# Episode 040 - Intel Inside, Schrodinger's Sheep & Hollywood Stars

An episode of [Are You Quizzing Me?](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1663104901), 15 Oct 2023, 52 min.

Audio: https://anchor.fm/s/d7afa960/podcast/play/77241622/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2023-9-15%2F351221747-44100-2-ae7f50943dfcf.m4a

Do you know which computer was upgraded every two years by a dedicated team at Intel from 1997 until 2018? Do you know why a jumper with a picture of two identical sheep is an exhibit at the National Science Museum? Do you know which celebrity's star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame is the only one on a vertical surface? Tune in to find out! You can reach us at Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/areyouquizzingme/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/areyouquizzingme Email: areyouquizzingme@gmail.com

## Transcript

[0:01] Welcome to our You Quizzing Me, I'm Vineet Nair with my Co host
[0:05] Aditya Kashim. This is a quizzing trivia
[0:07] podcast show. Join us as we dive deep into
[0:10] history, science, sport, pop culture, and so much more.
[0:13] Desk in Quizzing and we're back for episode #40 of our You
[0:21] Quizzing Me, your Favorite Quizzing podcast show.
[0:24] As usual, let's start off with an audience question before
[0:27] moving to our regularly scheduled programming.
[0:29] This audience question is specifically for you, our dear
[0:32] audience. We will be revealing the answer
[0:35] to this question at the end of the episode.
[0:36] So you have roughly 30-40 minutes to figure out the answer
[0:40] to this. No Googling.
[0:42] So the answer to the question for you this week is the Chinese
[0:48] gooseberry is the edible Berry of several species of woody
[0:52] wines in the genus Actinidia. It's native to central and
[0:56] eastern China in the early in the first recorded description
[1:00] dates back to the 12th century. During the Song Dynasty.
[1:03] In the early 20th century, cultivation of the Chinese
[1:05] gooseberry spread to another nation, which gave it a name
[1:09] from its indigenous language, and this is the name by which we
[1:12] know it today. It soon became popular with
[1:15] Allied servicemen stationed in that country during World War 2,
[1:18] which soon led to increased demand after the war and
[1:21] consequently its cultivation all throughout the world.
[1:24] How do we better know the Chinese gooseberry now moving on
[1:29] to our oldest tradition, something which we've maintained
[1:32] without fail for 40 episodes? Aditya's question, the calling
[1:36] it a question, would be somewhat of a loose description, but you
[1:41] know what we're talking about. So Aditya, what is your question
[1:44] from last week and what is your quote UN quote answer?
[1:49] Vineet, I know that you derived my answers and questions every
[1:54] week. Yet today I would be very
[1:57] surprised if you do not agree with me on my answer.
[1:59] The question that was posed last week was.
[2:03] Which actor has played the same role multiple times and has not
[2:06] been recognized with an award for it yet?
[2:09] And Oscar specifically. And this is in the context of
[2:13] actors who have received Oscars for playing the same character
[2:16] in multiple movies. So my question stood and the
[2:21] answer goes Ranbir Kapoor. You know what?
[2:25] I have a very specific thing about Ranbir Kapoor and and and
[2:30] he has played the exact same character in multiple movies.
[2:33] Where there's this grown man child who's just refusing to
[2:37] come of age, and then some Manic Pixie character comes into his
[2:40] life and suddenly grows up. But that's not even the biggest
[2:43] thing that that is similar across all his films.
[2:45] There is a scene, There's an iconic scene that is the same in
[2:48] at least three of his movies. Ranbir Kapoor at a wedding of
[2:53] someone he loves or loved in the past and then turning around and
[2:56] walking away. Yes, with his eyes glistening
[2:59] with tears. I agree with you completely.
[3:02] With eyes listening it is This is in Bajna Hasino in the song
[3:05] Jogi Mahi. This is also there in Yeh Jawani
[3:08] Hai Deewani and it is also there in AE Dil Hai Mushkil.
[3:12] All three movies where for some reason Ranbir Kapoor has a
[3:15] backpack on or is walking away from the wedding with the sad
[3:19] happy face and leaving behind his love to move on in life, I
[3:24] guess. I don't know and it's just the
[3:26] same exact scene. I can't believe that he has done
[3:28] the same exact scene in multiple movies.
[3:30] It is. I agree with you completely.
[3:32] The consistency should I agree with you completely and the
[3:36] characters are. Indiscreet.
[3:37] If you agree with the part that he should be given an award.
[3:40] Yes, they're all the same. They're all the same characters.
[3:43] And I don't know if you agree with the part that he should be
[3:45] given an Oscar for this, but he has played the same character in
[3:48] multiple movies. That part is very maybe the
[3:51] category could be the best consistency shown by an actor
[3:54] across movies. Yeah, that is and it's also.
[3:57] Let me let me let me just put it.
[3:58] I put this out there. Do you know that this is
[4:00] actually also been copied? Oh, I had no idea.
[4:04] Yes, it has. So if many people remember I If
[4:08] you're what if you watch Sherlock, Sherlock.
[4:11] Benedict Cumberbatch very famously copied the same kind of
[4:15] scene where he walks away from Watson's wedding into the night,
[4:19] putting on his coat, which I believe is a direct reference to
[4:23] and tribute to the great Ranbir Kapoor.
[4:26] Let us let us just put it out there into the ether that
[4:30] Benedict Cumberbatch is paying overage to Ranbir Kapoor's
[4:33] characters in that iconic, yes, Steven Moffat, you have some
[4:37] explaining to do. OK.
[4:42] How about you move on to some actual trivia?
[4:44] These shenanigans, why don't you start us off for this week
[4:47] Aditya with your question. OK.
[4:49] So my first question today is actually an audience question
[4:53] and this is a quick point for me to also make to any listener out
[4:57] there. Hey, if you like listening to
[4:59] our show and would like to contribute a question, please do
[5:02] send US1 on our social media or on our e-mail.
[5:06] We would love to receive one and we would absolutely love to have
[5:08] it as a question in our future episodes.
[5:11] This one is from one of our regular listeners, Anirudh,
[5:13] who's also a dear friend, Anirudh.
[5:16] Told me that he recently hosted a quiz himself and he also used
[5:19] some of our questions. Specifically, he used the
[5:23] question about Eli Lilly, the pharmaceutical company, and they
[5:27] broadcasted an event to the entire country when everybody
[5:30] rejoiced in America. This is a question we need asked
[5:33] a couple of episodes ago, so I needed to use this in his quiz.
[5:36] And the answer for If you're wondering, you'll have to go
[5:38] find that episode and listen to that episode.
[5:41] But he also gave me a lovely question that he suggested I
[5:44] could ask in the next episode. So I shall now.
[5:47] This question is from Science and Technology and it goes.
[5:51] In 1997, Gordon Moore, Intel's Co founder, saw an AMD processor
[5:58] in a computer and offered to upgrade that specific computer
[6:03] to a, quote UN quote, real computer with an Intel
[6:06] processor. Ever since then, a dedicated
[6:10] team at Intel. Has upgraded this computer every
[6:13] two years. Which computer am I talking
[6:16] about? S 1997 Intel engineer offers to
[6:22] upgrade a computer which had an AMD processor right and.
[6:28] Intel Co founder Gordon Moore. Very famous individual after
[6:32] whom Moore's Law is named. But OK, this is the oh, OK, he's
[6:38] pretty big. It's a big name.
[6:40] OK, so he offers to upgrade a computer, and he then continues
[6:45] to do so every two years, I'm guessing with Intel hardware.
[6:49] Yes, because it was an AMD processor.
[6:52] He offered to make it a quote UN quote, real computer tongue in
[6:55] cheek way of saying that hey, listen, use an Intel processor,
[6:57] not an AMD processor. And subsequently, every two
[7:01] years, Intel would actually upgrade that computer to what
[7:05] are the latest. Specifications were so this
[7:09] would be a this is a specific computer.
[7:13] You're talking about a specific unit, not like a a.
[7:17] It's not like a brand or a line of computers, right?
[7:19] It's it's a specific unit somewhere located.
[7:22] So, OK, first, I have no clue, but I think I know where the
[7:27] direction of this thing is going.
[7:28] So does it have to do anything with the US government?
[7:32] Is it like a computer at the White House?
[7:34] No, it doesn't. Or at NORAD or something, No.
[7:36] No, it does not. Since you mentioned that this
[7:39] question does have some more clues.
[7:40] So let me give you some clues. This computer, some very famous
[7:45] people have interacted with this computer as well.
[7:48] Some of the greatest minds, world leaders, scientists, even
[7:52] some actors have interacted with this specific computer.
[7:56] Is this IB Miss Deep Blue? No, this is not IB.
[7:59] Miss Deep Blue. Let me go ahead with another
[8:00] clue. Since March 2018, this computer
[8:04] has not been used. OK.
[8:06] Is this a computer? NASA?
[8:09] No. And OK, now I'm going to give
[8:10] you the last part of this question which Anirudh had put
[8:13] in the main question. So to be fair to you, Anirudh's
[8:15] question had a lot more clues in it.
[8:17] I have devolution divided up, so to make it more interesting we
[8:21] dastardly about it. Yes indeed.
[8:27] So the last clue that Anirudh that put in this question goes.
[8:32] To control the computer, an optical sensor would track
[8:35] movements of the user's cheek muscle below the right eye and
[8:40] relay that to a swift, key predictive keyboard.
[8:43] This is Stephen Hawking's text to speech Sorry, not movement.
[8:47] His tracks his eye and allows him to speak in that weird
[8:50] robotic voice. That's the thing, right?
[8:53] You should you should take full credit for getting this answer
[8:55] because technically his whole question had this in the 1st
[8:58] place, I just omitted it for true.
[9:01] Intrigue Yes, you did get it. You did get it.
[9:05] Yes, it is Stephen Hawking's computer.
[9:08] Sadly, since March 2018 it has not been used because that's
[9:11] when Stephen Hawking passed away.
[9:13] As I mentioned, a lot of people have interacted with Stephen
[9:16] Hawking through this computer and some actors.
[9:19] Actors, including those from Big Bang Theory.
[9:22] Yeah, Sheldon famously had a, you know, a fainting episode in
[9:27] front of Stephen Hawking, if I remember correctly.
[9:30] That's the one, yeah. This was a computer that Gordon
[9:33] Moore, who's Intel's Co founder, offered to upgrade back in 1997,
[9:38] and since then every two years they did do so.
[9:40] Interestingly enough, Moore's Law that I mentioned earlier
[9:43] says that the processors in rather the number of transistors
[9:48] in an integrated circuit will double every two years.
[9:52] So I wonder if the two year thing is just something that
[9:54] they do at Intel, like they just do upgrades every two years
[9:57] because Moore said that that's how often it should happen.
[10:01] But is that law? Is it still doubling every two
[10:05] years? I think it's stalled right right
[10:07] now because. It is.
[10:10] It is not really a law of physics as such.
[10:12] It is more of an empirical relationship and and when he
[10:16] predicted it, he said it only for the next 10 years.
[10:18] I think he did it in 1965 and he predicted it for the next 10
[10:22] years. So he wasn't making some
[10:25] prophecy for eternity and it has gotten a bit low since 2010.
[10:31] Apparently it has reduced the pace has reduced slightly, but
[10:35] it is still increasing. We probably have to move from
[10:37] binary to quantum computing to be able to get back to that, but
[10:40] there I think the spike would be quite high.
[10:42] It would be more of a sigmoid curve.
[10:44] Fancy, fancy terms. We need fancy terms.
[10:48] But you're right, yes. And yet I I am the one who's
[10:52] saying that you are, you're really throwing some jargon at
[10:54] me, which is going, yeah, go my head right now.
[10:58] So it's my turn for the question.
[11:00] And this is mine. There are, as of now, 2763 stars
[11:07] on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Only one star out of the 2763 is
[11:15] set on a vertical surface that it's not on, you know, the floor
[11:19] or on the pavement where all the stars usually are.
[11:22] There's only one out of these, 2763, which is on a vertical
[11:26] surface and it's on the wall of the Dolby Theater.
[11:32] OK, my question is who's Hollywood star on the Walk of
[11:37] Fame is set on a vertical surface?
[11:40] I do. This is, if I'm not wrong, this
[11:45] is Muhammad Ali. Yes, it is Muhammad Ali.
[11:47] Oh, this was too easy and I should have gone to something
[11:50] harder. But yes, this is Muhammad Ali.
[11:53] He did not want his star on the floor for two reasons.
[11:58] One, he didn't want people stepping on the name Muhammad.
[12:01] And #2. He didn't want people who didn't
[12:03] respect him stepping all over his name.
[12:06] Ah, OK, interesting. I knew the first reason.
[12:08] I didn't know the second one. OK.
[12:10] Yeah. So that's you got that way too
[12:15] quickly. Yeah.
[12:16] So that's that's why that was my question.
[12:18] So let's move on very quickly to your question.
[12:22] It is just one of those pieces of trivia which has something
[12:25] that sticks with you and you read it.
[12:27] But yeah, lovely, lovely question.
[12:29] Thanks for asking that, Vineet. OK, you know we have gotten
[12:32] comments that we are very formal.
[12:34] I hated that question, Vineet. Last question ever.
[12:42] I'm leaving that in, by the way. OK, for those of those of our
[12:49] listeners who think that we are too nice to each other, we shall
[12:53] rip each other apart once in a while.
[12:56] That's what the world wants to see.
[12:57] Just wants to see things burn. OK, so my question is the
[13:03] National Science Museum. Back in 1998, featured a
[13:09] sweater. A jumper.
[13:12] Why would the National Science Museum feature a jumper?
[13:17] Is a very simple question, which might not be the easiest to
[13:20] crack given the bare minimum information I've given so far.
[13:24] But in case you already know this trivia, I want you to have
[13:26] the opportunity to crack it immediately.
[13:29] I do not know this piece of trivia.
[13:31] There's a jumper, so this is, I'm guessing because you use the
[13:34] word jumper that this is the UK. Oh no, it's a sweater.
[13:39] I just said jumper sweater, but it is a sweater.
[13:43] OK, OK. OK.
[13:45] This is the US. This is the US.
[13:48] OK, fair enough, Fair enough. So I am going to guess that this
[13:56] because you said jumper, I'm guessing this belonged to
[13:59] somebody really famous. And the only person I can think
[14:03] of off the top of my head who's famous for wearing a jumper is a
[14:09] sweater or cardigan or whatever you want to call it, is Mr.
[14:13] Roger from the TV show for kids. Is it the jump?
[14:18] Is it one of his jumpers? Oh no, no, no.
[14:20] That's a very decent guess, but no, and this is not on the right
[14:23] track, so let me try to bring you back to the right direction.
[14:27] This was designed by a 12 year old girl.
[14:30] Her name was Holly Wharton. Holly designed a brightly
[14:34] colored sweater and won a nationwide contest with a
[14:38] blue-green and white image depicting 2 identical sheep
[14:41] grazing in a field. OK, so that throws my next guest
[14:44] out the window, which was going to be Jacqueline Kennedy's blood
[14:48] stained Chanel court, which I think could.
[14:51] Remember, it's the National Science Museum, Science Museum,
[14:54] Science Museum. So it's a bright blue jumper.
[14:57] Or OK, you've you've put that word in my head.
[15:00] Now I can only imagine jumpers. OK, so it's a bright blue jumper
[15:04] with two sheep, identical sheep grazing, and somebody designed
[15:10] this. A 12 year old girl designed
[15:12] this. It was part of a contest, a
[15:15] nationwide contest, and she won it.
[15:17] And eventually, this sweater was then featured in the National
[15:22] Science Museum. OK now, so usually Kant let me
[15:26] try to work this out. Usually contests are held when
[15:29] they want to create something for a particular event of
[15:33] something of that sort, right? Or to.
[15:37] Commemorate something or to commemorate something,
[15:40] obviously. So this it's not like this
[15:42] jumper's been to space or anything, right?
[15:44] No, no. But it is significant in the
[15:47] field of science, a jumper that's significant to the field
[15:51] of science, and two identical sheep.
[15:55] Is there anything else in that jumper that you're not talking
[15:58] about, say, an apple tree? They're grazing in a field.
[16:02] They're grazing in a field. OK, there is no apple tree.
[16:07] There is no because I was thinking of Newton and maybe
[16:09] something to do with Newton. Why would they have a sweater in
[16:13] a Science Museum? 2 sheep?
[16:18] There is no such thing as Schrodinger's sheep, is there?
[16:21] No, because I was wondering if you have one sheep in front and
[16:24] the other sheep behind. You don't know if there's a
[16:27] sheep behind unless you go look. This sounds like when you know
[16:33] when you're in school and they tell you that the Ashoka statue,
[16:38] the symbol, it has four lions. You just can't see the 4th lion
[16:41] because it's hidden behind and it blew my mind the first time I
[16:44] realized it was like there are no three, but four sounds
[16:48] exactly like that. So let's let's let's move away
[16:53] from Schrodinger's sheep. I need another clue.
[16:58] Holly Wharton, who was the designer of this thing, the 12
[17:01] year old girl, when she was presenting it at the museum.
[17:06] She was accompanied by an actress, Jenny Aguta.
[17:10] Jenny Aguta. Aguta, My bad Aguta, Yes, Jenny
[17:14] Aguta, who is a carrier of the hereditary disease cystic
[17:17] fibrosis. Aguta's interest in this
[17:20] particular scientific, let's call it achievement, was.
[17:26] The fact that someday the technology that came from it
[17:31] could help cure the disease or find solutions for the disease
[17:36] and for people who suffer from it.
[17:38] Did you by any chance tell me which year this jumper went on
[17:43] view? Yes, this is 1998.
[17:47] This is the cloning of Dolly. This is the wool from Dolly.
[17:52] You are right. OK.
[17:53] They use the wool from Dolly to make the jumper.
[17:56] OK, yes. It is a sweater made from the
[17:58] wool of Dolly and they held a contest nationwide contest to
[18:03] design it and which is why I mentioned it is a blue-green and
[18:06] white image depicting 2 identical sheep.
[18:10] I did not catch that the first time around, but then when you
[18:13] because it was it is my fault because I kept thinking in the
[18:16] 60s the National Science, because my mind went to the 60s,
[18:19] which is why I was thinking has it gone to space in the Apollo
[18:22] space program? Is it something to do with the
[18:25] Kennedy's assassination? So all my thoughts were way back
[18:28] and suddenly hit me. Is it the Is it the 90s?
[18:31] Well, that was a very good crack for anybody who might not be
[18:34] aware. Dolly was a sheep which was
[18:37] created from the other of of an adult sheep and was the first
[18:42] mammal to be cloned in that particular way.
[18:45] Dolly was the first proof of concept of cloning in the animal
[18:49] world and hence it could also, as was assumed that it could one
[18:55] day help find cures for diseases like cystic fibrosis.
[18:59] And that's how they commemorated Dolly's wool, by creating a
[19:03] sweater from it. I wonder what happened to the
[19:06] like. This is a very morbid thought
[19:07] and not something I should be thinking.
[19:09] But you know, these are the kind of thoughts that pass through my
[19:11] head. I wonder, like after Dolly died?
[19:13] Or did they kill her? If she did die, what did they do
[19:16] with the body? Basically, did Dolly end up as a
[19:19] rack of lamb on somebody's plate?
[19:21] Or a goat Curry. Or a sheep.
[19:24] I mean that that is a very morbid thought beneath.
[19:28] You know, this is like when you watch a movie and you think, oh,
[19:32] the dog in that movie is probably dead now because it has
[19:35] been 30 years since that movie came out.
[19:37] So that dog is definitely dead. Look at us, two morbid folks
[19:42] laughing at dead animals. So I am going to go to a little
[19:47] different format for the few more questions this week.
[19:50] So have you heard of misleading movie descriptions?
[19:55] So this is something I went down a rabbit hole when I was as
[19:59] usual, trawling the Internet. So there are these descriptions
[20:04] of movies crafted by people much smarter than me, which give a
[20:10] semi accurate picture of the movie itself.
[20:14] But maybe from a different point of view.
[20:16] OK, so I will give you these descriptions.
[20:19] I will do it in sets of three, and you can let me know what
[20:24] movie this is from the description.
[20:26] OK, OK, so at first I'll give you the description.
[20:29] And for a clue, if you ask for a clue, I'll give you the year in
[20:33] which the movie was released, which should help you.
[20:35] OK, so the first one, an Army veteran, learns about family
[20:41] values when he takes over his aging father's business.
[20:46] Army vet family values. Oh, Godfather.
[20:51] Yes. OK, you you've got the hang of
[20:54] this very quickly, so I'll move on to the next one.
[20:58] OK, a beautiful French woman hides a secret affair with a
[21:03] traitor and terrorist from her gay husband.
[21:07] She gets pregnant with the terrorist's baby and uses the
[21:10] fact to torture her father-in-law just before the
[21:13] terrorist gets executed in a very gruesome manner.
[21:17] Oh, wow. Just OK because I've not seen
[21:20] this movie. So it I don't know if this is
[21:22] the plot of the film. Is it Les Miserables?
[21:27] No, it is not Les Miserables. OK, oh, and sorry, What did he
[21:31] say about the execution? The father-in-law or something?
[21:33] What was that? Yeah, so she gets pregnant with
[21:36] a terrorist's baby and uses that fact to torture the
[21:40] father-in-law just before the terrorist gets executed in a
[21:44] very gruesome manner. Do you want a clue?
[21:49] Yeah, give me a clue. OK Movie released in 1995. 95
[21:55] Braveheart did not marry a French woman, did he?
[21:59] No, I never said he married the French woman.
[22:02] I said that he had an affair with the French woman.
[22:04] And you're right, it is Braveheart.
[22:06] It is Braveheart. It is Braveheart.
[22:08] Sophie Marceau, a very beautiful French woman.
[22:12] OK, this is a pretty easy one. I have a feeling you'll get this
[22:17] very quickly. An eclectic group of dreamers
[22:21] meets a poor little rich boy on a plane and try to change how he
[22:24] feels about losing his father. Inception I guess.
[22:29] Very good, I. Love the description, poor
[22:31] little rich boy. I mean like that is kind of it
[22:36] is kind of apartment when you think of Kitty.
[22:38] And ma people, it is quite apt. I will save the next three for
[22:42] after your question. So I think they hit me with
[22:45] whatever you have. Tip it with your best chat.
[22:47] OK, that was fun. Well, since you did bring up
[22:50] film, I'm going to talk about Hollywood as well, and I'm going
[22:54] to name 4 characters. Tell me which 2004 film are they
[23:01] from? The names of these characters
[23:04] are. Harry, Larry, Flow and MO Harry,
[23:08] Larry Flow and MO. It's from a 2004 movie.
[23:15] Yeah, and these are the main characters.
[23:17] Or have you just named some bit part characters along with the
[23:21] main character? So technically in the movie
[23:24] itself they are never named, but these are the names given by
[23:29] their boss who got really attached to them and.
[23:35] Decided to name them something because they didn't have a name
[23:38] to begin with. What your despicable immunities?
[23:41] Are these names of minions or something?
[23:43] No, this is not. This is not.
[23:45] That's a great guess, but no, they're not named in the movie.
[23:49] 2004 film Larry, Larry, Flo and more.
[23:54] Are these human characters? Ah, great question.
[23:57] They're not. OK, so they're not human.
[24:01] For dogs? For robots?
[24:04] For cats? What could it be?
[24:06] What could it be? Do you have any other clues to
[24:09] give me? So I mentioned that these
[24:10] characters first appeared in 2004.
[24:15] They also appeared again in 2021, in 2021.
[24:21] And both of these are massive hits.
[24:23] Both of these films were just very popular at the time of the
[24:29] release. I am completely blanking on
[24:32] this. So a sequel after what, 17
[24:37] years? So then, this is not a sequel.
[24:40] Technically it is part of the same lore, but it's not a direct
[24:45] sequel. Let me actually tell you more
[24:47] specifically, this is part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe,
[24:53] or at least partially part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
[24:57] OK, let me get out a little bit. So the first Marvel, technically
[25:01] the first MCU movie would be Iron Man, but that was 2008.
[25:05] So you said 2004, which would make it a Marvel movie basically
[25:11] from based on a Marvel product. What do you call it?
[25:13] Property. It would be Marvel IP, but
[25:16] produced by somebody else, I'm guessing.
[25:18] Yeah. So in those days, New Line had
[25:21] Blade, which they released in 98.
[25:25] The others were Sony. The other characters were with
[25:27] Sony. Which were This is the Sony
[25:31] production, so that makes it Spider Man.
[25:33] Correct were these characters which are non human.
[25:37] I'll give it to you. Spider Man 2 Spider Man 2 Spider
[25:41] Man Wait Are these dark ox arms? Yes, these are dark ox arms.
[25:47] Wow. Seriously, Harry.
[25:50] Larry. I said Molina the the very
[25:53] iconic. Doc actor from Spider Man 2.
[25:58] He was a little. Too attached to his tentacles
[26:01] and he gave them names. So he called them Harry, Larry,
[26:04] Flow, and more, and he used to distinguish them based on their
[26:08] strength and their dexterity. Harry and Larry were the lower
[26:11] extremities. They were bigger, bigger and
[26:13] heavier. Flow and More was slightly
[26:15] smaller but very powerful still. And Flow rested on Octavis's
[26:20] right shoulder and did all the delicate, intricate stuff.
[26:24] Such as removing Doctor Octavis's glasses and lighting a
[26:27] cigar for him. So at some point, Alfred Molina
[26:30] got really attached to the tentacles and named them Harry,
[26:33] Larry Flow and more. You know, you know, what's
[26:36] really surprising for me is I've seen the kind of behind the
[26:39] scenes for Spider Man 2 and the way that they have, they had
[26:43] the, like multiple puppeteers with, you know, almost like
[26:46] puppet strings and things like that to animate or to move these
[26:50] particular, you know, arms tentacles.
[26:53] So I wonder, was he actually calling it calling the arms
[26:57] Harry Larry Flow or more? Or was he, you know, very subtly
[27:02] and deceptively using those names for the puppeteers
[27:04] themselves? A true actor does not see
[27:08] anything except what is in the scene with him, so he probably
[27:11] did not even care about the puppeteers.
[27:13] All you cared about were the tentacles and OK, no, that's
[27:18] that's a solid question. I had absolutely a lot of fun
[27:21] working that out. Oh, this is nice.
[27:23] That was a nice question. OK, OK, I see you.
[27:26] I see you. So I'm going to go back to my
[27:30] misleading movie descriptions. And this is a favorite one of
[27:34] mine because I partly made it up and I got part of it from the
[27:37] Internet. So this is a favorite one of
[27:39] mine. A group of colorful characters
[27:42] have a workplace disagreement, leading to an 87.5% mortality
[27:48] rate. Reservoir Dogs, is that OK?
[27:55] Yes, you're you're right. It is Reservoir.
[27:57] How did you come to it? How did you get that so quickly?
[27:59] I was hoping I would have to give you at least a year for
[28:02] this one. 87.5 I was thinking 87.5.
[28:08] That means it has to be one in what, nine people?
[28:13] One in eight. One in eight people survive.
[28:15] One in eight people survive. Yeah.
[28:16] So the only thing which means initially when you were saying
[28:19] workplace disagreement, I thought, oh, maybe some space
[28:21] film where something happens out in space.
[28:25] There are some very good films about that, but I don't know if
[28:28] you've watched Solaris. But it is a fantastic.
[28:33] Oh no, sorry. My bad, my bad.
[28:34] Solaris is also a great film. I was talking about Sunshine.
[28:36] Sunshine is also a fantastic. Oh Sunshine, Danny Boyle, My
[28:39] God, that was. That's like the first good real
[28:42] space horror apart from Alien that I've seen.
[28:46] And if you haven't watched this film, I would suggest just
[28:48] skipping ahead 30 seconds because I'm going to spoil it.
[28:51] There are massive disagreements there and everybody dies in that
[28:55] film. So I feel that was not 87.5%
[28:57] survival rate. Hence no.
[29:00] It's a fantastic film and I think quite underrated.
[29:03] It's not very popular or high upon most people's lists, but I
[29:08] I love that movie. It's one of my favorite space
[29:11] horrors, even more than Event Horizon, which is just a bonkers
[29:15] movie. Lot of God, it's like Hellraiser
[29:17] in space. OK, so let me try and stump you
[29:23] with this. This actually I have to give
[29:25] credit to. This description is an actual
[29:29] description that came in ATV guide sometime in 9798 if I'm
[29:33] not mistaken. So it's it's an iconic
[29:35] description. A lot of people have heard about
[29:36] it because I can't remember the person's name who actually wrote
[29:41] it at the first time, but he's famous for having written this
[29:44] description. So keep in mind this is an
[29:46] actual description which appeared in an actual TV Guide
[29:49] in the late 90s. OK, transported to a surreal
[29:54] landscape, a young girl kills the first person she meets and
[29:59] then teams up with three strangers to kill again.
[30:01] Wizard of Oz, Yes. Oh, I love that description
[30:10] because my mind immediately went to like something like Mad Max
[30:12] or something. But then Wizard of Oz.
[30:14] Yes. OK, and this is this is also an
[30:17] easy one. I'll be very surprised if you
[30:19] don't get it very quickly. Just me hedging my bets here due
[30:23] to the voices in his head. A young man helps wanted
[30:27] terrorists kill thousands in a bid to seduce his sister.
[30:31] Huh. What?
[30:32] That that stumped me. He OK due to the due to the
[30:38] voices in his head. A young man helps wanted
[30:41] terrorists kill thousands in a bid to seduce his sister due.
[30:46] To his sister. Oh, and this is an iconic film.
[30:51] Yeah, all of these are like, you know, movies you've definitely
[30:54] known, definitely out of. The only one which is very
[30:57] iconic which I can think of somebody trying to seduce
[30:59] sister's gladiator, but there is no terrorist in that, no.
[31:05] A brother trying to seduce a sister?
[31:07] Oh, that should not be. A lot of films, I'd imagine.
[31:12] Do you want a clue? Yes.
[31:15] Wow. Yeah.
[31:17] Yeah. So yeah, so before giving,
[31:19] because I think the year would give it away too quickly and
[31:21] you've been catching into all of these too fast.
[31:23] So I'm going to give you another clue.
[31:25] At least at this point of time he didn't know she was his
[31:28] sister. That's also a giveaway.
[31:31] Oh, Star Wars. OK, that makes a lot more sense.
[31:41] OK, one last one before we get end up this set.
[31:46] This again is a description I heard on a another podcast.
[31:50] It's called Let's Learn Everything.
[31:52] It's an amazing podcast. Listen to it there.
[31:54] They basically spend 1 1/2 hours every week just giving you with
[31:59] a lot of knowledge. This is something I heard on
[32:01] about that. I don't know where they got it,
[32:03] but this is where I heard it. And this is a paraphrasing.
[32:06] I'm not using their exact phrasing.
[32:07] Slight changes to this. So this is how it goes.
[32:09] Partners protecting a senator split up after an assassination
[32:14] attempt. The older, wiser partner or
[32:17] mentor investigates the assassin, leading him to
[32:20] research libraries, CD bars and secret government facilities.
[32:25] The younger brash partner or mentee stays with the senator
[32:30] and in a not unsurprising turn of events, commits a war crime
[32:34] sounds. Like a very specific plot that I
[32:37] should remember If I've seen it, I'd be surprised.
[32:40] If you're not you, I'm fairly sure you would have movies a big
[32:43] deal like it was a big deal when it came out.
[32:46] And it's within our lifetime, you know, Gen.
[32:49] Y. Throwback to previous episode.
[32:52] OK, two bodyguards. One of them investigates the
[32:56] assassination attempt, goes into the underbelly of the city.
[32:59] The other one ends up committing a war crime.
[33:02] Yeah. The younger Papa stays with the
[33:04] senator and in a not and and in a not unsurprising turn of
[33:09] events, commits a war crime. Is this Star Wars also the
[33:13] prequels? Which one?
[33:17] The third one, right? Is it the Clone Wars or is it?
[33:20] It's it is it is. Attack of the Clones Star Wars
[33:22] Episode Two, Attack of the Clones.
[33:25] Attack of the Clones. So send me so Senator Ahmed
[33:29] Allah, there's an assassination attempt against her.
[33:31] There's a very thrilling chase sequence through the skies and
[33:35] in the end the assassin is killed.
[33:38] Obi Wan Kenobi goes searching for the assassin, finds the
[33:41] whole clone army, and in a secret government facility.
[33:45] Anakin Skywalker stays with Padme to protect her, falls in
[33:49] love with her. When he visits Tatooine to visit
[33:52] his mother, he finds out that his mother has been killed by
[33:55] Banta Banta Raiders and so then he goes and wipes out an entire
[33:59] village, which technically is a war crime.
[34:01] In my defense, the prequel movies have pretty much been
[34:04] suppressed in my mind. Like, I feel like I've forgotten
[34:07] most of them. So yeah, see, The thing is there
[34:11] is a lot of trade agreements and things like that.
[34:13] But I would. I haven't seen Ahsoka.
[34:16] People have been telling me Ahsoka is really good, the new
[34:19] TV series, the one on Disney. But I would defend at least the
[34:25] first movie, The Phantom Menace. Do you?
[34:28] Defend the Phantom Menace. Yes, I will defend The Phantom
[34:31] Menace for the last 15 to 20 minutes because the last
[34:36] lightsaber fight between Darth Maul, Qui Gon Jin and a very
[34:41] young Obi Wan Kenobi as probably the best.
[34:45] Well, lad Saber fight in the entire, you know, 6 or 9 movies
[34:49] or whichever one you look at. Because the lightsaber duels in
[34:53] the last three trailer, the last three movies released Ben Solo
[34:57] and whatnot. Yeah, not great.
[35:00] I mean, like, really you should just watch them in slow motion.
[35:02] It's just horrible. But this fight, it is.
[35:07] I mean, like, it's a story. You can actually watch it.
[35:09] How, you know, the fight goes between Liam Neeson and Darth
[35:14] Maul, played by an amazing, fantastic Ray Park.
[35:16] A very acrobatic Ray Park. And then Qui Gon Jing is cut
[35:19] down and then Kenobi just picks up.
[35:23] Then he goes from being the Paragon to the master and him
[35:27] cutting down Ray Park's Darth Maul and then becoming Anakin's
[35:32] Master. Is the transition point the
[35:33] first transition point for Obi Wan?
[35:36] I agree. No that is fantastic scene.
[35:39] I would also recommend because I recently saw this video where
[35:41] they were talking about film and music that is used in films.
[35:45] Oh yes, watching the same scene and they use that as a example.
[35:48] Watching that same scene without John Williams score, it just
[35:51] feels like the soul of the scene has gone away.
[35:54] I I think if I'm not mistaken we can Fact Check this, but I think
[35:58] that particular theme is called Duel of the Fates.
[36:01] But perhaps, perhaps. But it is just a genius score
[36:04] which elevates that scene so much beyond what it already is.
[36:07] A great scene. So I cannot fault you for loving
[36:11] that sequence. Yeah, for sure.
[36:13] Fight choreography in that is number one, Number one.
[36:16] But to also be fair, that is the movie that introduced us to Jar
[36:19] Jar Binks. Jar Jar Binks cannot be
[36:23] redeemed. I mean like nobody can defend
[36:26] Jar Jar Binks, unfortunately. Miss.
[36:31] I agree. OK, let us do my, I believe,
[36:37] last question for this episode. Yes.
[36:40] OK, so we are moving from Hollywood all the way to the UK
[36:47] and entertainment in the UK now. This particular idea for the
[36:51] show came to the creator, Ian Messeta.
[36:58] As he was riding on the top of a #13 bus, he recalled Percival
[37:03] Parry Jones, a history master from his own days at Sherbourne
[37:07] School. This particular master, when
[37:10] seeing the young messetor daydreaming in a class,
[37:13] instructed him to do something very specific.
[37:16] Messeter realized that this would be a great idea for a
[37:19] show. Which show?
[37:21] Which iconic show in the UK am I talking about?
[37:25] So it's an iconic TV show on on top of a #13 bus.
[37:29] I think then 13 would be important for some reason.
[37:31] Again, not very relevant. Lot of red herrings.
[37:35] Lot of red herrings. OK, so the only major clue I
[37:39] have is that this is something he was asked to do when he was
[37:42] daydreaming, and this is an iconic British show.
[37:46] It's actually a panel show. Oh, OK, so then let me start
[37:49] listing. The panel shows on British
[37:52] television. This is what, 9 out of 10 cats
[37:56] countdown? No, no University Challenge.
[38:00] No, the weakest link. Also, might I clarify this has
[38:05] while this. While this show has been adapted
[38:08] for TV, this was originally a radio show.
[38:11] I don't think I mentioned that, but this was originally a radio
[38:14] show. It is ABBC radio show ABBC
[38:17] Radio. Has been adapted for TV as well.
[38:19] It's been erupted for television Mastermind.
[38:22] But no, that has its inspiration from the Gestapo interrogations
[38:26] during World War 2. Not mastermind.
[38:28] Then Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?
[38:29] But that's not a panel show. That's just a wow.
[38:33] Wait, is this Qi? This is not QII.
[38:36] Would have also guessed Qi if I was posed this question.
[38:38] But no, not Qi. You know, because I'm basically
[38:41] just at this point, guessing panel shows, all the panel shows
[38:44] that I've seen on British television.
[38:47] I don't know if this will help you, but the person who hosted
[38:51] it for almost 50 years, I believe, was this gentleman
[38:55] called Nicholas Parsons. It's a British individual.
[39:00] Oh, why is that name familiar? He passed away in 2020.
[39:05] That name is familiar. This is not countdown right?
[39:08] This is not Countdown. I would know the show, right?
[39:12] It's not like one of these obscure ITV shows that.
[39:15] It it has been running for more than 50 years.
[39:19] It has had some very iconic people who have appeared on it.
[39:23] Some of the people are Graham Norton Superkin, Stephen Fry
[39:29] names that you would. To be fair, I don't think
[39:32] there's any panel show on which to Stephen Fry has not appeared.
[39:37] True, he's he's the BBC staple. Do you have any other clues?
[39:42] OK, so let me tell you what happened in that iconic historic
[39:47] day where Messita was a little boy in his school and he was
[39:52] daydreaming in class. His history master asked him to
[39:56] repeat everything that had just been said, but he gave him two
[40:02] restrictions. Now Ian Messita, when he adapted
[40:04] this for the show, he added a third restriction and that has
[40:08] become the iconic basically format for this particular show.
[40:12] I think you might not be very well versed with the show, but
[40:15] it once I say the name it should ring a bell I'd imagine.
[40:18] OK, is it currently being hosted by a comedian?
[40:22] It is hosted by Sue Perkins. Sue Perkins is hosting the show.
[40:27] What show? Sue Perkins hosting.
[40:28] Nope. Man, I think I spent too much.
[40:30] I I don't. I I my mind is not going to, let
[40:33] me just tell you what, let me just tell you what Percival
[40:36] Perry Jones, the history teacher, said.
[40:38] He said repeat everything that has been said in the previous
[40:40] minute without hesitation or repetition.
[40:44] Mess, iterate later. Also added the rule that you
[40:48] cannot deviate from the subject, so you have.
[40:51] To talk, continue hesitation, repetition, and without
[40:56] repeating yourself. I we have versions of this in.
[41:01] Fests and competitions all across college, That's how.
[41:03] Yes, so this is this is actually how most people in India would
[41:06] know it. They might not know of the
[41:07] original show, but this happens in almost every fest in every
[41:10] College in India. The version of this.
[41:12] So you have your dump charades, you have your plays, you have
[41:17] your dance competition. You also have this.
[41:19] Yes, yes, I know that. But now this is how numb my
[41:24] brain is. I cannot for the life of me
[41:25] remember because I have participated in these things
[41:28] before. Granted, it was like 1015 years
[41:31] ago in school and whatnot, but I can't remember what this is.
[41:35] I said, oh God, I can't remember what this is called.
[41:39] You have to speak for a minute without hesitation, repetition
[41:42] and deviation. Yes, I know, I know, I know, I
[41:44] know. And then people can challenge
[41:46] you in between. And then you got called out and
[41:47] you get and the person who ends the minute gets the points.
[41:50] I know the rules. I've played it before, but I
[41:53] can't remember what it is now. Oh God, this is so stupid.
[41:59] I'm having a brain fart, man. I'm very sorry.
[42:01] OK. No, no, no.
[42:02] But I'll give it to you because you are obviously aware of what
[42:06] it is called. It's called just a minute.
[42:07] It's a. Just a minute.
[42:08] Jam. Jam.
[42:09] Jam. Yes, it's Jam.
[42:12] OK Oh, God. Yeah.
[42:14] I think my. Oh, this is just bad.
[42:18] This is just bad. This is no, don't be sorry.
[42:22] This is just the worst moment on this podcast that I've had.
[42:26] See, my gut instinct is to be nice to you.
[42:28] But then apparently our listeners want us to be rude to
[42:30] each other. So we need shame.
[42:33] Shame. We need shame.
[42:36] You're missing a bell. You need a bell to go along
[42:38] with. It doesn't have any spec to be a
[42:39] bell for it. Oh God, nice.
[42:44] Nice. Man.
[42:46] I should have gotten that one, but jello.
[42:48] OK, I'll finish off today's set with a few more misleading movie
[42:53] descriptions. So here goes.
[42:56] Three failed college professors start a company where they
[42:58] threaten businesses for money, use their position to coerce
[43:02] dates and destroy the environment.
[43:06] What? Coerce dates and destroy the
[43:09] environment. Destroy the environment.
[43:11] That's a major plot point. No, no, no idea.
[43:15] Oh, OK. The year is 1984 Nineteen Eighty
[43:20] OH. Ghostbusters.
[43:23] Yes. This is Ghostbusters.
[43:25] Yes? You said three.
[43:28] There are four Ghostbusters, Vineet.
[43:30] You always forget that, professors.
[43:32] No, no, I said. 3 college professors founded the company.
[43:35] The 4th one came in much later. That is true.
[43:39] That is true. OK, yes you are right.
[43:40] I am wrong? A student uses a powerful device
[43:45] to do her homework, save her friend's pet and an escaped
[43:48] convict. Powerful device?
[43:51] Yeah, do her homework, save her friends pet, and help an escaped
[43:57] convict. Nope.
[43:59] No idea. OK, this is 2004 still blanking.
[44:04] It's my brain fart moment. No, I'm just thinking of what
[44:09] kind of clue I could give for this.
[44:12] OK, let's just say that the importance of the things that
[44:17] I've mentioned. Right, I've mentioned homework,
[44:20] saving a friend's pet and escape convict.
[44:22] The importance of these particular acts to that person,
[44:29] to to the student is in the following order.
[44:33] Least Important escape convict. Somewhat important.
[44:38] Saving her friend's pet. Most important, doing her
[44:41] homework, OK? At least I'm extrapolating.
[44:45] They don't mention this anywhere in the movie, but I'm
[44:47] extrapolating knowing the character.
[44:49] OK, oh, this is Prisoner of Azkaban?
[44:53] Yes, this. Is Harry Potter and the Prisoner
[44:55] of Azkaban? And we're quoting Hermione
[44:59] Granger, who once said you might get killed or worse, expelled.
[45:05] Expelled. Lovely.
[45:08] Yes, OK. An orphan torn between his home
[45:12] and heritage realizes that he must condemn an entire race.
[45:16] Forced into an impossible choice, he commits genocide and
[45:21] then follows it up with a justifiable homicide.
[45:24] No, give me the year. 2013 Oh, is this a superhero film by any
[45:30] chance? Yes, this is Is this Superman?
[45:36] It's Man of Steel. This is Man of Steel.
[45:38] Yes, yes, you have that. It is Man of Steel, OK, a tragic
[45:45] tale of a father who goes to great extremes to save his son
[45:51] from an assassin obsessed with killing him.
[45:54] He ultimately fails and dies trying to get revenge where the
[45:58] father dies or the son dies. The father, basically.
[46:02] I'll repeat the description again.
[46:04] A tragic tale of a father who goes to extremes.
[46:09] To save his son from an assassin obsessed with killing him, he
[46:13] ultimately fails and dies trying to get revenge.
[46:17] It's very tragic trying to get revenge.
[46:20] This is not Lion King, right? No, no.
[46:23] I have no context right now. No clue.
[46:25] OK. This is 20/14/2014.
[46:29] Doesn't ring a bell. OK, this assassin is a an
[46:34] extreme mass murderer. In this movie, Assassin is a
[46:37] mass murderer. Yeah, very high body count.
[46:41] And his father tries everything to save his son.
[46:45] Is this John Wick? Yes, yes.
[46:49] This is John Wick. OK.
[46:52] Yep. Yep.
[46:53] Well, see it from his father, from the Russians viewpoint man.
[46:57] He's desperately trying to save his son from this guy who's
[46:59] killing hundreds of people. Like what is John Wick's body
[47:03] count till now? John Wick.
[47:04] Is spoiler alert for anybody who's not watched John Wick 4,
[47:07] but I like the fact that they ended the movie with him dying
[47:11] because there's no other way you would end John Wick's story.
[47:14] I mean like he can't keep just be killing people and then
[47:17] getting away with it and then finally living happily ever
[47:19] after. Like this is not possible.
[47:21] That was the only possible outcome, yeah.
[47:24] And it was a pretty great send off also for a very iconic
[47:28] character. So this is the last one for this
[47:32] episode. And for this particular set, a
[47:35] daughter disobeys her father and goes on a long sailing trip with
[47:41] a muscle bound, tattooed up. Narcissist, this is Moana.
[47:46] Yes, this is Moana and Aditya has completed a very successful
[47:50] set of misleading movie descriptions.
[47:53] Let me just give me give the disclaimer again, most of these
[47:57] are not my creation. I have borrowed.
[47:59] And adapted and added my own spin to a lot of descriptions
[48:03] I've gotten from the Internet. This is a very popular thing
[48:06] with a lot. Hundreds more of these kinds of
[48:08] descriptions are available online.
[48:09] You just have to search for them.
[48:11] I don't own any of this, so don't you know message us saying
[48:15] that you can't add from this website on this forum.
[48:18] I know I did get it from that website on that forum so.
[48:24] Aditya. Honestly, no, no.
[48:25] Do messages, please. I love receiving messages.
[48:27] Even if there's some hate mail, I like it.
[48:30] I think no publicity is worse than bad publicity.
[48:33] So yeah, it is up. No, I don't think.
[48:37] That's how it goes. I don't think that's how it
[48:40] goes. I just what let me make
[48:44] something up. Yes, definitely.
[48:47] So Adika, what's your question to keep our audience on
[48:50] tenterhooks until next week? Or should I say meat hooks?
[48:53] So my question is a reference to vineet's question about how a
[48:57] Hollywood Walk of Fame star, the only one to be placed not on the
[49:03] flat surface but instead on a vertical surface, is that of
[49:07] Muhammad Ali's. My question is, if there ever
[49:10] was to be a Hollywood Walk of Fame star which would be on the
[49:12] roof, which particular star would that be?
[49:18] Instead of the floor, instead of the wall, it would be on the
[49:20] roof. What star would that be?
[49:22] And the answer will be revealed in next week's episode.
[49:25] Yes, hang on, more meat hooks till then.
[49:28] So before we end the episode definitively does the matter of
[49:33] the audience question. So the audience question for
[49:35] this week was as follows. This week's episode was as
[49:38] follows. A Chinese gooseberry is the
[49:40] edible Berry of several species of what we find in the genus
[49:44] Actinidia. It is native to Central and
[49:46] Eastern Asia, the first recorded description dating back to the
[49:50] 12th century, during the Song Dynasty.
[49:52] In the early 20th century, cultivation of the Chinese
[49:55] gooseberry spread to another nation, which gave it a name
[49:59] from its own indigenous language, the name by which we
[50:02] know it today. It soon became popular with
[50:04] Allied servicemen stationed in the country during World War 2,
[50:07] which soon led to increased demand after the war and
[50:10] consequently its cultivation all across the world.
[50:14] How do we better know the Chinese gooseberry Aditya?
[50:19] I can see from your face that you probably know this or
[50:22] question and the answer. So do you want to tell our
[50:25] audience what the answer is? I believe the answer is Kiwi.
[50:30] Yes, it is the Kiwi fruit. The Kiwi fruit is originally
[50:34] from China, and it was called initially the Chinese gooseberry
[50:38] cultivation of it in New Zealand.
[50:41] Led to it being given the name the Kiwi Fruit from its own
[50:45] indigenous Maori language. Allied Forces, which was
[50:49] stationed in New Zealand, grew quite fond of the fruit and when
[50:53] they went back to their respective homes after the war,
[50:56] they demanded or they there was a demand for this fruit and soon
[51:00] it was cultivated in many parts of the world, and now it's quite
[51:03] ubiquitous. You get in most countries,
[51:04] either grown there or imported. So that's the end.
[51:11] Of today's episode. Thank you for listening in.
[51:14] We hope you enjoyed the show and you learned something new.
[51:16] If you like what you heard, please consider subscribing to
[51:18] our podcast and leaving us a review on your favorite podcast
[51:21] platform wherever you're listening to us right now.
[51:24] It helps us reach a wider audience and allows more people
[51:26] to discover and enjoy the show. We would also love to hear from
[51:30] you feedback, suggestions, trivia questions like Aditya got
[51:34] today from Anirudh. Thank you Anirudh again.
[51:37] You can send it to our personal Instagram accounts or to the OR
[51:42] to our account on Instagram at RU quizzing me.
[51:45] We appreciate your support and look forward to sharing more
[51:47] episodes with you in the future. Aditya, our Fact checker General
[51:51] will be back with the Fact Check after the musical sting.
[51:55] So that's all for me for today's episode.
[51:58] See you guys next week. Bye, bye.

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.
