# UPDATE: The Long Island Serial Killer Finally Learns His Fate

An episode of [True Crime Conversations](https://invisiblenetwork.ai/podcast/1469153910), 28 Jun 2026, 28 min.

Audio: https://traffic.omny.fm/d/clips/3ea926be-9be7-482a-8ac3-a44f016e43d1/abaa347e-8ac5-454e-85f9-aa64005c285f/715f8dc7-072c-4d95-92d9-b47400234951/audio.mp3?utm_source=Podcast&in_playlist=6d9fdc19-147e-4f77-8d3f-aa64005e5923

Rex Heuermann, known as the Long Island Serial Killer in the Gilgo Beach murders, has now been sentenced to life in prison without parole after pleading guilty to the deaths of eight women. Host of the Unraveled podcast, Alexis Linkletter, was in court for Heuermann's plea hearing and gives us an update on what the courtroom felt like, how Heuermann reacted to his sentence and where this story goes next. Listen to Unraveled here. LINKS If any of the contents in this episode have caused distress, know that there is help available via Lifeline on 13 11 14 or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636. GET IN TOUCH Follow us on Instagram and TikTok @truecrimeconversations Want us to cover a case on the podcast? Email us at truecrime@mamamia.com.au or send us a voice note. Make sure to leave us a rating and review on Apple & Spotify to let us know how you're liking the episodes. CREDITS Guest: Alexis Linkletter Host: Gemma Bath Senior Producer: Tahli Blackman Group Executive Producer: Ilaria Brophy Video Editor: Julian Rosario Mamamia acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which we have recorded this podcast. Become a Mamamia subscriber: https://www.mamamia.com.au/subscribe See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

## Transcript

[0:00] Speaker 1: Hi there, I'm Jemma Bath and you're listening to True
[0:03] Speaker 1: Crime Conversations. Just a few weeks ago, an American serial
[0:07] Speaker 1: killer was sentenced to life without parole. It brought to
[0:11] Speaker 1: an end a case that spans decades, a case recovered
[0:15] Speaker 1: in detail on this podcast in twenty twenty four, when
[0:18] Speaker 1: there were only charges involved to recap in twenty eleven,
[0:22] Speaker 1: A total of eleven human remains were found on or
[0:25] Speaker 1: around Gilgo Beach on Long Island, New York. In twenty
[0:29] Speaker 1: twenty three and twenty twenty four, one man was charged
[0:33] Speaker 1: with murdering seven of them. His name is Rex Hueman,
[0:37] Speaker 1: and he was a local architect who hid in plain
[0:40] Speaker 1: sight for years before his eventual arrest in July twenty
[0:44] Speaker 1: twenty three. He'd been using up to one hundred bonafones
[0:48] Speaker 1: to lure women, mainly sex workers, before torturing them, killing
[0:53] Speaker 1: them and burying some were dismembered. The women were aged
[0:58] Speaker 1: between twenty and thirty four, and they were killed between
[1:01] Speaker 1: nineteen ninety three and twenty ten. Their names were Sandra Costia,
[1:07] Speaker 1: Valerie Mack, Jessica Taylor, Maureen Brainard Barnes, Melissa Barthelomy, Megan Waterman,
[1:14] Speaker 1: and Amber Costello. We now know of an eighth victim,
[1:19] Speaker 1: Karen Vegata, killed in nineteen ninety six, whom Human admitted
[1:23] Speaker 1: to murdering earlier this year. To understand more about the
[1:27] Speaker 1: evidence police found that led them to Human, how they
[1:30] Speaker 1: caught him, and more about the victims by suggest dipping
[1:34] Speaker 1: back into our original episode. It's linked in our show notes.
[1:37] Speaker 1: But in the meantime, we asked our original guest, Alexis Slipletter,
[1:42] Speaker 1: who has a podcast called Unraveled, unpacking this case in detail,
[1:47] Speaker 1: to come back on our show and fill us in
[1:49] Speaker 1: on the latest from court.
[1:51] Speaker 2: Here.
[1:51] Speaker 3: She is Alexis.
[1:53] Speaker 1: Last time we spoke, it was October twenty twenty four.
[1:57] Speaker 1: At that point, Rex Human had been charged with six motors,
[2:02] Speaker 1: and then a few months after our interview there was
[2:04] Speaker 1: a seventh murder charge. Were you expecting that momentum to
[2:09] Speaker 1: continue because there were eleven bodies found in and around
[2:12] Speaker 1: Gilgo Beage.
[2:14] Speaker 3: I was expecting that momentum to continue.
[2:16] Speaker 4: I had always been of the mind that all of
[2:19] Speaker 4: the remains found along Ocean Parkway were connected to Rex Hwermen.
[2:25] Speaker 4: But in the months that followed I discovered that I
[2:28] Speaker 4: was wrong about that.
[2:30] Speaker 1: Can you tell us a bit about that, because two
[2:32] Speaker 1: of the three remaining motors that we haven't attributed were
[2:35] Speaker 1: attributed to someone else.
[2:38] Speaker 3: Correct.
[2:38] Speaker 4: So there were two victims who had long been unidentified,
[2:42] Speaker 4: and they were known as Peaches and Baby Dough, and
[2:47] Speaker 4: they were linked genetically in I believe around like the
[2:52] Speaker 4: early side of like the twenty tens, they were able
[2:58] Speaker 4: to link them genetically in confirmed that they were a
[3:01] Speaker 4: mother and daughter. Now, the remains were found really far
[3:04] Speaker 4: apart from each other. The mother's torso was found in
[3:07] Speaker 4: an area close to New York City, where her appendages
[3:10] Speaker 4: were found along Ocean Parkway, and the toddler was found
[3:14] Speaker 4: along Ocean Parkway about two hundred and fifty feet from
[3:18] Speaker 4: the remains belonging to a woman named Valerie.
[3:21] Speaker 3: Mack who rex Yuerman was charged with.
[3:24] Speaker 4: Now, a little while after rex Huerman was charged with
[3:30] Speaker 4: that seven victim, these two victims were identified as Tanya
[3:36] Speaker 4: Jackson is the mother and Tatiana Dykes is the baby.
[3:40] Speaker 4: And not long after that, the neighboring county to where
[3:44] Speaker 4: the Long Island serial killer case basically is unfolding, which
[3:46] Speaker 4: is called Suffolk County. The neighboring county in a different
[3:49] Speaker 4: jurisdiction charged a different man with the murder of Tanya Jackson,
[3:56] Speaker 4: who was known as Peaches. Nobody has been charged for
[3:59] Speaker 4: the baby, and presumably, I mean we think obviously they
[4:05] Speaker 4: believe if this man killed the mother, they killed the
[4:08] Speaker 4: child as well. So it was a big shock to
[4:10] Speaker 4: everybody familiar with the case. I don't think anyone was
[4:12] Speaker 4: expecting that. I'm still in shock over it because there
[4:17] Speaker 4: are so many coincidences tied to where these remains are found.
[4:21] Speaker 4: I find it really hard to believe that two different
[4:24] Speaker 4: people would have chosen such precise locations for this.
[4:28] Speaker 1: And then the third victim, known as Asian Doe. No
[4:32] Speaker 1: one has been charged over that death.
[4:35] Speaker 4: No one has been charged with the death of Asian Doe.
[4:38] Speaker 4: There is a renewed push once again to try to
[4:41] Speaker 4: figure out who they are. Although when I was attending
[4:45] Speaker 4: in court the plea hearing for Rex Hereman, so when
[4:48] Speaker 4: he pled guilty, there was a giant press conference afterwards,
[4:52] Speaker 4: and one of my colleagues asked the district attorney whether
[4:57] Speaker 4: or not the DA believed that Rex Huremen could be
[5:00] Speaker 4: responsible for the murder of Asian Doe. And the district
[5:05] Speaker 4: attorney has sort of like an interesting personality. But he
[5:09] Speaker 4: said this to my colleague, he said, it doesn't matter
[5:12] Speaker 4: what I believe, it matters what I can prove. And
[5:16] Speaker 4: it kind of made us feel like they believe he
[5:20] Speaker 4: did that they haven't proven it yet, and especially because
[5:24] Speaker 4: in these batches of evidence that the district attorney was
[5:28] Speaker 4: sharing with the public along the way, you know, over
[5:31] Speaker 4: the three years since he'd been arrested, to go along
[5:34] Speaker 4: with all the new indictments, there are many many Google
[5:39] Speaker 4: searches that have been provided to the public that rex
[5:41] Speaker 4: hu Weermen made and a lot of them were about
[5:44] Speaker 4: Asian victims.
[5:45] Speaker 3: And a lot of them are about Asian.
[5:49] Speaker 4: Trans victims, which many people believe that Asian doe was
[5:54] Speaker 4: living their life as a woman because they were biologically
[5:57] Speaker 4: male but found in women's clothing.
[6:00] Speaker 1: Human was going to trial, that was what we've been
[6:03] Speaker 1: waiting for. He'd pled not guilty. It was shaping up
[6:06] Speaker 1: to be enormous. The sheer scope of you know, the
[6:10] Speaker 1: number of victims, the years he was active, the evidence.
[6:15] Speaker 1: Can you kind of help paint that picture because at
[6:17] Speaker 1: one point his defense team wanted five different trials, like
[6:20] Speaker 1: this was going to be huge.
[6:23] Speaker 4: It was going to be huge because with every new arrest,
[6:26] Speaker 4: I mean with every new indictment they made. You know,
[6:29] Speaker 4: he was indicted for the murder of a woman named
[6:31] Speaker 4: Santra Costia.
[6:33] Speaker 3: She was murdered in nineteen ninety three.
[6:35] Speaker 4: Prior to that, the earliest victim we all thought that
[6:39] Speaker 4: he was responsible for was nineteen ninety six, So the
[6:42] Speaker 4: timeline of when he was murdering kept broadening, and so
[6:46] Speaker 4: did them. A lot of these victims were dismembered, some
[6:51] Speaker 4: of them were not. With Sandra Costia, the woman that
[6:55] Speaker 4: he was indicted for the seventh victim, she had sharp
[7:01] Speaker 4: force injuries and was left in the woods, not where
[7:04] Speaker 4: any of the other victims were found. For a long time,
[7:07] Speaker 4: everyone thought a different serial killer was responsible. So for
[7:10] Speaker 4: that reason, we're talking so many geographic areas, so many
[7:13] Speaker 4: different mos and his attorney did attempt to sever the
[7:17] Speaker 4: trials into five separate trials. He attempted several times to
[7:20] Speaker 4: get evidence thrown out because the evidence against him is
[7:23] Speaker 4: vast as well. But there was new DNA technology that
[7:27] Speaker 4: was used in a lot of this DNA analysis, so
[7:30] Speaker 4: it was going to be huge. That's why I mean
[7:32] Speaker 4: it took three years, all of the pre trial hearings.
[7:35] Speaker 4: It was going to be a massive trial and it
[7:37] Speaker 4: was going to be complicated. But the evidence against him
[7:40] Speaker 4: is overwhelming, So I think he saw the writing on
[7:42] Speaker 4: the wall.
[7:44] Speaker 1: Did you think human was going to change his play,
[7:47] Speaker 1: that that is something that hey would do.
[7:53] Speaker 4: My instinct was no, But I heard early on from
[7:56] Speaker 4: a source that he was considering that.
[7:58] Speaker 3: Because I was of the mind that, well, what does
[8:01] Speaker 3: he have to lose? You know, we don't have the death.
[8:03] Speaker 4: Penalty in New York State, so why not why not
[8:08] Speaker 4: sit there through the attention and the media circus and
[8:12] Speaker 4: soak all of that in.
[8:13] Speaker 3: I didn't see a downside for him.
[8:15] Speaker 4: But the more I've under gootten to know sort of
[8:20] Speaker 4: his life through interviews with people who knew him, and
[8:24] Speaker 4: I've you know, developed a friendship with Rex Chruerman's wife's attorney.
[8:29] Speaker 4: His name is Bob Macedonia, and I talked to him
[8:30] Speaker 4: quite frequently. I realized that people like Hureman are much
[8:35] Speaker 4: more on a spectrum than I believed initially, in that
[8:40] Speaker 4: he did appear to do this to spare his own
[8:42] Speaker 4: family fur their embarrassment because a lot more evidence was
[8:47] Speaker 4: going to be paraded out publicly had he gone a trial,
[8:50] Speaker 4: and I think a lot of that was going to
[8:52] Speaker 4: make things look way worse. So weirdly, I mean, I
[8:56] Speaker 4: didn't think men like him were capable of caring about
[8:58] Speaker 4: their families, but it seems to some degree he is,
[9:02] Speaker 4: or at least he's capable of making these decisions to
[9:05] Speaker 4: control a narrative around him.
[9:07] Speaker 1: Because in the last year or so, we have learned
[9:09] Speaker 1: a lot more about human's wife and daughter, in particular
[9:13] Speaker 1: because they spoke to a documentary ride what did you
[9:16] Speaker 1: learn about them?
[9:17] Speaker 3: Saying that, Wow, So I was.
[9:21] Speaker 4: In that documentary and I was fascinated. You know, we
[9:26] Speaker 4: have never seen the aftermath of an arrest of a
[9:29] Speaker 4: serial killer who was living a double life that up
[9:32] Speaker 4: close and personally before and that deal for them came
[9:35] Speaker 4: together so quickly, so we really saw them in shock
[9:39] Speaker 4: at first, in total denial. So what I've learned about
[9:45] Speaker 4: that family is that his wife had no idea. Their
[9:49] Speaker 4: marriage was very traditional as far as like their gender roles.
[9:54] Speaker 4: She didn't ask questions. He was the breadwinner. He went
[9:57] Speaker 4: into the city. He commuted about an hour and a
[10:00] Speaker 4: half each day. He had kind of a separate life
[10:03] Speaker 4: in Manhattan and because he sort of had control of
[10:06] Speaker 4: their household in relationships. He would buy her ticket to
[10:10] Speaker 4: go somewhere and say you're going on this trip, bring
[10:13] Speaker 4: the kids, And he was doing these things when she
[10:16] Speaker 4: wasn't home. It's hard to believe that someone could hide
[10:21] Speaker 4: that much from their spouse and children, but it seems
[10:24] Speaker 4: he has. And the timeline fits together where he murdered
[10:28] Speaker 4: a woman days before he married her, and he was
[10:31] Speaker 4: murdering far long before he married her. So in my opinion,
[10:35] Speaker 4: I think he chose her because he knew he could
[10:38] Speaker 4: get away with this with the type of personality she had.
[10:41] Speaker 1: Well, he certainly has been hiding in planes for decades,
[10:44] Speaker 1: so that wouldn't be a surprise. Now, can you talk
[10:48] Speaker 1: us through how news of this plea deal played out?
[10:52] Speaker 1: How close to trial was he and how did you
[10:55] Speaker 1: find out it was happening. You said you had a
[10:56] Speaker 1: bit of an inkling.
[10:57] Speaker 3: Oh, yeah, I knew beforehand.
[11:00] Speaker 4: I had heard from a source long before, probably you know,
[11:03] Speaker 4: six months before it actually happened. And I asked, you know,
[11:09] Speaker 4: the DA at one of the court appearances about it,
[11:12] Speaker 4: you know, during one of the press briefings afterwards, and
[11:16] Speaker 4: then people started asking about it saying, oh, is that
[11:19] Speaker 4: really on the table? Is that really going to happen?
[11:21] Speaker 4: And then the rumors kept circulating. So I knew, and
[11:27] Speaker 4: the trial I think was going to take place. I
[11:31] Speaker 4: mean they were talking about twenty twenty six, but I
[11:34] Speaker 4: mean it's hard to know. I mean, the judge was
[11:36] Speaker 4: getting impatient with all of the pre trial hearings. But
[11:42] Speaker 4: you know, probably a handful of months out the trial
[11:45] Speaker 4: was set to start.
[11:46] Speaker 1: Did we know that he was going to admit to
[11:48] Speaker 1: an eighth victim as part of that play?
[11:50] Speaker 3: Do we suspected it?
[11:54] Speaker 4: We didn't know for sure until we were there, until
[11:58] Speaker 4: it happened, But every one suspected that he murdered Karen Vergatta.
[12:03] Speaker 4: That's the woman he admitted to killing, and you know
[12:06] Speaker 4: that was part of the deal. I always believe that
[12:08] Speaker 4: he was responsible for her murder. So a lot of
[12:11] Speaker 4: us who follow the case suspected that, but we weren't
[12:13] Speaker 4: sure till that day.
[12:15] Speaker 2: Can you tell us what the actual play deal that
[12:17] Speaker 2: he agreed to was.
[12:19] Speaker 3: Yeah, So he admitted to the victims.
[12:23] Speaker 4: He was charged with killing seven of them, and then
[12:25] Speaker 4: he admitted to Karen Vergatta, who he was just accepting
[12:29] Speaker 4: responsibility for and in return he is receiving three consecutive
[12:34] Speaker 4: life sentences. He cannot be prosecuted any further for any
[12:39] Speaker 4: of these eight victims. However, he can be prosecuted if
[12:43] Speaker 4: any other murder victims are linked to him in the future,
[12:46] Speaker 4: like when his DNA is put in codis. If there
[12:50] Speaker 4: are any other hits, he can be prosecuted for any
[12:52] Speaker 4: other crimes, which again makes me think that the district
[12:55] Speaker 4: attorney believes there are more victims. And what's odd in
[12:58] Speaker 4: what really ruffleds some feathers was that part of this
[13:02] Speaker 4: deal was that he is to cooperate with the FBI's
[13:06] Speaker 4: Behavioral Science Unit, which means he's going to be interviewed
[13:10] Speaker 4: by the FBI. And part of the deal is that
[13:11] Speaker 4: he's supposed to be completely candid and honest. But a
[13:14] Speaker 4: serial killer doesn't care about deals or what their commitments.
[13:20] Speaker 4: We can never know whether he'll be telling the truth.
[13:22] Speaker 4: And I think that bothered a lot of people too,
[13:24] Speaker 4: because he's fascinated by the FBI. They found a copy
[13:28] Speaker 4: of mind Hunter in his house. In his planning document,
[13:32] Speaker 4: he was taking notes from mind Hunter, and if you're
[13:34] Speaker 4: not familiar, mind Hunter was written by a former FBI
[13:37] Speaker 4: agent named John Douglas, who basically was a founding member
[13:42] Speaker 4: of the FBI's Behavioral Sciences Unit and coined the term
[13:45] Speaker 4: serial killer. So a lot of people think that Rex
[13:48] Speaker 4: Yeerman's very excited by this and it's giving him some
[13:52] Speaker 4: narcissistic validation.
[13:54] Speaker 1: It's hard because I can say why people would be
[13:57] Speaker 1: upset by that. But then on the other side, we
[13:59] Speaker 1: do need to look from people like these so that
[14:01] Speaker 1: we can catch them in the future and stop them
[14:03] Speaker 1: in the future.
[14:05] Speaker 4: Yeah, there is value in it, I think, especially because
[14:10] Speaker 4: serial killers like Rex Hewerman are very rare. There are
[14:14] Speaker 4: other kind of serial killers, you know, there used to
[14:18] Speaker 4: be more, you know, but because of technology, serial killers
[14:22] Speaker 4: operating through digital means, like Rex Huerman was bringing women
[14:27] Speaker 4: into his house to murder them.
[14:28] Speaker 3: I mean, that's not really happening anymore.
[14:31] Speaker 4: The most recent serial killer prior to his arrest was
[14:35] Speaker 4: I think the Golden State Killer, and he stopped murdering
[14:39] Speaker 4: in nineteen eighty six, but then, you know, he murdered
[14:41] Speaker 4: ten people and then it was cold, right, and they
[14:43] Speaker 4: didn't know who he was. But for people to be
[14:45] Speaker 4: murdering into two thousand and nine twenty ten, the way
[14:48] Speaker 4: he was, it's highly highly unusual now, so I think, yeah,
[14:53] Speaker 4: I think the FBI wants to understand like the compulsive
[14:56] Speaker 4: nature of his crimes because he didn't really have the
[14:59] Speaker 4: self preservation, in the self control to stop when he
[15:04] Speaker 4: should have.
[15:04] Speaker 1: And the fact that he got away with it for
[15:06] Speaker 1: that long. Given the world we live in and how
[15:08] Speaker 1: connected we are and you know, the Internet, it is
[15:12] Speaker 1: quite unbelievable.
[15:13] Speaker 3: Really, it's really disturbing. It's really disturbing.
[15:17] Speaker 4: And you know, because he stopped in twenty ten, it
[15:20] Speaker 4: really would have been impossible, you know now with the
[15:23] Speaker 4: way our phones are, cameras are everywhere tracking. I think
[15:26] Speaker 4: he really got lucky in that time period because he
[15:30] Speaker 4: was using burner phones and he was using you know,
[15:34] Speaker 4: sock puppet emails, you know, fake email accounts. But that's
[15:38] Speaker 4: still now. I feel like if someone was doing that
[15:40] Speaker 4: right now, they'd be caught. So it's unusual, which is good.
[15:45] Speaker 4: We should say, yes, right, that's very good.
[15:49] Speaker 1: Up next, Alexis takes us inside Human's plea hearing, describing
[15:53] Speaker 1: the atmosphere in the courtroom and what he said during
[15:56] Speaker 1: the proceedings. You are right at the court for the
[16:02] Speaker 1: plea hearing at four forty five am to be there
[16:05] Speaker 1: well at all unfolded, which means you did get to
[16:07] Speaker 1: see everything. What was that experience like? What was that
[16:11] Speaker 1: room like when you walked into it? So for the
[16:16] Speaker 1: sentencing or for the plea hearing, plea hearing. So the
[16:19] Speaker 1: plea hearing, it was.
[16:22] Speaker 4: A really it was strange, Like it was more intense
[16:24] Speaker 4: than the sentencing.
[16:26] Speaker 3: It was a longer day.
[16:27] Speaker 4: It was really stressful, and people were there for I
[16:32] Speaker 4: mean we were there for like hours and hours and hours.
[16:36] Speaker 4: It was it was intense, you know, it was strange.
[16:40] Speaker 4: It's it was strange that he was admitting it. It's
[16:43] Speaker 4: just it's all just very shocking. I still can't believe
[16:46] Speaker 4: that he did it in the cottom and he admitted it.
[16:49] Speaker 2: Did he verbally admit it in that hearing.
[16:52] Speaker 4: So what he did was he provided an allocution, and
[16:55] Speaker 4: sometimes allocutions are the the deal that is made is
[17:01] Speaker 4: that they are going to go into detail about what
[17:04] Speaker 4: they did there on the spot. It's my understanding that
[17:08] Speaker 4: prior to his plea, he did what was called a proffer,
[17:11] Speaker 4: which you basically admit everything. It can't be used against
[17:15] Speaker 4: you in court, it's just for it to strike a
[17:18] Speaker 4: plea deal. But in court he did an allocution with
[17:22] Speaker 4: yes or no answers or one word answers. So the
[17:25] Speaker 4: DA would ask, you know, did you do this, did
[17:29] Speaker 4: you cause the death of Megan Waterman or Melissa Bartholomy
[17:32] Speaker 4: on this date? Yes, he would say, and then they
[17:35] Speaker 4: would say by what means and he would say strangulation,
[17:39] Speaker 4: And they did that eight times in a row. But
[17:43] Speaker 4: he wasn't required to go into any further detail. He
[17:46] Speaker 4: really just admitted that he did it and said how
[17:49] Speaker 4: he did it.
[17:50] Speaker 2: And the families were old they to hear of that.
[17:52] Speaker 2: How did they react?
[17:53] Speaker 4: I'm not sure all the families were there, you know.
[17:56] Speaker 4: It's very emotional, you know. I still I don't know
[18:00] Speaker 4: how the families do it, you know, sitting close to
[18:03] Speaker 4: a man who took the life of your daughter or sister,
[18:06] Speaker 4: it's like the thoughts unbearable. The families are strong and
[18:13] Speaker 4: do everything with grace. So there are things that are said,
[18:17] Speaker 4: you know, especially during the sentencing. It was a lot
[18:21] Speaker 4: of things were said by the family in the room.
[18:24] Speaker 3: But yeah, no, it was. It's devastating to witness, you know,
[18:27] Speaker 3: and you don't wish it on anyone.
[18:29] Speaker 2: The play hearing was obviously the first step. Then we
[18:30] Speaker 2: had the sentencing.
[18:32] Speaker 1: Did you, as someone that has worked on this case
[18:34] Speaker 1: for so long, did you think that that play hearing
[18:38] Speaker 1: gave you or anyone their closure?
[18:42] Speaker 3: No, I don't think. I don't think closure is possible.
[18:45] Speaker 4: You know.
[18:45] Speaker 3: It's like, was something so senseless in something so I mean,
[18:52] Speaker 3: he's so pathetic.
[18:53] Speaker 4: It's like he's this giant man targeting small women to
[18:59] Speaker 4: feel powerful and in control. And it's what he did
[19:02] Speaker 4: wasn't hard. What he did was cowardly, you know. So
[19:05] Speaker 4: I think it's just I can't imagine closure is ever
[19:10] Speaker 4: going to be had. It's like we don't know the
[19:13] Speaker 4: rest of it.
[19:13] Speaker 3: We'll never know.
[19:14] Speaker 4: But I think for the families, it's like for them
[19:17] Speaker 4: it was a demarcation line, like I'm done with you.
[19:20] Speaker 4: I'm going to be focusing on my loved one's memory
[19:23] Speaker 4: and now I don't have to think about you anymore
[19:24] Speaker 4: because you're going to be in a cage.
[19:26] Speaker 1: After cold there were a huge number of press conferences.
[19:29] Speaker 1: He's defense his wife, who we hadn't really heard from
[19:32] Speaker 1: the DA. What stood out to you the most from
[19:35] Speaker 1: that flurry of press conferences?
[19:38] Speaker 4: So his wife Asa Allerup did address the media. You know,
[19:42] Speaker 4: she hasn't done much of that. And what I thought
[19:45] Speaker 4: was really interesting is like the second she was done,
[19:48] Speaker 4: she had a prepared statement that she read from and
[19:51] Speaker 4: immediately reporters were questioning, again, how could you not know?
[19:58] Speaker 3: How did you not know it was happening right in
[20:00] Speaker 3: front of you?
[20:01] Speaker 4: And there is still so much suspicion looming over her.
[20:06] Speaker 4: And what I want to keep conveying is that, you know,
[20:09] Speaker 4: it's unbelievable for people that she couldn't have known, but
[20:12] Speaker 4: clearly she didn't because if the district attorney had evidence
[20:17] Speaker 4: that she had knowledge or was involved, he would have
[20:20] Speaker 4: delighted in charging her. So they have gone over every
[20:24] Speaker 4: shred of evidence, her cell phones, her computers. There's just
[20:27] Speaker 4: no indication that she knew. And I think what, I
[20:31] Speaker 4: don't think she should be blamed for not knowing. What
[20:33] Speaker 4: I do think that should do with scare people that
[20:37] Speaker 4: you could be living with someone lying to you to
[20:40] Speaker 4: that degree. I mean she was, and she's not the
[20:43] Speaker 4: first woman to be duped by a serial killer like this.
[20:46] Speaker 1: Well, she really is a form of a victim in
[20:49] Speaker 1: all of these too. She's had her life rip to
[20:51] Speaker 1: shreds as well.
[20:53] Speaker 4: She has, and you know, she starts as a victim, right,
[20:57] Speaker 4: and then for every decision she since the arrest, it's
[21:01] Speaker 4: hard to blame her for all of it. You know,
[21:04] Speaker 4: the shock, trauma, desperation processing this. I don't know that
[21:09] Speaker 4: my decisions would be sound. I don't know that I
[21:13] Speaker 4: would be able to trust my instincts about anything. People
[21:18] Speaker 4: think her participating in the documentary that the optics were
[21:20] Speaker 4: poor there. Maybe they were, but maybe she was out
[21:24] Speaker 4: of options. It's just really hard to judge her after
[21:28] Speaker 4: the shock and trauma of these revelations that she was
[21:32] Speaker 4: exposed to.
[21:33] Speaker 1: Let's talk a bit about the sentencing that only happened
[21:36] Speaker 1: a week ago from when we're talking. Yeah, I want
[21:39] Speaker 1: to start with human because we did he briefly from him.
[21:44] Speaker 1: You mentioned the word cowardly before. I feel like that
[21:47] Speaker 1: kind of needs to be repeated again here with what
[21:49] Speaker 1: he said, right.
[21:50] Speaker 4: Yeah, So everyone was wondering whether or not he would speak,
[21:54] Speaker 4: because the defendant is often given that opportunity, and when
[21:58] Speaker 4: he said yes, was surprised and he began to speak
[22:02] Speaker 4: and the judge yelled at him.
[22:03] Speaker 3: The judge was very intense and told him to stand up.
[22:07] Speaker 4: So then there was like awkward five seconds where he's
[22:09] Speaker 4: like trying to stand up and he began speaking. He
[22:14] Speaker 4: said something to the effect of, you know, and I'm paraphrasing,
[22:17] Speaker 4: my words have no meaning. I am responsible for the
[22:20] Speaker 4: words that were said today. I'm going to leave it there.
[22:25] Speaker 4: And he sat back down and the judge looked at
[22:27] Speaker 4: him sort of annoyed and said, you know, I know
[22:31] Speaker 4: you're probably sorry for what you put your family through,
[22:34] Speaker 4: but are you a little sorry for what for murdering
[22:36] Speaker 4: these innocent women? And he sort of was like yeah,
[22:40] Speaker 4: but it was so hollow and strange.
[22:44] Speaker 3: It's like, why say anything at all? I couldn't understand.
[22:48] Speaker 2: Did he look remosetful at all?
[22:50] Speaker 4: No, he does not care. This man could not care less.
[22:55] Speaker 4: It's not funny at all. It's just this man doesn't care.
[22:59] Speaker 4: He would have done it a million more times. After
[23:03] Speaker 4: he murdered Melissa Bartholemy, he called to torture her family like,
[23:07] Speaker 4: this guy loves hurting women, and this guy does not
[23:11] Speaker 4: feel bad about it. It doesn't matter that he has a daughter,
[23:13] Speaker 4: their age of when he was killing them, It doesn't
[23:16] Speaker 4: matter that he's married to a woman.
[23:18] Speaker 3: He doesn't care.
[23:19] Speaker 1: In the sentencing, we also had the chance to hear
[23:21] Speaker 1: from the victims. That's the chance to stand up and
[23:24] Speaker 1: tell this man what they've done to their lives in
[23:28] Speaker 1: the form of a victim impact statement. Was that emotional
[23:31] Speaker 1: hearing from so many family members in that courtroom.
[23:34] Speaker 3: Yeah, it was unbelievable.
[23:37] Speaker 4: It was long too, It was you know, I think
[23:39] Speaker 4: there were about sixteen total. And yeah, some some made
[23:46] Speaker 4: you like want to give them a high five because
[23:51] Speaker 4: they just said the exact right thing that you know,
[23:55] Speaker 4: just hit him where it hurts.
[23:57] Speaker 3: You know, these men are narcissists.
[24:01] Speaker 4: So one of the victim's cousins, her name's Jasmine Robinson,
[24:05] Speaker 4: basically went over the planning document that rex Huermann had
[24:10] Speaker 4: written in two thousand about like don't leave DNA behind,
[24:14] Speaker 4: don't leave her behind, and she's like, well, you didn't
[24:16] Speaker 4: do that, You couldn't do that, and totally just like
[24:19] Speaker 4: mocked him, and you could tell he was getting like
[24:22] Speaker 4: so mad.
[24:24] Speaker 3: But every single one was compelling.
[24:26] Speaker 4: Some made you cry, Some made you furious for how
[24:30] Speaker 4: articulate they were in explaining just the devastation what this
[24:35] Speaker 4: had done to their lives. You know, Megan Waterman's daughter
[24:39] Speaker 4: spoke and it's just she lost her mom when she
[24:42] Speaker 4: was two, and she is left with this like what
[24:45] Speaker 4: who would I have been? What would I have my
[24:47] Speaker 4: life have been like had I not had my mom
[24:49] Speaker 4: ripped from me? And I think that's a really valid
[24:53] Speaker 4: question and it's so unfair.
[24:55] Speaker 1: I read that there was even applause when he was
[24:58] Speaker 1: taken from the room.
[24:59] Speaker 4: Oh, there was more than that. There was applause. There
[25:04] Speaker 4: was applause. There were screams from the family saying I
[25:08] Speaker 4: can't wait till you get raped in jail. Then they
[25:11] Speaker 4: all started chanting ogre as he was walking out of
[25:14] Speaker 4: the room, and it was the whole thing was intense
[25:17] Speaker 4: like that. It was like the energy, the entire hearing.
[25:21] Speaker 4: You know. One of the victims, Melissa Bartholomey's sister, who
[25:25] Speaker 4: received the calls, the taunting calls that were made from
[25:29] Speaker 4: her sister, her murdered sister's phone because he had her phone.
[25:33] Speaker 3: That's how he called her family.
[25:34] Speaker 4: So first it's hope, right, she's missing, and now she's
[25:38] Speaker 4: calling me and she said something like it's been seventeen years.
[25:43] Speaker 3: Since we spoke.
[25:45] Speaker 4: And then she's like demanded that he looked at her
[25:47] Speaker 4: because he'd just been looking ahead like a coward. There
[25:50] Speaker 4: were a lot of intense moments during her during her
[25:53] Speaker 4: impact statement, but it was very almost primal.
[25:58] Speaker 3: I don't know how to explain it over for you.
[26:00] Speaker 2: Now.
[26:01] Speaker 1: Do you think, knowing that he is behind bars, he's
[26:05] Speaker 1: been sentenced without murders, is this over for you? Because
[26:09] Speaker 1: you know, we don't know how many more there are
[26:11] Speaker 1: out there. You've been working on this case for so
[26:13] Speaker 1: many years. What does this mean for you? I don't
[26:17] Speaker 1: think it's ever going to be over.
[26:18] Speaker 4: I think it's part of who I am because it's
[26:21] Speaker 4: not just about this killer and these victims. It's about
[26:27] Speaker 4: the way women are treated. It's about violence against women.
[26:30] Speaker 4: It's about sex workers, the demonization of them and not
[26:35] Speaker 4: the clients or the men who push them and force
[26:39] Speaker 4: them and traffic them and make them do sex work,
[26:42] Speaker 4: which is what was happening for the majority of these women. Right.
[26:45] Speaker 4: So it's never going to be over. I'm always going
[26:47] Speaker 4: to be speaking out about that. And as long as
[26:50] Speaker 4: there are victims I believe are connected to him, like
[26:53] Speaker 4: Asian Doe, who haven't seen justice, I'll always be monitoring
[26:57] Speaker 4: and tracking. I wish I could do more, you know.
[27:00] Speaker 4: It's kind of contingent upon what investigators do, whether there's
[27:04] Speaker 4: any story left here.
[27:06] Speaker 3: So I do feel like.
[27:08] Speaker 4: Though, this law enforcement team that has brought him to
[27:12] Speaker 4: justice is phenomenal, and I'm sure they won't stop if
[27:16] Speaker 4: they believe he's responsible for more. But it's also not
[27:19] Speaker 4: done for me because I have a book coming out
[27:21] Speaker 4: about the case early next year, so I'm gonna be
[27:24] Speaker 4: probably talking about it for a while because, like I said,
[27:27] Speaker 4: the implications, it's not him, it's society, you know, and
[27:31] Speaker 4: I think that's what I'm going to be talking about
[27:33] Speaker 4: a lot.
[27:34] Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Alexis. We really appreciate your updates.
[27:37] Speaker 1: Of course, thank you to Alexis for joining us on
[27:42] Speaker 1: this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please leave us
[27:46] Speaker 1: a rating or review on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. It
[27:49] Speaker 1: really helps people define the show. Thanks so much for listening.
[27:53] Speaker 1: I'll be back on Thursday with another true crime Conversation
[28:00] Speaker 4: Zero

Shows are listed from Apple Podcasts' charts and directory, and Podcast Index where it is used. Every show and episode belongs to its publisher and plays from the publisher's own feed; this site hosts none of them.