# Iran and Global Debt Cloud IMF-World Bank Meetings

An episode of [Big Take](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1578096201), 16 Apr 2026, 19 min.

Audio: https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/tracking.swap.fm/track/UVBrz8bN8aM2Xe47PEPu/traffic.omny.fm/d/clips/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/825d4e29-b616-46f4-afd7-ae2b0013005c/2f6aed93-bdba-416a-a1d6-b42e01482829/audio.mp3?utm_source=Podcast&in_playlist=8b1dd624-a026-43e9-8b57-ae2b00130066

The atmosphere was grim at this week’s IMF and World Bank spring meetings, as global central bankers grappled with economic shocks from the war in Iran, AI and mounting debt. On today’s Big Take podcast, host David Gura sits down with Stephanie Flanders — Bloomberg’s head of Economics and Politics and host of Trumponomics — and senior economic writer Shawn Donnan to discuss the IMF’s revised global growth forecast and whether governments are equipped to contain the next economic crisis. Read more: The World’s Anti-Recession Guardrails Are Weaker Than Ever We have a special Bloomberg subscription offer for podcast listeners at Bloomberg.com/podcastoffer. Hosted by David Gura; Produced by David Fox; Reported by Stephanie Flanders and Shawn Donnan; Edited by Jeffrey Grocott. Fact-checking by Eleanor Harrison-Dengate; Engineering by Katie McMurran Senior Producer: Naomi Shavin; Deputy Executive Producer: Julia Weaver. Executive Producer: Nicole Beemsterboer. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

## Transcript

[0:00] Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
[0:09] Speaker 2: After nearly seven weeks of war in the Middle East,
[0:11] Speaker 2: the flow of oil and other goods through the Strait
[0:13] Speaker 2: of Hormuz has been reduced to a trickle, and the
[0:16] Speaker 2: global economy is showing signs of strain. On Thursday, President
[0:21] Speaker 2: Trump announced Israel and Lebanon have agreed to a ten
[0:23] Speaker 2: day ceasefire, but the future of that conflict and the
[0:26] Speaker 2: war in Iran is still uncertain. It's against that backdrop
[0:30] Speaker 2: that central bankers and other policymakers from around the world
[0:34] Speaker 2: are gathering this week at the Spring meetings of the
[0:36] Speaker 2: International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in Washington, d C.
[0:40] Speaker 2: Chris Delina Georgieva is one of the hosts of this
[0:43] Speaker 2: week's meetings. She's the managing director of the IMF, and
[0:46] Speaker 2: at a news conference, she warned more pain is coming
[0:50] Speaker 2: for the global economy.
[0:51] Speaker 3: If the conflict persists and oil prices stay high for
[0:56] Speaker 3: an extended period, we must brace for tough dimes ahead.
[1:01] Speaker 3: I think there's a sort of mixture of they're depressed
[1:04] Speaker 3: and there I think irritation at least some of the
[1:07] Speaker 3: finance ministers that are moving in the Central Bank governors
[1:10] Speaker 3: that have been flying in.
[1:11] Speaker 2: Stephanie Flanders is the head of Economics and Politics at
[1:14] Speaker 2: Bloomberg and hosts the Trump Andomics podcast. She flew in
[1:18] Speaker 2: from London to cover the meetings and says the mood
[1:20] Speaker 2: in Foggy Bottom is bleak.
[1:23] Speaker 3: There's definitely a sense of frustration and now barely suppressed
[1:28] Speaker 3: sort of depression at the fact that all their forecasts
[1:31] Speaker 3: are being torn up by a conflict that they would
[1:34] Speaker 3: not have chosen, and many of them still don't understand.
[1:39] Speaker 1: Look, I think I would add foreboding to the depression.
[1:42] Speaker 2: Sean Donnan is a senior writer from Bloomberg Economics.
[1:45] Speaker 1: They are looking at at the global economy and they
[1:47] Speaker 1: really feel like we're only just now seeing the beginnings
[1:51] Speaker 1: of the impact of the Iran war. The other thing
[1:54] Speaker 1: I would say is it's not just irritation at the
[1:57] Speaker 1: US that you're hearing from finance ministers, also some meritation
[2:01] Speaker 1: at the markets, who policymakers, central bank governors, finance ministers,
[2:07] Speaker 1: lots of people on the sidelines. And I've heard this
[2:09] Speaker 1: at dinners this week. I've heard this in public meetings.
[2:12] Speaker 1: I've had it in conversations as well. It's just this
[2:15] Speaker 1: real feeling that financial markets don't get how bad this is,
[2:20] Speaker 1: and that we are going to see some serious damage
[2:22] Speaker 1: in the global economy, and that this is going to
[2:26] Speaker 1: drag on for a good long while.
[2:29] Speaker 2: On Tuesday, the IMF slashed its growth outlook for the year,
[2:32] Speaker 2: saying it now expects global GDP to increase by three
[2:36] Speaker 2: point one percent this year. Back in January, the IMF
[2:39] Speaker 2: forecast three point three percent growth. That revision down reflects
[2:44] Speaker 2: the major energy shock caused by the Iran war and
[2:47] Speaker 2: the possibility of a downturn if the conflict drags on.
[2:50] Speaker 2: It also assumes the conflict will be relatively short lived.
[2:54] Speaker 2: If it lasts longer, the IMF warns the world could
[2:57] Speaker 2: come close to experiencing a recession.
[3:00] Speaker 3: What was striking, I mean, those of us who spend
[3:01] Speaker 3: probably too much time looking at forecasts. You know, when
[3:04] Speaker 3: you get a range, it's normally you get the kind
[3:06] Speaker 3: of middle of the range, and then there's the upside
[3:09] Speaker 3: and the downside scenario. I was kind of struck by
[3:11] Speaker 3: the fact that the IMF is producing the sort of baseline,
[3:15] Speaker 3: and then there's the worst scenario, and then the even
[3:18] Speaker 3: worst scenario, which sort of captured the fact that they
[3:20] Speaker 3: didn't see much potential upside risk in this situation.
[3:27] Speaker 2: I'm David Durrett and this is the big take from
[3:29] Speaker 2: Bloomberg News today on the show the alarm bells going
[3:32] Speaker 2: off in Washington as the IMF and the World Bank
[3:35] Speaker 2: hold their Spring meetings, and why the tools the world
[3:38] Speaker 2: uses to deal with financial crises may be the weakest
[3:41] Speaker 2: they've been in decades. Sean, You've been reporting on the
[3:48] Speaker 2: current capacity of governments and institutions to absorb a financial shock.
[3:52] Speaker 2: So let's start with the bottom line here. How ready
[3:55] Speaker 2: are they?
[3:56] Speaker 3: Well?
[3:56] Speaker 1: Look, I mean people talk about the global safety at
[3:59] Speaker 1: meetings like this and that what they're really talking about
[4:02] Speaker 1: is government's fiscal capacity to respond to whether there's money
[4:07] Speaker 1: in the budget to throw some money out of problem
[4:10] Speaker 1: when the problem surfaces. Monetary policy, what central banks can do,
[4:14] Speaker 1: whether they can lower rate, how they can address things,
[4:18] Speaker 1: and then you know the capacity of the IMF and
[4:20] Speaker 1: the World Bank. And so you talk to people, and
[4:23] Speaker 1: we talked to for a story that we did for
[4:26] Speaker 1: BusinessWeek magazine. We talked to Carmen Reinhardt, who has looked
[4:29] Speaker 1: at centuries of financial crises, and she says, we're at
[4:32] Speaker 1: the worst place we've been globally in terms of preparedness
[4:36] Speaker 1: to respond to a crisis since before the global financial crisis,
[4:41] Speaker 1: and possibly as far back as the nineteen eighties. And
[4:44] Speaker 1: what she's really thinking about is coming out of the pandemic.
[4:48] Speaker 1: Governments spent a lot to respond to that emergency. They
[4:52] Speaker 1: took on big debt loads to do that. They haven't
[4:55] Speaker 1: repaid that debt. There is no fiscal space to use
[4:59] Speaker 1: the kind of IMF terminology. So we're being hit by
[5:02] Speaker 1: these shocks in terms of energy price, but governments don't
[5:05] Speaker 1: really have any ammunition to respond or much less NATA.
[5:09] Speaker 1: Then you look at the monetary policy stuff in Carmen
[5:12] Speaker 1: Reinhartz tells us, look, in the past, we looked to
[5:16] Speaker 1: central bankers to be the heroes and crises, right, they
[5:19] Speaker 1: would rescue the global economy from things. We put them
[5:21] Speaker 1: on the front page of newspapers and covers of magazines.
[5:25] Speaker 1: And this time around they're stuck because not everyone's gotten
[5:30] Speaker 1: rid of the inflation from the last time around. So
[5:32] Speaker 1: that kind of tells you that you still want to
[5:34] Speaker 1: raise rates when gas prices go up and they feed
[5:38] Speaker 1: into more inflation. But if this is going to hit
[5:42] Speaker 1: growth hard, then you might want to lower rates. So
[5:46] Speaker 1: that's this kind of stagflationary shock is what people talk about,
[5:50] Speaker 1: and that's just something that's really hard for central banks
[5:52] Speaker 1: to do. The IMF and the World Bank, they still
[5:55] Speaker 1: have some capacity to respond, but they also are kind
[5:59] Speaker 1: of enter during this crisis with less credibility than they
[6:04] Speaker 1: had in the past. You know, if we think back
[6:06] Speaker 1: to the global financial crisis of a pandemic, the idea
[6:09] Speaker 1: of a US led rescue plan for the global economy
[6:15] Speaker 1: or the G twenty getting together and coordinating action, there's
[6:19] Speaker 1: just a feeling that that's not going to happen this
[6:21] Speaker 1: time around. So we've got a crisis that seems to
[6:25] Speaker 1: be brewing here, and it's happening in the context of
[6:29] Speaker 1: a world that's not in great shape to respond to
[6:32] Speaker 1: a crisis.
[6:32] Speaker 3: And just on the the sort of double whammy that
[6:34] Speaker 3: you have when you talk about the lack of so
[6:36] Speaker 3: called fiscal space. Public debt has ratcheted up in one
[6:40] Speaker 3: big step after the global financial crisis, and then another
[6:43] Speaker 3: big step, as Sean points out, after the pandemic. The
[6:46] Speaker 3: key thing that's changed since then is obviously the cost
[6:48] Speaker 3: of servicing that debt. Has gone up. So you had
[6:51] Speaker 3: a period after the global financial crisis where public debt
[6:53] Speaker 3: is a shared GDP across OECD countries, cross the Advanced
[6:56] Speaker 3: countries I think, doubled as a share of GDP roughly,
[6:59] Speaker 3: and the cost of servicing that debt actually went down
[7:02] Speaker 3: because interest rates had fallen. Solo, we're obviously in a
[7:05] Speaker 3: very different environment. It is making an enormous difference day
[7:08] Speaker 3: to day to the capacity of governments to respond. And
[7:12] Speaker 3: you had even an auction this week of UK debt
[7:16] Speaker 3: where they were paying very close to five percent on
[7:19] Speaker 3: that debt, which is the highest it's been I think
[7:21] Speaker 3: since the global financial crisis.
[7:23] Speaker 1: And just to add to the glom even some more
[7:25] Speaker 1: on debt servicing costs. I mean, there are according to
[7:27] Speaker 1: the UN, there are something like three and a half
[7:29] Speaker 1: billion people out of eight billion total who live in
[7:32] Speaker 1: countries that spend more on servicing their debt than on
[7:36] Speaker 1: education and healthcare nowadays.
[7:40] Speaker 2: Definitely, Sean brought up the Carmen Reinhardt comment, and I
[7:43] Speaker 2: wonder if as you look at the moment that we're
[7:46] Speaker 2: in right now, is there an historical analog that you
[7:48] Speaker 2: gravitate toward that strikes you as similar to the one
[7:50] Speaker 2: that we're living now. Is it the seventies with the
[7:52] Speaker 2: oil sharks for instance.
[7:53] Speaker 3: I think what people will always say is that there's
[7:56] Speaker 3: mixtures of everything, But I think we're certainly more in
[7:58] Speaker 3: a seventies SONI supply side shocks, of which obviously the
[8:04] Speaker 3: oil shock in the seventies was the big example. Most
[8:07] Speaker 3: of us, ancient though we are, David, don't really have
[8:10] Speaker 3: a great memory of the early mid seventies, and the
[8:12] Speaker 3: crises that we tend to have remembered have been more
[8:15] Speaker 3: about shortages of demand, and we've seen central banks and
[8:19] Speaker 3: policymakers respond to a lack of demand in various ways.
[8:22] Speaker 3: But the biggest change is the degree of international cohesion.
[8:28] Speaker 3: You know, you can exaggerate how much difference something like
[8:30] Speaker 3: the G twenty made in the context of the global
[8:33] Speaker 3: financial crisis, But the fact that there is so much
[8:38] Speaker 3: disagreement about you know, what the reasoning was to go
[8:42] Speaker 3: into the Iran war, whether there should be international sort
[8:45] Speaker 3: of approaches to international debt, for example. The fact that
[8:50] Speaker 3: there is now so much disagreement on these things, I
[8:52] Speaker 3: think does make this a particularly difficult time, and I
[8:55] Speaker 3: guess takes you a little bit more back to the
[8:57] Speaker 3: kind of nineteen twenties nineteen thirties, without exaggerating those parallels.
[9:07] Speaker 2: After the break, what tools did the IMF and the
[9:10] Speaker 2: World Bank have at their disposal and what can those
[9:12] Speaker 2: institutions do to help a more fragmented debt burden global
[9:16] Speaker 2: economy respond to a financial crisis. The energy shock the
[9:27] Speaker 2: Iran war has brought about comes on the heels of
[9:30] Speaker 2: two big moves by the Trump white House that have
[9:32] Speaker 2: rattled global markets and upended the world order. One the
[9:36] Speaker 2: whipsaw of the president's trade policy, and two the United
[9:39] Speaker 2: States is retreat from multilateral institutions. Stephan who hosts the
[9:44] Speaker 2: Trumponomics podcast here at Bloomberg, which, as you put it,
[9:46] Speaker 2: and as loyal listeners will know, looks at the economic
[9:48] Speaker 2: world of Donald Trump and how he is shaking the
[9:51] Speaker 2: global economy and in terms of the world's readiness for
[9:54] Speaker 2: a financial crisis, how have the last fifteen months or
[9:58] Speaker 2: so of changed the calculus.
[10:00] Speaker 3: I mean, it's interesting, right because we started by talking
[10:03] Speaker 3: Sean mentioned that irritation with the markets. I'm not sure
[10:07] Speaker 3: at Bloomberg wherever allowed to be irritated by the markets,
[10:09] Speaker 3: but we could certainly be bemused and intrigued by the
[10:13] Speaker 3: confidence of the markets in the face of such potentially
[10:16] Speaker 3: alarming economic news coming down the track. So one of
[10:20] Speaker 3: the striking things is that we haven't seen a lot
[10:22] Speaker 3: of warning signals flashing in the markets, and the fact
[10:26] Speaker 3: that the main indices are kind of back to where
[10:28] Speaker 3: they were before the Iran crisis began, I think is
[10:31] Speaker 3: a source of sort of surprise and head scratching, to
[10:36] Speaker 3: put it mildly, when we think about what would constitute
[10:39] Speaker 3: a financial crisis, you know, I guess one thing that
[10:42] Speaker 3: you can fall back on is it is very much
[10:44] Speaker 3: public debt. That is, if you like the problem, or
[10:49] Speaker 3: at least the thing that feels most likely to cause
[10:52] Speaker 3: an issue. At least in most countries in the world,
[10:54] Speaker 3: private balance sheets, with some exceptions, are actually in relatively
[10:58] Speaker 3: good health. So I would say, although the politics seems
[11:02] Speaker 3: very dysfunctional, although governments are under enormous strain, I think
[11:06] Speaker 3: we're in a slightly better position in terms of private
[11:09] Speaker 3: balance sheets, and even I would say, the sort of
[11:11] Speaker 3: state of financial balance sheets to withstandard crisis, even though
[11:17] Speaker 3: the signs are not there yet, because there's just such
[11:20] Speaker 3: determined optimism by all those investors.
[11:23] Speaker 2: You mentioned those balance sheets. I wanted to ask you
[11:24] Speaker 2: about another sort of potential bright spot here, and that
[11:26] Speaker 2: is that the US's positioned, Stephanie, in the global energy market.
[11:31] Speaker 2: There is so much concern about the rising price of crude,
[11:33] Speaker 2: the US is in a marketly different position than a
[11:35] Speaker 2: lot of countries in the world.
[11:37] Speaker 3: Yeah, and I started off, I think, I mean, Sean
[11:39] Speaker 3: and I have a slightly different view on this, and
[11:40] Speaker 3: I think I would like to sort of he will
[11:42] Speaker 3: be able to sort of respond to what I said.
[11:45] Speaker 3: But I think, you know, one of the interesting things
[11:48] Speaker 3: about the dynamic in Washington and at these meetings is
[11:51] Speaker 3: that you have the IMF putting out the scenario which
[11:54] Speaker 3: goes very quickly from like a baseline to an adverse scenario,
[11:57] Speaker 3: even in the course of a press conference. But the
[12:00] Speaker 3: country that whose forecasts are barely being downgraded in terms
[12:04] Speaker 3: of growth is the US. Is the country that has
[12:07] Speaker 3: in a sense, caused all of this economic damage. And
[12:11] Speaker 3: even more strikingly, although we're very focused on the gasoline price,
[12:14] Speaker 3: and I'm people who are off trying to fill up
[12:17] Speaker 3: the tank in the US are very clear about the
[12:19] Speaker 3: rising gasoline price, the natural gas price domestically has actually
[12:24] Speaker 3: fallen significantly in the US even as this crisis has
[12:27] Speaker 3: been happening. It's fallen about twenty percent since last year
[12:30] Speaker 3: and slightly less than that since the start of the crisis.
[12:33] Speaker 3: That is the source of energy that is now very
[12:36] Speaker 3: plentiful in the US, the US being a exporter of energy,
[12:41] Speaker 3: which is driving a lot of manufacturing and gives the
[12:43] Speaker 3: country an enormous competitive advantage at this point. So although
[12:46] Speaker 3: there's going to be a lot of political and some
[12:49] Speaker 3: household economic damage from this, you know it is not
[12:52] Speaker 3: lost on the IMF and the other countries at this
[12:55] Speaker 3: meeting that actually, in other ways, the US is in
[12:58] Speaker 3: a very strong position to ride out.
[13:00] Speaker 1: Is still John, You're not persuaded, No, I just like
[13:03] Speaker 1: I am always persuaded by Stephanie's arguments. But I I am.
[13:09] Speaker 3: I think it's me being your boss makes a difference.
[13:11] Speaker 1: That it's hard to disagree with your boss. But the
[13:14] Speaker 1: But look, I do think it depends where you look
[13:16] Speaker 1: at the economy. If you are a farmer who needs diesel,
[13:20] Speaker 1: your inputs have just gotten a lot more expensive. That
[13:23] Speaker 1: tractor you're going to want to run it a lot less.
[13:26] Speaker 1: So the farm economy is going to take ahead if
[13:30] Speaker 1: you make anything that has plastics in it, whether it's
[13:34] Speaker 1: a toy or a phone case, or you know, anything else,
[13:38] Speaker 1: that's just gotten a lot more expensive. If you are
[13:44] Speaker 1: reliant on golf capital for an investment that is happening
[13:48] Speaker 1: in the US, I would argue you've got new questions
[13:51] Speaker 1: about whether that capital is going to be forthcoming, and
[13:54] Speaker 1: then there are some longer term questions. Alexis Crow, who's
[13:57] Speaker 1: very smart economist at PwC, made the point to me
[14:01] Speaker 1: yesterday as we were sitting having a coffee at the
[14:03] Speaker 1: IMF headquarters that you know, people aren't thinking about the
[14:07] Speaker 1: potential impact of this on the AI boom. There's a
[14:11] Speaker 1: very real possibility that in a matter of months production
[14:15] Speaker 1: of chips is going to become a lot more expensive.
[14:17] Speaker 1: You may seem some curtailing of chip production that may
[14:21] Speaker 1: add to memory chip shortages, which may then feed through
[14:25] Speaker 1: into into the US economy in different ways. You know,
[14:29] Speaker 1: maybe in the US the damage for Donald Trump is
[14:33] Speaker 1: not economic per se at the kind of aggregate level,
[14:37] Speaker 1: but certainly politically this is not something that is going
[14:41] Speaker 1: to help the Republican case in the midterm elections. That
[14:46] Speaker 1: adds to volatility political volatility in the US, which hasn't
[14:51] Speaker 1: historically been very good for the economy either.
[14:53] Speaker 3: And then the beautiful synthesis of both of our views
[14:55] Speaker 3: is and I think it also goes to some of
[14:57] Speaker 3: the discussion that the World Bank is all of what
[15:00] Speaker 3: Sean says, I'm sure is right. The disconnect or the
[15:04] Speaker 3: contrast with the countries around those various tables in the
[15:07] Speaker 3: World Bank is they're feeling the pain now or they
[15:10] Speaker 3: can see it coming at them, and they are nervous
[15:14] Speaker 3: that not enough of that short term economic pain is
[15:17] Speaker 3: going to be felt by the US. And given that
[15:20] Speaker 3: the US is the main force that can actually influence
[15:23] Speaker 3: the length of this crisis, if there's a lack of
[15:26] Speaker 3: urgency in the US, that is deeply troubling to the
[15:28] Speaker 3: rest of the world.
[15:32] Speaker 2: Sort of rabbit by talking about the state of these
[15:33] Speaker 2: two institutions. So Sean, let me start with you. You
[15:37] Speaker 2: said a bit earlier that there are kind of questions
[15:39] Speaker 2: about the lessoning of credibility when it comes to it
[15:41] Speaker 2: to the IMAF. What's the state of the IMF in
[15:43] Speaker 2: the World Bank today?
[15:45] Speaker 1: The state and the most important thing to think about
[15:49] Speaker 1: when you are thinking about these big multilateral institutions is
[15:53] Speaker 1: their biggest shareholder is walking away from multilateralism as an idea.
[16:00] Speaker 1: You know, there is a really interesting dissonance between what
[16:04] Speaker 1: the IMF is saying about the economic impact and what
[16:07] Speaker 1: Scott Bess and the Treasury Secretary is say about the
[16:10] Speaker 1: economic impact of the war kind of just saying, well,
[16:14] Speaker 1: you know, it's all worth it and we shouldn't worry
[16:17] Speaker 1: about it too much, and the rest of the world
[16:20] Speaker 1: is worrying about it. You know. The IMF and the
[16:22] Speaker 1: World Bank always have come good in a crisis, you know,
[16:27] Speaker 1: and we're going to see if that happens again this time.
[16:29] Speaker 1: I suspect that they will. But every crisis we've been
[16:32] Speaker 1: through recently, it feels like the IMF comes out just
[16:35] Speaker 1: a little bit weaker than it was going into the oven.
[16:39] Speaker 2: You know.
[16:39] Speaker 1: Going to these meetings is a little bit like going
[16:42] Speaker 1: to the doctor and listening to all the sensible advice
[16:46] Speaker 1: that you should take, and it kind of and it's
[16:48] Speaker 1: all in a sometimes it feels like in an alternative world. Right.
[16:52] Speaker 1: So the advice this week is if you are going
[16:54] Speaker 1: to help your people, and if you're going to help them,
[16:58] Speaker 1: whether the impact of high end energy prices. Then make
[17:01] Speaker 1: sure it is targeted and limited, and that you make
[17:04] Speaker 1: sure you pay back to debt and that you don't
[17:07] Speaker 1: give it to everyone. Right, And of course that goes
[17:10] Speaker 1: against good politics in a lot of these countries. Right
[17:13] Speaker 1: when you have people in the streets in places like Ireland,
[17:17] Speaker 1: right when you have Australian farmers complaining about diesel prices
[17:21] Speaker 1: and putting pressure on the government and so on. And
[17:24] Speaker 1: when you look at countries like the Philippines and Thailand
[17:28] Speaker 1: that are really feeling the impact of this heavily, it's
[17:31] Speaker 1: going to be hard for them to take that advice.
[17:34] Speaker 1: And so fast forward a few years we come out
[17:37] Speaker 1: of it. You know, the IMF may have been right,
[17:41] Speaker 1: but it will have lost a little bit of authority
[17:43] Speaker 1: because again, it kind of offers this advice in this
[17:46] Speaker 1: kind of pure world of gray suited technocrats, although there
[17:52] Speaker 1: are some blue suits at the IMF.
[17:54] Speaker 3: I guess the only if you're the IMF and the
[17:57] Speaker 3: World Bank and you're looking at what's happened to some
[17:59] Speaker 3: other instances that potentially the Trump administration could have had
[18:03] Speaker 3: in their sights, you might also feel after a year
[18:06] Speaker 3: at least that you've dodged a bullet that you're not.
[18:09] Speaker 3: You might have expected a few more broadsides, more attempts
[18:13] Speaker 3: either intervening into IMF World Bank policy or indeed threatening
[18:18] Speaker 3: to leave. You know, we've had all of that from
[18:20] Speaker 3: the administration in other areas. So the fact that the
[18:26] Speaker 3: IMF and the World Banks are still constituted as they are,
[18:30] Speaker 3: that the US has not involved itself is Yes, it's
[18:33] Speaker 3: a negative, certainly from the times when I first when
[18:35] Speaker 3: I was working at the US Treasury during the asia
[18:38] Speaker 3: of financial crisis, where the criticism was always that the
[18:40] Speaker 3: US had too much control over these institutions. The fact
[18:44] Speaker 3: that they have largely ignored them, I suspect the heads
[18:49] Speaker 3: of the institutions will be a little bit relieved, even though,
[18:52] Speaker 3: as Sean says, the long term cost is they have
[18:55] Speaker 3: less capacity to respond to crisis like the ones that
[18:58] Speaker 3: are potentially coming down the right now.
[19:07] Speaker 2: This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm David Gerra.
[19:10] Speaker 2: To get more from The Big Take and unlimited access
[19:12] Speaker 2: to all of Bloomberg dot Com, subscribe today at Bloomberg
[19:16] Speaker 2: dot Com Slash Podcast offer. Thanks for listening. We'll be
[19:20] Speaker 2: back tomorrow.
[19:21] Speaker 3: Thank you.

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.