently at those temperatures.
[7:59] Speaker 2: So we can just cross normal stars off the list?
[8:01] Speaker 3: Methodically, yes. We can rule out the usual suspects based
[8:05] Speaker 3: on that sheer energy capacity alone. It absolutely cannot be
[8:08] Speaker 3: thermal heat, like the radiation you get from standard star formation.
[8:12] Speaker 2: So that knocks out flare stars, right? And novae and
[8:16] Speaker 2: cataclysmic variables?
[8:17] Speaker 3: All of them. They might erupt. But they simply don't
[8:20] Speaker 3: possess the raw energetic capacity for a sustained, compact 20-year
[8:24] Speaker 3: burn at 10 billion degrees. They fall orders of magnitude short.
[8:28] Speaker 2: What about dead stars?
[8:30] Speaker 3: We do have to consider those. A young neutron star
[8:33] Speaker 3: or a highly magnetized pulsar could, in principle, provide a
[8:36] Speaker 3: massive amount of raw energy. Pulsars lose rotational energy and
[8:39] Speaker 3: power these massive glowing clouds called pulsar wind nebulae.
[8:43] Speaker 2: Okay, so could it be a pulsar wind nebula?
[8:45] Speaker 3: No, because the fatal flaw in the pulsar theory is
[8:48] Speaker 3: the time scale. Pulsars and their surrounding nebulae evolve over
[8:51] Speaker 3: centuries or millennia.
[8:53] Speaker 2: And VTJ 1906 changed substantially in just a few years.
[8:57] Speaker 2: It brightened by a factor of six.
[8:59] Speaker 3: Exactly. It is evolving far too rapidly to be a
[9:02] Speaker 3: passively aging pulsar.
[9:04] Speaker 2: So if it's evolving this fast, maintaining this insane brightness temperature,
[9:08] Speaker 2: and generating all this radio energy without blowing itself apart,
[9:12] Speaker 2: what is the actual physical mechanism? We have to be
[9:15] Speaker 2: looking at something moving near the speed of light.
[9:17] Speaker 3: We are. The only physical mechanism left that fits the
[9:21] Speaker 3: data is synchrotron radiation.
[9:23] Speaker 2: Okay, synchrotron radiation.
[9:24] Speaker 1: Right.
[9:25] Speaker 3: This occurs when highly energetic relativistic electrons, meaning electrons moving
[9:30] Speaker 3: very close to the speed of light, get caught spiraling
[9:33] Speaker 3: through incredibly strong magnetic fields.
[9:35] Speaker 2: So they get whipped around.
[9:36] Speaker 3: Yes, they spiral tightly along those magnetic field lines. And
[9:40] Speaker 3: as they do, they emit photons, specifically in the radio spectrum.
[9:44] Speaker 2: Here's where it gets really interesting. Because if it is
[9:46] Speaker 2: blasting out synchrotron radiation from near light speed electrons... You
[9:51] Speaker 2: need an engine. You need a massive cosmic accelerator to
[9:54] Speaker 2: get those electrons moving that fast in the first place.
[9:56] Speaker 3: Very powerful engine.
[9:58] Speaker 2: So what entirely different beast could generate this much continuous
[10:02] Speaker 2: compact radio energy for 20 years without leaking a single X-ray?
[10:06] Speaker 3: This leads us directly to the primary hypothesis proposed by
[10:09] Speaker 3: the Caltech research team. They argue we are observing sustained
[10:13] Speaker 3: accretion onto a compact object.
[10:16] Speaker 2: Accretion meaning it's feeding.
[10:18] Speaker 3: Exactly. Either a stellar mass black hole or a neutron
[10:21] Speaker 3: star is actively feeding on surrounding material.
[10:24] Speaker 2: So the black hole is pulling in gas and dust,
[10:27] Speaker 2: and as it eats, things get incredibly messy.
[10:30] Speaker 3: The physics of accretion are incredibly messy, yes.
[10:32] Speaker 2: Yeah.
[10:33] Speaker 3: Especially when an object is feeding at a highly accelerated rate.
[10:37] Speaker 3: The material forms an accretion disk, and it heats up
[10:40] Speaker 3: intensely as it spirals inward.
[10:42] Speaker 2: But it doesn't all fall in.
[10:43] Speaker 3: No, not everything falls past the event horizon. These extreme
[10:47] Speaker 3: magnetic and gravitational forces continuously launch jets of relativistic particles
[10:52] Speaker 3: and magnetic fields outward from the poles of the compact object.
[10:56] Speaker 2: Ah, okay.
[10:56] Speaker 3: That high-speed, near-light-speed jet is the accelerator. It's what generates
[11:00] Speaker 3: the synchrotron radiation.
[11:01] Speaker 2: Okay, I follow that. But if there's a jet blasting
[11:04] Speaker 2: outward at near-light speed, why doesn't the VLBA see the
[11:07] Speaker 2: object expanding? We just established it's incredibly compact. And more importantly,
[11:13] Speaker 2: an accretion disk heating up to the point of launching
[11:15] Speaker 2: near light-speed jets should be absolutely screaming in X-rays.
[11:20] Speaker 3: It should be, yes.
[11:21] Speaker 2: So where are the X-rays?
[11:23] Speaker 3: The solution to that paradox relies on the physical environment
[11:26] Speaker 3: immediately surrounding the central engine. The researchers propose a dense
[11:30] Speaker 3: disk wind model. The disk wind.
[11:33] Speaker 1: Right.
[11:33] Speaker 3: When a compact object feeds extremely rapidly, something we call
[11:36] Speaker 3: super Eddington accretion, the immense radiation pressure actually pushes material
[11:41] Speaker 3: away before it can even reach the black hole.
[11:43] Speaker 2: It's like it's a messy eater.
[11:45] Speaker 3: Very messy. It violently sheds material outward, committing a thick
[11:48] Speaker 3: asymmetric wind blowing off the accretion disk itself.
[11:51] Speaker 2: Oh, wow. So the jet is trying to blast outward
[11:53] Speaker 2: into space, but it's slamming directly into this dense wind
[11:56] Speaker 2: that the disk is simultaneously throwing off.
[11:59] Speaker 3: Exactly. The wind is acting as a physical wall.
[12:01] Speaker 2: Keeping the radio-emitting plasma trapped and compact. While the collision
[12:06] Speaker 2: accelerates the electrons to give us that synchrotron radio signal.
[12:10] Speaker 3: That is the exact mechanism. The powerful jet is physically
[12:14] Speaker 3: obstructed by the dense, heavy disk wind. The collision creates
[12:18] Speaker 3: a persistent shock wave, which confines the radio emission to
[12:22] Speaker 3: a very tight region, completely explaining the compactness observed by
[12:26] Speaker 3: the VLBA.
[12:27] Speaker 2: Okay, let me try an analogy to visualize this, because
[12:29] Speaker 2: it's a lot. It's almost like taking a flashlight, a high-powered,
[12:34] Speaker 2: blindingly bright flashlight, and wrapping it tightly in a thick,
[12:38] Speaker 2: heavy blanket. You can't see the blinding light itself, which
[12:41] Speaker 2: would be the missing X-rays from the accretion disk, because
[12:44] Speaker 2: the blanket blocks it. Right.
[12:45] Speaker 3: The blanket is the disk wind.
[12:46] Speaker 2: Exactly. But you can see the outside of the blanket
[12:48] Speaker 2: radiating from the intense trapped heat, which represents the radio
[12:52] Speaker 2: waves we can actually detect escaping the system.
[12:54] Speaker 3: The blanket analogy captures the trapping of the X-rays nicely,
[12:58] Speaker 3: but physically it's less of a static blanket and more
[13:01] Speaker 3: of a violent, heavy hurricane of plasma constantly blowing outward.
[13:05] Speaker 2: A plasma hurricane.
[13:06] Speaker 3: It is a highly dynamic environment. The inner layers of
[13:10] Speaker 3: this plasma hurricane completely obscure the central X-ray source. The
[13:15] Speaker 3: material is so dense that X-ray photons simply cannot scatter
[13:18] Speaker 3: their way out.
[13:19] Speaker 2: But the radio waves can.
[13:21] Speaker 3: Yes. The lower frequency radio waves, which are generated where
[13:24] Speaker 3: the jet violently interacts with the inner edge of this hurricane,
[13:28] Speaker 3: they are able to escape and reach our telescopes.
[13:31] Speaker 2: But do we have any actual observational proof that this
[13:34] Speaker 2: plasma hurricane exists? Or is it just, you know, a
[13:37] Speaker 2: theoretical construct to make the math work for the missing X-rays?
[13:40] Speaker 3: No, we have direct observational proof. The astronomers looked at broad,
[13:45] Speaker 3: near-infrared emission lines from the object, and they isolated a
[13:48] Speaker 3: persistent blue-shifted component in the spectrum.
[13:51] Speaker 2: Blue shifted, meaning the light waves are compressed.
[13:53] Speaker 3: Exactly.
[13:53] Speaker 2: Which provides direct proof that the material emitting that light
[13:57] Speaker 2: is hurtling directly toward us.
[13:58] Speaker 3: The persistent blue shift means we have empirical evidence that
[14:01] Speaker 3: a massive, dense portion of this lopsided disk wind is
[14:05] Speaker 3: moving incredibly fast toward Earth. It perfectly matches the theoretical
[14:09] Speaker 3: model of an asymmetric wind blowing out from a central
[14:11] Speaker 3: feeding frenzy.
[14:12] Speaker 2: Wow.
[14:13] Speaker 3: The material blowing toward us gives us the blue shift.
[14:16] Speaker 3: while the incredibly dense inner core acts as the barrier
[14:19] Speaker 3: hiding the X-rays from the accretion disk.
[14:22] Speaker 2: Have we ever seen a mechanism like this before? Like
[14:24] Speaker 2: a central engine wrapped in its own dense wind, essentially
[14:28] Speaker 2: choking its own jets?
[14:29] Speaker 3: We have observed the underlying physics before, actually, which lends
[14:32] Speaker 3: a tremendous amount of credibility to this new finding. There
[14:35] Speaker 3: is a famous microquasar in our galaxy called SS433.
[14:39] Speaker 2: Okay, SS433.
[14:40] Speaker 3: It consists of a compact object that is rapidly cannibalizing
[14:43] Speaker 3: a companion star. It generates a massive accretion disk. And
[14:47] Speaker 3: it also features a dense equatorial wind that interacts with
[14:50] Speaker 3: precessing jets.
[14:51] Speaker 2: So in SS433, we've seen this exact dynamic of jets
[14:55] Speaker 2: interacting with a heavy surrounding wind.
[14:57] Speaker 3: We have. However, SS433 represents a different parameter space. The
[15:01] Speaker 3: interaction in SS433 produces a different ratio of emissions. What
[15:05] Speaker 3: makes VTJ1906 so remarkable is its extreme persistence as a
[15:09] Speaker 3: dominant radio source while remaining completely invisible in the X-ray spectrum.
[15:13] Speaker 2: It's like SS433 on steroids.
[15:16] Speaker 3: It is essentially taking the physics of a system like
[15:18] Speaker 3: SS 433, burying it deeper, and sustaining it for decades.
[15:23] Speaker 2: So what does this all mean? I mean, if you're
[15:25] Speaker 2: listening to this, you might be wondering why one highly
[15:28] Speaker 2: obscured black hole or neutron star matters to the grand
[15:32] Speaker 2: scheme of astrophysics.
[15:33] Speaker 3: It matters immensely.
[15:35] Speaker 2: Right, because this changes how we map the entire life
[15:37] Speaker 2: cycle of extreme objects in our galaxy.
[15:40] Speaker 3: Exactly. This raises a crucial question about our own observational biases.
[15:45] Speaker 3: Our map of the galaxy is entirely dependent on the
[15:48] Speaker 3: specific types of light our instruments are tuned to detect.
[15:52] Speaker 2: We only see what we're looking for.
[15:53] Speaker 3: Traditionally, we hunt for feeding black holes by scanning the
[15:56] Speaker 3: sky for X-rays. If this model is correct, it proves
[16:00] Speaker 3: the existence of a phase of stellar evolution, or perhaps
[16:03] Speaker 3: an entirely distinct class of systems that we've been completely
[16:06] Speaker 3: blind to simply because we were looking through the wrong filter.
[16:09] Speaker 2: We were looking for the X-ray flash, and we completely
[16:12] Speaker 2: missed the radio burn happening behind the veil.
[16:14] Speaker 3: We missed the blanket entirely.
[16:15] Speaker 2: So how do we pull that veil back? What are
[16:18] Speaker 2: the next steps to prove beyond a shadow of a
[16:21] Speaker 2: doubt what's operating inside this wind?
[16:23] Speaker 3: To fully confirm the central engine, researchers need two very
[16:26] Speaker 3: specific types of advanced observations. First, high-resolution infrared spectroscopy.
[16:32] Speaker 2: Okay, to map the wind. Yes.
[16:34] Speaker 3: This will allow astronomers to map out the complex dynamics
[16:37] Speaker 3: and geometry of that asymmetric disk wind in much greater detail. Second,
[16:42] Speaker 3: and this is the crucial part, they need deep... Hard
[16:45] Speaker 3: X-ray observations.
[16:46] Speaker 2: Hard X-ray.
[16:47] Speaker 3: Standard X-rays are completely blocked by the plasma wind, as
[16:50] Speaker 3: we've discussed. But harder, significantly higher energy X-rays might just
[16:55] Speaker 3: possess enough penetrating power to pierce through that dense cosmic
[16:58] Speaker 3: veil and reveal the faint signature of the central accreting engine.
[17:02] Speaker 2: And if that happens and those hard X-rays are detected,
[17:05] Speaker 2: VTJ 1906 isn't just a singular weird anomaly anymore.
[17:08] Speaker 3: No, it ceases to be an anomaly and becomes the
[17:11] Speaker 3: founding member of an entirely new population of Galactic accreting
[17:15] Speaker 3: compact object.
[17:16] Speaker 2: A whole new category.
[17:17] Speaker 3: Exactly. Objects that are incredibly faint in X-rays, but extraordinarily
[17:22] Speaker 3: bright in radio waves. It literally requires us to rewrite
[17:26] Speaker 3: the census of extreme physics in the Milky Way.
[17:30] Speaker 2: It really makes you look up at the night sky
[17:32] Speaker 2: completely differently. We started this conversation by talking about how
[17:35] Speaker 2: we expect cosmic events to be like camera flashes. Bright, sudden, obvious, and,
[17:41] Speaker 2: you know, easy to categorize.
[17:42] Speaker 3: The universe doesn't care about our category.
[17:44] Speaker 2: It really doesn't. This object proves that the universe is
[17:46] Speaker 2: just as good at hiding its most violent engines as
[17:49] Speaker 2: it is at showing them off.
[17:50] Speaker 3: The universe does not conform to the simple categories we
[17:52] Speaker 3: create for it. Finding a system that has sustained this
[17:55] Speaker 3: level of extreme, obscured energy release for over two decades
[18:00] Speaker 3: challenges everything we thought we knew about how these compact
[18:03] Speaker 3: objects regulate their feeding and their outflows.
[18:06] Speaker 2: Which leaves you with this lingering thought. If a cosmic
[18:09] Speaker 2: engine this powerful, generating billions of degrees of raw energy,
[18:14] Speaker 2: was hiding in plain sight in our own galactic backyard
[18:16] Speaker 2: for over 20 years simply because its X-rays were muffled
[18:19] Speaker 2: by its own violent wind, what other invisible giants are
[18:22] Speaker 2: out there in the dark, silently screaming in radio waves,
[18:25] Speaker 2: just waiting for us to figure out how to look
[18:27] Speaker 2: for them?

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.