# Secrets Behind The Age of Disclosure: Government Hiding Info On UFO's & Aliens

An episode of [The Colin Cowherd Podcast](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1551365571), 4 Dec 2025, 1 h 01 min.

Audio: https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/arttrk.com/p/D5CA5/pscrb.fm/rss/p/prfx.byspotify.com/e/pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.omny.fm/d/clips/e73c998e-6e60-432f-8610-ae210140c5b1/4013d28e-5f67-4885-bff1-ae3300346830/89113deb-d1e3-4376-bb26-b3a9000eb96d/audio.mp3?utm_source=Podcast&in_playlist=e829cf60-fc06-4d61-8691-ae330034683e

Colin is joined by Dan Farah, the producer and director of the new documentary The Age of Disclosure They dive into the stunning revelations behind The Age of Disclosure, his new documentary on UAPs and the decades-long retrieval programs operating outside congressional oversight. Farah explains the moment he realized just how extraordinary the story was—the subjects’ accounts all lined up, people only felt safe speaking out together, and evidence pointed to an 80-year effort by the U.S., China, and Russia to locate and study advanced craft. He and Colin discuss why the public deserves transparency, the trillion-dollar scale of the program, and why credible officials—from military base contacts to former intelligence leaders like James Clapper—are now willing to put their reputations on the line. Farah walks through some of the most dramatic moments in the documentary: football-field-sized craft at nuclear bases, physical harm reported by people who got too close, and the “bubble” theory that explains how these objects warp spacetime and evade photography. The conversation explores underwater UAP activity, misguided attempts to engage the craft militarily, and the slow drip of official disclosures—including claims of recovered bodies and technology. Colin even shares his own childhood UFO sighting, as Farah argues that The Age of Disclosure is only the beginning of what the public is about to learn. Timeline: 00:00 Dan Farah joins the Colin Cowherd Podcast 01:45 What was the “Oh shit” momentum you had during the making of the doc? 02:45 It was shocking how many of the subjects stories lined up 03:45 People needed safety in numbers in order to tell their stories 05:00 What is the UAP retrieval program that’s been going on for 80 years? 06:00 The program has been operating outside of congressional oversight 06:45 China and Russia have active UAP retrieval programs 08:00 Public should be informed so we can put more resources into the program 09:45 Did anybody you talked to think it was China beating us in an arms race? 11:30 Need to make the case to the public that we need to win this tech race 13:30 This project has thousands of employees and a trillion dollar budget 15:45 Which military base contact stood out the most to you? 16:45 UAPs show up at bases and nuclear weapons sites 17:45 Football field sized craft appeared at Vandenberg Air Force Base 19:45 Having an experience seeing a UAP will change you forever 20:30 Colin’s experience seeing a UFO when he was younger 21:45 People interviewed who had contact have had negative physical effects 22:30 Getting too close to this technology has caused sickness and cancer 24:15 The “bubble” theory of how the UAP’s work 25:30 The craft are warping space time around themselves 26:30 Inside the bubble the craft aren’t impacted by physics or the environment 27:30 The bubble is why we can’t get good photos of the craft 28:00 This technology is the solution to energy crisis and interstellar travel 30:15 Has there been any pushback to Age of Disclosure? 32:30 Credible people with stellar resumes put their names/reputations on the line 34:00 There’s an enormous amount of UAP activity underneath the ocean 34:30 The ocean is the easiest place to hide from humanity 35:45 UFO became UAP because of the activity underwater 37:15 No reports of UAP’s shooting down planes, few stories of them causing harm 38:00 Humans have fired missiles at UAP’s… not a great idea 39:15 What do we know about Russia’s retrieval program? 40:00 There was a directed energy weapon in craft retrieved by Russia 40:30 Rumors that Trump may disclose the existence of craft/program 42:30 Many of the UFO reports near Vegas turned out to be the stealth bomber 44:30 James Clapper has impeccable resume and had nothing to gain by speaking out 45:30 Area 51 is the epitome of conspiracy and BS, and Clapper confirmed it’s real 46:45 Clapper confirmed they had a program to investigate UAP despite…

## Transcript

[0:01] Speaker 1: The volume. This product contains nicotine. That's an addictive chemical.
[0:06] Speaker 1: What are you reaching for? If you're a smoker or dipper,
[0:09] Speaker 1: you're reaching for nicotine satisfaction and all the problems that
[0:11] Speaker 1: come with smoking or dipping. But you could be reaching
[0:14] Speaker 1: for Zen nicotine pouches. Let's talk about what Zen helps
[0:17] Speaker 1: you reach for. First, variety, ten flavored and unflavored Zen
[0:21] Speaker 1: varieties neither three milligram or six milligram straints. Also, because
[0:24] Speaker 1: Zen nicotine pouches are smoke free and spit free, you
[0:27] Speaker 1: don't have to think about lingering smells or unsightly spit models.
[0:30] Speaker 1: Then there's living life on your terms where you don't
[0:33] Speaker 1: have to step away from good times because you need
[0:35] Speaker 1: a smokeror a dip, where you can be part of
[0:37] Speaker 1: every moment. And hey, there's more. Zen offers a robust
[0:40] Speaker 1: rewards program, opportunities to break free from your routine, membership,
[0:43] Speaker 1: and a unique nationwide community. Whatever you're reaching for, reach
[0:46] Speaker 1: for it with America's number one nicotine pouch brand. Find
[0:49] Speaker 1: your z in at Zen dot com. That's zyn dot com.
[0:52] Speaker 1: If you're a smoker dipper, you could be reaching for
[0:54] Speaker 1: more with Zen Nicotine pouches. When you reach for zen,
[0:57] Speaker 1: you're reaching for ten satisfying varieties and two strains for
[1:00] Speaker 1: a smoke free, spit free option that lets you lean
[1:02] Speaker 1: into good times instead of stepping away for premiere rewards,
[1:05] Speaker 1: chances to break free from your routine, and a unique
[1:08] Speaker 1: nationwide community. Find yours in zyn wherever nicotine products are
[1:12] Speaker 1: sold near you. Today's guests on the pod is Dan Farrah.
[1:22] Speaker 1: Dan's the director and producer of Age of Disclosure. It's
[1:25] Speaker 1: currently on Prime Video. In fact, it's the number one
[1:30] Speaker 1: movie on Prime and if you look at their lineup,
[1:38] Speaker 1: that's pretty heavy stuff. Dan Farrah has made a movie
[1:44] Speaker 1: that has altered my perception of intelligence beyond our borders
[1:53] Speaker 1: and beyond our capabilities. And when I watched Age of Disclosure,
[2:00] Speaker 1: and I'm not as cynical today as I was twenty
[2:04] Speaker 1: years ago. And a lot of that's because of videos
[2:08] Speaker 1: of craft and technology that were clearly not capable of.
[2:13] Speaker 1: And so I thought, I want to spend an hour
[2:16] Speaker 1: with Dan Farrah. And many of you have seen it,
[2:20] Speaker 1: probably many more of you will see it, and so
[2:24] Speaker 1: let's start our interview. Well, for years, I thought Man
[2:30] Speaker 1: on Wire was my favorite documentary and if you've not
[2:34] Speaker 1: seen that, I highly recommend it. But our next guest,
[2:38] Speaker 1: Dan Fara, is a director and producer of Age of Disclosure,
[2:41] Speaker 1: and anybody who was listening to my three hour radio
[2:43] Speaker 1: TV show knows I was much more cynical about craft
[2:51] Speaker 1: until I saw the Pentagon leaked New York Times reporting
[2:56] Speaker 1: on the tic TAC shape device, andsequently the pilots are
[3:02] Speaker 1: pilots freaking out. They were highly credible people, and from
[3:07] Speaker 1: that point forward, I think I look at it. I
[3:10] Speaker 1: don't feel there's a stigma in America. I don't look
[3:12] Speaker 1: at it cynically. Dan Fara has created a documentary I
[3:17] Speaker 1: think is really for those of you who have been
[3:20] Speaker 1: cynical Age of Disclosure. It took I read three years
[3:27] Speaker 1: to produce this, thirty four senior intelligence officials, astrophysicists, pilots,
[3:35] Speaker 1: people who have been biologically affected. I have to start
[3:39] Speaker 1: with this. Dan, over the course of your production of this,
[3:43] Speaker 1: this is really a lifetime work. I mean, this is
[3:49] Speaker 1: something you're obviously proud of. When was the moment, maybe
[3:54] Speaker 1: it was an interview, I certainly know I had a
[3:58] Speaker 1: couple during the documentary when was a kind of a
[4:01] Speaker 1: jaw dropper or a shit just got real. I am
[4:05] Speaker 1: hearing things that even I you may have questioned or
[4:10] Speaker 1: been a bit cynical about. Did you have one of
[4:12] Speaker 1: those aha moments?
[4:14] Speaker 2: Well, for me, it was when I started to get
[4:17] Speaker 2: access to a high level to intelligence officials, military officials,
[4:21] Speaker 2: government officials, and got an audience with them in private
[4:25] Speaker 2: before I interviewed them, just private conversations, phones off, real honest,
[4:31] Speaker 2: grounded conversations about the reality of this. For me, the
[4:37] Speaker 2: eye opening, the first eye opening experience was realizing that
[4:42] Speaker 2: all these people who have mostly no relationship at all
[4:46] Speaker 2: and are ideologically opposed. You know, they all have different worldviews,
[4:49] Speaker 2: they all have different political beliefs, they all have different
[4:51] Speaker 2: social beliefs, they were all saying the same thing. And
[4:55] Speaker 2: it was super eye opening to me right off the bat.
[4:57] Speaker 2: In those first few weeks of you know, going to
[5:00] Speaker 2: d C and getting these these private meetings, it was
[5:06] Speaker 2: it was shocking how lined up they all were on
[5:11] Speaker 2: these big truths that have been hidden from the public.
[5:15] Speaker 2: And they were also all lined up on why they
[5:18] Speaker 2: haven't spoken about it so far. So there's this line
[5:22] Speaker 2: that they can't cross, right, there's classified information that none
[5:25] Speaker 2: of these people reveal, but there's a lot that they
[5:29] Speaker 2: can lawfully disclose. And for decades, people with that information
[5:34] Speaker 2: have just been discouraged from sharing it publicly, uh through
[5:40] Speaker 2: through very through for various reasons, you know, threats to
[5:43] Speaker 2: their career, threats to their reputation. Some people feared it
[5:46] Speaker 2: would cost them their life, and they just decided it
[5:50] Speaker 2: was best to keep silent about it. And and as
[5:52] Speaker 2: I had these conversations with them, I realized that the
[5:56] Speaker 2: only way to get these kind of people to speak
[6:00] Speaker 2: up with what they lawfully could would be to give
[6:02] Speaker 2: them the platform to do it arm in arm, you know,
[6:06] Speaker 2: to have numbers for them all to you know, you know,
[6:09] Speaker 2: step up and speak their truth together, and and to
[6:13] Speaker 2: do it in a film that is assuring them, Hey,
[6:18] Speaker 2: you're not going to be intercut with some knucklehead you
[6:21] Speaker 2: know who's just cool casting or has like an interesting opinion.
[6:24] Speaker 2: It's only going to be I will only interview people
[6:26] Speaker 2: who have direct knowledge of this topic as a result
[6:29] Speaker 2: of working for the US government. And I'll put you
[6:31] Speaker 2: all in the same film together. You can have safety
[6:33] Speaker 2: of numbers. There'll be dozens of you. And that was
[6:37] Speaker 2: the solution to to the problem but you know, again,
[6:40] Speaker 2: the eye opening thing for me was just how in
[6:43] Speaker 2: sync all of these people were, you know, regardless of
[6:46] Speaker 2: their political opinion, regardless of their you know, ideologies, like
[6:50] Speaker 2: they were all in sync on the reality of the situation,
[6:53] Speaker 2: and that just in Yeah, that's eye opening.
[6:57] Speaker 1: So let's talk about the retrieval program, because that's not
[7:02] Speaker 1: something that happened over the last year two That is
[7:05] Speaker 1: forty fifty plus years eight Russia, eighty years, eighty years,
[7:09] Speaker 1: eighty years total. And for the uninitiated, the people who
[7:14] Speaker 1: have not seen this, and I figure between thirty and
[7:16] Speaker 1: fifty percent of my audience have and you know, sixty
[7:20] Speaker 1: to fifty something thereabouts, haven't explain what the retrieval program
[7:26] Speaker 1: is that's been going on for eighty years, because that
[7:30] Speaker 1: will make that our starting point. Yeah.
[7:32] Speaker 2: So look, the biggest headline of what's revealed this film
[7:36] Speaker 2: is that the existence of non human intelligent life, intelligent
[7:40] Speaker 2: life that is not human, has been covered up for
[7:42] Speaker 2: eighty years. And on top of that, there has been
[7:47] Speaker 2: a deeply hidden program within our government system and our
[7:51] Speaker 2: military system that has been capturing and retrieving crashed UAP
[7:56] Speaker 2: formerly known as UFOs right and been doing so for
[8:00] Speaker 2: eighty years, and they have been actively working behind the
[8:04] Speaker 2: scenes to figure out how to reverse engineer this technology,
[8:07] Speaker 2: meaning how to recreate it. Right, this technology that does
[8:11] Speaker 2: things that we don't have the current ability to do,
[8:15] Speaker 2: and they are trying to figure out how it works
[8:18] Speaker 2: so that we can use that technology. That is the
[8:20] Speaker 2: simplest way to say it. Now. People in my film
[8:23] Speaker 2: reveal that this program has been operating for eighty years
[8:27] Speaker 2: outside of congressional oversight, meaning it's been hidden from Congress,
[8:31] Speaker 2: the people we elect to oversee how our tax dollars
[8:35] Speaker 2: are spent, how our country has run. Right, this program
[8:39] Speaker 2: is operating outside of their oversight. People in the film
[8:42] Speaker 2: also reveal that the program has even been operating outside
[8:45] Speaker 2: of the oversight of the President of the United States,
[8:47] Speaker 2: meaning the public, Congress, and the White House are out
[8:50] Speaker 2: of the loop. Right, And a number of the people
[8:53] Speaker 2: in my film feel like that needs to change because
[8:57] Speaker 2: we are now in a very heightened, high stakes cold
[9:01] Speaker 2: war technology race with China because they have the same
[9:05] Speaker 2: set of circumstances. They have also been retrieving these crashed
[9:08] Speaker 2: uap UFOs.
[9:10] Speaker 1: And our intelligence tells us that yeah.
[9:12] Speaker 2: And that's what that's what the people my film reveal
[9:14] Speaker 2: that China has a very active program, and so does Russia.
[9:17] Speaker 2: The biggest concern is China specifically, But China and Russia
[9:21] Speaker 2: have programs, and this is a technology race, and people
[9:24] Speaker 2: in my film refer to it as the Manhattan Project
[9:27] Speaker 2: on steroids, you know, the atomics, right, sure, And so
[9:31] Speaker 2: people in my film feel like it's important for this
[9:34] Speaker 2: all to come out of the shadows and the base
[9:36] Speaker 2: facts to be known so that the US can put
[9:40] Speaker 2: more resources towards it. You know, government only puts resources
[9:43] Speaker 2: towards what the public demands. Resources are put towards, right,
[9:46] Speaker 2: you know, right right after nine to eleven, average person
[9:50] Speaker 2: in America was like, hey, we got to put more
[9:52] Speaker 2: money towards counter terrorism, right, we need more you know
[9:56] Speaker 2: going on here to fight this stuff. And so what happened.
[9:59] Speaker 2: We put tons of resource versus funding towards it. The
[10:02] Speaker 2: position of the Director of National Intelligence was created to
[10:05] Speaker 2: make sure the intelligence community was sharing more information so
[10:07] Speaker 2: we could avoid an intelligence failure like nine to eleven
[10:10] Speaker 2: halving again. And so what the people in my film
[10:12] Speaker 2: are essentially saying is, hey, let's not wait till something
[10:14] Speaker 2: bad happens on this front. Let's make the public aware
[10:18] Speaker 2: of the base facts of the situation so that the
[10:21] Speaker 2: right amount of resources can be put towards it, so
[10:23] Speaker 2: people can the average person can learn what's happening and
[10:27] Speaker 2: can make their voice heard to their elected representatives and say, hey,
[10:30] Speaker 2: take this more seriously, put the right resources towards us.
[10:33] Speaker 2: And that's really why they're speaking up about this secret program.
[10:37] Speaker 1: So and in terms of technology, there are things that
[10:42] Speaker 1: China is ahead of us. Electric vehicles some would say
[10:46] Speaker 1: five G.
[10:49] Speaker 2: I would say.
[10:51] Speaker 1: High speed rail. You could argue that China is our
[10:54] Speaker 1: equal space. Technology is again they feel but I feel
[11:00] Speaker 1: like they're in our class. And so as I watched
[11:05] Speaker 1: the tick Talk tic TAC. As I watched the tic
[11:10] Speaker 1: Tac that video that came, you know, from the Pentagon
[11:14] Speaker 1: New York Times, I remember opening the paper and thinking, WTF,
[11:18] Speaker 1: what is going on? My first thought is China's ahead
[11:23] Speaker 1: of us. Now, there are things there are economic metrics
[11:26] Speaker 1: dan that they're not in their form of government I
[11:30] Speaker 1: don't think is obviously not as progressive, but there are
[11:33] Speaker 1: things that they are ahead of us. And I thought,
[11:37] Speaker 1: you know what, they have cracked the code of reverse engineering,
[11:41] Speaker 1: that's why. And they may have done it decades ago.
[11:46] Speaker 1: Because if they can activate and deactivate nuclear, you know,
[11:52] Speaker 1: base weapons, why wouldn't they blow us up? Why wouldn't
[11:55] Speaker 1: they sow doubt and chaos? Why would they do this covertly?
[12:00] Speaker 1: So are there anybody in our thirty four insiders that
[12:05] Speaker 1: you talk to that think maybe a big part of
[12:08] Speaker 1: this is China beating us to the race? Not wanting
[12:12] Speaker 1: to start World War three, but if they can deactivate
[12:16] Speaker 1: nuclear sites, which has been discussed and has happened, they're
[12:20] Speaker 1: testing stuff and they're simply ahead of us. They don't
[12:23] Speaker 1: want to start war, but they want to end it
[12:26] Speaker 1: and control us. Is that possible?
[12:28] Speaker 2: Well, look, anything's obviously possible.
[12:29] Speaker 1: But the.
[12:31] Speaker 2: People I interviewed made it clear that this high stakes
[12:35] Speaker 2: race with China is a very close race. And Senator
[12:40] Speaker 2: Arounds from South Dakota, who's a very senior guy in
[12:44] Speaker 2: the US Senate. He says in the film, he says,
[12:46] Speaker 2: you know, do you think that Putin and she would
[12:49] Speaker 2: hesitate for even a second to use this technology for
[12:52] Speaker 2: their global domination if they didn't think we the US
[12:56] Speaker 2: had access to the same technology. And that was a
[12:58] Speaker 2: really bombshell line in the film in a big statement
[13:02] Speaker 2: by him, because it sheds light on how real this
[13:05] Speaker 2: technology race is. Both countries have made progress clearly, and
[13:11] Speaker 2: you know, there's a general belief though that we would
[13:14] Speaker 2: benefit from general belief amongst the people I interviewed that
[13:18] Speaker 2: we would benefit as a nation if the base facts
[13:21] Speaker 2: were made public. And the analogy a lot of these
[13:23] Speaker 2: guys made with me is, you know, when we entered
[13:25] Speaker 2: the space race, Kennedy gave that big famous, you know,
[13:28] Speaker 2: rally espeege where he said, you know, we are determined
[13:32] Speaker 2: to win this race. And he speaks about the space technology.
[13:36] Speaker 2: He says, space technology is like nuclear technology. It has
[13:39] Speaker 2: no conscience of its own. It's up to mankind to
[13:42] Speaker 2: either use that technology for good or for bad, for
[13:46] Speaker 2: peace or for war right, And his whole point was
[13:48] Speaker 2: he wanted the US to lead the way in the
[13:50] Speaker 2: space race so that the US could make sure that
[13:52] Speaker 2: technology is used for the better betterment of mankind and
[13:55] Speaker 2: not for war. And it's the same situation here. And
[13:58] Speaker 2: I don't think in a lot of people I've interviewed
[14:00] Speaker 2: have made it clear to me that they don't think
[14:03] Speaker 2: we would have won the space race if that speech
[14:06] Speaker 2: hadn't happened. It made it clear the public that this
[14:08] Speaker 2: was a real thing. Because what happened as a result
[14:10] Speaker 2: of that is people in the scientific community and people
[14:13] Speaker 2: in academia could say to themselves, Hey, I can put
[14:16] Speaker 2: my brain power towards this, I can help the US win,
[14:19] Speaker 2: right They you know, they can apply themselves to that,
[14:22] Speaker 2: to that effort, Whereas now this situation is so hidden
[14:26] Speaker 2: in secrecy. The average scientist, average person at you know,
[14:30] Speaker 2: at you know, academia, these like you know, super smart
[14:33] Speaker 2: people that are at MIT and all these fancy schools,
[14:35] Speaker 2: they don't even know this is real, right, And obviously
[14:39] Speaker 2: they can't help us win this race if they don't
[14:41] Speaker 2: know it's real.
[14:42] Speaker 1: Yeah, right, And that's another reason for the age of disclosure.
[14:46] Speaker 1: People are pressing this this this the Manhattan Project. Of course,
[14:51] Speaker 1: there were I think one hundred and thirty thousand people involved, UK, Canada,
[14:56] Speaker 1: the United States the Manhattan Project. It was, you know,
[14:59] Speaker 1: the nuclear bom Do we have a sense between the
[15:03] Speaker 1: number of people one hundred and thirty thousand people in
[15:06] Speaker 1: America is a large corporation. Yeah, but given the time
[15:10] Speaker 1: of the Manhattan Project, it's a remarkable number of people
[15:15] Speaker 1: working on something covertly. Do we have any idea that
[15:19] Speaker 1: the volume dan the number of people between defense contractors, CIA,
[15:26] Speaker 1: Air Force intelligence officials, what is the number we're talking
[15:32] Speaker 1: about the people that have knowledge and that are working
[15:36] Speaker 1: on retrieval programs and advancement of devices and craft.
[15:40] Speaker 2: Yeah, this is one of the one of the fascinating thoughts.
[15:44] Speaker 2: Like I've been told off the record that this is
[15:47] Speaker 2: not a small program, that this is thousands of people
[15:50] Speaker 2: employed full time, and that it's been the case for
[15:53] Speaker 2: eight years. And I've been told that the overall budget
[15:58] Speaker 2: of this situation is closer to a trillion dollars his
[16:01] Speaker 2: billions a year for eighty years. And to people who
[16:04] Speaker 2: focus on this every single day, and every time I've
[16:07] Speaker 2: thought about that, it's it's really a head scratcher, because
[16:12] Speaker 2: what it leads you to is, you know, the guy
[16:14] Speaker 2: you're sitting next to on the bleachers at your kids
[16:16] Speaker 2: litle league baseball game, you know, he might have just
[16:18] Speaker 2: spent his day working on this stuff, and you think
[16:21] Speaker 2: he is you know, a ups driver, you know, or
[16:24] Speaker 2: like you know the family across from you at the
[16:26] Speaker 2: local pizza place. The dad might be dealing with non
[16:29] Speaker 2: human technology all day and this high stakes race and
[16:32] Speaker 2: his family doesn't know about it, His neighbors don't know
[16:34] Speaker 2: about it, and he don't know about it. These are
[16:35] Speaker 2: normal people who are living amongst us who have the
[16:39] Speaker 2: job of dealing with this, you know, And that's that's
[16:41] Speaker 2: a pretty remarkable thought. But it was the case with
[16:44] Speaker 2: the Manhattan Project too, Like you said, lots of people
[16:47] Speaker 2: going to work every day working on this atomic race.
[16:50] Speaker 2: You know, the stakes were the future of humanity back then,
[16:53] Speaker 2: whether it was going to help us win World War
[16:55] Speaker 2: two or not. And they were dealing with this, They
[16:56] Speaker 2: were falling asleep with that on their shoulders, and their
[16:58] Speaker 2: neighbors had no clue. Their family, we had no clue,
[17:00] Speaker 2: you know. So we've been as a country, we've been
[17:03] Speaker 2: in a situation like this before, but this is this
[17:06] Speaker 2: is the biggest version of it yet by far.
[17:11] Speaker 1: Today's show brought to you by our new presenting sponsor,
[17:13] Speaker 1: hard Rock Bet. Big News hard Rock Bet now live
[17:16] Speaker 1: in Michigan, Michigan. Congrats. Sign up today. Place your first
[17:20] Speaker 1: five dollars sports bet. If it wins, get one hundred
[17:23] Speaker 1: and fifty bucks in bonus bets on top of your winnings,
[17:25] Speaker 1: and if you're more into casino games, new customers can
[17:29] Speaker 1: GetUp to one thousand bucks back in casino bonus. If
[17:31] Speaker 1: you're not up money after your first twenty four hours
[17:34] Speaker 1: playing slots win money, we get a casino bonus back,
[17:37] Speaker 1: Plus you also get two hundred bonus spins winnings paid
[17:40] Speaker 1: in cash. Not sure what to place your first bet on,
[17:43] Speaker 1: head over to the hard Rock Bet Stats up. It's
[17:45] Speaker 1: going to help you out. Loaded with trend streaks, stats
[17:48] Speaker 1: help you guide you through your picks. Numbers don't lie,
[17:51] Speaker 1: neither does the data in there. Check out the stats
[17:54] Speaker 1: hub now get the edge bet with confidence plus. Hard
[17:56] Speaker 1: Rock Bet offers new promos daily plus big legendary war
[18:00] Speaker 1: war drops every Thursday like gifts under the Tree, So
[18:02] Speaker 1: whenever you're listening, just open the app and check out
[18:06] Speaker 1: what you've got waiting for you. Download the hard Rock
[18:08] Speaker 1: Bet app and make your first deposit payable in bonus bets,
[18:12] Speaker 1: not a cash offer offered by the Seminole Tribe of
[18:14] Speaker 1: Florida in Florida. Offered by Seminole hard Rock Digital LLC.
[18:18] Speaker 1: In older states. Must be twenty one plus and physically
[18:20] Speaker 1: president in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,
[18:24] Speaker 1: or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about
[18:27] Speaker 1: gambling in Florida, call one eighty and eight. Admit it
[18:29] Speaker 1: in Indiana. If you are somebody you know as a
[18:31] Speaker 1: problem wants help, call one eight hundred and nine with it.
[18:33] Speaker 1: Gambling problem called one eight hundred. Gambler Arizona, Colorado, Illinois,
[18:37] Speaker 1: New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia. The first pop moment for
[18:47] Speaker 1: me watching this when I really sat back ka. I
[18:51] Speaker 1: watched it twice and then I've watched several interviews was
[18:55] Speaker 1: when you went and it was senior officials, highly credible people,
[19:00] Speaker 1: many retired. You went to Missoula or Missouri or California.
[19:07] Speaker 1: You went to bases a great It was really like
[19:11] Speaker 1: Google maps. You went in and zoned in on these
[19:14] Speaker 1: bases and told stories. And these were people that were older.
[19:21] Speaker 1: They were not hyperbolic. They almost felt as if they
[19:26] Speaker 1: were ashamed they hadn't told this story earlier. They were
[19:30] Speaker 1: That's what it felt like to me. They felt like, listen,
[19:32] Speaker 1: I'm telling you the story. I mean, what in the
[19:34] Speaker 1: world could it have been?
[19:35] Speaker 2: I didn't know.
[19:35] Speaker 1: They felt guilty for not telling it earlier. Of all
[19:39] Speaker 1: those base stories and there's four or five you illustrate,
[19:43] Speaker 1: and it's really worth watching for that five minute part
[19:47] Speaker 1: of the documentary. Which one to you? I mean? Because
[19:50] Speaker 1: they all felt so real and there's no reason at
[19:53] Speaker 1: this point you're retired to you know, ad libit or
[19:58] Speaker 1: disclose information that's not forthright and honest. Which one of
[20:02] Speaker 1: those base experiences to you? Is there one you still
[20:07] Speaker 1: think about or one that had the most impact to you?
[20:10] Speaker 2: Yeah, for sure, said one really stands out to me.
[20:12] Speaker 2: But first I'll tell you. Look, you you interview people
[20:15] Speaker 2: every day this film. This was the first documentary I
[20:18] Speaker 2: directed and the first time I conducted interviews right, and
[20:23] Speaker 2: I really truly felt it when they were sharing their
[20:27] Speaker 2: truths and their experiences. I felt like these people were
[20:30] Speaker 2: just getting a weight off their shoulder and relieved to
[20:33] Speaker 2: finally talk about it right, Like they wanted the world
[20:35] Speaker 2: to know the truth. They felt deserve the world deserved
[20:37] Speaker 2: to know the truth. So the activity at bases UAP base,
[20:42] Speaker 2: the UAP activity over military bases, it's not just military base,
[20:45] Speaker 2: it's also our nuclear weapons sites, and it's active. It's
[20:49] Speaker 2: an ongoing issue. And I interviewed a number of military
[20:54] Speaker 2: officials who experienced events that happened in our classified airspace
[20:59] Speaker 2: over military basis, and one that really stands out took
[21:02] Speaker 2: place at Vanderberg Air Force Base. I'm in Los Angeles
[21:05] Speaker 2: right now as I talk to you, and st up
[21:07] Speaker 2: the coast like two hours is Vanderberg right around Santa
[21:09] Speaker 2: Barbara area, And I interviewed a Air Force security guard
[21:15] Speaker 2: whose job at the time was to guard nuclear weapons
[21:19] Speaker 2: like a guy we clearly trust, right, like not a
[21:22] Speaker 2: crazy person, like someone put in a very trusted position.
[21:27] Speaker 2: And he was amongst it was five or six other
[21:30] Speaker 2: Air Force security guards at the time. They saw a
[21:32] Speaker 2: light coming off the coast, the Pacific coast, towards the base.
[21:35] Speaker 2: At first they thought it was an airplane that was
[21:37] Speaker 2: flying towards them. They just saw a single light and
[21:39] Speaker 2: then as it got closer, the light went away and
[21:42] Speaker 2: what came into view was a giant what they described
[21:45] Speaker 2: as a giant craft the size of a football field.
[21:49] Speaker 2: It puts his arms out like this and says it
[21:51] Speaker 2: was the size of a football field. It was rectangular,
[21:54] Speaker 2: it was matt black, no lights, no visible means of propulsion,
[21:58] Speaker 2: and it was just there and it came over the
[22:00] Speaker 2: base over their heads, and it hovered over their heads,
[22:03] Speaker 2: and they said they just looked up in awe and
[22:04] Speaker 2: shocked at this extraordinary thing that just defied everything they
[22:08] Speaker 2: knew about reality. And then it shot off at thousands
[22:10] Speaker 2: of miles an hour. Obviously, you know, mankind has never
[22:15] Speaker 2: made a craft the size of a football field that
[22:18] Speaker 2: could fly no propulsion system and no lights and then
[22:21] Speaker 2: shoot off at thousands of miles an hour. And you know,
[22:24] Speaker 2: hearing hearing this, this this person tell his story was extraordinary.
[22:30] Speaker 2: H He had never spoken up publicly about it. This
[22:32] Speaker 2: was his first time going public after a month wow decade.
[22:37] Speaker 2: He had no desire previously to talk about it. But
[22:40] Speaker 2: when he learned about you know who was speaking up
[22:43] Speaker 2: in this film and revealing the truth, he felt like
[22:45] Speaker 2: it was important for him to join that and share
[22:47] Speaker 2: his truth. But was also extraordinary. On top of that is,
[22:50] Speaker 2: after talking to him, I talked to other Air Force
[22:54] Speaker 2: security guards that were on the base that day and
[22:57] Speaker 2: they all told the same thing. They all had the
[22:59] Speaker 2: same story from different perspectives. And then a couple of
[23:03] Speaker 2: them actually slip me the police report, the Air Force
[23:07] Speaker 2: Security police report that had to do shows the details
[23:10] Speaker 2: in it and it's a real situation that actually happened,
[23:14] Speaker 2: and that is extraordinary. The idea that there are human
[23:17] Speaker 2: beings out out there in our country that have had
[23:20] Speaker 2: these experiences, you know, and I and I and I
[23:22] Speaker 2: you know, I was talking about this with with Joe
[23:24] Speaker 2: Rogan last week. I'll ask you, like, think about, like
[23:26] Speaker 2: put yourself in the shoes of this guy. What like
[23:29] Speaker 2: what would your reaction be? You look up and you
[23:31] Speaker 2: see a UFO the size of a football field just
[23:33] Speaker 2: above you, and it takes off thousands of miles an hour.
[23:35] Speaker 2: It's you know, that's that's so insane and such a
[23:40] Speaker 2: like departure from what we know to you know, be reality. Right,
[23:45] Speaker 2: It's got to just forever change you. And I think
[23:46] Speaker 2: these people who have these experiences, I think they are
[23:49] Speaker 2: forever changed by them.
[23:51] Speaker 1: Well, I've told my audience this. I think once before,
[23:55] Speaker 1: I had an experience years ago. I was in college.
[23:59] Speaker 1: I was in a I believe it was a AMC
[24:06] Speaker 1: pacer my dad had got from his friend who was
[24:08] Speaker 1: car dealer wow. And I had driven from college with
[24:11] Speaker 1: Mark Fisher who was my friend, and we uh were
[24:15] Speaker 1: in a very rural area in Drayln, Washington and We
[24:18] Speaker 1: pulled up to my house, which had a long driveway
[24:20] Speaker 1: and I had a Frank Lloyd Wright house. I've told
[24:22] Speaker 1: this once or twice before. And I saw a light
[24:25] Speaker 1: above the house and it was a very rural road,
[24:28] Speaker 1: so I Mark was sleeping, and I said, hey, dude,
[24:30] Speaker 1: look look what is that. It was very small hovering
[24:33] Speaker 1: right over our house, multiple lights and as I pulled
[24:36] Speaker 1: up our driveway, it shot out and up.
[24:38] Speaker 2: Wow.
[24:40] Speaker 1: And I went, okay, I'm going to take Mark home.
[24:43] Speaker 1: I did. I came back. I came and my mom
[24:46] Speaker 1: she was up actually because I'd driven from college and
[24:48] Speaker 1: she wanted to make sure I was safe. I said,
[24:50] Speaker 1: did you hear anything? She goes, She was British, No, Darling,
[24:53] Speaker 1: I didn't hear anything. I said, nothing, a humming anything.
[24:58] Speaker 1: So I always chalked it up. My town was small.
[25:01] Speaker 1: We didn't have helicopters in my town. It wasn't a
[25:04] Speaker 1: small plane because it hovered and then went out and up,
[25:08] Speaker 1: and it was I was thinking, as I was taking
[25:10] Speaker 1: the train in Chicago, I'm an La some but Chicago more.
[25:12] Speaker 1: And I was thinking, I'm not going to waste his
[25:14] Speaker 1: time with his story. But now we can you know,
[25:17] Speaker 1: kind of segue to it. As you know, there have
[25:20] Speaker 1: been Aaron Rodgers has talked about this, Baker Mayfield, who
[25:23] Speaker 1: I you know. I didn't chide, but I sort of
[25:26] Speaker 1: poked funted him. I said, I don't want my quarterbacks
[25:28] Speaker 1: talking UFOs. Right, this is an adult position. But the
[25:31] Speaker 1: truth is a lot of people who have nothing to
[25:34] Speaker 1: gain from it have had these experiences. What I thought
[25:37] Speaker 1: was really fascinating is the negative biological effects of people
[25:43] Speaker 1: you interviewed of your thirty four and senior intelligence officials
[25:47] Speaker 1: who have come in contact with not only craft, but
[25:54] Speaker 1: I guess I would say, lack of a better word, aliens, yes,
[25:57] Speaker 1: that have had very negative physical biological effects. Take our
[26:03] Speaker 1: audience there, because that to me again, to say that publicly.
[26:09] Speaker 1: To say it privately at a party is one thing.
[26:11] Speaker 1: To say it publicly is mind blowing to me. I
[26:17] Speaker 1: don't remember anybody of that level ever saying that publicly. Yeah. Yeah.
[26:22] Speaker 2: So one of the big reveals that came out making
[26:25] Speaker 2: this dock is that Intellton officials military officials who have
[26:28] Speaker 2: encountered uap UFOs have had biological effects, meaning being getting
[26:34] Speaker 2: too close to this technology has negatively impacted them their
[26:39] Speaker 2: health their bodies in some cases caused cancer. And you know,
[26:44] Speaker 2: it's understandable because this is a technology that we don't
[26:48] Speaker 2: fully understand and it's extremely powerful and it gives off
[26:50] Speaker 2: a lot of energy. So the analogy is like, hey,
[26:53] Speaker 2: if you didn't know what an F sixteen was and
[26:55] Speaker 2: you went and stood behind it when it was taken off,
[26:57] Speaker 2: you're gonna get fed up, you know, like it's not great. Yeah,
[27:00] Speaker 2: And so you know, I think what we're learning is
[27:03] Speaker 2: that this technology is far outside or understanding in every way.
[27:10] Speaker 2: And yes, there's been a number of of Intel officials
[27:13] Speaker 2: and military officials who have had severe health issues and
[27:18] Speaker 2: some people have passed away from cancer that they got
[27:23] Speaker 2: by being too close to UFOs and and that's a
[27:27] Speaker 2: darker part of this whole truth that is coming out
[27:29] Speaker 2: now and it is shocking. Yeah.
[27:33] Speaker 1: Dan Fara is joining US director and producer Age of Disclosure.
[27:37] Speaker 1: What has been interesting is since you have done this documentary,
[27:44] Speaker 1: there's been other pieces of video that have run even
[27:47] Speaker 1: on the network nightly news. One in particular is what
[27:52] Speaker 1: appears to be a UAP I think it's Yemen, and
[27:57] Speaker 1: we fire at it and the missile or the shot
[28:02] Speaker 1: goes through it bounces through it, which, based on the
[28:07] Speaker 1: bubble wrap theory in your documentary, is explainable. So the
[28:10] Speaker 1: Nightly News couldn't explain it. But I want you to
[28:14] Speaker 1: talk about the two physicists that talked about the bubble
[28:16] Speaker 1: wrap theory because I have seen and many people who
[28:20] Speaker 1: have seen these UAPs there is a almost a muted
[28:26] Speaker 1: look like they're inside something. And if you could, let's
[28:30] Speaker 1: talk about the bubble rap theory. It's about a three
[28:32] Speaker 1: to five minute discussion, and it really to me it
[28:38] Speaker 1: was a pivotal moment because a lot of these things
[28:41] Speaker 1: look different. The ones I've always struggled with is the
[28:45] Speaker 1: ones that appear to have a circular device or a
[28:49] Speaker 1: shield around them, and it was described by your physicists.
[28:53] Speaker 2: Yeah. So over the years, it has been a lot
[28:55] Speaker 2: of flight performance characteristics that have been observed. When people
[28:59] Speaker 2: see you, they see them doing these these these these
[29:02] Speaker 2: performance characteristics that defie physics as we know it. Right,
[29:06] Speaker 2: And a couple of the very senior scientists that I
[29:08] Speaker 2: interviewed who worked on classified UAP programs for the US government,
[29:13] Speaker 2: they reveal in the film that they have figured out
[29:17] Speaker 2: how this technology works, how these UAP are are doing
[29:21] Speaker 2: what they're doing, and simply put, these craft are generating
[29:26] Speaker 2: a significant amount of energy and they are creating a
[29:30] Speaker 2: they're essentially warping space time, which sounds like something out
[29:34] Speaker 2: of a science fiction movie. I understand that, but they
[29:36] Speaker 2: are saying. What the scientists reveal is that they are
[29:39] Speaker 2: warping space time in a localized area, and they're creating
[29:42] Speaker 2: a bubble around the craft. And essentially, the simplest way
[29:46] Speaker 2: to say it is that bubble creates a barrier between
[29:50] Speaker 2: the craft the environment the craft is in in our environment,
[29:54] Speaker 2: so the laws that you know define what you can do,
[29:58] Speaker 2: you know with you know, put physics to do in
[30:00] Speaker 2: our environment are no longer applicable, right, So what happens
[30:04] Speaker 2: in that bubble is completely different than what happens outside
[30:07] Speaker 2: the bubble. So they might be moving along having a
[30:10] Speaker 2: Sunday stroll like a leisurely flight, right and to us
[30:13] Speaker 2: it looks like they're going into these impossible speeds. It
[30:16] Speaker 2: explains everything. It explains why trans medium travels or we
[30:21] Speaker 2: see these craft going from space to the air to
[30:24] Speaker 2: the ocean seamlessly through these separate environments, which is not
[30:27] Speaker 2: something our aircraft can do. But once you understand that
[30:30] Speaker 2: they're in their own space time environment or within this bubble,
[30:34] Speaker 2: then it makes sense because the bubble and everything in
[30:37] Speaker 2: it is not impacted by the environment around it. It
[30:40] Speaker 2: also explains why we've had so much trouble getting these
[30:43] Speaker 2: things on radar, because the way radar works is a
[30:45] Speaker 2: radar emitter shoots radar at an object, and then it
[30:48] Speaker 2: bounces back to the radar emitter, and that's how you
[30:50] Speaker 2: figure out where the thing is right. But in this case,
[30:52] Speaker 2: the radar is just bouncing around the bubble and continuing
[30:55] Speaker 2: on right. It also explains, you know, the answer to
[30:59] Speaker 2: the age old question why is it so hard to
[31:00] Speaker 2: get a good photo or video of a UFO. The
[31:04] Speaker 2: simple answer is because we're taking photos and videos through
[31:07] Speaker 2: a space time barrier, through this bubble. It's the equivalent
[31:10] Speaker 2: of trying to take pictures of fish under the ocean
[31:13] Speaker 2: from above the ocean. You can't do it. No one
[31:16] Speaker 2: would ever be like, hey, I'm trying to take a
[31:17] Speaker 2: picture of these fish in this coy pond that it
[31:19] Speaker 2: looks all blurry. Why is that happening? You'd be like, well, moron,
[31:22] Speaker 2: you're taking a picture from above the water. To some
[31:25] Speaker 2: in the water, right, And it's the same thing here,
[31:27] Speaker 2: Like you can't get a good picture of these things
[31:29] Speaker 2: because we're trying to take photos through a spacetime barrier,
[31:33] Speaker 2: through this bubble that's been created. And this warp bubble
[31:36] Speaker 2: is the key to that technology. And what's also extraordinary
[31:39] Speaker 2: about it is, as the signedists say, this technology, this
[31:42] Speaker 2: ability to generate this immense amount of energy in a
[31:45] Speaker 2: localized area and create this warp bubble, it is it is,
[31:48] Speaker 2: in their opinion, the key to interstellar travel. It's the
[31:52] Speaker 2: key to basically the next chapter for humanity. Right, it's
[31:57] Speaker 2: a solution to the energy crisis, creating immense amount of energy,
[32:02] Speaker 2: and they're tapping an energy that we haven't figured out
[32:04] Speaker 2: how to tap into yet. Right, That could solve one
[32:07] Speaker 2: of the biggest problems humanity has, the energy crisis. It
[32:10] Speaker 2: could set up future generations, you know, for a much
[32:12] Speaker 2: better life. And then you know, in terms of you know,
[32:16] Speaker 2: opening its doord interstillar travel, they could just expand you know,
[32:20] Speaker 2: you know, mankind's exploration of the galaxy. The possibilities are limitless.
[32:25] Speaker 2: One of the other big big things talked about with
[32:27] Speaker 2: Rearther technology is once we start making this information known
[32:35] Speaker 2: to academia and the scientific community. Then they can put
[32:38] Speaker 2: their brain power towards it, and who knows what else
[32:41] Speaker 2: comes off the back of that. You know, the Space
[32:44] Speaker 2: Race was a single mission to get to the Moon, right,
[32:47] Speaker 2: but the process led to something like thirty five thousand
[32:51] Speaker 2: other inventions coming off the back of it that have
[32:53] Speaker 2: benefited us, like things we don't even think about, Like
[32:56] Speaker 2: you know, I think velcro and microwaves and like things
[33:00] Speaker 2: we use. Yeah, right, right, And you don't know what
[33:02] Speaker 2: will come off the back of something like this, So
[33:05] Speaker 2: so yeah, that's that sequence in the film is one
[33:07] Speaker 2: of my favorite sequences of the film because the two
[33:11] Speaker 2: people who speak are incredibly intelligent. They're quantum physicists. They
[33:16] Speaker 2: worked as senior scientists on these classified UAP programs for
[33:20] Speaker 2: the government, and they're just straight up revealing how this
[33:23] Speaker 2: technology works. And it's stated in such a simple way
[33:27] Speaker 2: that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to
[33:29] Speaker 2: follow it, you know, and it all makes sense and
[33:32] Speaker 2: it's it's really inspiring.
[33:35] Speaker 1: How has the UFO community. I would be considered a normy, right,
[33:39] Speaker 1: Like I when I said how much I loved your film,
[33:43] Speaker 1: your documentary, Uh, you know, a few people push back, Well,
[33:47] Speaker 1: now the normies are talking about it.
[33:49] Speaker 2: But.
[33:53] Speaker 1: I can sense because you're getting such legitimate it, corporate discussion,
[34:03] Speaker 1: nightly news, major cable programs. Joe Rogan has always had
[34:09] Speaker 1: a great interest in this. But because you're getting so
[34:13] Speaker 1: much credit and so much discourse and discussion, has there
[34:20] Speaker 1: been any pushback from you know, nobody's ever done this,
[34:24] Speaker 1: nobody's ever had thirty four senior intelligence officials, and the
[34:28] Speaker 1: documentary beyond that is so brilliantly made. Has there been
[34:32] Speaker 1: any pushback or have you been universally accepted and celebrated.
[34:37] Speaker 2: Well, look, I think before the movie came out, I
[34:39] Speaker 2: certainly dealt with some people who were causing problems for
[34:42] Speaker 2: me behind the scenes, and there were a number of
[34:44] Speaker 2: people who wish this movie didn't exist, wish I hadn't
[34:47] Speaker 2: made it, wish it wouldn't get released. I overcame all
[34:51] Speaker 2: that and obviously got the movie out there. I think
[34:54] Speaker 2: that the response to the film has been so overwhelmingly supportive,
[34:59] Speaker 2: and as you said, in an unprecedent way, is getting
[35:01] Speaker 2: serious news coverage. And I was on Jake Tapper on CNN,
[35:04] Speaker 2: I you know, Hannity and Brett Baher on Fox and
[35:09] Speaker 2: Your Times did a big piece about a secret screening
[35:11] Speaker 2: I held for Congress a couple of weeks ago, how
[35:14] Speaker 2: important that was. And so I think all of that
[35:17] Speaker 2: is making people realize how important this is, and it's
[35:20] Speaker 2: overcoming those who would want to cause problems. But there
[35:22] Speaker 2: are still they're still bad actors on social media. I'm
[35:25] Speaker 2: aware of people who are paid bad actors who are
[35:29] Speaker 2: actually on social media, paid to just wake up every
[35:33] Speaker 2: morning and disparage this film and the people in it. Yes,
[35:35] Speaker 2: take shots at it, and that's a very real thing.
[35:39] Speaker 2: They're not the smoothest operators, because once you realize they're
[35:42] Speaker 2: doing it, I can tell. I mean, some of it's
[35:45] Speaker 2: so obvious, you're like, no one spends this much time
[35:48] Speaker 2: ragging on the same thing unless it's their and guess
[35:52] Speaker 2: what it is your job, you know, Like so, but
[35:55] Speaker 2: you know what, I think the reality of it is
[35:56] Speaker 2: the good guys winning the end, and you know, the
[35:59] Speaker 2: truth will prevail. And this film is thirty four people
[36:03] Speaker 2: arm in arm putting their credibility on the line to
[36:06] Speaker 2: share their truth. And I think ultimately that that's any
[36:10] Speaker 2: of these bad actors on social media just making up disparaging,
[36:13] Speaker 2: negative stuff. I just think it's noise and the truth is.
[36:16] Speaker 2: The truth is gonna win. And you know, you know,
[36:19] Speaker 2: speaking of three four people, the thing everyone's gonna remember
[36:22] Speaker 2: this day and age. You could put a four K
[36:24] Speaker 2: video of that giant craft that went over Vanderberg online
[36:27] Speaker 2: and half the human population will think it's AI. They'll
[36:30] Speaker 2: be like, oh, some Hollywood producer made that with visual
[36:33] Speaker 2: effects or this or that, right, But people, credible people
[36:38] Speaker 2: with amazing resumes and and lots of credibility, putting their
[36:42] Speaker 2: their name and reputation on the line and going on
[36:44] Speaker 2: camera on the record revealing this information. To me, that
[36:48] Speaker 2: is that is the strongest evidence you could hope for.
[36:52] Speaker 2: And I think it's gonna ultimately overshadow any any bad
[36:56] Speaker 2: actors online, who are you know, saying to spare things.
[37:02] Speaker 1: Only twenty seven percent of the ocean is mapped. Many
[37:05] Speaker 1: of these videos, these craft have been in and out
[37:08] Speaker 1: of the water. There's two or three that are more
[37:11] Speaker 1: prominent that I think almost everybody listening to this will
[37:13] Speaker 1: have seen. Were there discussions with any of the people
[37:24] Speaker 1: that you talk to that believe that's their primary base
[37:29] Speaker 1: on this planet or is it something they can you
[37:33] Speaker 1: know they can activate, they can hide, or does it
[37:38] Speaker 1: go deeper than that? Sometimes, by the way, when you
[37:40] Speaker 1: do a documentary, there's some stuff that may be interesting
[37:43] Speaker 1: but doesn't make the cut. You guys didn't spend a
[37:47] Speaker 1: ton of time on the ocean, and my take is
[37:50] Speaker 1: because you didn't want a six hour documentary. But when
[37:53] Speaker 1: you talk to these intelligence officials, the thirty four people,
[37:59] Speaker 1: is there a sense that there are bases a base
[38:03] Speaker 1: or there's a lot more activity in the infrequently mapped
[38:07] Speaker 1: oceans that's going on.
[38:09] Speaker 2: Yeah, there's an enormous amount of activity the oceans that
[38:11] Speaker 2: I've learned about. And yes, the only reason I didn't
[38:14] Speaker 2: go deeper into the ocean is just because I had
[38:16] Speaker 2: to get this documentary under two hours for people to
[38:19] Speaker 2: kill me. But yes, so everyone I interviewed was of
[38:27] Speaker 2: the same mindset and thought that the most obvious place
[38:31] Speaker 2: for the UAP to hide is the ocean, because the
[38:34] Speaker 2: majority of our planet is the ocean and it's the
[38:37] Speaker 2: easiest place to hide from humanity. On top of that,
[38:40] Speaker 2: there's been a lot of activity recorded by our military
[38:44] Speaker 2: in Tennis Committe under the ocean. There have been reports
[38:46] Speaker 2: of craft the size of football fields again moving at
[38:51] Speaker 2: one hundreds of miles an hour under the ocean, which
[38:53] Speaker 2: is not something we have the capability to do, you know,
[38:57] Speaker 2: and it's extraordinary. There are definitely hot spots. Congressman Tim
[39:06] Speaker 2: Burchett actually recently talked about it publicly in an interview
[39:10] Speaker 2: that there's four or five hot spots that are believed
[39:12] Speaker 2: to be either maybe their bases, maybe it's just a
[39:16] Speaker 2: lot of activity there. We don't know that's yet to
[39:19] Speaker 2: come out, but there's a lot of activity under the ocean.
[39:23] Speaker 2: And that's also you know, for people who haven't really
[39:26] Speaker 2: looked in this topic and they hear, okay, now people
[39:28] Speaker 2: are calling UFOs u a P. Why did that change happen?
[39:32] Speaker 2: The primary change is UFO stood for Unidentified Flying object
[39:36] Speaker 2: UAP stands for Unidentified anomalists phenomena, and that that is
[39:41] Speaker 2: because it covers activity under the ocean and not just
[39:43] Speaker 2: in the sky, because the things underwater are not flying
[39:47] Speaker 2: technically right, But there is a tremendous amount of UAP
[39:51] Speaker 2: activity in our oceans, and as Congressman Carson, one of
[39:55] Speaker 2: the senior members of Congress, in my film reveals, they
[39:59] Speaker 2: have lots of ports of these craft coming out of
[40:02] Speaker 2: the ocean, and as he says, these aren't rockets and
[40:04] Speaker 2: not aircraft, there are other worldly things. He literally says
[40:07] Speaker 2: that on camera. And he's a very senior member of Congress.
[40:10] Speaker 2: He's on the House Intelligence Committee. He was on the
[40:13] Speaker 2: House Committee for the Central Intelligence Agency. Really smart, senior,
[40:18] Speaker 2: thoughtful guy.
[40:21] Speaker 1: Yeah.
[40:21] Speaker 2: So there's there's a there there. There's a real situation,
[40:24] Speaker 2: and it's fascinating.
[40:28] Speaker 1: Football seasons here and if you want to go to
[40:30] Speaker 1: an NFL or college football game, game Time is the
[40:34] Speaker 1: place for you. The Game Time app just gives you
[40:36] Speaker 1: the advantage back to you, the fans. It's a hack
[40:39] Speaker 1: for unlocking amazing tickets and experiences and a few taps.
[40:42] Speaker 1: I love it easy to use. The game Time guarantee
[40:45] Speaker 1: means you can trust you'll get one hundred percent authentic
[40:47] Speaker 1: tickets on time and at the best price one hundred percent.
[40:50] Speaker 1: So they even let you preview your seat on the app.
[40:53] Speaker 1: That special plus fees role was included. So what you
[40:55] Speaker 1: see is what you pay every time. Take the guests
[40:58] Speaker 1: work out of buying professional football team, it's with game Time.
[41:01] Speaker 1: Just download the game Time app, create an account if
[41:04] Speaker 1: you use the code column CLI. In twenty bucks off
[41:07] Speaker 1: your first purchase terms apply again, create an account, redeem
[41:10] Speaker 1: code co l I N twenty bucks off, swipe tap ticket,
[41:14] Speaker 1: go download the game Time app today. Has an American
[41:21] Speaker 1: pilot ever been shot down? Again, that's not something that
[41:28] Speaker 1: would be reported to the public. Right there. The stigma
[41:34] Speaker 1: has worn off significantly. I mean the story about George
[41:38] Speaker 1: Bush and the ranch. I remember hearing about that, and
[41:42] Speaker 1: I also you talk. I believe I've watched so many
[41:46] Speaker 1: interviews with you and others in regards in regards to
[41:49] Speaker 1: Bush having a like a meeting, a private meeting. Should
[41:53] Speaker 1: we talk about this to the public. There's been suggestions
[41:56] Speaker 1: Trump will, but it can affect our economy and how
[41:58] Speaker 1: do you present it? But has there ever been privately
[42:02] Speaker 1: not discussed? Has there been a pilot shot down, a
[42:06] Speaker 1: ship attacked to that level of violence?
[42:09] Speaker 2: I haven't heard anything about an aircraft being shot down.
[42:15] Speaker 2: There are stories of events that happened in the past
[42:20] Speaker 2: of U A p causing seemingly intentional biological effects. There's
[42:27] Speaker 2: there's some historical events that happened in other countries where
[42:31] Speaker 2: UFOs seem to have intentional encounters with people and and
[42:36] Speaker 2: cause harm to them. But overall, there's not a lot
[42:40] Speaker 2: of those stories. The one of the big reveals in
[42:44] Speaker 2: the film, a senior in Telton's official hal putof reveals
[42:48] Speaker 2: that we have actually fired missiles at u a P
[42:53] Speaker 2: that that humans have and and obviously that's that's that's
[43:00] Speaker 2: it's a bit of a slippery slope and right, probably
[43:03] Speaker 2: not a great idea, right.
[43:07] Speaker 1: The I'm interested going back to the retrieval programs that
[43:17] Speaker 1: our intelligence discovered that Russia had retrieved, because Russia, the
[43:24] Speaker 1: United States, and the US are the three countries that
[43:29] Speaker 1: we I think we broadly believe at least we have
[43:32] Speaker 1: access to their access. If you could talk about I
[43:37] Speaker 1: think it was in the late eighties, Dan, Yeah, again
[43:42] Speaker 1: a tic tac although larger than the one we saw
[43:46] Speaker 1: on the Pentagon footage. The Russia encounter or retrieval of
[43:52] Speaker 1: some note that has sort of changed their perception and
[43:55] Speaker 1: perhaps created their retrieval program and their program. All these
[44:01] Speaker 1: programs sound like they're being ramped up over the last
[44:03] Speaker 1: eighty years. Can we talk about the Russia invasion or.
[44:08] Speaker 2: Two of the two of the senior scientists who were
[44:12] Speaker 2: in my film who worked on UAP programs for the government,
[44:16] Speaker 2: they go on the record and say that that the
[44:21] Speaker 2: US government is aware of retrievals in Russia of UAP
[44:26] Speaker 2: and one of them, specifically hone in on was a
[44:29] Speaker 2: tic Tac shaped UFO UAP that was significantly larger than
[44:34] Speaker 2: the tic Tac UAP that the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group
[44:38] Speaker 2: encountered twenty years ago. The incident we know as the
[44:41] Speaker 2: tic Tac UFO, right, so much bigger than that, and
[44:44] Speaker 2: it was recovered in Russia. And apparently there was a
[44:48] Speaker 2: very advanced directed energy weapon in that craft. And yeah,
[44:54] Speaker 2: that's that's alarming that that kind of technology, you know,
[44:57] Speaker 2: has been in the hands of anavisarial nation since the eighties,
[45:00] Speaker 2: and it's not the only time it's happened.
[45:05] Speaker 1: The suggestion that Trump perhaps would go public with the
[45:09] Speaker 1: acknowledgment of all this, what do you make of those reports?
[45:15] Speaker 2: So people in the film reveal that there's been a
[45:18] Speaker 2: few occasions where a sitting president has contemplated going to
[45:22] Speaker 2: the microphone and telling the world the base facts that
[45:24] Speaker 2: they learned that we're not alone in the universe. There's
[45:27] Speaker 2: a story in the film about Bush two contemplating doing it.
[45:32] Speaker 2: One of the intellience officials in the film goes on
[45:34] Speaker 2: the record saying he was part of a think tank
[45:36] Speaker 2: that the Bush administrators put together to determine whether it
[45:39] Speaker 2: would be a good idea or not to go public,
[45:41] Speaker 2: and that their decision was not to do it. Obviously
[45:44] Speaker 2: at the time that was Bush two. There's another intelligence official,
[45:48] Speaker 2: very senior guy in the film who goes on the
[45:50] Speaker 2: record saying that during the first Trump administration, Trump contemplated
[45:54] Speaker 2: just sharing the base facts that he had learned that
[45:56] Speaker 2: were not alone in the universe, and that Secretary Menus,
[46:00] Speaker 2: who was the you know, Secretary of Treasury at the time,
[46:03] Speaker 2: all this intelligt's official in and asked him for a
[46:05] Speaker 2: briefing on the reality of the situation. And he explains
[46:10] Speaker 2: to this intelligent's officially, he said, the reason I'm asking
[46:12] Speaker 2: you is I want to be able to think about
[46:15] Speaker 2: what the economic repercussions will be if President Trump decides
[46:18] Speaker 2: the step to the microphone and tell the world we're
[46:20] Speaker 2: not alone. And and so these people in my film
[46:23] Speaker 2: reveal that this almost happened a couple of times. And
[46:26] Speaker 2: now I do think that this film sets the stage
[46:29] Speaker 2: for him to comfortably do that. I don't know if
[46:32] Speaker 2: he will choose to do it. Obviously, only he can
[46:34] Speaker 2: make that decision. But I think this film makes it,
[46:38] Speaker 2: you know, extremely clear to the average person that this
[46:41] Speaker 2: is a real situation, that there's real stakes, and that
[46:46] Speaker 2: the average American is owed some basic level of transparency
[46:51] Speaker 2: on this from the president. And so, you know, we'll see.
[46:54] Speaker 2: Time will tell if if he uses this opportunity to
[46:57] Speaker 2: comfortably step to the microphone and tell the world we're
[46:59] Speaker 2: not alone. It would certainly be one of the biggest
[47:01] Speaker 2: moments in human history if he did. But we will see.
[47:04] Speaker 2: I think it's only a matter of time though, before
[47:07] Speaker 2: a sitting president does decide to do that.
[47:11] Speaker 1: Dan far a director of producer Age of Disclosure. I
[47:15] Speaker 1: worked in Las Vegas as a sportscaster. Area fifty one
[47:19] Speaker 1: was understood and it was newsworthy at the time, and
[47:23] Speaker 1: over the course of about a two to three year period,
[47:26] Speaker 1: we had a reporter that was one of his beats
[47:29] Speaker 1: Area fifty one, Dan Burns, and the activity ramped up
[47:35] Speaker 1: substantially over about a two year period. Then stealth fighters
[47:41] Speaker 1: emerged from our country, and so as Dan in some
[47:45] Speaker 1: of his reporting, which was accurate, Many of the triangle
[47:49] Speaker 1: shaped lights seen over two to three year period was
[47:52] Speaker 1: the development of stealth. Bob Lazar made a name for
[47:56] Speaker 1: himself years ago. His background has sometimes not checked out.
[48:02] Speaker 1: Not a knock at Bob, but that's the reality. I
[48:04] Speaker 1: looked up his Wikipedia page for the first time ever.
[48:08] Speaker 1: So Area fifty one is something that gets discussed. I
[48:11] Speaker 1: thought one of the and all the moments were credible.
[48:14] Speaker 1: But James Clapper, who is now in his eighties, has
[48:18] Speaker 1: no reason to be involved in this at all. You know. Again,
[48:21] Speaker 1: this is because the stigma has to a large degree died.
[48:23] Speaker 1: But James Clapper came on and share it with the listeners.
[48:29] Speaker 1: Now he acknowledged, and I mean it was a real
[48:33] Speaker 1: moment where I went, Okay, time out James Clapper. He's
[48:37] Speaker 1: been with multiple White House, multiple presidents. Was that a
[48:41] Speaker 1: wow moment for that.
[48:42] Speaker 2: Was a significant wow moment for me and just you know,
[48:45] Speaker 2: for your audience. James Clapper was the Director of National Intelligence,
[48:49] Speaker 2: you know, the highest level position in the intelligence community.
[48:53] Speaker 2: He was the head of Air Force Intelligence, He was
[48:56] Speaker 2: the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, a number of
[49:00] Speaker 2: other other agencies. His resume reads like a Marvel character.
[49:04] Speaker 1: It is.
[49:06] Speaker 2: A ridiculous resume that no one else has, like uncomparable
[49:10] Speaker 2: resume and credibility and a very serious guy. And he's
[49:15] Speaker 2: in his eighties when I when I did the interview,
[49:17] Speaker 2: he was he was already in his eighties and at
[49:21] Speaker 2: the time, to give some other color to it, at
[49:24] Speaker 2: the time, his wife was was was was was battling
[49:30] Speaker 2: cancer and in her in her in her final days.
[49:34] Speaker 2: And and despite that, and despite being an amazing loyal
[49:38] Speaker 2: husband who was like there for her every day at
[49:40] Speaker 2: the hospital, he left the hospital to come do this interview.
[49:43] Speaker 2: And I really have a lot of respect for him
[49:46] Speaker 2: for doing that. He told me he thought it was
[49:47] Speaker 2: important to still do it. I remember, hey, should we
[49:50] Speaker 2: reschedule this, should we not do this today? And he
[49:52] Speaker 2: was like, no, this is important. Let's do it. And
[49:55] Speaker 2: he shared what he lawfully could. And one of those
[49:58] Speaker 2: big things he shared was that UAP activity over are
[50:02] Speaker 2: sensitive military basis and training sites is very real and
[50:07] Speaker 2: very active, especially he said, our ranges out west and
[50:10] Speaker 2: the west, the west side of the United States. And
[50:13] Speaker 2: he specifically said most notably Area fifty one. And that's
[50:18] Speaker 2: such a big statement because UAP activity UFO activity over
[50:23] Speaker 2: Area fifty one is widely considered you know, the epitome
[50:27] Speaker 2: of conspiracy, right, and like bullshit, Like your average person thinks, oh,
[50:31] Speaker 2: that's bullshit, that's there's nothing there, right, And here's this
[50:34] Speaker 2: extremely credible Intellien special who ran Air Force intelligence saying no,
[50:38] Speaker 2: that is real. That is a real situation. UFO activity
[50:42] Speaker 2: over Area fifty one is real. And I remember when
[50:45] Speaker 2: he said it, he said it so naturally, And then
[50:49] Speaker 2: there was a part of me that felt like he
[50:50] Speaker 2: was like, oh, why did I say that? You know,
[50:52] Speaker 2: there was I felt it like, oh, that came out,
[50:54] Speaker 2: but it's the truth, so it is what it is.
[50:56] Speaker 2: And and and he kind of put his head down
[50:59] Speaker 2: for a second and realized, you know, how significant what
[51:01] Speaker 2: he just said was. And in that moment, I turned
[51:04] Speaker 2: around to a couple other people that were in the room,
[51:05] Speaker 2: some other Intelllmence officials were there because they were going
[51:08] Speaker 2: to do interviews with me next. And I looked at
[51:11] Speaker 2: them and their jaws were on the floor because it's
[51:13] Speaker 2: such a big statement from a guy like that. And yeah,
[51:17] Speaker 2: I have a lot of respect for him for sharing
[51:20] Speaker 2: that with us, and I think he probably felt a
[51:26] Speaker 2: responsibility to share what he could.
[51:28] Speaker 1: He also specific duty almost Yeah, he also.
[51:30] Speaker 2: Shared in that interview that despite the US Air Force
[51:34] Speaker 2: saying that they haven't had an active investigation to study
[51:37] Speaker 2: this stuff or investigate this stuff since the closure of
[51:40] Speaker 2: Project Blue Book, which we've all heard about, you know,
[51:44] Speaker 2: closed in the late seventies, and the Air Force has
[51:47] Speaker 2: consistently taken the position, even as recently a couple of
[51:49] Speaker 2: months ago, that they have not had a program to
[51:52] Speaker 2: investigate you AP since then. But Jim Clapper says on
[51:56] Speaker 2: camera on the record that when he was running Air
[51:58] Speaker 2: Force Intelligence, they did in to have a program to
[52:01] Speaker 2: investigate UAP. So he dropped some very significant statements in
[52:06] Speaker 2: the film, and I think he did us all a
[52:09] Speaker 2: service by opening our eyes to the truth that he
[52:11] Speaker 2: could share. And you know, the thing for everyone, remember
[52:14] Speaker 2: when they watched this film and they see these extraordinary
[52:17] Speaker 2: statements made by credible people, is this is just what
[52:20] Speaker 2: they can lawfully disclose. There's a whole lot more on
[52:23] Speaker 2: the other side of that line that you just have
[52:25] Speaker 2: to use your imagination and think about what could be there.
[52:30] Speaker 2: And that's a pretty that's a pretty wild thought. I've
[52:33] Speaker 2: I've spent a lot of time thinking about that and
[52:35] Speaker 2: if if these extraordinary bombshell statements. This paradigm shift information
[52:39] Speaker 2: they can lawfully disclose is so big and so significant.
[52:43] Speaker 2: What the hell's on the other side of that line.
[52:45] Speaker 2: What's the other stuff that they can't talk about?
[52:48] Speaker 1: Dan light theory would be is they are testing the reaction.
[52:54] Speaker 1: My theory is these including James Clapper, are testing the waters.
[53:02] Speaker 1: They are seeing the reaction. They're finding out that it's
[53:06] Speaker 1: it is now publicly credible, and that it's the it's
[53:10] Speaker 1: the first step of a second or a third evolution
[53:14] Speaker 1: of information and disclosure. That was my takeaway watching this,
[53:18] Speaker 1: which is what they're allowed to say, that they're they're
[53:22] Speaker 1: kind of putting everybody's foot in the water. Yeah, there
[53:25] Speaker 1: will be a second or a third evolution of this,
[53:28] Speaker 1: perhaps a president does that seem too random and too cons.
[53:32] Speaker 2: That's one hundred percent of the case.
[53:34] Speaker 1: You know.
[53:34] Speaker 2: I called the movie the Age of Disclosure because as
[53:38] Speaker 2: I was making it, it became clear that this film
[53:45] Speaker 2: was the beginning of the Age of Disclosure, of a
[53:48] Speaker 2: period of time in which a lot of information will
[53:51] Speaker 2: come out. You know, it's not a it's not a
[53:54] Speaker 2: singular event. It's going to be a period of time
[53:59] Speaker 2: where we all slowly learn the reality of the situation,
[54:03] Speaker 2: and what I would suspect is on the other side
[54:07] Speaker 2: of that line is events like contact events and technological
[54:17] Speaker 2: advancements that sound like the stuff of science fiction, but
[54:21] Speaker 2: that have in fact been figured out.
[54:24] Speaker 1: You know.
[54:24] Speaker 2: I think that's where it goes.
[54:27] Speaker 1: Dan. I mean, have you noticed the timing About every
[54:31] Speaker 1: six weeks now there's a new piece of video which
[54:35] Speaker 1: which wasn't discovered within the month. I feel like stuff
[54:40] Speaker 1: is being leaked. There's a plan about every six weeks.
[54:46] Speaker 1: Every eight weeks there's another piece of video, the Yemen video.
[54:49] Speaker 1: I believe it was there where you see a high
[54:52] Speaker 1: speed craft, we shoot at it and it goes right
[54:55] Speaker 1: through its bubble or its force its field. I again
[55:00] Speaker 1: that sound. I'm not a co conspiracy theory person, but
[55:04] Speaker 1: it does feel like it's we're getting information parse to
[55:09] Speaker 1: us as it's almost like a guidebook. Okay, here's the
[55:13] Speaker 1: big documentary, here's senior officials, here's more video. That's what
[55:17] Speaker 1: it feels like to me.
[55:18] Speaker 2: Look, when I was making the documentary, at some point
[55:21] Speaker 2: in the process, early on, I realized that this film
[55:25] Speaker 2: I was making as a normal person outside of this world,
[55:28] Speaker 2: like trying to uncover what can lawfully be talked about
[55:32] Speaker 2: and learn the truth somewhere in that process it my
[55:36] Speaker 2: film became the vehicle for people in the know to
[55:44] Speaker 2: bring about disclosure, like it became a number of these
[55:48] Speaker 2: people's plan for disclosure, where people who are aware of
[55:54] Speaker 2: significant information wanted to find a way to disclose in
[55:57] Speaker 2: the public. They decided my film would be that that vehicle.
[56:01] Speaker 2: And then once that decision was made, I think a
[56:04] Speaker 2: lot got held for after the movie, and so the
[56:12] Speaker 2: movie coming out, I think is setting the table for
[56:14] Speaker 2: a lot more coming out is the simplest way to
[56:17] Speaker 2: say it. I really believe that to be true, and
[56:20] Speaker 2: in some cases I know for sure it to be true.
[56:22] Speaker 2: I mean, I know some people who are you know.
[56:25] Speaker 2: Jase Stratton, for example, is in my film. Jay Stratton
[56:29] Speaker 2: is the most senior intellience official to ever investigate UAP
[56:32] Speaker 2: and non human intelligent life for the US government. He
[56:34] Speaker 2: did it for sixteen years, like a like a real
[56:37] Speaker 2: life Molder from X Files. This was his job, right.
[56:40] Speaker 2: He was the director of the UAP Task Force, the
[56:43] Speaker 2: largest whole of government investigation at UAP. He when he retired,
[56:49] Speaker 2: he was a senior executive. He's a member of the
[56:51] Speaker 2: Senior Executive Services of the Defense Intelligence in c to
[56:57] Speaker 2: basically the civilian equivalent of a two star admiral. Extremely serious,
[57:02] Speaker 2: very credible guy. He reveals in the film that he
[57:05] Speaker 2: has seen non human beings and non human craft. He
[57:11] Speaker 2: reveals details like there were bodies recovered at Roswell, non
[57:16] Speaker 2: human bodies. He reveals where they were brought to. He
[57:19] Speaker 2: reveals how he uncovered the deeply hidden crash retrieval and
[57:24] Speaker 2: reverse engineering program and how they created obstacles for him
[57:27] Speaker 2: trying to get to the truth. He reveals a lot
[57:29] Speaker 2: of information. He's also got a book coming out early
[57:33] Speaker 2: next year that's his tell all memoir where he shares
[57:36] Speaker 2: even more. And then I know after the book comes out,
[57:39] Speaker 2: he's going to share even more after that. So a
[57:42] Speaker 2: lot of these people who participated in the film are
[57:45] Speaker 2: aware of so much information, and they're also aware of
[57:47] Speaker 2: how people digest information. Can't you can't you can't tell,
[57:53] Speaker 2: you can't share everything at the same time, it's just
[57:55] Speaker 2: too overwhelming, and I think the film plays a really
[57:58] Speaker 2: important role of establishing the lay of the land and
[58:04] Speaker 2: the base facts and who's involved and why it's complicated.
[58:08] Speaker 2: It answers basic questions the average person has, like why
[58:12] Speaker 2: has this been kept secret for so long? Why why
[58:14] Speaker 2: should it now be made more public? What are the
[58:17] Speaker 2: concerns we have to have? You know, all these basic questions.
[58:21] Speaker 2: The lay of the land. I think this film really
[58:23] Speaker 2: lays that out. And you know, it's a complicated situation
[58:28] Speaker 2: that's been going on for eighty years. But I'd tell you, Colin,
[58:30] Speaker 2: when I was making it, a big goal for me
[58:33] Speaker 2: was to make it digestible to the average person. And
[58:35] Speaker 2: I just kept thinking of my parents, who are in
[58:37] Speaker 2: their mid seventies and live in Jersey and are normal
[58:40] Speaker 2: middle class people, and you know, I just kept thinking, Okay,
[58:44] Speaker 2: at every turn making this movie, like is the information
[58:46] Speaker 2: going to be too overwhelming? It's gonna be too much?
[58:48] Speaker 2: Is it gonna be the kind of thing where you
[58:50] Speaker 2: watch it and then you can't remember anything because there's
[58:52] Speaker 2: just so much information? Right, And so it was really
[58:54] Speaker 2: important for me to make this film very digestible, easy
[59:01] Speaker 2: to understand, Like give the average person who doesn't know
[59:04] Speaker 2: anything about the situation a clear understanding the lay of
[59:07] Speaker 2: the land. They can walk away from this film and
[59:10] Speaker 2: really get it. You know, It's kind of thing you
[59:13] Speaker 2: could watch this film. You could tell your friends, Hey,
[59:15] Speaker 2: this is what I learned. It's this is this is
[59:17] Speaker 2: why we're in this situation. This is what's been going on.
[59:20] Speaker 2: These are the players, this is the pros and cons
[59:23] Speaker 2: of the situation. This is why we got to worry
[59:25] Speaker 2: about it. These base facts, And you know, I think
[59:30] Speaker 2: the response I'm seeing is that that worked and it's
[59:33] Speaker 2: really opening a lot of people's eyes and so so yes,
[59:36] Speaker 2: I think there will be more after that. Once people
[59:38] Speaker 2: understand the base facts and the lay of the land,
[59:40] Speaker 2: then then more can come out.
[59:43] Speaker 1: Yeah, you definitely landed. You landed it. Dan Farah, Director producer,
[59:47] Speaker 1: Age of Disclosure. Dan, where do I watch this if
[59:52] Speaker 1: I just popped into this and I'm not exactly sure
[59:55] Speaker 1: how to view it tonight?
[59:57] Speaker 2: Cool? So everyone in the world can watch the movie
[59:59] Speaker 2: on Prime Video. You do not have to have a
[1:00:02] Speaker 2: Prime subscription. You can just go to Prime Video. You
[1:00:04] Speaker 2: could rent it, you could purchase it. It's available in
[1:00:07] Speaker 2: every country around the world and with subtitles in every
[1:00:10] Speaker 2: major language. So I'd encourage ever to watch it and
[1:00:12] Speaker 2: tell their friends and family and join the conversation about
[1:00:16] Speaker 2: this issue.
[1:00:17] Speaker 1: So appreciative of you taking time it's been really for me,
[1:00:23] Speaker 1: an attitude altering documentary. Thank you, and I think I'm
[1:00:28] Speaker 1: reasonably curious. I appreciate your work and your excellence and
[1:00:31] Speaker 1: your devotion to it. And Dan, thank you so much.
[1:00:34] Speaker 2: Thank you for having me. I really appreciate it. The
[1:00:38] Speaker 2: volume

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.