# Episode 062 - Grammys, Overprints & Frankenstein

An episode of [Are You Quizzing Me?](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1663104901), 1 Apr 2024, 57 min.

Audio: https://anchor.fm/s/d7afa960/podcast/play/84796088/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2024-3-1%2F08e03480-1a9a-2ff6-fbeb-1a08670a4525.mp3

Do you know who's the 3rd oldest person to ever win a Grammy when he won his 3rd Grammy in 2019 at the age of 94? Do you know why the US once over-printed the name of a state on their currency? Do you know which two actors alternated between playing Victor Frankenstein and the monster in the 2011 Danny Boyle stage production of the play based on Mary Shelly's Frankenstein? Tune in to find out!! You can reach us at Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/areyouquizzingme/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/areyouquizzingme Email: areyouquizzingme@gmail.com Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/areyouquizzingme

## Transcript

[0:00] Welcome to Are you quizzing Me? I am Vineet Nair with my Co host
[0:04] Aditya Kashyap. This is a quizzing trivia
[0:07] podcast show. Join us as we dive deep into
[0:10] history, science, pop culture and so much more.
[0:14] Let's get quizzing and we're back, ladies and gentlemen, for
[0:20] Episode #62 of Your Favorite Quizzing and Trivia podcast
[0:24] show. Are you quizzing me, Aditya and
[0:27] are back for another round of quizzing?
[0:29] Let's start off today's episode with the audience question,
[0:33] which I will answer at the end of today's episode.
[0:37] So X is the dish that is invented in Canada by a Greek
[0:43] immigrant who was inspired by Chinese food to put a South
[0:47] American ingredient on an Italian dish that is now most
[0:52] popular in Australia. Let me repeat that for you.
[0:56] This dish was invented in Canada by a Greek immigrant who was
[1:00] inspired by Chinese food to put a South American ingredient on
[1:04] an Italian dish that is now most popular in Australia.
[1:08] However, this is not named after any of these places.
[1:12] What dish am I talking about? I will reveal the answer at the
[1:16] end of today's episode. Now, as to the question that
[1:19] Aditya had asked last week, let me hand over the baton to
[1:23] Aditya. Beneath I asked last week which
[1:27] movie has been named after food accidentally.
[1:34] Just like Dabangg, the Bollywood hit was somehow also the name
[1:41] for Korean coffee and tea shops. So here's the answer for this
[1:46] week. We have a few answers.
[1:48] This week we of course had Anda, Apna.
[1:51] Apna which is also the name of a restaurant so if you like eggs
[1:56] your own way, you get. And obviously there is grill
[2:00] say. Like if you like a food grill
[2:04] and you want it directly from the grill you say grill say of
[2:08] course Aja naturally like if you like your nachos there is Kane,
[2:14] bido, Yarrow. Plus, of course you want to eat,
[2:17] then you want to eat. And I believe my favorite out of
[2:21] all of them is bake up Sid. Because why not?
[2:28] In this case, I do have to credit a certain individual
[2:31] sayantan Guha who came up with these food based funds.
[2:36] I found these online so I can't take credit for these today.
[2:40] They're all Santan Guha's recipe for disaster, I guess.
[2:45] OK, OK, fair enough. Let's move on to the serious
[2:50] portion of today's cuisine, because I frankly don't have
[2:53] anything to say after listening to those puns.
[2:56] Aditya, why don't you start us off this week?
[2:59] All right, do you know what the repository for germinal choice
[3:04] is all about? The repository for germinal
[3:08] choice. Is that the question or is it
[3:11] the kind of prelude to the question?
[3:14] Let's call it a prelude. OK, I I I don't know what it is,
[3:19] I don't know what it is, but I would guess it would have
[3:21] something to do with seed banks preserving biodiversity when it
[3:26] comes to seeds or something like that.
[3:28] I love it when you make unintentional puns, Vineet.
[3:31] And I'll tell you why. Because this is a sperm bank
[3:36] that was operating in California from 1980 to 1999.
[3:43] OK. What was special about it?
[3:46] It it became popular, it got some level of notoriety, I
[3:50] guess. What was special about it that
[3:55] the founder of this sperm bank advertised as being unique about
[3:59] the sperm bank. It was founded by this person
[4:02] called Robert Clark Graham. OK, what was so unique about it?
[4:07] OK, First off the top of my head, did he have like or did he
[4:11] advertise that he had sperm samples from celebrities and top
[4:16] scientists and people who are the doins of their field or
[4:21] something like that? You are.
[4:24] You are dangerously close to the answer, so I'm just going to
[4:28] push in the right direction. Yes, it is about the specificity
[4:33] from a certain group of people who are allowed to donate to
[4:37] this bank, I guess. OK, are these people who don't
[4:42] want to have children of their own, but don't want to waste
[4:45] their reproductive potential and also donating?
[4:48] No. And that would be tough to
[4:50] enforce, I imagine. But in any case, you were much
[4:53] closer with your previous guests.
[4:55] OK, with the celebrity thing. Yes, you also mentioned
[4:58] something else. Sports people, people who are
[5:02] scientists or high IQ people. Oh, very close, very very close.
[5:06] So I'll I'll give you maybe a couple of more shots at this.
[5:12] OK, wait, so these are so these are not men's members in
[5:17] particular. That's not the answer.
[5:18] We these are not like people who are members of the.
[5:22] IQ societies. OK, so not in particular maybe
[5:25] high IQ societies in general like Prometheus and whatnot?
[5:29] Not high IQ societies, no. Let's say these are people who
[5:33] have a certain achievement. Accolade or Nobel Prize winners?
[5:39] You're right, yes, this is a sperm bank that was intended to
[5:43] be only for Nobel Prize winners, recipients of the Nobel Prize.
[5:47] Except that non Nobel non Nobelist also did donate, but it
[5:51] was famous as the Nobel Prize sperm bank.
[5:55] It was initially called the Hermann J Mueller Repository for
[6:00] germinal choice, named after Hermann.
[6:02] Joseph Mueller was a Nobel laureate from the 50s, I
[6:05] believe. Turns out that even though
[6:08] Robert Graham went around talking big game about how this
[6:11] will be a high IQ sperm bank, it wasn't the case that there were
[6:18] a lot of Nobel Prize winners who were attached to this.
[6:21] Yeah, I was going to say that sounds a little SUS to use the
[6:24] Gen. Z.
[6:24] Terminology, SUS. Oh, it was very SUS because
[6:29] Robert Graham was also a eugenist eugenicist, and there
[6:35] were three people who were attached to it, two of whom
[6:38] pulled out. No pun intended.
[6:45] Pulled out once this place got Notriti, and only one known
[6:49] Nobel Prize winner who was associated with it who did
[6:53] donate once, apparently. So that that was the case.
[6:58] The media made a huge furor of what this whole eugenicist sort
[7:03] of, you know, went to this thing.
[7:05] Do you know which TV show references this particular sperm
[7:10] bank? Particular TV show.
[7:12] In in its pilot episode. Oh wait, this is The Big Bang
[7:17] Theory. They try to make money by going
[7:19] to a sperm bank. It is The Big Bang Theory.
[7:22] The first scene I believe is Leonard and Sheldon visiting
[7:26] the, quote, UN quote, high IQ sperm bank.
[7:29] Yeah, and they're also based in California and they intend to
[7:32] donate specimens. And Sheldon later feels bad
[7:36] because what if he can committed genetic fraud by donating sperm
[7:43] that may not produce a genius offspring.
[7:46] So yeah, that was how from 1980 to 1999, there was a quote, UN
[7:54] quote, Nobel Prize sperm bank that was operating in
[7:57] California. That's nice.
[8:00] That's nice. Great question.
[8:01] I'm going to move on to something related to music, or
[8:05] at least the Grammys. So X has been nominated for a
[8:09] Grammy 9 times and has won three times.
[8:13] He has won last in 2019 and was 94 years old and was the 3rd
[8:21] oldest person to win such a Grammy.
[8:23] He was a prolific author, spent more than 30 books about his
[8:27] life, career and experiences, subjects ranging from
[8:30] international affairs to a recollection of childhood
[8:33] Christmases. So who are we talking about?
[8:36] When was the last Grammy? 2019.
[8:41] And he was 94 years old. He was 94 years old.
[8:45] Also the author of multiple books you said.
[8:48] Yes, more than 30 books. I can't think of anybody who
[8:55] jumps to mind right now, so. OK, I will give you a clue which
[8:59] may immediately get you the answer.
[9:03] He led the effort to eradicate the Guinea worm parasite in
[9:11] developing countries. He has often been stated as
[9:14] saying that he hoped to live longer than the last Guinea worm
[9:19] parasite, and it's a testament to his effort that in 2021 only
[9:24] 1414 cases of Guinea worm parasites were recorded as
[9:30] compared to 3.5 million in 1986. So you can say he's been pretty
[9:35] successful. I have vague feeling that this
[9:38] is Jimmy Carter. You're right, it is President
[9:44] Jimmy Carter. He's won three Grammys, all
[9:47] spoken word Grammys, but 3 Grammys nonetheless 3.
[9:51] Wow. OK, I remember this was an audio
[9:54] book that he got the last one for.
[9:56] That's what I remember. Yeah, yes.
[9:59] My next group was going to be that he the position of power
[10:02] that he held, he's often regarded by many as not having
[10:05] been one of the best. And to be fair, he also lived
[10:09] during the transition period when the world was moving
[10:13] towards a much darker context. So he was president during the
[10:18] embassy takeover in Iran. When more what we consider today
[10:22] as modern day terrorism, Rose's head it wasn't a good time for
[10:27] him. This was Jimmy Carter was just
[10:29] before Bush Senior, right? No, Jimmy Carter was before
[10:33] Reagan, if I'm not mistaken. All right, Reagan was.
[10:37] So it'll be Carter, Reagan, Bush Senior, Clinton, Bush Junior or
[10:43] West, then Obama, then Trump, then Biden, and then God knows
[10:49] who's going to be next. That's a pretty cool question.
[10:53] Interesting. I had no idea that he won a
[10:55] Grammy three times. Yeah, threes.
[10:58] Three times. Because when he first asked that
[11:00] question, I was like, oh boy, I'm I'm going to struggle with
[11:03] this because I'm very bad at music trivia.
[11:06] But lovely. Speaking of America, I want to
[11:12] know, do you know what over prints are?
[11:14] Over prints, not specifically, no.
[11:19] OK, so the idea of an overprint is an additional layer of text
[11:25] or graphic added to the face of postage or revenue stamp or a
[11:29] bank note or a ticket perhaps that's called an overprint.
[11:34] So there'll be the standard format that any of these
[11:37] officially issued pieces of paper or?
[11:41] Yeah. Yeah.
[11:42] No, I understand now. Yeah.
[11:43] Yeah. OK, great.
[11:44] So that would be an overprint. Do you know why America issued
[11:50] over prints on a bunch of dollar bills, including the $20 bill
[11:56] with the name of a specific state on it.
[11:59] With the name of a specific state.
[12:01] Yeah. Was this during the American
[12:04] Civil War? No.
[12:06] OK, so it's not one of the Confederate states.
[12:10] Did it happen when they changed a particular state's name?
[12:12] Did this happen after the acquisition of Alaska?
[12:15] Also no. OK, then you'll need to give.
[12:18] I'll give you the name of the state, it is Hawaii.
[12:21] OK, Hawaii became a state in the 50s I believe.
[12:25] Slightly earlier, if I'm not wrong, I retract that Hawaii did
[12:31] become a state post or Pearl Harbor.
[12:34] It was part of the United States of America before that,
[12:37] obviously, but it wasn't granted statehood then.
[12:42] OK. Yes, TK, so then it.
[12:43] Was it was 1959? 1959 I remember something about
[12:48] it being in the 50s and then I'm like, OK, so fine.
[12:51] So it's not. It is wasn't a state.
[12:54] Can you give me a time frame as to when this happened?
[12:56] That would be a very easy clue then.
[12:59] So before I give you that I will give you something else.
[13:04] The intention behind doing the over printing was to render the
[13:10] note worthless. Was this because they were
[13:15] afraid of a Japanese invasion and they didn't want the
[13:18] Japanese to get US currency which they could use as a
[13:23] foreign exchange and have more dollar bills in their hand?
[13:26] You know you don't want your currency in the hands of.
[13:28] Perfect. Yes, yes, you are absolutely
[13:31] right. You got that very quickly.
[13:33] The fear was that the Imperial Japanese Armed Forces might
[13:37] invade Hawaii and capture a bunch of these banknotes and
[13:43] unnecessarily contribute to the enemy's war effort, I guess.
[13:46] So to make sure that these dollar notes were recognizable
[13:50] immediately, the United States of America decided that they're
[13:53] going to print Hawaii on top of them during World War 2.
[13:57] And if they were caught, or if they were being used by the
[14:01] enemy, you'd be immediately made aware that you can that they
[14:06] should not be considered legal tender anymore.
[14:08] So yeah, the Hawaii overprint note was a series of bank notes
[14:12] issued during World War 2, and it was an emergency issue after
[14:17] the attack on Pearl Harbour. So specifically, that's why I
[14:19] didn't mention when it was, because I didn't give it to you
[14:23] too easily, but beneath you cracked it nonetheless.
[14:25] So, well done, well done. Yeah, so I've actually am in the
[14:31] middle of watching a World War 2 series.
[14:34] It's called Masters of the Air, which is a companion piece to
[14:39] Band of Brothers in the Pacific. But this is specifically dealing
[14:42] with bombers, B17 bombers flying out of England, bombing Germany
[14:47] and Europe in advance, the invasion.
[14:50] So I was watching that. So World War 2 is in the
[14:52] forefront of my mind right now. Isn't it always?
[14:55] It is your Roman Empire. OK, yes, I actually got that
[15:03] reference. So Amy, let's go to sport.
[15:06] Right. Let me give you a sport question
[15:08] because I rarely ever ask a sport question, right?
[15:11] So. Go for it.
[15:13] This type of field goal was first tested at the collegiate
[15:18] level in 1945 in a game between Columbia and Fordham, but it was
[15:23] not kept as a rule, it was just a test.
[15:26] There was another one game experiment in 1958 in a game
[15:30] between Saint Francis and Siena. It was adopted across all
[15:34] professional and collegiate conferences, leagues and
[15:37] associations in phases all throughout the 1980s.
[15:42] The use of this type of field goal has become more frequent in
[15:46] the modern day, particularly from the mid 2015 onwards.
[15:51] This increase in the past few years has been attributed to one
[15:57] single player who's credited with revolutionizing the game by
[16:03] inspiring teams to regularly employ this type of field goal
[16:07] as part of their winning strategy.
[16:10] What type of field goal are we talking about?
[16:13] Field goal is an interesting choice of words.
[16:17] I just want to clarify, are we talking about football?
[16:20] No. By field field goal is the
[16:23] official terminology that is used in the official books and
[16:29] whatnot. However, we would know it by
[16:32] slightly different names. OK.
[16:35] And you haven't mentioned the sport yet.
[16:37] I have specifically not mentioned the sport because of
[16:41] that would be a dead giveaway. OK, interesting because I was
[16:45] assuming it would be hockey or ice hockey or something along
[16:49] those lines, but now I'm. Fair guess, but no.
[16:52] Yeah, now I'm thinking it isn't a sport with goals in general,
[16:57] so. Technically not true, but not
[17:00] untrue either. That is unhelpful in the worst
[17:05] possible way. It is true, but not true at the
[17:08] same time. Keep that in mind.
[17:10] No, don't I I will categorically refuse to keep that in mind
[17:15] because it only confuses me further.
[17:17] So I'm going to go with my assumption and my first guess is
[17:23] not even the answer of the question, but rather the sport
[17:26] itself. Is it cricket by any chance?
[17:28] No, no, not cricket. OK.
[17:31] In cricket, you can categorically say that there are
[17:33] no types of goals, right? There are no field goals or any
[17:36] kind of goals of that kind. This sport has a goal like
[17:41] system. OK, All right.
[17:43] So it does have something like you would know as goals.
[17:45] OK, Because I was very, very curious if cricket has goals
[17:50] too. OK.
[17:52] No. Except for Hardik Pandya's goal
[17:55] to win. Oh, look at us, we need we have
[18:01] grown so much making cricket jokes now, asking sports
[18:05] questions, making cricket do. Our listeners should be proud.
[18:10] OK? A sport which has a goal like
[18:12] feature. I don't know why Quidditch comes
[18:15] to mind, but 1950. No, Quidditch does have goals
[18:19] right. It does that.
[18:20] Specifically, all the 1950s would be pushing it.
[18:23] So until This is a fake history of Quidditch, Quidditch Through
[18:27] the Ages. You never know.
[18:30] I'm I'm going to assume it's not the case.
[18:33] No, it's not. But then I like to stir the pot.
[18:38] Gold like features. But I don't know.
[18:41] I'm so confused. Basketball.
[18:43] Close. Not actually close.
[18:45] Yes, let me say it is basketball.
[18:49] So unnecessary. We need OK, basketball and field
[18:56] goal. Would it be a three pointer?
[19:00] Yes, it is a three pointer. OK.
[19:03] So we what we call as baskets or points, they're technically
[19:06] supposed to be called field goals in the official
[19:09] terminology. Interesting.
[19:12] And so the, do you know the player?
[19:14] So I had mentioned in the question that the increase in
[19:17] the use of this particular type of field goal in the latter
[19:19] years has been attributed to one particular player who is
[19:22] credited with revolutionizing the game by inspiring teams to
[19:26] regularly employ this type of field goal as a part of their
[19:29] winning strategy. As in, don't just use this as an
[19:32] opportunity, use this as a part of a winning strategy.
[19:35] Do you know which player I'm talking about?
[19:38] You know, I know this piece of trivia because I remember
[19:41] hearing about this. Oh no, I'm it's even escaping me
[19:45] where I heard about it. But yeah, the fact that three
[19:47] pointers should be a big part of the game instead of just one
[19:53] soft thing. Oh man, I'm not so good at the
[19:55] basketball names also. But it's not.
[19:58] I'll give you a clue about the player.
[20:00] This player's name is the same as a dish with a sauce seasoned
[20:06] with spices, mainly associated with South Asian cuisine.
[20:10] South Asian A dish seasoned with sauce that is just every so
[20:16] every dish in South Asia. Yeah, dish with the sauce
[20:19] seasoned with spices mainly associated with South Asian
[20:23] cuisine. What would you call such a dish?
[20:26] Kobe Beef. Kobe.
[20:29] Brian, I'm trying to think of what does an Asian.
[20:32] Well, Kobe is not Asian. South Asian, but it's Asian.
[20:36] No, the name just happens to be the same.
[20:38] It's a it's like it's like a Dabangg association.
[20:40] It's not intended to be that way.
[20:44] OK, like if I if I told you there's like the name of one
[20:47] particular, the name of a type of dish is the same across
[20:50] India, Indonesia, Singapore, even Japan.
[20:54] What name would you think of? Like the same name you'd see
[20:59] here, there, everywhere that would.
[21:01] Be oyster sauce, Gordon. No, no, I used to.
[21:06] No, I used to serve in India. Oh, I was thinking first names.
[21:11] Do you mean Steph Curry? Yes, it is.
[21:14] Stephen Curry. Stephen Curry.
[21:16] So Steph Curry is who's inspired this.
[21:18] He's like a regular 3 point machine.
[21:21] So like he's one of the few basketball players I know of.
[21:24] So that should tell you how how famous he actually is.
[21:27] I'm on first name basis. I call him Steph.
[21:28] I don't even call him Stephen. You call Steph.
[21:31] So this three pointer was not part of the original basketball
[21:35] rules, right? It was first tested in 1945, but
[21:39] not kept as a rule. Then they experimented on it
[21:41] again in 1958. But at the time, there were
[21:44] problems with defining how far across what line, because there
[21:48] were different courses, different basketball courts with
[21:51] different sizes where the length was different.
[21:54] So it wasn't kept as a rule. And then throughout the 80s, it
[21:57] was all standardized and made common across all leagues,
[22:01] associations and conferences. And finally, it has become a
[22:04] standard rule now and since 2015, since Steph Curry has
[22:08] become this major player, it has also become a part of creating a
[22:13] winning strategy during a game. Cool.
[22:17] That's that's a fun question, All right.
[22:20] I did not. Especially the field goal part.
[22:23] I love that. OK, Speaking of goals in the
[22:29] classic sense. Football.
[22:31] Whichever takes me to football, which takes me to Brazil and we
[22:35] have segue. My next question is from Brazil.
[22:41] So the right to dash, just like there are Bill, Bill of Rights
[22:48] for most countries, Brazil has a right to dash, which is
[22:53] colloquially called the right to dash and is in the healthcare
[22:57] system, is something that has become a sort of a cultural
[23:01] export from Brazil or a cultural identity of Brazil, because they
[23:07] do offer the right to dash. This is something that came to
[23:11] be because of a guy called Ivo Pitan Guy.
[23:15] In the late 1950s, Betangay, who is now known as the Pope of
[23:21] Dash, convinced the president that the right was as basic as
[23:26] any other health need. Can you tell me what the right
[23:32] is that is pretty unique to Brazil?
[23:36] I am going to give you a number of guesses because I have no
[23:38] clue what this is. And when you sent in Brazil and
[23:41] being a cultural export of Brazil or an export of Brazil, a
[23:44] lot of things come to mind, right?
[23:46] But what's really throwing me off is that they said it's part
[23:48] of the healthcare thing. So the right to something is a
[23:52] healthcare thing you're talking about?
[23:55] Adjacent, I guess you could call it that.
[23:58] Healthcare adjacent OK, first guess.
[24:01] I have no expectation this will be right, but is it the right to
[24:05] drink coffee? Oh, that's a fun guess, but no.
[24:08] Because Brazil is one of the largest exporters of coffee in
[24:10] the world. OK, second, knowing Brazil would
[24:15] be the right to play football, I don't think that should be a
[24:18] right. But still, like, what else are
[24:20] you talking about? Brazil.
[24:21] OK, it's not football. And again, I don't know, that's
[24:25] not health adjacent. Unless you count injuries due to
[24:28] football. Wow, the right to samba.
[24:33] Oh man, I really wish that countries had the right to a
[24:37] specific kind of dance. No.
[24:41] OK, OK. I am lost.
[24:44] Oh, wait, wait, wait. Is it peyote or one of those
[24:49] hallucinogenic drugs that there are a lot of these Amazonian
[24:52] tribes which do that. It's not peyote.
[24:55] Peyote is Mexico. There's one specifically in
[24:57] Brazil and South America. Ayahuasca.
[25:01] Yeah, that's what it is. Is it?
[25:02] Is it that? No, it's not ayahuasca either.
[25:06] All right. So let me tell you a little bit
[25:09] more about this. So let me give you more
[25:11] descriptive details. In most of the countries,
[25:16] including India and the United States and any other country, I
[25:22] believe this particular part of the healthcare industry would
[25:28] not be subsidized. Oh, is this plastic surgery?
[25:32] That's right. It is plastic surgery.
[25:34] So do you know what the right is?
[25:37] The right to boob jobs that. Would be too specific.
[25:43] OK, think more general. With the right to beauty, the
[25:48] right to. Beauty is something that is,
[25:51] wow, guaranteed to Brazilians. And this was because of the
[25:56] efforts of this one specific guy who's considered the Pope of
[26:00] plastic surgery. I hope and Guy and he argued the
[26:07] right to beauty was as basic as any other health need.
[26:10] He made the case that ugliness caused so much psychological
[26:14] suffering in Brazil that the medical class could not turn
[26:17] back on the humanitarian issue. In 1960, he opened the first
[26:23] institute that offered plastic surgery to the poor.
[26:26] And Brazil has a massive number of very qualified plastic
[26:32] surgeons because there's a huge demand in the country.
[26:35] It has become sort of a cultural exporter, definitely a cultural
[26:38] identity. Like you mentioned, breast
[26:41] enhancement surgeries are very common over there and other
[26:45] plastic surgeries are also common enough and you would not
[26:48] be paying out of your pocket. Insurance would cover it because
[26:52] it is considered necessary and not merely aesthetic.
[26:58] OK. No wonder you have so many good
[26:59] looking Brazilian people. Do you want to take a guess as
[27:03] to how many surgeries are subsidized by the government
[27:08] every year? Oh, I would not be able to.
[27:12] Let's say a few million. No, it's half a million.
[27:16] It's half. A million.
[27:17] Surgeries every year are subsidized by the government.
[27:22] It is a strange world. It is the world we live in.
[27:25] Yeah. And you cannot make this up.
[27:30] If somebody put this in a movie, they, the critics would be like,
[27:34] this is so unrealistic, this would never happen.
[27:37] Like I guarantee if you do it, if you do it now, even with
[27:39] Brazil having it, most people would say it's unrealistic until
[27:42] you point out that this actually exists in a country like this.
[27:45] All right. I mean, it hit me.
[27:47] OK, so this is regarding something in something in
[27:51] particular, something very specific.
[27:53] OK, they created a special packing case which could
[28:00] minimize vibration and ensure that it would never come into
[28:03] contact with another surface. To increase security, the case
[28:07] had to be small enough to be easily carried by two men, but
[28:12] impossible to be carried by only one.
[28:16] Moreover, the case had to be unsinkable in the event it had
[28:20] to be thrown overboard into the sea.
[28:23] They also had the French flag painted on it to show that it
[28:28] was French property because they worried that without the
[28:32] markings, maritime law concerning the salvage rights of
[28:35] property retrieved outside territorial waters might allow
[28:39] it to be wrenched from the possession of France after
[28:43] reaching the destination. They also insisted on a bank
[28:46] vault with an independent air conditioning system, and in the
[28:51] case of a labor strike or loss of electricity, it would need to
[28:55] be connected to a hospital or the Pentagon.
[28:59] What was carried inside this case?
[29:02] Did you give me a time frame for this?
[29:05] No, that is next. That's my first clue.
[29:08] See if you can get it without that.
[29:10] Something from France going to the United States of America.
[29:15] I'm assuming it's not the Statue of Liberty.
[29:18] Or no, obviously yeah, no, because they said it is a case
[29:22] which had to be carry, which can be carried easily by two people
[29:26] but should not be carried by one or it would be impossible to be
[29:29] carried by only one person. That's very interesting.
[29:33] It could easily be carried by two, but cannot be.
[29:36] Carried cannot have, yeah. Huh.
[29:39] That is such a fun description because I can't think of a
[29:42] single thing. Forget the other clues.
[29:45] I can't think of a single object in the whole wide world that
[29:48] would fit that description. Can easily be carried by two,
[29:50] but cannot be carried. By one, the case we're talking
[29:53] about, the case that is carrying.
[29:56] The case is designed so that it can be carried easily by two
[29:59] people, but cannot be carried by one.
[30:02] That does not necessarily mean that the object inside would fit
[30:06] that same description. OK, all right, all right.
[30:09] That makes it slightly vaguer, I imagine, but it's bigger.
[30:15] Even a word? No.
[30:18] Yeah, I have absolutely no clue. Give me either the.
[30:22] Time frame. I will give you a time frame.
[30:25] The time frame is 1962. OK.
[30:30] Not sure if that helps me. Was it some sort of an award or
[30:34] or? Not an award.
[30:36] OK, give me what? What space am I thinking of?
[30:40] Am I thinking arts? Entertainment.
[30:42] Sports. Politics.
[30:44] Arts. Entertainment, yeah.
[30:46] Is it some sort of movie movie memorabilia?
[30:49] No, though 1.7 million people did queue up when it arrived and
[30:57] was used. Not used, let's say displayed.
[31:01] Oh, did the Mona Lisa come to the US?
[31:06] Yes. So it is the packing case that
[31:10] carried the Mona Lisa from France to the US and then back
[31:14] to France. So they had displayed it in the
[31:18] US between March of 1962 and from December of 1962 to March
[31:23] of 1963, the French government lent it to the US to be
[31:27] displayed in New York City and Washington DC.
[31:30] In New York, an estimated 1.7 million people queued up so that
[31:35] they could see the Mona Lisa for all of 20 seconds.
[31:39] Each person was allowed 20 seconds to see it.
[31:43] What I find really ironic about it is they had the French flag
[31:46] painted on it to show to show that it was French property.
[31:52] Yeah, you don't want that disputed.
[31:54] What? What do the French have if not
[31:56] the Mona Lisa? And I guess baguettes and miming
[32:00] that you have Mona. Quasong, quasong.
[32:03] Let's say quasong quasong. Quasong.
[32:05] That's true. Though it is disputed whether it
[32:08] is from France. Yeah, there was this thing.
[32:13] I think people were saying it's also from Austria, yes.
[32:17] Yeah. So then possibly that's not.
[32:19] But then a French cuisine at least is from France.
[32:22] We can definitely say that. Escargot snails from France,
[32:27] Champagne from France. I have a friend who works in the
[32:34] culinary space in food, and she has argued that food, French
[32:39] food sucks. So her argument is that French
[32:43] bakery goods are great. So anything that's baked but
[32:47] everything that's considered the high branded hot.
[32:53] Cuisine. Hot cuisine is actually quite
[32:56] garbage. I I don't completely agree, but
[33:00] I do see. Neither do I I think it's a
[33:02] matter of your palate. If you're used to a Southeast
[33:05] Asian, South Asian or East Asian palate, or even African palate,
[33:08] it's very difficult to appreciate French food because
[33:12] it can seem very bland. Yeah, I think they have few
[33:15] ingredients and they make those ingredients shine.
[33:18] They don't have as much of, I guess, variety in terms of
[33:21] spices and all whatnot, but that's for another time.
[33:24] That's one of the food episode, I imagine.
[33:26] Yes, yes. OK, Vineet, Speaking of old
[33:32] things. What old?
[33:36] Now Mona Lisa is old. Come on.
[33:39] Also sorry, before I asked my question, the whole 20 second
[33:42] thing, I went to the Louvre and I stood near the queue.
[33:47] I didn't get into the queue to view the Mona Lisa.
[33:50] It seemed like the most ridiculous thing to queue up for
[33:54] just because the queue is super long and you barely get any time
[33:58] in front of it. And it's very small.
[34:01] I've seen photographs of it, like in the context of the room,
[34:04] it's very small. It's tiny and there are huge,
[34:08] beautiful paintings in that museum.
[34:11] Well, I guess it is. It is what it is.
[34:14] All right. But Speaking of old things,
[34:18] let's move to my last question and the second last question of
[34:23] this episode. And here I have to warn you that
[34:27] this question isn't technically a great trivia question, but it
[34:33] is a phenomenal piece of trivia. So.
[34:37] Bear with me if the question doesn't make a whole lot of
[34:40] sense. OK.
[34:42] What is common between the rings of Saturn?
[34:47] OK. Polaris, The North Star.
[34:50] OK. The Atlantic Ocean.
[34:53] Wait, what? Wait for it.
[34:55] Wait for the last one. Trees.
[34:58] What? Wait, we're talking about the
[35:03] rings of Saturn, the North Star, the Atlantic Ocean, and trees.
[35:12] Not any specific tree, just all trees.
[35:16] Trees. All trees.
[35:18] What? I cannot even get a starting
[35:21] point. Polaris.
[35:23] The rings of Saturn. Wow.
[35:27] Anything to do with Atlantis? Atlantic Ocean?
[35:30] Atlantis. But then trees?
[35:31] What do trees have to do with Atlantis?
[35:34] Wow, this is just weird. And Polaris is OK Are we talking
[35:39] about the star Polaris or the North Star?
[35:41] Because the North Star keeps changing every few 10,000 years.
[35:47] We're talking about the star Polaris.
[35:50] The star Polaris. Wow.
[35:53] What we call Dhruvtara, right? Yes.
[35:56] Oh God, I have nothing. The Atlantic Ocean, The rings of
[36:02] Saturn and trees. Wait, are these all things that
[36:06] James Cameron changed in the second cut of Titanic?
[36:12] Oh man, that is. No, technically that that that
[36:16] may not be wrong. There must have been a tree
[36:18] somewhere in the film. I'm guessing he might have added
[36:21] it or removed it. The Polaris in the rings of
[36:24] Saturn, when he changed the night sky, and he might have
[36:27] also changed the special effects for the water.
[36:30] I It's a right answer. You cannot say this is wrong.
[36:32] I I will consider this the unofficial second answer to this
[36:37] question for me. Yeah, but it isn't the answer I
[36:41] was. Looking for OK, give me a clue
[36:43] what should I be looking for? Is it etymology related?
[36:47] Is it mythology related? Is it something else?
[36:51] What is this It is? In the space of science, and
[36:56] specifically let's say the animal and plant Kingdom, let's
[37:02] be even more specific. It's one species.
[37:05] A species is common to the rings of Saturn, Polaris, the Atlantic
[37:09] Ocean, and. Well, it's not common to it, but
[37:14] they all of these things relate to that species in a very
[37:18] specific way. OK.
[37:21] To be fair, these are not. I'm using the word species
[37:25] rather non scientifically, so it's not.
[37:28] I'm not sure if it's a specific species or.
[37:31] Wait, are these something to do with dogs?
[37:33] I'm spitballing here. Polaris dog?
[37:37] No, That's a good guess. But no, it's not.
[37:39] It's. Not no.
[37:40] The serious serious is the dog star, not Polaris.
[37:43] Yeah. OK, oh, pigeons or doves or
[37:48] something which navigate. No, no.
[37:52] All right, let me, let me give you specifically how they're
[37:55] related to that species. I have tormented you long
[37:57] enough, OK? All of these are younger than a
[38:01] specific species. Oh, then in that case, I would
[38:08] have to go with sharks. It is sharks.
[38:12] These are all things in the universe younger than sharks, so
[38:17] I'm I'm sure there will be a bunch of other other animal and
[38:21] plant species also out there older than this bacteria.
[38:25] Viruses I'm sure are much older, but in this case I was just
[38:30] amazed by the idea. And I did know that sharks are
[38:34] older than trees, just because trees came on land much later
[38:38] and then sharks had been around for a while even that that
[38:41] trivia might blow some people's minds.
[38:43] It is a phenomenal piece of trivia Polaris, and I don't mean
[38:46] Polaris became the North Star after that.
[38:49] I mean, the star is younger than sharks.
[38:52] The. Star has not been around for as
[38:54] long as sharks have been around. That to me is freaking insane
[38:58] because sharks have been around for 450 million years.
[39:03] And Polaris? And they've changed relatively
[39:06] very little, except for size. They've changed relatively
[39:10] little. Insanity.
[39:12] That is absolute insanity because a shark is a pretty, if
[39:16] I guess a complex animal, complex being and and and to
[39:21] think that that was around before, you know what else is in
[39:26] the realm of of sharks as a species lifetime, I'll tell you.
[39:30] So Saturn rings. I mentioned Ayanga.
[39:33] A lot of exoplanets, Ayanga. There's this thing called the
[39:35] boot void, which is the largest known void between galaxies,
[39:40] which is 350 million light years.
[39:43] So technically, light can travel across the entire boot void and
[39:47] still not be as old as sharks. 3 million years.
[39:52] Oh, here's my favorite piece of this.
[39:54] All of this, right? So I mentioned the Atlantic
[39:57] Ocean is probably younger, trees are younger, Saturn rings are
[40:01] younger, and Polaris, a galactic orbit of the Sun, is only 200 to
[40:09] 225,000,000 years. So the Sun has gone around Milky
[40:14] Way Galaxy twice in the time. Shark sharks have been a wow.
[40:19] Sharks have taken two whole revolutions of the Milky Way
[40:23] Galaxy. And just look at the comparison
[40:26] between how long they have been alive.
[40:28] Sharks have been alive compared to humans, like modern day
[40:32] humans in our current aspect, what 40,050 thousand years?
[40:37] I think. That's pushing it to the very
[40:39] extreme, like when we're talking civilizations maybe around 7:00
[40:42] or 10,000 years, but humans as hunter, hunter, gatherers maybe
[40:47] about 50,000 years or so. You might push it to a few
[40:50] 100,000 if you look at our previous, you know, progenitors,
[40:55] progenitor species. But it's very interesting
[40:58] because the Homo erectus was around for 2,000,000 years.
[41:01] So even the Homo erectus has been like almost 10 times longer
[41:08] than than Homo sapiens have been around.
[41:09] So it is, it is insane. But yeah, 200,000 years is the
[41:14] maximum I believe to that Homo sapiens are estimated to be
[41:16] around compared to 450 million years that is.
[41:22] What is that number? You know, I I've read a couple
[41:27] of these, you know, kind of mind your perception of time changes,
[41:32] right? So Nintendo.
[41:36] I was around when the Ottoman Empire existed.
[41:41] Warner Brothers was around when the Ottoman Empire existed.
[41:46] You could actually write a a historically accurate pastiche
[41:51] of Sherlock Holmes going to Japan and buying trading game
[41:55] cards of Nintendo. Yeah, that is true.
[41:59] That is true. So there are more modern day
[42:01] things also which are in the same realm Picasso was around
[42:09] the time that Indira Gandhi was alive.
[42:11] Like somehow that to me also doesn't make as much sense
[42:14] because Picasso seems somehow much older, but he was around,
[42:20] and if you go slightly longer, I think a common one that people
[42:24] might have heard is Cleopatra is closer to us in history than she
[42:30] was to the Pyramids of Giza. Yeah.
[42:33] There is another one which blew my mind and this is much longer.
[42:36] The T Rex is closer to us than the Stegosaurus was to the T
[42:41] Rex. Yes, I've heard the same thing.
[42:44] Yeah. Is insane.
[42:49] Now it's something I had mentioned something similar last
[42:54] episode, I believe last episode. The episode before last where
[42:56] Claire Bloom and Charlie Chaplin.
[42:59] If you took their careers together, they've spanned 3
[43:01] centuries, 3 Gregorian centuries.
[43:05] Another one, which again will blow your perception of time, is
[43:09] that John Tyler was the 10th president of the United States.
[43:15] OK, 10th president of the United States, which means he was born
[43:19] when Washington was president and then he became president.
[43:25] OK, John Tyler's grandson is still alive today.
[43:31] So John Tyler, they had a son very late in life, around 75
[43:35] something. His son again had a son who was
[43:38] born very late in life. And the last time I read it was
[43:42] in 2020. Harrison Ruffin Tyler was still
[43:47] alive in 2020. He was 91 years old.
[43:53] So he could say that his grandfather was born when
[43:57] Washington was president. That's a that's a flex.
[44:05] That is a flex. Yeah.
[44:07] Wow, OK. But I generally the til moment
[44:12] for the whole of last week has to be that sharks are.
[44:16] Older than older than probably half the shit on earth.
[44:19] Yeah, that is like before a single species had walked on
[44:24] land or survived on land. Sharks had been roaming the seas
[44:28] for a while. I think that's also part of why
[44:31] we are so fascinated with sharks.
[44:33] Sharks, they are. They are so very complex as
[44:36] creatures that it it is. And also quite alien because you
[44:40] don't see any other fish, because sharks are not fish, but
[44:43] you don't see any other kind of aquatic or marine animal or
[44:48] whatever you want to call them living being, which resembles
[44:51] sharks. Like they have their own
[44:52] identity and it's very separate from everything else.
[44:57] Oh, and of course, Jaws. Yes, Jaws and Shark Week.
[45:03] OK, let's move from sharks to the theatre.
[45:08] There are two actors, let's call them X&Y, OK?
[45:12] They're famous for playing the same character.
[45:16] Both of them are famous for playing a character, and it's
[45:19] the same character these two actors starred on the London
[45:23] stage together in 2011 in a production of Frankenstein.
[45:29] It was directed by Danny Boyle, and what was unique about this
[45:33] play was that X&Y would alternate between playing Victor
[45:40] Frankenstein and Frankenstein's monster.
[45:43] So if you went on a Monday, you would see X playing Victor
[45:47] Frankenstein and Y playing the monster, and the next day the
[45:51] same play would be played with Y playing Frankenstein and X
[45:56] playing the monster. So what ended up happening is
[45:59] X&Y shared the Laurence Olivier Award and the Evening Standard
[46:06] Theater Award for Best Actor and Leading Role for their
[46:09] performance. I want you to tell me if you
[46:12] know who these two are. Obviously I've left out a major
[46:16] clue, which I will give if you don't know off the top of your
[46:19] head who this might be. No, I do know that it is
[46:23] Benedict Cumberbatch. I'm not sure who the other actor
[46:28] is. OK, so then you know which same
[46:30] character they've played, right? Probably Sherlock Holmes.
[46:33] Yes. So it is Sherlock Holmes.
[46:35] One of them is Benedict Cumberbatch.
[46:37] Can you tell me who the second person was?
[46:39] I have no idea who the second person was, no.
[46:42] OK, would it help if I told you that this person also played
[46:48] Sherlock Holmes on television? Oh, on television?
[46:53] There's that American version of Sherlock Holmes also.
[46:57] OK. But no, no, I have no idea.
[47:00] Yeah. You've not seen OK, the show's
[47:02] name is Elementary. Does that help?
[47:04] Elementary. Yes.
[47:05] No. I just know that there's a show
[47:06] called Elementary. I have not watched it.
[47:08] I had, oh. You've not watched it.
[47:09] Oh, OK, OK. The actor, the one I'm talking
[47:12] about, was once married to Angelina Jolie.
[47:15] Last chance to get it. No, no, I have no clue as who.
[47:19] And I remember his face and I can't record his name.
[47:23] So it is Johnny Lee Miller and Benedict Cumberbatch.
[47:26] They both played Sherlock Holmes on TV, one in Sherlock and the
[47:30] other in Elementary, and they both start together in a stage
[47:34] production of Frankenstein. And I think it's a brilliant
[47:36] concept. I think it's a brilliant concept
[47:39] to have the same like actors alternating between these two
[47:42] roles. Because at the end, at the core
[47:45] of the story, and this is my personal take on it, is that who
[47:51] actually is the monster? Is it Frankenstein or is it the
[47:56] creature that he created? Who's the monster?
[47:59] So having actors alternate between those roles, kind of,
[48:03] you know, drives on that thing. And also from a financial point
[48:07] of view, obviously if you want to watch Frankenstein and you go
[48:10] watch it once and you see Benedict Cumberbatch playing
[48:13] Victor Frankenstein, you want to come back and see how Johnny Lee
[48:16] Miller does it. No makes sense.
[48:19] Makes sense. Smart choice.
[48:20] From a financial viewpoint as well.
[48:23] I just remember this piece of trivia because Benedict
[48:27] Cumberbatch and this other guy playing both the roles.
[48:29] Yeah, you're right. Like as a financial point of
[48:31] view, and even if you're a fan of just one of those actors, you
[48:33] want to watch that actor play the other role also.
[48:36] So you want to come back and watch the show again.
[48:38] So makes sense, yeah. So that was my last question and
[48:42] the last question for this episode.
[48:44] Aditya, what is your question for next week?
[48:49] OK, so my question is, since you mentioned Frankenstein, I want
[48:56] to ask you which two actors from the Indian film industry should
[49:02] play the same character, same iconic character, if there was
[49:06] ever an adaptation of that character to stage.
[49:10] I don't know why, why or how I'm going to arrive at this answer,
[49:13] but there will be an answer ready for you next week.
[49:16] So which two actors would be perfect to play the same
[49:19] character on the Indian film industry?
[49:22] OK, I'm grateful I'm not the one coming up with that answer, but
[49:28] moving on to my question. From the beginning of this
[49:30] episode, our audience question how many of you have cracked
[49:33] this? This dish was invented in Canada
[49:36] by a Greek immigrant who was inspired by Chinese food to put
[49:41] a South American ingredient on an Italian dish that has gone on
[49:45] to be most popular in Australia. However, it's not named after
[49:49] any of these places. What dish are we talking about?
[49:53] Do you have any clue? That's a great question.
[49:57] Is. Is it named after some other
[49:59] place? Or is it not named after any
[50:01] place at all? The name is the same as that of
[50:05] a place, but it was not technically named after the
[50:07] place. Oh, so the name is.
[50:10] Is it like Hong Kong Noodle or something?
[50:12] Similar, but as I mentioned, it's invented in Canada by a
[50:17] Greek immigrant inspired by Chinese food to put a South
[50:21] American ingredient on an Italian dish that became most
[50:27] popular in Australia. South American ingredient on an
[50:31] Italian dish became popular in Australia?
[50:35] No, I have no clue. OK, this is the Hawaiian pizza.
[50:43] So the how do I put this very divisive act of putting
[50:48] pineapples on a pizza was first done by a Greek immigrant by the
[50:52] name of Sam Panopoulos in Canada.
[50:55] He was inspired by the complex interplay of sweet, sour, spicy
[51:00] in Chinese food to put pineapples, which are
[51:04] technically a South American origin, ingredient, on an
[51:08] Italian dish, which is pizza. But now the place in the world
[51:13] where it's most popular is Australia.
[51:16] Wow, I had no clue that it's. What is funny is it was called
[51:20] Hawaiian pizza, not because of the island of Hawaii, because
[51:25] that was the name of the brand of canned pineapple that he had
[51:28] in the restaurant. Oh, wow.
[51:33] OK, that's pretty cool. Nice.
[51:38] Yeah. It's not pineapple.
[51:39] Didn't happen to me when you said South American ingredient,
[51:42] but yeah. I know.
[51:43] That's why I just love I took this out of a there was an
[51:46] article, I think in the New York Times or one of the larger
[51:49] newspapers where the journalist had written exactly this line
[51:54] makes sense, but it's it's really divisive.
[51:58] I saw this YouTube video of this guy going throughout the going
[52:02] to multiple pizzerias in Napoli in Naples and asking them to put
[52:06] pineapple on the pizza. Let's just say the Italians
[52:10] weren't very on board with that particular request.
[52:15] Is it the same guy who went around asking for ketchup when
[52:18] he ordered pasta? Because I know there's a guy who
[52:19] did that also. I think it's the same guy.
[52:21] I think the same guy. OK, so what's your pop culture
[52:28] recommendation for this week, Aditya?
[52:31] I'm going to do YouTube channel for this week and because I was
[52:36] reminded of this channel because we're talking about sharks and
[52:39] the universe and things that are old and ancient and impressive,
[52:43] and this would be PBS Eons. PBS Eons is a YouTube channel,
[52:48] which is a very interesting channel.
[52:51] They are simple. They don't do very complex
[52:55] graphics as many other infotainment channels on YouTube
[53:00] do. But this does have a thorough
[53:05] scientific, I guess research backing it, or at least seems to
[53:09] me. I'm not.
[53:10] I'm not a scientist so I can't claim that it is thorough, but
[53:12] seems to be pretty thorough. And they do tell great stories
[53:19] in in 10 minute videos. So check it out.
[53:22] And there are some very fun topics that they cover, right?
[53:26] Right from dinosaurs to modern day humans and their histories.
[53:30] Oh, that's great. My recommendation for this week
[53:34] is related to my recommendation from a past episode.
[53:38] So if you remember, I had mentioned Benjamin Stevenson's
[53:42] book Everyone in My family Has Killed someone.
[53:47] Yeah, so there's a sequel to that book, which the last
[53:51] episode I mentioned that I'd bought and was in my reading
[53:53] list called. Everyone on this train is a
[53:55] Suspect. Let me tell you, it rocks.
[54:00] The book is fantastic. It is truly fantastic.
[54:05] And I would recommend it to everybody, Anybody who enjoys a
[54:08] good comedy book or a good mystery.
[54:10] Because it's a solid mystery. Because I believe that a good
[54:14] mystery writer should be able to put all the clues in front of
[54:18] the audience and then reveal the answer.
[54:22] Many times what happens is there will be some odd clue or
[54:24] something that is off screen or is not told about, and it's a
[54:28] Deus Ex machina or some kind of thing that comes up in the end.
[54:31] And they're like, oh, it is because of this that this person
[54:33] was the killer. But no, here in the chapter,
[54:37] right before the complete reveal, the author or the
[54:41] narrator actually lists all the clues for you one more time.
[54:46] Nice. OK.
[54:48] It's a fantastic book. I would highly, highly recommend
[54:50] it to everyone else and something that Aditya and I were
[54:55] discussing earlier about how long humans have been, how long
[54:59] Homo erectus was there before Homo sapiens took over and
[55:02] things like that. I was reminded of a line from
[55:04] ATV series that I saw recently. It's called The Three Body
[55:07] Problem on Netflix, where during one particular episode, a
[55:11] character I'm not going to spoil who basically asks them how long
[55:15] did it take you from fire to the wheel?
[55:17] From the wheel to the industrial revolution?
[55:19] From the industrial revolution to the Information Age.
[55:21] So it's like shortening periods of time.
[55:23] So I was reminded of the same thing.
[55:25] We walked erect for 2,000,000 years, then we became hunter
[55:27] gatherers. Then we became an Agricultural
[55:29] Society. Then we become civilizations.
[55:31] And then the Iron Age, Stone Age.
[55:34] And then finally Stone Age, Iron Age, the Bronze Age, the
[55:37] medieval times. And now we have moved so quickly
[55:41] from the information Age to what I'm now calling the Age of AI.
[55:46] I wonder what our children will see.
[55:48] As long as what they're listening to is this podcast,
[55:51] I'm OK there. Nice plug.
[55:54] I like it. So that's all for today's
[55:58] episode. Thanks everyone for listening
[56:00] in. We hope you enjoyed the show.
[56:02] Hope you learned something new because frankly there was a
[56:05] massive tiles for me in this episode.
[56:07] If you like what you heard, please please subscribe to our
[56:10] podcast, leave us a review on your favorite podcast platform,
[56:13] take two seconds after I finish my spiel to give us a five star
[56:16] rating and subscribe to our podcast on whichever platform
[56:19] you're listening to us on. It helps us reach a wider
[56:21] audience and allows more people to discover and enjoy the show.
[56:23] We'd love to hear from you, Feedback, suggestions, trivia,
[56:27] even questions you want asked on the episode.
[56:29] Just send us an e-mail at areyouquizzingme@gmail.com with
[56:34] the name of the quiz master who you want to ask the question in
[56:37] the subject line of the e-mail. We also have a subreddit R slash
[56:42] Are You Quizzing me? And you can also reach us on
[56:45] Instagram at Are You Quizzing Me?
[56:47] We appreciate your support and look forward to sharing more
[56:49] episodes in the future. Thanks again for tuning in.
[56:52] Have a great day. See you guys next week.

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.