# Natural Side Effect

An episode of [Divided Argument](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1567718103), 27 Feb 2025, 1 h 20 min.

Audio: https://op3.dev/e/dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.beamly.com/GxB3tIWgJ0MCDbmD/GxB3ykF8pz0UMRya/GxB3ynasa6wAs47k/ebe34ffdcef0.mp3

Back in the studio after a couple of fun live shows, we discover that the Court has finally given us too much to talk about. We discuss the new Trump Administration's first shadow docket adventure, a number of interesting solo opinions from the orders list, the decline in summary reversals, and the overall quality of oral advocacy before the Court. We then take a deep dive into the Court's opinion in Glossip v. Oklahoma, a capital case with many factual, jurisdictional, and remedial complexities.

## Transcript

[56:04] Will Baude: Five votes to say, “We are confident that there is a Napue violation, \[unintelligible is missing. “We are confident there's a Napue violation--

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.